<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &quot;Remastering&quot; old work - kosher or not?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/25/remastering-old-work-kosher-or-not/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/25/remastering-old-work-kosher-or-not/</link>
	<description>Comic Book Resources Presents... Comics Should Be Good!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 10:18:10 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Vladimir Roschjenko</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/25/remastering-old-work-kosher-or-not/comment-page-1/#comment-684067</link>
		<dc:creator>Vladimir Roschjenko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Sep 2008 01:03:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/25/remastering-old-work-kosher-or-not/#comment-684067</guid>
		<description>Virginal comic book cunts! Go and suck your father&#039;s dick!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Virginal comic book cunts! Go and suck your father's dick!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/25/remastering-old-work-kosher-or-not/comment-page-1/#comment-669977</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 01:14:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/25/remastering-old-work-kosher-or-not/#comment-669977</guid>
		<description>I haven&#039;t read the comic yet, but seeing the comparison there, I think the newer version is as good as the older one.
When I think about Gotham City, I don&#039;t think of colourful settings and characters. I think of everything being sort of...muddy and gloomy. Everything downcast.
And the art is amazing colourful or no.


Also, if Bolland feels better about changing the colours, then so be it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven't read the comic yet, but seeing the comparison there, I think the newer version is as good as the older one.<br />
When I think about Gotham City, I don't think of colourful settings and characters. I think of everything being sort of...muddy and gloomy. Everything downcast.<br />
And the art is amazing colourful or no.</p>
<p>Also, if Bolland feels better about changing the colours, then so be it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: davidwynne</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/25/remastering-old-work-kosher-or-not/comment-page-1/#comment-631388</link>
		<dc:creator>davidwynne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 04:21:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/25/remastering-old-work-kosher-or-not/#comment-631388</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Thereâ€™s a story Bolland did for â€œBatman Black &amp; Whiteâ€ which is colorized; as far as I understand, itâ€™s a quasi-sequel to â€˜Killing Jokeâ€™.&lt;/i&gt;

No, it&#039;s a story by itself. It doesn&#039;t really tie into any other Batman stories at all... and Batman isn&#039;t even in it, really. It&#039;s very good though.

Although, I&#039;m surprised to hear that &lt;i&gt;that&#039;s&lt;/i&gt; been coloured as well, since it was originally &lt;i&gt;intended&lt;/i&gt; to be presented in black and white...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Thereâ€™s a story Bolland did for â€œBatman Black &amp; Whiteâ€ which is colorized; as far as I understand, itâ€™s a quasi-sequel to â€˜Killing Jokeâ€™.</i></p>
<p>No, it's a story by itself. It doesn't really tie into any other Batman stories at all... and Batman isn't even in it, really. It's very good though.</p>
<p>Although, I'm surprised to hear that <i>that's</i> been coloured as well, since it was originally <i>intended</i> to be presented in black and white...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/25/remastering-old-work-kosher-or-not/comment-page-1/#comment-630869</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 20:23:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/25/remastering-old-work-kosher-or-not/#comment-630869</guid>
		<description>Wow, I didn&#039;t realize Killing Joke was recolored.  

Judging by the pages above, I&#039;m a bit torn.  I love the recolored look and understand it&#039;s artistic choice by highlighting the green and red.  But I also love the original version since those colors are amazing...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, I didn't realize Killing Joke was recolored.  </p>
<p>Judging by the pages above, I'm a bit torn.  I love the recolored look and understand it's artistic choice by highlighting the green and red.  But I also love the original version since those colors are amazing...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dalarsco</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/25/remastering-old-work-kosher-or-not/comment-page-1/#comment-628969</link>
		<dc:creator>Dalarsco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 22:05:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/25/remastering-old-work-kosher-or-not/#comment-628969</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t see the point in doing it on anything from the mid-70s onward, basically anything where the colorist was credited.  But new collections of material from the Golden and Silver ages when the colorist was someone around the office with extra time on his or her hands should be recolored.
Of course, this is also a case where the colorist was changed at the last minute, so the new version really is Bolland&#039;s original vision.  I see this as more of a Director&#039;s Cut.  That being said, I do prefer the old version to the slightly Sin City splash of color version.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don't see the point in doing it on anything from the mid-70s onward, basically anything where the colorist was credited.  But new collections of material from the Golden and Silver ages when the colorist was someone around the office with extra time on his or her hands should be recolored.<br />
Of course, this is also a case where the colorist was changed at the last minute, so the new version really is Bolland's original vision.  I see this as more of a Director's Cut.  That being said, I do prefer the old version to the slightly Sin City splash of color version.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sean</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/25/remastering-old-work-kosher-or-not/comment-page-1/#comment-628953</link>
		<dc:creator>sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 21:54:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/25/remastering-old-work-kosher-or-not/#comment-628953</guid>
		<description>&quot;Is there anything besides the recoloring?&quot;

There&#039;s a story Bolland did for &quot;Batman Black &amp; White&quot; which is colorized; as far as I understand, it&#039;s a quasi-sequel to &#039;Killing Joke&#039;.

I think the old coloring had problems, I think the new coloring has problems, but I lean towards the new.

Also, I thought the Richard Donner &#039;Superman II&#039; completely ruined Zod&#039;s character, and that alone made the new version a net-negative for me (even though the &quot;morning after&quot; scene involving Brando&#039;s head rolling his eyes at Lois-in-S-shirt was the best thing in any Superman movie ever).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"Is there anything besides the recoloring?"</p>
<p>There's a story Bolland did for "Batman Black &amp; White" which is colorized; as far as I understand, it's a quasi-sequel to 'Killing Joke'.</p>
<p>I think the old coloring had problems, I think the new coloring has problems, but I lean towards the new.</p>
<p>Also, I thought the Richard Donner 'Superman II' completely ruined Zod's character, and that alone made the new version a net-negative for me (even though the "morning after" scene involving Brando's head rolling his eyes at Lois-in-S-shirt was the best thing in any Superman movie ever).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ComparaciÃ³n de la versiÃ³n nueva de The Killing Joke &#171; Â¡OperaciÃ³n Mandril!</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/25/remastering-old-work-kosher-or-not/comment-page-1/#comment-628682</link>
		<dc:creator>ComparaciÃ³n de la versiÃ³n nueva de The Killing Joke &#171; Â¡OperaciÃ³n Mandril!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 19:20:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/25/remastering-old-work-kosher-or-not/#comment-628682</guid>
		<description>[...] Fuente: Comics Should Be Good [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Fuente: Comics Should Be Good [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DanCJ</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/25/remastering-old-work-kosher-or-not/comment-page-1/#comment-628250</link>
		<dc:creator>DanCJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 15:19:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/25/remastering-old-work-kosher-or-not/#comment-628250</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I think The Man Who Laughs, another egregious example of DC catering to the collector marketâ€™s worst OCD traits, at least threw in some new pages.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
I agree with you about The Killing Joke, but The Man Who Laughs is completely different.  Firstly, the prestige format jobby is out of print and fetching high prices on eBay now and Secondly, they&#039;ve put some other related issues in the book to bulk it out to a decent size.  The Man Who Laughs is on my Buy list when it comes out in TPB.
&lt;blockquote&gt;An example of reworking being done badly (to my mind, at least) is in the recolored collected version of Batman: Year One. Thereâ€™s a great splash page at the end of part 3, where Jim Gordon is sitting on the edge of his bed, holding his gun while his pregnant wife is asleep on the bed. In the original, the bedsheets were a pale yellow. But in the collected edition, Richmond Lewis put a pattern on the bedsheet, so when I look at that page, I donâ€™t see Jim Gordon, I see that damn stupid peacock Richmond Lewis put in.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Yeah - I agree with you on that one.  I loved the colouring in the original, but the patterns on duvets and wallpaper in the TPB just provides an annoying distraction.  That said it&#039;s still one of the most beautiful books I own.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I think The Man Who Laughs, another egregious example of DC catering to the collector marketâ€™s worst OCD traits, at least threw in some new pages.</p></blockquote>
<p>I agree with you about The Killing Joke, but The Man Who Laughs is completely different.  Firstly, the prestige format jobby is out of print and fetching high prices on eBay now and Secondly, they've put some other related issues in the book to bulk it out to a decent size.  The Man Who Laughs is on my Buy list when it comes out in TPB.</p>
<blockquote><p>An example of reworking being done badly (to my mind, at least) is in the recolored collected version of Batman: Year One. Thereâ€™s a great splash page at the end of part 3, where Jim Gordon is sitting on the edge of his bed, holding his gun while his pregnant wife is asleep on the bed. In the original, the bedsheets were a pale yellow. But in the collected edition, Richmond Lewis put a pattern on the bedsheet, so when I look at that page, I donâ€™t see Jim Gordon, I see that damn stupid peacock Richmond Lewis put in.</p></blockquote>
<p>Yeah - I agree with you on that one.  I loved the colouring in the original, but the patterns on duvets and wallpaper in the TPB just provides an annoying distraction.  That said it's still one of the most beautiful books I own.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gavin</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/25/remastering-old-work-kosher-or-not/comment-page-1/#comment-628122</link>
		<dc:creator>Gavin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 13:35:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/25/remastering-old-work-kosher-or-not/#comment-628122</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m on the fence about remastering an old work.  But I did enjoy the Richard Donner cut of Superman II.  I can&#039;t stand the Star Wars special editions, though.  In a comic I don&#039;t think dialogue should be changed, but I don&#039;t mind recoloring, for the most part.  The recoloring work of Batman: Year One was a real improvement in my opinion, and the recoloring of Absolute Watchmen was fantastic.  In the case of the Killing Joke I feel like I need to look over the whole book and compare it to the original before I can make a fully valid judgment.  I&#039;m disappointed they took out the yellow oval, but that&#039;s not a make or break thing for me.  The insane brightness of the colors worked for me with the story in the original version, so it&#039;ll be interesting to see how Bollard handles them himself.  Could be better, could be worse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm on the fence about remastering an old work.  But I did enjoy the Richard Donner cut of Superman II.  I can't stand the Star Wars special editions, though.  In a comic I don't think dialogue should be changed, but I don't mind recoloring, for the most part.  The recoloring work of Batman: Year One was a real improvement in my opinion, and the recoloring of Absolute Watchmen was fantastic.  In the case of the Killing Joke I feel like I need to look over the whole book and compare it to the original before I can make a fully valid judgment.  I'm disappointed they took out the yellow oval, but that's not a make or break thing for me.  The insane brightness of the colors worked for me with the story in the original version, so it'll be interesting to see how Bollard handles them himself.  Could be better, could be worse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Trumbull</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/25/remastering-old-work-kosher-or-not/comment-page-1/#comment-627552</link>
		<dc:creator>John Trumbull</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 05:46:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/25/remastering-old-work-kosher-or-not/#comment-627552</guid>
		<description>I met Bolland at Dragon Con in 1990 or 1991, and he expressed dissatisfaction about the coloring to me then, so I&#039;m happy he&#039;s finally gotten the chance to do it how he wanted.  I haven&#039;t seen the new hardcover, but it looks very well done to me.

I go back &amp; forth on these things.  Sometimes you&#039;ll get cool things like the Donner Superman II cut, sometimes you&#039;ll get abominations like the Star Wars Special Olympics Editions.  I think the artist should always have the right to control the work as he/she sees fit, but it is nice to see the original version remain available.

An example of reworking being done badly (to my mind, at least) is in the recolored collected version of Batman: Year One.  There&#039;s a great splash page at the end of part 3, where Jim Gordon is sitting on the edge of his bed, holding his gun while his pregnant wife is asleep on the bed.  In the original, the bedsheets were a pale yellow.  But in the collected edition, Richmond Lewis put a pattern on the bedsheet, so when I look at that page, I don&#039;t see Jim Gordon, I see that damn stupid peacock Richmond Lewis put in.

Oh, and Richmond Lewis is a woman.  David Mazzuchelli&#039;s wife, as a matter of fact.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I met Bolland at Dragon Con in 1990 or 1991, and he expressed dissatisfaction about the coloring to me then, so I'm happy he's finally gotten the chance to do it how he wanted.  I haven't seen the new hardcover, but it looks very well done to me.</p>
<p>I go back &amp; forth on these things.  Sometimes you'll get cool things like the Donner Superman II cut, sometimes you'll get abominations like the Star Wars Special Olympics Editions.  I think the artist should always have the right to control the work as he/she sees fit, but it is nice to see the original version remain available.</p>
<p>An example of reworking being done badly (to my mind, at least) is in the recolored collected version of Batman: Year One.  There's a great splash page at the end of part 3, where Jim Gordon is sitting on the edge of his bed, holding his gun while his pregnant wife is asleep on the bed.  In the original, the bedsheets were a pale yellow.  But in the collected edition, Richmond Lewis put a pattern on the bedsheet, so when I look at that page, I don't see Jim Gordon, I see that damn stupid peacock Richmond Lewis put in.</p>
<p>Oh, and Richmond Lewis is a woman.  David Mazzuchelli's wife, as a matter of fact.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: greyghost</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/25/remastering-old-work-kosher-or-not/comment-page-1/#comment-627494</link>
		<dc:creator>greyghost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 05:02:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/25/remastering-old-work-kosher-or-not/#comment-627494</guid>
		<description>I personally welcome the chance to view the story in a new light.  I&#039;ve always thought that the original colors had a bit of an &quot;outside the lines&quot; look to them that didn&#039;t match the crisp artwork.  Also, if you are complaining about the price of the graphic novel in a hardcover format, that&#039;s why the internet is so wonderful.  Go to amazon, ebay or other online outlets instead of paying the full price for it at your comic retailer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I personally welcome the chance to view the story in a new light.  I've always thought that the original colors had a bit of an "outside the lines" look to them that didn't match the crisp artwork.  Also, if you are complaining about the price of the graphic novel in a hardcover format, that's why the internet is so wonderful.  Go to amazon, ebay or other online outlets instead of paying the full price for it at your comic retailer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Hatcher</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/25/remastering-old-work-kosher-or-not/comment-page-1/#comment-627146</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Hatcher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 01:06:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/25/remastering-old-work-kosher-or-not/#comment-627146</guid>
		<description>In fairness, I should add that I was first in line for the Richard Donner cut of &lt;i&gt;Superman II,&lt;/i&gt; so I&#039;m not against this sort of re-mastering at all. I&#039;m just kind of appalled at the idea of these skinny little books suddenly showing up as hardcovers and that people actually pay those gouger&#039;s prices for them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In fairness, I should add that I was first in line for the Richard Donner cut of <i>Superman II,</i> so I'm not against this sort of re-mastering at all. I'm just kind of appalled at the idea of these skinny little books suddenly showing up as hardcovers and that people actually pay those gouger's prices for them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Hatcher</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/25/remastering-old-work-kosher-or-not/comment-page-1/#comment-627141</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Hatcher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 01:03:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/25/remastering-old-work-kosher-or-not/#comment-627141</guid>
		<description>For me it&#039;s always a case-by-case thing. I&#039;m not crazy about the new version -- I liked Higgins&#039; approach better -- but I completely understand how it can eat at you to have a piece of work out there that you aren&#039;t happy with and want to fix, so I sympathize with Mr. Bolland. And it&#039;s not as though they&#039;re recalling all previous versions and pulping them. Certainly, I&#039;m not going to be running out and replacing mine. These high-end books are nice enough but I think they are aimed squarely at the OCD collector. I spent too many years trying to beat the obsessive-compulsive streak OUT of my comics buying. 

The annoying part of it for me is that it&#039;s ramping up  this new trend of the overpriced hardcover. This is a book that Alan Moore himself has shrugged off as a lesser work, that&#039;s almost never been unavailable as far as I know, that just got reprinted AGAIN last year, and now here&#039;s a new edition that offers... what? Is there anything besides the recoloring? I think &lt;i&gt;The Man Who Laughs,&lt;/i&gt; another egregious example of DC catering to the collector market&#039;s worst OCD traits, at least threw in some new pages. 

Oh well. My gut feeling about the whole enterprise is that if fans want to spend their money on this sort of thing, it&#039;s stupid of DC not to take it. I&#039;m just sort of appalled at the idea of a page count that used to barely rate a 50% increase or so in the newsstand price in an &#039;Annual&#039; format is now suddenly saleable as a high-end hardcover. For God&#039;s sake, how much disposable income is out there to cut up on this sort of thing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For me it's always a case-by-case thing. I'm not crazy about the new version -- I liked Higgins' approach better -- but I completely understand how it can eat at you to have a piece of work out there that you aren't happy with and want to fix, so I sympathize with Mr. Bolland. And it's not as though they're recalling all previous versions and pulping them. Certainly, I'm not going to be running out and replacing mine. These high-end books are nice enough but I think they are aimed squarely at the OCD collector. I spent too many years trying to beat the obsessive-compulsive streak OUT of my comics buying. </p>
<p>The annoying part of it for me is that it's ramping up  this new trend of the overpriced hardcover. This is a book that Alan Moore himself has shrugged off as a lesser work, that's almost never been unavailable as far as I know, that just got reprinted AGAIN last year, and now here's a new edition that offers... what? Is there anything besides the recoloring? I think <i>The Man Who Laughs,</i> another egregious example of DC catering to the collector market's worst OCD traits, at least threw in some new pages. </p>
<p>Oh well. My gut feeling about the whole enterprise is that if fans want to spend their money on this sort of thing, it's stupid of DC not to take it. I'm just sort of appalled at the idea of a page count that used to barely rate a 50% increase or so in the newsstand price in an 'Annual' format is now suddenly saleable as a high-end hardcover. For God's sake, how much disposable income is out there to cut up on this sort of thing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FunkyGreenJerusalem</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/25/remastering-old-work-kosher-or-not/comment-page-1/#comment-627082</link>
		<dc:creator>FunkyGreenJerusalem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 00:26:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/25/remastering-old-work-kosher-or-not/#comment-627082</guid>
		<description>I guess they can do what they want, but did it really need it?
Were people sitting around going &#039;man, I really want to love Killing Joke, but that colouring just keeps me away from it?&#039;

If it hadn&#039;t been for this, and me reading an interview where Bolland mentioned being unhappy with it, it never would have crossed my mind it needed fixing.
I won&#039;t be shelling out cash for this (already got the damn thing twice!).

New versions are funny though, I hated the Star Wars ones - it was always a nostalgia watch, so changing it to make it kewl kinda took away any reason to watch it (except for Billy Dee!) - but Apocalypse Now Redux is a much better film than the original - by adding more, it seems to go faster, and the slip into insanity is more noticeable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess they can do what they want, but did it really need it?<br />
Were people sitting around going 'man, I really want to love Killing Joke, but that colouring just keeps me away from it?'</p>
<p>If it hadn't been for this, and me reading an interview where Bolland mentioned being unhappy with it, it never would have crossed my mind it needed fixing.<br />
I won't be shelling out cash for this (already got the damn thing twice!).</p>
<p>New versions are funny though, I hated the Star Wars ones - it was always a nostalgia watch, so changing it to make it kewl kinda took away any reason to watch it (except for Billy Dee!) - but Apocalypse Now Redux is a much better film than the original - by adding more, it seems to go faster, and the slip into insanity is more noticeable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff R.</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/25/remastering-old-work-kosher-or-not/comment-page-1/#comment-626970</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff R.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 22:53:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/25/remastering-old-work-kosher-or-not/#comment-626970</guid>
		<description>Chris: You&#039;ve got to be kidding.  The BW&amp;R &lt;i&gt;Devil by the Deed&lt;/i&gt; was at least as much of a prismatic abomination as anything ever perpetrated by Ted Turner.  It&#039;s a dead thing, where the original was vibrantly alive.

As for the Killing Joke remix, I&#039;d have to see more than just three pages to pass judgment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris: You've got to be kidding.  The BW&amp;R <i>Devil by the Deed</i> was at least as much of a prismatic abomination as anything ever perpetrated by Ted Turner.  It's a dead thing, where the original was vibrantly alive.</p>
<p>As for the Killing Joke remix, I'd have to see more than just three pages to pass judgment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jccalhoun</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/25/remastering-old-work-kosher-or-not/comment-page-1/#comment-626754</link>
		<dc:creator>jccalhoun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 20:22:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/25/remastering-old-work-kosher-or-not/#comment-626754</guid>
		<description>Wow, I didn&#039;t know that the recoloring was going to be that dramatic.  I&#039;m not sure what to think. As others have written, I would need to see more to decide which is better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, I didn't know that the recoloring was going to be that dramatic.  I'm not sure what to think. As others have written, I would need to see more to decide which is better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Griswold</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/25/remastering-old-work-kosher-or-not/comment-page-1/#comment-626545</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Griswold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 17:59:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/25/remastering-old-work-kosher-or-not/#comment-626545</guid>
		<description>Looking at the example above, I prefer the original. But I am going to give it a chance and check out the entire work before I reach a conclusion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looking at the example above, I prefer the original. But I am going to give it a chance and check out the entire work before I reach a conclusion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yo go re</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/25/remastering-old-work-kosher-or-not/comment-page-1/#comment-626422</link>
		<dc:creator>yo go re</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 15:35:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/25/remastering-old-work-kosher-or-not/#comment-626422</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d need to see more pages before I can make a decision: the ones chosen to show off are a somber scene in Arkham, a flashback, and another flashback; in other words, all things that could have a simple, logical reason for a muted palette. Is it like that through the whole book, or do the colors fluctuate through the story?

That said, even in a flashback, I&#039;d have made the initial &quot;reveal&quot; of Joker pop out a bit more, to reflect how disconnected he is from the &quot;real&quot; world.

But still, as long as both versions exist, I&#039;m good with it. It&#039;s like the new dvd release of &lt;i&gt;The Mist&lt;/i&gt;, which has the movie both in full color, as seen in theatres, and entirely in black and white, to better suggest the atmosphere of a &#039;50s horror flick - you get the choice. And it&#039;s not like &lt;i&gt;The Killing Joke&lt;/i&gt; has been in short supply over the years, so everyone&#039;s had a shot at the first, &quot;colorized&quot; version...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'd need to see more pages before I can make a decision: the ones chosen to show off are a somber scene in Arkham, a flashback, and another flashback; in other words, all things that could have a simple, logical reason for a muted palette. Is it like that through the whole book, or do the colors fluctuate through the story?</p>
<p>That said, even in a flashback, I'd have made the initial "reveal" of Joker pop out a bit more, to reflect how disconnected he is from the "real" world.</p>
<p>But still, as long as both versions exist, I'm good with it. It's like the new dvd release of <i>The Mist</i>, which has the movie both in full color, as seen in theatres, and entirely in black and white, to better suggest the atmosphere of a '50s horror flick - you get the choice. And it's not like <i>The Killing Joke</i> has been in short supply over the years, so everyone's had a shot at the first, "colorized" version...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Krod</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/25/remastering-old-work-kosher-or-not/comment-page-1/#comment-626403</link>
		<dc:creator>Krod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 15:23:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/25/remastering-old-work-kosher-or-not/#comment-626403</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not commenting on whether or not it&#039;s better.  That will be judged on a case by case basis.  But when you start releasing different versions of your product, I think it hurts the integrity of it.

Example: I would have bought the Kill Bill DVDs a long time ago, but I just can&#039;t bring myself to do it because they&#039;re always going to release a newer, better version.

I don&#039;t want to buy something if I&#039;m not sure it&#039;s the finished product.  And once stuff like this starts happening, I have more doubts and a sense of higher risk with each purchase.  When my risk is higher, either your prices will drop, or my purchases will.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm not commenting on whether or not it's better.  That will be judged on a case by case basis.  But when you start releasing different versions of your product, I think it hurts the integrity of it.</p>
<p>Example: I would have bought the Kill Bill DVDs a long time ago, but I just can't bring myself to do it because they're always going to release a newer, better version.</p>
<p>I don't want to buy something if I'm not sure it's the finished product.  And once stuff like this starts happening, I have more doubts and a sense of higher risk with each purchase.  When my risk is higher, either your prices will drop, or my purchases will.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan (other Dan)</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/25/remastering-old-work-kosher-or-not/comment-page-1/#comment-626358</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan (other Dan)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 14:34:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/25/remastering-old-work-kosher-or-not/#comment-626358</guid>
		<description>Is John Higgins getting paid for this?

His work is not in the book, and although he may have some contractual protection in the event of something like this, I doubt he&#039;s getting anything from this.

That sucks if he went from a regular source of residuals on The Killing Joke to nothing on the new, improved version that will be the only one in print.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is John Higgins getting paid for this?</p>
<p>His work is not in the book, and although he may have some contractual protection in the event of something like this, I doubt he's getting anything from this.</p>
<p>That sucks if he went from a regular source of residuals on The Killing Joke to nothing on the new, improved version that will be the only one in print.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
