<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What I bought &#8211; 12 March 2008</title>
	<atom:link href="http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/14/what-i-bought-12-march-2008/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/14/what-i-bought-12-march-2008/</link>
	<description>Comic Book Resources Presents... Comics Should Be Good!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:12:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: OJ is innocent. It was Machine Inkers &#187; Blog Archive &#187; What others have been saying about machine inker</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/14/what-i-bought-12-march-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-643579</link>
		<dc:creator>OJ is innocent. It was Machine Inkers &#187; Blog Archive &#187; What others have been saying about machine inker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 15:57:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/14/what-i-bought-12-march-2008/#comment-643579</guid>
		<description>[...] http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/14/what-i-bought-12-march-2008/Gotham Underground #6 (of eight) by Frank Tieri (writer), Jim Calafiore (penciller), Jack Purcell (inker), Mark McKenna (inker), Brian Reber (colorist), and Sal Cipriano (letterer). $2.99, 22 pgs, FC, DC. &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/14/what-i-bought-12-march-2008/Gotham" rel="nofollow">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/14/what-i-bought-12-march-2008/Gotham</a> Underground #6 (of eight) by Frank Tieri (writer), Jim Calafiore (penciller), Jack Purcell (inker), Mark McKenna (inker), Brian Reber (colorist), and Sal Cipriano (letterer). $2.99, 22 pgs, FC, DC. &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OJ is innocent. It was Machine Inkers &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Quick scan of the net - machine inker</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/14/what-i-bought-12-march-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-638662</link>
		<dc:creator>OJ is innocent. It was Machine Inkers &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Quick scan of the net - machine inker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 15:55:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/14/what-i-bought-12-march-2008/#comment-638662</guid>
		<description>[...] http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/14/what-i-bought-12-march-2008/Gotham Underground #6 (of eight) by Frank Tieri (writer), Jim Calafiore (penciller), Jack Purcell (inker), Mark McKenna (inker), Brian Reber (colorist), and Sal Cipriano (letterer). $2.99, 22 pgs, FC, DC. &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/14/what-i-bought-12-march-2008/Gotham" rel="nofollow">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/14/what-i-bought-12-march-2008/Gotham</a> Underground #6 (of eight) by Frank Tieri (writer), Jim Calafiore (penciller), Jack Purcell (inker), Mark McKenna (inker), Brian Reber (colorist), and Sal Cipriano (letterer). $2.99, 22 pgs, FC, DC. &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Burgas</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/14/what-i-bought-12-march-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-613920</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Burgas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 15:55:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/14/what-i-bought-12-march-2008/#comment-613920</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a good point about the shot of Reed, Marc.  It&#039;s probably what Millar and Hitch were going for, so I&#039;ll concede the point.  I still don&#039;t agree with you about Nu-World, though!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a good point about the shot of Reed, Marc.  It&#8217;s probably what Millar and Hitch were going for, so I&#8217;ll concede the point.  I still don&#8217;t agree with you about Nu-World, though!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc Caputo</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/14/what-i-bought-12-march-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-612810</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc Caputo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 04:05:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/14/what-i-bought-12-march-2008/#comment-612810</guid>
		<description>Over at my site (http://marcscomichut.blogspot.com/), I&#039;ve taken a look at both issues of Millar/Hitch/Neary&#039;s FF and really liked them. Sure, the stuff with Johnny was unforgivably BAD, but I had a reason for the full head shot of Reed. Let me know what you think.

(But there&#039;s no excuse for Alyssa&#039; tongue, I&#039;ll concede.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over at my site (<a href="http://marcscomichut.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://marcscomichut.blogspot.com/</a>), I&#8217;ve taken a look at both issues of Millar/Hitch/Neary&#8217;s FF and really liked them. Sure, the stuff with Johnny was unforgivably BAD, but I had a reason for the full head shot of Reed. Let me know what you think.</p>
<p>(But there&#8217;s no excuse for Alyssa&#8217; tongue, I&#8217;ll concede.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/14/what-i-bought-12-march-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-609233</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 18:21:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/14/what-i-bought-12-march-2008/#comment-609233</guid>
		<description>This just in: Brian hates comic books!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This just in: Brian hates comic books!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BDaly</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/14/what-i-bought-12-march-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-607087</link>
		<dc:creator>BDaly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 18:04:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/14/what-i-bought-12-march-2008/#comment-607087</guid>
		<description>I grew up in Johannesburg, I&#039;m 25 and I used to watch plenty of Three&#039;s Company as a kid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I grew up in Johannesburg, I&#8217;m 25 and I used to watch plenty of Three&#8217;s Company as a kid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/14/what-i-bought-12-march-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-606839</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 15:25:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/14/what-i-bought-12-march-2008/#comment-606839</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m 21 and I know what &quot;Three&#039;s Company&quot; is . . . She did high school here in the U.S., more or less. Is it much of a stretch to say she&#039;s watched some TV now and then?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m 21 and I know what &#8220;Three&#8217;s Company&#8221; is . . . She did high school here in the U.S., more or less. Is it much of a stretch to say she&#8217;s watched some TV now and then?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dizzy D</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/14/what-i-bought-12-march-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-605522</link>
		<dc:creator>Dizzy D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 22:26:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/14/what-i-bought-12-march-2008/#comment-605522</guid>
		<description>My only problem with Monet&#039;s &quot;Three&#039;s Company&quot;-line is that she probably would be more familiar with &quot;Man about the House&quot; (then again, Terry would probably get the reference and wouldn&#039;t need the explanation.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My only problem with Monet&#8217;s &#8220;Three&#8217;s Company&#8221;-line is that she probably would be more familiar with &#8220;Man about the House&#8221; (then again, Terry would probably get the reference and wouldn&#8217;t need the explanation.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick C.</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/14/what-i-bought-12-march-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-605346</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 20:01:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/14/what-i-bought-12-march-2008/#comment-605346</guid>
		<description>I think what&#039;s going on with Millar&#039;s &lt;i&gt;Fantastic Four&lt;/i&gt; story is that, in the quest to recapture the gee-whiz big ideas spirit of book - which he has established as his goal - he&#039;s gone too far in the other direction, throwing stuff on the page with no regard for how far you can push suspension of disbelief.

I mean, when I read #555, I&#039;m struck with a lot of things - where did they get the raw materials for a whole other planet, for instance? Are we really to believe that they can re-create the entire biosphere perfectly and everything will work out fine? If they&#039;re constructing a new Earth and Moon, then, as Greg pointed out, does that mean reconstructing a sun for them to orbit as well? If World Bank is going to be controlling the economy to make sure there&#039;s no recession - and if the scientists are going to be controlling the planet&#039;s social and cultural direction, doesn&#039;t that make New Earth a fascist state by definition? There obviously won&#039;t be free markets, which gives me an uneasy feeling about, say, free assembly and freedom of the press. And how in God&#039;s name is the Earth going to be unsalvageable in ten years? That doesn&#039;t make much sense. And don&#039;t get me started on the idiocy of the giant robot idea.

It doesn&#039;t bother me so much that these plotholes exist, but that Reed, easily the smartest character in the Marvel Universe, doesn&#039;t see them or ask about them. The entire issue is pretty much Reed being awed. If Millar put some doubts into Reed&#039;s dialogue, or had him ask some questions, then I could believe that Millar is going somewhere with this. But these also strike me as the kind of things nobody would really ask about in a Lee/Kirby story - they&#039;d just roll with it. I think Millar is thinking we should do the same with his story without really considering that comics are held to a somewhat different standard.

At least, that&#039;s my take.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think what&#8217;s going on with Millar&#8217;s <i>Fantastic Four</i> story is that, in the quest to recapture the gee-whiz big ideas spirit of book &#8211; which he has established as his goal &#8211; he&#8217;s gone too far in the other direction, throwing stuff on the page with no regard for how far you can push suspension of disbelief.</p>
<p>I mean, when I read #555, I&#8217;m struck with a lot of things &#8211; where did they get the raw materials for a whole other planet, for instance? Are we really to believe that they can re-create the entire biosphere perfectly and everything will work out fine? If they&#8217;re constructing a new Earth and Moon, then, as Greg pointed out, does that mean reconstructing a sun for them to orbit as well? If World Bank is going to be controlling the economy to make sure there&#8217;s no recession &#8211; and if the scientists are going to be controlling the planet&#8217;s social and cultural direction, doesn&#8217;t that make New Earth a fascist state by definition? There obviously won&#8217;t be free markets, which gives me an uneasy feeling about, say, free assembly and freedom of the press. And how in God&#8217;s name is the Earth going to be unsalvageable in ten years? That doesn&#8217;t make much sense. And don&#8217;t get me started on the idiocy of the giant robot idea.</p>
<p>It doesn&#8217;t bother me so much that these plotholes exist, but that Reed, easily the smartest character in the Marvel Universe, doesn&#8217;t see them or ask about them. The entire issue is pretty much Reed being awed. If Millar put some doubts into Reed&#8217;s dialogue, or had him ask some questions, then I could believe that Millar is going somewhere with this. But these also strike me as the kind of things nobody would really ask about in a Lee/Kirby story &#8211; they&#8217;d just roll with it. I think Millar is thinking we should do the same with his story without really considering that comics are held to a somewhat different standard.</p>
<p>At least, that&#8217;s my take.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/14/what-i-bought-12-march-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-604529</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 06:31:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/14/what-i-bought-12-march-2008/#comment-604529</guid>
		<description>umm hasnt ghost rider been fighting satan..as in lucifer Satan..big guy with horns and such for the last 19 unreadable (thank you very much Daniel Way) issues of Ghost Rider..not that this is Damian Hellstroms dad but I think there is actually a Satan in the Marvel universe now</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>umm hasnt ghost rider been fighting satan..as in lucifer Satan..big guy with horns and such for the last 19 unreadable (thank you very much Daniel Way) issues of Ghost Rider..not that this is Damian Hellstroms dad but I think there is actually a Satan in the Marvel universe now</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lucion</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/14/what-i-bought-12-march-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-604407</link>
		<dc:creator>Lucion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 04:27:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/14/what-i-bought-12-march-2008/#comment-604407</guid>
		<description>Don DeLillo literary criticism, planetary sciences, full-frontal nudity, gun-running animals, and G.I. Joe all in one discussion.  I love you, internet!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don DeLillo literary criticism, planetary sciences, full-frontal nudity, gun-running animals, and G.I. Joe all in one discussion.  I love you, internet!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Norris</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/14/what-i-bought-12-march-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-604215</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Norris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 01:43:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/14/what-i-bought-12-march-2008/#comment-604215</guid>
		<description>Crazy almost-magic comic book science is fine with me, but somehow I just couldn&#039;t buy the idea that the over the top superscience needed to build a completely new, improved copy of Earth was somehow easier/more-within -reach than the over the top superscience needed to hadwavily (sic, sorry) fix the environmental etc. problems of the existing one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Crazy almost-magic comic book science is fine with me, but somehow I just couldn&#8217;t buy the idea that the over the top superscience needed to build a completely new, improved copy of Earth was somehow easier/more-within -reach than the over the top superscience needed to hadwavily (sic, sorry) fix the environmental etc. problems of the existing one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Hatcher</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/14/what-i-bought-12-march-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-603964</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Hatcher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 22:25:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/14/what-i-bought-12-march-2008/#comment-603964</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I guess if you think Firefly/Serenity is the greatest thing in the history of entertainment, this will be enjoyable.  I donâ€™t hate it, but I just canâ€™t figure out the Whedon-love.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

My theory is that it&#039;s &quot;Gene Roddenberry syndrome.&quot; It&#039;s not just the work. It&#039;s the work coupled with actively wooing a fanbase-- no, that&#039;s not fair. Say rather, greeting a burgeoning fanbase with enthusiasm instead of the (more usual) bemused shake of the head and a shrug.  Fans &lt;b&gt;really&lt;/b&gt; like creators who like them back, who seem to appreciate them. As long as the work continues to reach a baseline level of good, such creators are bulletproof. 

Anyway, that&#039;s my theory. That being said, we loved Firefly and Serenity and so I was pleased to see this book, I&#039;d much rather have more of these than Buffy Season 8. I admit it&#039;s more for the fan than the non-fan but I think it stands better on its own than the Buffy books do. Of course, there&#039;s a lot less backstory for a show that ran half a season and got one movie than a show that ran seven years with a five-year spinoff, and that would figure into it too, I suppose. What I really liked about it was that it&#039;s basically just an extra Firefly episode, as opposed to a sequel to the Serenity movie. I think Serenity-- the movie-- really should stand as the last word on this crew. 

The dialogue reads okay to me but then again, fans tend to &#039;hear&#039; the actual actors as they are reading. And it made Julie laugh out loud in a couple of places. I think I&#039;d rather have the Chinese profanities spelled out phonetically or something, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I guess if you think Firefly/Serenity is the greatest thing in the history of entertainment, this will be enjoyable.  I donâ€™t hate it, but I just canâ€™t figure out the Whedon-love.</p></blockquote>
<p>My theory is that it&#8217;s &#8220;Gene Roddenberry syndrome.&#8221; It&#8217;s not just the work. It&#8217;s the work coupled with actively wooing a fanbase&#8211; no, that&#8217;s not fair. Say rather, greeting a burgeoning fanbase with enthusiasm instead of the (more usual) bemused shake of the head and a shrug.  Fans <b>really</b> like creators who like them back, who seem to appreciate them. As long as the work continues to reach a baseline level of good, such creators are bulletproof. </p>
<p>Anyway, that&#8217;s my theory. That being said, we loved Firefly and Serenity and so I was pleased to see this book, I&#8217;d much rather have more of these than Buffy Season 8. I admit it&#8217;s more for the fan than the non-fan but I think it stands better on its own than the Buffy books do. Of course, there&#8217;s a lot less backstory for a show that ran half a season and got one movie than a show that ran seven years with a five-year spinoff, and that would figure into it too, I suppose. What I really liked about it was that it&#8217;s basically just an extra Firefly episode, as opposed to a sequel to the Serenity movie. I think Serenity&#8211; the movie&#8211; really should stand as the last word on this crew. </p>
<p>The dialogue reads okay to me but then again, fans tend to &#8216;hear&#8217; the actual actors as they are reading. And it made Julie laugh out loud in a couple of places. I think I&#8217;d rather have the Chinese profanities spelled out phonetically or something, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tomer S</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/14/what-i-bought-12-march-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-603520</link>
		<dc:creator>Tomer S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 17:31:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/14/what-i-bought-12-march-2008/#comment-603520</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t agree with the comment about the Monet/&#039;Three&#039;s Company&#039; scene. Sure, I also think that it&#039;s not quality humor and PAD shouldn&#039;t use this kind of joke in his stories (though I did find it funny). The part that irritates me was about Monet knowing about a 70&#039;s American sitcom, while she spent most of her life in Europe. I never been out of Israel and 85% of my culture food is based on American products. With the influence of US over the world, you shouldn&#039;t be surprised that a foreigner will know who were the original members of SNL or that they watched every episode of M*A*S*H*. I&#039;m sure not many non-Americans as I do has a varied knowledge of Pop Culture, but don&#039;t rule that scene just because the character was born and raised overseas.
Besides, I assume that if Monet didn&#039;t watch the show in the past, she may have caught it on TV during her time living with NY state&#039;s resident mutants. I myself watched it when I was 13 on local cable TV.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t agree with the comment about the Monet/&#8217;Three&#8217;s Company&#8217; scene. Sure, I also think that it&#8217;s not quality humor and PAD shouldn&#8217;t use this kind of joke in his stories (though I did find it funny). The part that irritates me was about Monet knowing about a 70&#8242;s American sitcom, while she spent most of her life in Europe. I never been out of Israel and 85% of my culture food is based on American products. With the influence of US over the world, you shouldn&#8217;t be surprised that a foreigner will know who were the original members of SNL or that they watched every episode of M*A*S*H*. I&#8217;m sure not many non-Americans as I do has a varied knowledge of Pop Culture, but don&#8217;t rule that scene just because the character was born and raised overseas.<br />
Besides, I assume that if Monet didn&#8217;t watch the show in the past, she may have caught it on TV during her time living with NY state&#8217;s resident mutants. I myself watched it when I was 13 on local cable TV.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/14/what-i-bought-12-march-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-603324</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 15:35:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/14/what-i-bought-12-march-2008/#comment-603324</guid>
		<description>Greg: Re: Don DeLillo: I should probably foreground my hatred of Don DeLillo with the fact that I&#039;m 19th-century lit scholar, so the post-modernists have never sat well with me. I was enjoying White Noise until the main character started talking about Bee in the third person while she was in the room. 

But since this post is about comics, I love David&#039;s X-Factor. His original run on it is what got me into comics, and since this one is even farther removed from the other X-titles, I think its been going even better (minus the whole Messiah Complex thing). I&#039;m not a fan of Arcade, but I guess we have to assume he keeps getting work because he&#039;s killing non-superpowered people successfully off screen as it were. Plus, how many people are willing to take the gig?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greg: Re: Don DeLillo: I should probably foreground my hatred of Don DeLillo with the fact that I&#8217;m 19th-century lit scholar, so the post-modernists have never sat well with me. I was enjoying White Noise until the main character started talking about Bee in the third person while she was in the room. </p>
<p>But since this post is about comics, I love David&#8217;s X-Factor. His original run on it is what got me into comics, and since this one is even farther removed from the other X-titles, I think its been going even better (minus the whole Messiah Complex thing). I&#8217;m not a fan of Arcade, but I guess we have to assume he keeps getting work because he&#8217;s killing non-superpowered people successfully off screen as it were. Plus, how many people are willing to take the gig?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/14/what-i-bought-12-march-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-603050</link>
		<dc:creator>R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 13:25:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/14/what-i-bought-12-march-2008/#comment-603050</guid>
		<description>Regarding the FF plot problems- You&#039;re obviously forgetting Pinky &amp; The Brain&#039;s &#039;Chia Earth&#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding the FF plot problems- You&#8217;re obviously forgetting Pinky &amp; The Brain&#8217;s &#8216;Chia Earth&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JD</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/14/what-i-bought-12-march-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-602759</link>
		<dc:creator>JD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 10:36:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/14/what-i-bought-12-march-2008/#comment-602759</guid>
		<description>As a regular reader of Gotham Underground, I can tell you that Spoiler&#039;s identity is still supposed to be a mystery. Last issue had a fun visual gimmick to show her being recruited by the Penguin without actually showing her face (it also explained a good part of the plot you&#039;re puzzled by).

This may be the Bat-book I enjoy the most. Morrison&#039;s Batman is dull and pretentious (seriously, who cares about Batman impersonators ? or Bat-Mite ?), and Dini&#039;s Detective suffers a lot from its stop-start pacing (between the one-issue format and the multiple fill-ins). I do enjoy what he&#039;s done with Riddler, Harley Queen and the new Ventriloquist, though.
(As for the secondary books, Catwoman seems to have lost its way, and all the others - Nightwing, Outsiders, Robin - are barely getting started.)

Gotham Underground, on the other hand, understands what appeals to me in Batman : a dysfunctional team of crime-fighters fighting a combination of quirky and crime villains, with the diversity of factions resulting in a convoluted plot and numerous plot twists. It&#039;s also the ultimate Bat-crossover, with nearly everyone who&#039;s anybody in the Bat-Universe making at least a cameo (with the welcome exception of the Joker), and building up on previous or current storylines (Face the Face, Salvation Run, 52...).
For the first time since at least One Year Later, it finally fells like the Bat-books are a coherent whole, with an actual plan in mind.

It reminds me most of Dixon&#039;s 90s Detective run, actually. It&#039;s not art or flashy, but it works. This is the Batman I enjoy. And Tieri has been surprisingly competent these last couple of years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a regular reader of Gotham Underground, I can tell you that Spoiler&#8217;s identity is still supposed to be a mystery. Last issue had a fun visual gimmick to show her being recruited by the Penguin without actually showing her face (it also explained a good part of the plot you&#8217;re puzzled by).</p>
<p>This may be the Bat-book I enjoy the most. Morrison&#8217;s Batman is dull and pretentious (seriously, who cares about Batman impersonators ? or Bat-Mite ?), and Dini&#8217;s Detective suffers a lot from its stop-start pacing (between the one-issue format and the multiple fill-ins). I do enjoy what he&#8217;s done with Riddler, Harley Queen and the new Ventriloquist, though.<br />
(As for the secondary books, Catwoman seems to have lost its way, and all the others &#8211; Nightwing, Outsiders, Robin &#8211; are barely getting started.)</p>
<p>Gotham Underground, on the other hand, understands what appeals to me in Batman : a dysfunctional team of crime-fighters fighting a combination of quirky and crime villains, with the diversity of factions resulting in a convoluted plot and numerous plot twists. It&#8217;s also the ultimate Bat-crossover, with nearly everyone who&#8217;s anybody in the Bat-Universe making at least a cameo (with the welcome exception of the Joker), and building up on previous or current storylines (Face the Face, Salvation Run, 52&#8230;).<br />
For the first time since at least One Year Later, it finally fells like the Bat-books are a coherent whole, with an actual plan in mind.</p>
<p>It reminds me most of Dixon&#8217;s 90s Detective run, actually. It&#8217;s not art or flashy, but it works. This is the Batman I enjoy. And Tieri has been surprisingly competent these last couple of years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: red-Ricky</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/14/what-i-bought-12-march-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-602351</link>
		<dc:creator>red-Ricky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 06:42:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/14/what-i-bought-12-march-2008/#comment-602351</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;

&lt;i&gt;Gotham Underground #6&lt;/i&gt;
I donâ€™t really have much to say about this comic.  I was curious about it, so I picked it up, knowing full well that it was the sixth issue of a nine-issue mini-series, and therefore there would be some things I wouldnâ€™t get [...]  I wasnâ€™t expecting much out of this, and I didnâ€™t get much.  Itâ€™s a pretty dull Batman story[...]

&lt;/blockquote&gt;

You should&#039;ve tried &lt;i&gt;BATMAN CONFIDENTIAL #14&lt;/i&gt; instead. Honestly, it wasn&#039;t that bad.  And the arc is only 4-issues long (as opposed to Underground&#039;s eight or nine!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p><i>Gotham Underground #6</i><br />
I donâ€™t really have much to say about this comic.  I was curious about it, so I picked it up, knowing full well that it was the sixth issue of a nine-issue mini-series, and therefore there would be some things I wouldnâ€™t get [...]  I wasnâ€™t expecting much out of this, and I didnâ€™t get much.  Itâ€™s a pretty dull Batman story[...]</p>
</blockquote>
<p>You should&#8217;ve tried <i>BATMAN CONFIDENTIAL #14</i> instead. Honestly, it wasn&#8217;t that bad.  And the arc is only 4-issues long (as opposed to Underground&#8217;s eight or nine!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark_Andrew</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/14/what-i-bought-12-march-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-602285</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark_Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 06:04:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/14/what-i-bought-12-march-2008/#comment-602285</guid>
		<description>I should actually have a &quot;Son of Satan and Evil&quot; post up here in the next... well, month or so.  It&#039;ll talk about the Devil, at least in the context of Daimon Hellstrom.  

And, lemme see...

Yeah, I remember feeling slightly lost in the last few issues of Gutsville and REALLY lost however many months later. Wish it was more timely.

But I agree w/ your pro-frontal-male-nudity position.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I should actually have a &#8220;Son of Satan and Evil&#8221; post up here in the next&#8230; well, month or so.  It&#8217;ll talk about the Devil, at least in the context of Daimon Hellstrom.  </p>
<p>And, lemme see&#8230;</p>
<p>Yeah, I remember feeling slightly lost in the last few issues of Gutsville and REALLY lost however many months later. Wish it was more timely.</p>
<p>But I agree w/ your pro-frontal-male-nudity position.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad Nevett</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/14/what-i-bought-12-march-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-602258</link>
		<dc:creator>Chad Nevett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 05:46:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/14/what-i-bought-12-march-2008/#comment-602258</guid>
		<description>My main problem with the current Fantastic Four run is that I have no idea what the plot is. What is it they want Reed to do exactly? What&#039;s the problem with the Earth? And, if Reed is supposed to so smart, why is he being asked to participate (in unknown, mysterious ways) after most of the heavy lifting seems to be done? What&#039;s the goddamn point of it all?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My main problem with the current Fantastic Four run is that I have no idea what the plot is. What is it they want Reed to do exactly? What&#8217;s the problem with the Earth? And, if Reed is supposed to so smart, why is he being asked to participate (in unknown, mysterious ways) after most of the heavy lifting seems to be done? What&#8217;s the goddamn point of it all?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

