Comments on: Alex Ross Cover for Uncanny X-Men #500

By: Jack Norris

Jack Norris — Wed, 09 Apr 2008 02:47:01 +0000

No, I'm really not. That does not constitute a "demand", even when dickishly pulled out of context like that, and in the context of the full post merely offers a subjective reaction to the incompleteness of the original post.

By: Apodaca

Apodaca — Wed, 09 Apr 2008 01:59:59 +0000

This is one of the first sites I check each day, so no, maybe I havenâ€™t come fully prepared with the days news, but I really shouldnâ€™t have to.

That's where you're demanding something as a right.

By: DBish

DBish — Wed, 09 Apr 2008 00:49:23 +0000

I think it looks awesome

I would love to get it airbrushed on the side of a van

By: Jack Norris

Jack Norris — Tue, 08 Apr 2008 22:54:18 +0000

I'm in no way "assuming" that it's anyone else's "responsibility". I'm just pointing out that it would be, you know, nice, to add the context. I was asking a favour, not demanding something as a right. As I explained, as I started reading CSBG back before it became part of CBR, I always go to CBR *through* CSBG, so even if I were to make it an obligatory daily stop, it would always be second, and posts here maybe shouldn't just assume that the entire readership is coming here through the link on the main CBR page.

By: Michael

Michael — Tue, 08 Apr 2008 22:06:47 +0000

"Wait, that canâ€™t be Alex Ross work. I see characters in there that were created after 1980!"

Yeah, notice how they're all clustered towards the back.

By: Jon H

Jon H — Tue, 08 Apr 2008 17:48:29 +0000

Phoenix looks like the girl he did for the cover of JSA sans panties.

By: Gonger

Gonger — Tue, 08 Apr 2008 13:35:23 +0000

Phoenix in her first run wasn't Jean Grey, who was in a cocoon from X-Men 101 til just before X-Factor 1. Though with all the reboots and resurrections, that may have changed.

By: Tomer S

Tomer S — Tue, 08 Apr 2008 10:25:30 +0000

Why is Jean twice on the cover (bothe in her original costume and as Phoenix) or am I missing sometihng?

Anyway, it's way better than Greg Land's cover.

By: The Dane

The Dane — Tue, 08 Apr 2008 06:10:22 +0000

Hey Apodaca (or Dan, is it? I don't know whether I rate calling you that), good point. You'd think that my obvious interest in the Good Comics blog (I've been reading since the Blogspot era too) would translate to broadening my horizons, but for some reason, it just doesn't. I'm not sure if I can explain it, but I pretty much get all my comics news and blog talk from this blog and The Beat's. I very occasionally (maybe once a week) check Kalinara's, Calvin Pitt's, Johanna Draper's, and Dave Carter's. It's not that I don't like comics enough or wouldn't find more articles interesting, but I've just got too many other internet interests and too little time, so I kinda put minimal effort in. I tend to enjoy some of the diversity of posting here (especially Burgas' non-superhero stuff and I'm enjoying "Manga before Flowers") and I like some of Heidi's longer-form articles. So I guess I've just found my comfort zone and haven't felt the need to branch out (though i will follow links to interesting articles discussed on these blogs...). Anyway, does that make sense? I suddenly feel kinda bad for not giving more writers a shot.

By: snap judgments » A Step in the Right Direction

snap judgments » A Step in the Right Direction — Tue, 08 Apr 2008 04:07:09 +0000

[...] you’ve probably already seen it a dozen other places by now (CBR being one of them), but I just have to [...]

By: mightygodking

mightygodking — Tue, 08 Apr 2008 03:24:52 +0000

Wait, that can't be Alex Ross work. I see characters in there that were created after 1980!

By: BBop

BBop — Tue, 08 Apr 2008 03:17:28 +0000

Apparently Alex Ross hasn't seen what the X-Men look like since the early '90s. Writers get shit on for not doing any research but all the artist has to do is look a pictures! It's silly of marvel to promote a huge issue like number 500 of one of rtheir top series with images that people may not recognize.

By: M Bloom

M Bloom — Tue, 08 Apr 2008 02:21:32 +0000

Pretty, but much like the current X-Men books, it needs more Rachel Summers.

By: Hige

Hige — Tue, 08 Apr 2008 00:50:22 +0000

Don't like it.
Cyclops is blasting Iceman from behind and Havok's pose is ridiculous.

By: Matt

Matt — Tue, 08 Apr 2008 00:04:10 +0000

Generally it looks good. Cyclops' optic blast looks rather odd, though, as if he's trying to shoot Colossus in the leg.

By: Apodaca

Apodaca — Mon, 07 Apr 2008 23:40:32 +0000

Itâ€™s just not even in the scope of things that would attract my attention.

That's not really true, though, is it? I mean, you're clearly interested in reading about comics and what people think of them, which is a good chunk of what's on CBR's front page.

By: Joey K

Joey K — Mon, 07 Apr 2008 23:31:28 +0000

I guess I disagree with their idea of a "special" comic. It seemed more like they were saying "A cover by Alex Ross, oh yeah and an issue of Uncanny X-Men comes with it" rather than "We have a kick ass Issue 500 and on top of that a cover by Alex Ross"

By: The Dane

The Dane — Mon, 07 Apr 2008 23:31:08 +0000

Yeah, I've never even seen the CBR front page myself. It's just not even in the scope of things that would attract my attention. So I'm always appreciative when links to referenced articles are provided (thanks Brian!).

By: Kyle

Kyle — Mon, 07 Apr 2008 22:23:16 +0000

Because it's issue 500. I'm sure Marvel will do whatever they can think of to promote the hell out of it.

By: Joey K

Joey K — Mon, 07 Apr 2008 22:09:18 +0000

Maybe I'm just being grumpy about this, but was commentary on a COVER really needed? I mean he basically just said "I painted this." Sure it's a nice picture and all but so what? Alex Ross does covers all the time, why was this one cover special?