<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top 100 Comic Book Runs #65-61</title>
	<atom:link href="http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/04/10/top-100-comic-book-runs-65-61/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/04/10/top-100-comic-book-runs-65-61/</link>
	<description>Comic Book Resources Presents... Comics Should Be Good!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 04:44:45 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Filisteu &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Top Runs</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/04/10/top-100-comic-book-runs-65-61/comment-page-2/#comment-660591</link>
		<dc:creator>Filisteu &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Top Runs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 11:16:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=15815#comment-660591</guid>
		<description>[...] 62. O Quarteto FantÃ¡stico de Waid e Wieringo. HistÃ³rias leves e engraÃ§adas, conceitos novos e interessantes, senso de humor&#8230; mas nada de [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 62. O Quarteto FantÃ¡stico de Waid e Wieringo. HistÃ³rias leves e engraÃ§adas, conceitos novos e interessantes, senso de humor&#8230; mas nada de [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DanCJ</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/04/10/top-100-comic-book-runs-65-61/comment-page-2/#comment-656067</link>
		<dc:creator>DanCJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 09:20:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=15815#comment-656067</guid>
		<description>Another good selection.  With the exception of Iron Man (which I haven&#039;t read) these are all good.  LoEG might have made my list if I&#039;d thought of it...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another good selection.  With the exception of Iron Man (which I haven't read) these are all good.  LoEG might have made my list if I'd thought of it...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lynxara</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/04/10/top-100-comic-book-runs-65-61/comment-page-2/#comment-655906</link>
		<dc:creator>Lynxara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 09:10:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=15815#comment-655906</guid>
		<description>In terms of writing structure, an ensemble cast that focuses on a variety of people is a very different type of writing than a story that focuses on a sole protagonist with a supporting cast in a clearly subordinate (if important) role. I suspect what Rene is trying to flag up is the number of books focusing on sole female as opposed to sole male protagonists, as opposed to books with a group dynamic, which the statistical breakdown treats separately. Sole female protagonists are extremely unusual in just about all genres of comics, as opposed to sole male protagonists and ensembles, so I don&#039;t think there&#039;s anything wrong with pointing it out. It&#039;s like pointing out the number of non-superhero books, showing exceptions to a dominating trend.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In terms of writing structure, an ensemble cast that focuses on a variety of people is a very different type of writing than a story that focuses on a sole protagonist with a supporting cast in a clearly subordinate (if important) role. I suspect what Rene is trying to flag up is the number of books focusing on sole female as opposed to sole male protagonists, as opposed to books with a group dynamic, which the statistical breakdown treats separately. Sole female protagonists are extremely unusual in just about all genres of comics, as opposed to sole male protagonists and ensembles, so I don't think there's anything wrong with pointing it out. It's like pointing out the number of non-superhero books, showing exceptions to a dominating trend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ZZZ</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/04/10/top-100-comic-book-runs-65-61/comment-page-2/#comment-655900</link>
		<dc:creator>ZZZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 08:09:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=15815#comment-655900</guid>
		<description>Bernard, I fully acknowledge that male characters dominate the list, I just think the phrase &quot;2 runs have female protagonists&quot; is overstating the case. If you say only two runs have female protagonists, that meanst that all the other runs DON&#039;T have female protagonists, and is it really fair to say that of a book with a primary cast of three women and two men? If a team book where the women outnumber the men doesn&#039;t have female protagonists, then it doesn&#039;t have male protagonists either, making Excalibur and NextWave books with no protagonists. 

And I&#039;m sure Rene isn&#039;t trying to be misleading or push an agenda or anything. I&#039;d say it&#039;s just a difference of opinion in what the word &quot;protagonist&quot; means. I&#039;d say that the Fantastic Four has four protagonists; someone else might say it has no protagonists, because it doesn&#039;t have a single main character; some might even say Reed Richards is the protagonist, because every story must have one and only one protagonist, so in a team book it&#039;s the leader or the character who gets the most screen time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bernard, I fully acknowledge that male characters dominate the list, I just think the phrase "2 runs have female protagonists" is overstating the case. If you say only two runs have female protagonists, that meanst that all the other runs DON'T have female protagonists, and is it really fair to say that of a book with a primary cast of three women and two men? If a team book where the women outnumber the men doesn't have female protagonists, then it doesn't have male protagonists either, making Excalibur and NextWave books with no protagonists. </p>
<p>And I'm sure Rene isn't trying to be misleading or push an agenda or anything. I'd say it's just a difference of opinion in what the word "protagonist" means. I'd say that the Fantastic Four has four protagonists; someone else might say it has no protagonists, because it doesn't have a single main character; some might even say Reed Richards is the protagonist, because every story must have one and only one protagonist, so in a team book it's the leader or the character who gets the most screen time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Top 100 Lists Should Be Good &#171; Goki&#8217;s Giving Groin</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/04/10/top-100-comic-book-runs-65-61/comment-page-2/#comment-655734</link>
		<dc:creator>Top 100 Lists Should Be Good &#171; Goki&#8217;s Giving Groin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 14:53:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=15815#comment-655734</guid>
		<description>[...] Top 100 Comic Book Runs #65-61 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Top 100 Comic Book Runs #65-61 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tomer S</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/04/10/top-100-comic-book-runs-65-61/comment-page-2/#comment-655704</link>
		<dc:creator>Tomer S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 10:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=15815#comment-655704</guid>
		<description>Rene said:
&quot;Well, the X-Men in the 1990s arenâ€™t something that will get you too hooked into Marvel, that is for sureâ€¦&quot;

My first encounter with the X-Men was due to their animated show and my first American comics were X-Men and Spider-Man in the mid-late 90&#039;s (&quot;the shitty era&quot;, if you want), and I still became comic book lover and read X-Men and Spider-Man books to this day. So at least I give that era the benefit for hooking me with the medium (I did read comics back then, but not in English or superheroes) and Marvel.

Still, I won&#039;t remember any of the stories as the ones on top of my favorites list, perhaps with the exception of Dezago and Wieringo&#039;s Spider-Man.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rene said:<br />
"Well, the X-Men in the 1990s arenâ€™t something that will get you too hooked into Marvel, that is for sureâ€¦"</p>
<p>My first encounter with the X-Men was due to their animated show and my first American comics were X-Men and Spider-Man in the mid-late 90's ("the shitty era", if you want), and I still became comic book lover and read X-Men and Spider-Man books to this day. So at least I give that era the benefit for hooking me with the medium (I did read comics back then, but not in English or superheroes) and Marvel.</p>
<p>Still, I won't remember any of the stories as the ones on top of my favorites list, perhaps with the exception of Dezago and Wieringo's Spider-Man.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bernard the Poet</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/04/10/top-100-comic-book-runs-65-61/comment-page-2/#comment-655696</link>
		<dc:creator>Bernard the Poet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 09:20:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=15815#comment-655696</guid>
		<description>Oh, I forgot Love and Rockets. 

Iâ€™m betting that there will only be 4 female protagonists in the top 100.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, I forgot Love and Rockets. </p>
<p>Iâ€™m betting that there will only be 4 female protagonists in the top 100.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bernard the Poet</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/04/10/top-100-comic-book-runs-65-61/comment-page-2/#comment-655695</link>
		<dc:creator>Bernard the Poet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 08:55:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=15815#comment-655695</guid>
		<description>ZZZ, I understand what you are saying about the central role women play in the team books, but if you deduct the 15 teams from the list, you still have 25 male protagonists to 2 female protagonists. Furthermore when the countdown is completed, I&#039;m betting that there will only be 3 female protagonists in the top 100 (Promethea will probably be in the early fifties).  Surely, that is something that&#039;s worth noting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ZZZ, I understand what you are saying about the central role women play in the team books, but if you deduct the 15 teams from the list, you still have 25 male protagonists to 2 female protagonists. Furthermore when the countdown is completed, I'm betting that there will only be 3 female protagonists in the top 100 (Promethea will probably be in the early fifties).  Surely, that is something that's worth noting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jazzbo</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/04/10/top-100-comic-book-runs-65-61/comment-page-2/#comment-655694</link>
		<dc:creator>jazzbo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 08:43:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=15815#comment-655694</guid>
		<description>I grew up on Marvel comics, and even though for the past 10 years I&#039;ve read way more DC than Marvel, I still feel like I&#039;m more familiar with the Marvel characters. I think part of the reason so many people have such a strong affinity/bias for the Marvel characters is that they weren&#039;t gods for the most part, just people. Superman, especially before the Byrne reboot, could do virtually anything. Same with Martian Manhunter. Green Lantern has a ring that let&#039;s him do whatever he imagines. Those things might all be cool, but in my opinion they make for dull storytelling possibilities. Iron Man and Hulk and Spider-Man might all be powerful, but they have flaws, and they have weaknesses. So even though you know they&#039;re going to win in the end, it can at least seem like they don&#039;t have a chance.  Not surprisingly, I guess, Batman is my favorite character overall, simply because he&#039;s not a god. At least that&#039;s my take on why there might be more of a Marvel bias amongst the comic book public in general.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I grew up on Marvel comics, and even though for the past 10 years I've read way more DC than Marvel, I still feel like I'm more familiar with the Marvel characters. I think part of the reason so many people have such a strong affinity/bias for the Marvel characters is that they weren't gods for the most part, just people. Superman, especially before the Byrne reboot, could do virtually anything. Same with Martian Manhunter. Green Lantern has a ring that let's him do whatever he imagines. Those things might all be cool, but in my opinion they make for dull storytelling possibilities. Iron Man and Hulk and Spider-Man might all be powerful, but they have flaws, and they have weaknesses. So even though you know they're going to win in the end, it can at least seem like they don't have a chance.  Not surprisingly, I guess, Batman is my favorite character overall, simply because he's not a god. At least that's my take on why there might be more of a Marvel bias amongst the comic book public in general.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ZZZ</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/04/10/top-100-comic-book-runs-65-61/comment-page-2/#comment-655690</link>
		<dc:creator>ZZZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 08:23:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=15815#comment-655690</guid>
		<description>Rene said:

&quot;- 2 run have female protagonists (Strangers in Paradise, Alias - 197 pts)&quot;

While only two have exclusively female protagonists, plenty of the other books on the list do have female protagonists. All the team books do, and a few (NextWave, New Mutants, Excalibur, and some incarnations of the X-Men that I know of; I don&#039;t know about some of the others) have more female than male protagonists. And Toy Box, Dizzy Cordova, Mina Murray, and Rene Montoya are clearly central characters in their books most of the time (Dizzy tends to fade in and out and I honestly have never read Gotham Central so I can&#039;t say how much time Montoya gets compared to the other characters, but I&#039;d argue Mina was the main protagonist of LotG and Toy Box was the POV character for Top 10). 

Which isn&#039;t to say that the list isn&#039;t dominated by male characters; it clearly is (and I know Rene just pointed it out and didn&#039;t decry it as sexist or anything). I just think it&#039;s overstating the matter to say that only two books have female protagonists. Like counting the number of books with child protagonists and discounting Lone Wolf and Cub because one of them is an adult.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rene said:</p>
<p>"- 2 run have female protagonists (Strangers in Paradise, Alias - 197 pts)"</p>
<p>While only two have exclusively female protagonists, plenty of the other books on the list do have female protagonists. All the team books do, and a few (NextWave, New Mutants, Excalibur, and some incarnations of the X-Men that I know of; I don't know about some of the others) have more female than male protagonists. And Toy Box, Dizzy Cordova, Mina Murray, and Rene Montoya are clearly central characters in their books most of the time (Dizzy tends to fade in and out and I honestly have never read Gotham Central so I can't say how much time Montoya gets compared to the other characters, but I'd argue Mina was the main protagonist of LotG and Toy Box was the POV character for Top 10). </p>
<p>Which isn't to say that the list isn't dominated by male characters; it clearly is (and I know Rene just pointed it out and didn't decry it as sexist or anything). I just think it's overstating the matter to say that only two books have female protagonists. Like counting the number of books with child protagonists and discounting Lone Wolf and Cub because one of them is an adult.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mrjayberry</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/04/10/top-100-comic-book-runs-65-61/comment-page-1/#comment-655676</link>
		<dc:creator>mrjayberry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 05:36:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=15815#comment-655676</guid>
		<description>I had Grant/Beryfogles Batman on my ballot for almost one reason, Batman 471, it was the first issue I read by said creative team and in a time when characters mattered more than artists/writers I looked them up just to see who these cats were.

The thing that is so great about thier run is they are able to include things that, when used lazily are horrendus.  In the aforementioned 471 we get an appereance of Ace the Bathound and your left thinking Batman having a dog is the coolest idea ever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had Grant/Beryfogles Batman on my ballot for almost one reason, Batman 471, it was the first issue I read by said creative team and in a time when characters mattered more than artists/writers I looked them up just to see who these cats were.</p>
<p>The thing that is so great about thier run is they are able to include things that, when used lazily are horrendus.  In the aforementioned 471 we get an appereance of Ace the Bathound and your left thinking Batman having a dog is the coolest idea ever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Bird</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/04/10/top-100-comic-book-runs-65-61/comment-page-1/#comment-655673</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Bird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 04:46:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=15815#comment-655673</guid>
		<description>Hah!  Please!  Attachment to Grant/Breyfogle&#039;s Batman has nothing to do with sentiment.  I grew up on Gerry Conway&#039;s Batman ten years earlier, and I still love it, but those Grant/Breyfogle issues are simply Batman at his best, equalling even the Englehart/Rogers and O&#039;Neill/Adams runs.  It&#039;s just high-quality comics: clever plots, iconic characterization, and dynamic, expressionistic pencils.  If you don&#039;t get it, you don&#039;t get it, but don&#039;t blame sentiment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hah!  Please!  Attachment to Grant/Breyfogle's Batman has nothing to do with sentiment.  I grew up on Gerry Conway's Batman ten years earlier, and I still love it, but those Grant/Breyfogle issues are simply Batman at his best, equalling even the Englehart/Rogers and O'Neill/Adams runs.  It's just high-quality comics: clever plots, iconic characterization, and dynamic, expressionistic pencils.  If you don't get it, you don't get it, but don't blame sentiment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tommy</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/04/10/top-100-comic-book-runs-65-61/comment-page-1/#comment-655672</link>
		<dc:creator>Tommy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 04:36:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=15815#comment-655672</guid>
		<description>Kudos to Brian. When I saw the Grant/ Breyfogle run I did a double take. I mean, while what I have read of it&#039;s fine...#65? Really? In the first sentence, Mr. Cronin explained it. I can&#039;t begrudge anyone for havng a favorite not because it&#039;s the BEST per se, it just has a warm place in their heart. (I&#039;m not making fun, if it reads like I am.) 

Also, I know I had that Fantastic 4 run on my list at some point, I just can&#039;t remember if it ended up there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kudos to Brian. When I saw the Grant/ Breyfogle run I did a double take. I mean, while what I have read of it's fine...#65? Really? In the first sentence, Mr. Cronin explained it. I can't begrudge anyone for havng a favorite not because it's the BEST per se, it just has a warm place in their heart. (I'm not making fun, if it reads like I am.) </p>
<p>Also, I know I had that Fantastic 4 run on my list at some point, I just can't remember if it ended up there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DKing</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/04/10/top-100-comic-book-runs-65-61/comment-page-1/#comment-655656</link>
		<dc:creator>DKing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 02:42:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=15815#comment-655656</guid>
		<description>Plus they&#039;ve been around a lot less, I mean Spider-Man and Fantastic Four are all from the 60&#039;s, and Batman and Superman started in the Great Depression almost. 

The thing was Marvel came out with semi-serious characterization , and took the whole thing seriously when Batman et el were still behaving like the Adam West TV show.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Plus they've been around a lot less, I mean Spider-Man and Fantastic Four are all from the 60's, and Batman and Superman started in the Great Depression almost. </p>
<p>The thing was Marvel came out with semi-serious characterization , and took the whole thing seriously when Batman et el were still behaving like the Adam West TV show.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Loughlin</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/04/10/top-100-comic-book-runs-65-61/comment-page-1/#comment-655649</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Loughlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 01:46:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=15815#comment-655649</guid>
		<description>Marvel has, historically, had a more cohesive universe. From Stan Lee to Chris Claremont, they&#039;ve captured the feel of adolescent angst better than DC. Marvel&#039;s had a more recognizable &quot;house style&quot; (watered down Kirby), while DC has been more diffuse. When DC tried to play catch up, they did so by bringing Marvel style angst with varied success (from the debacle of the &#039;70s Teen Titans to the success of the &#039;80s New Teen Titans). 

Marvel was better at attracting and/or keeping the artists whose styles appealed to the adolescent male mindset (see: Jim Lee) in the &#039;80s and &#039;90s. Even though Suicide Squad, Green Arrow, and the Levitz &amp; Giffen Legion were better written and technically better drawn than X-Men, the heavily-detailed, violent world of Marvel&#039;s mutant titles caught the attention of pre-teen and teenage boys in the &#039;80s. That&#039;s my take on the possible Marvel bias, anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marvel has, historically, had a more cohesive universe. From Stan Lee to Chris Claremont, they've captured the feel of adolescent angst better than DC. Marvel's had a more recognizable "house style" (watered down Kirby), while DC has been more diffuse. When DC tried to play catch up, they did so by bringing Marvel style angst with varied success (from the debacle of the '70s Teen Titans to the success of the '80s New Teen Titans). </p>
<p>Marvel was better at attracting and/or keeping the artists whose styles appealed to the adolescent male mindset (see: Jim Lee) in the '80s and '90s. Even though Suicide Squad, Green Arrow, and the Levitz &amp; Giffen Legion were better written and technically better drawn than X-Men, the heavily-detailed, violent world of Marvel's mutant titles caught the attention of pre-teen and teenage boys in the '80s. That's my take on the possible Marvel bias, anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rene</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/04/10/top-100-comic-book-runs-65-61/comment-page-1/#comment-655639</link>
		<dc:creator>Rene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 00:25:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=15815#comment-655639</guid>
		<description>Well, the X-Men in the 1990s aren&#039;t something that will get you too hooked into Marvel, that is for sure...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, the X-Men in the 1990s aren't something that will get you too hooked into Marvel, that is for sure...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DKing</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/04/10/top-100-comic-book-runs-65-61/comment-page-1/#comment-655633</link>
		<dc:creator>DKing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 23:25:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=15815#comment-655633</guid>
		<description>I love  any Batman work by Grant and Breyfogle; as the article said when I started seriously reading the Bat (pre Burton) these guys were the guys who got me hooked; i don&#039;t know whether it was because they were determined to not just mine the old villains we&#039;d seen forever or the atmosphere they created in Gotham-but to me they did Batman perfectly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love  any Batman work by Grant and Breyfogle; as the article said when I started seriously reading the Bat (pre Burton) these guys were the guys who got me hooked; i don't know whether it was because they were determined to not just mine the old villains we'd seen forever or the atmosphere they created in Gotham-but to me they did Batman perfectly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lynxara</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/04/10/top-100-comic-book-runs-65-61/comment-page-1/#comment-655631</link>
		<dc:creator>Lynxara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 23:05:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=15815#comment-655631</guid>
		<description>slaz, I fit my stereotype of the DC reader, despite coming to comics through X-Men in the 90&#039;s. I think I never got hooked into the wider Marvel universe because... well, I have no idea, but I got attached to DC thanks to Mark Waid&#039;s various DC projects (yes, even Kingdom Come) and then quickly branched out into reading lots and lots of indy comics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>slaz, I fit my stereotype of the DC reader, despite coming to comics through X-Men in the 90's. I think I never got hooked into the wider Marvel universe because... well, I have no idea, but I got attached to DC thanks to Mark Waid's various DC projects (yes, even Kingdom Come) and then quickly branched out into reading lots and lots of indy comics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/04/10/top-100-comic-book-runs-65-61/comment-page-1/#comment-655630</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 23:01:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=15815#comment-655630</guid>
		<description>&quot;I read the first 5-7 trades of 100 Bullets before finally quitting cause I found the whole thing incomprehensible at some point. Of the readers who voted for 100 Bullets â€” is that something you liked in the series - the parsing of the narrative? Or was it just not confusing to you?&quot;

I didn&#039;t submit anything to the list, but 100 Bullets would have been my number one pick.

To me it reads more like a Noir version of the Wire (the acclaimed HBO series).  Not so much in the story or plot, but the format.  Watching one episode of the Wire doesn&#039;t make you love the show.  Its much slower paced and detailed than a typical &quot;drama&quot; on TV.  But the story and the connections build and unfold over time and the more you watch it, the more you&#039;re drawn in.  And when things are revealed you can piece together what happened in the past and see it as a logical progression.

Now, some of 100 Bullets confused me.  But it&#039;s a build to reveals.  Some of the things that were confusing, now make sense given what&#039;s happened over time.  Some of the other things remain confusing but we&#039;re seeing the pieces fall into place and I&#039;m pretty confident over the next 12 issues they will be resolved.

100 Bullets has an ending point, remember.  Azz isn&#039;t going to give away too much as he builds to it.  I get the single issues but it does read better in trade (or by re-reading the arcs when they are done).  I think the great thing that I love about 100 Bullets is that I can re-read it and learn new things or pick up new things each time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"I read the first 5-7 trades of 100 Bullets before finally quitting cause I found the whole thing incomprehensible at some point. Of the readers who voted for 100 Bullets â€” is that something you liked in the series - the parsing of the narrative? Or was it just not confusing to you?"</p>
<p>I didn't submit anything to the list, but 100 Bullets would have been my number one pick.</p>
<p>To me it reads more like a Noir version of the Wire (the acclaimed HBO series).  Not so much in the story or plot, but the format.  Watching one episode of the Wire doesn't make you love the show.  Its much slower paced and detailed than a typical "drama" on TV.  But the story and the connections build and unfold over time and the more you watch it, the more you're drawn in.  And when things are revealed you can piece together what happened in the past and see it as a logical progression.</p>
<p>Now, some of 100 Bullets confused me.  But it's a build to reveals.  Some of the things that were confusing, now make sense given what's happened over time.  Some of the other things remain confusing but we're seeing the pieces fall into place and I'm pretty confident over the next 12 issues they will be resolved.</p>
<p>100 Bullets has an ending point, remember.  Azz isn't going to give away too much as he builds to it.  I get the single issues but it does read better in trade (or by re-reading the arcs when they are done).  I think the great thing that I love about 100 Bullets is that I can re-read it and learn new things or pick up new things each time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: slaz</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/04/10/top-100-comic-book-runs-65-61/comment-page-1/#comment-655623</link>
		<dc:creator>slaz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 22:12:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=15815#comment-655623</guid>
		<description>And Flex is a miniseries. Oops, never mind. I&#039;m most curious as to if/when Cerebus shows up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And Flex is a miniseries. Oops, never mind. I'm most curious as to if/when Cerebus shows up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
