<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What I bought - 29 May 2008</title>
	<atom:link href="http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/05/31/what-i-bought-29-may-2008/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/05/31/what-i-bought-29-may-2008/</link>
	<description>Comic Book Resources Presents... Comics Should Be Good!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 22:51:30 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Northlanders # 6 - Review</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/05/31/what-i-bought-29-may-2008/comment-page-2/#comment-666551</link>
		<dc:creator>Northlanders # 6 - Review</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 10:52:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=16932#comment-666551</guid>
		<description>[...] other people are saying: What I bought - 29 May 2008 PulpSecret video review (in the Lightning Round) Brian Wood interview at [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] other people are saying: What I bought - 29 May 2008 PulpSecret video review (in the Lightning Round) Brian Wood interview at [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ivan brandon</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/05/31/what-i-bought-29-may-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-665312</link>
		<dc:creator>ivan brandon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 16:39:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=16932#comment-665312</guid>
		<description>i&#039;m glad you dug part 2.  in the 3rd part niko draws like ralph steadman and jack kirby had a baby.  and that baby is holding niko captive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i'm glad you dug part 2.  in the 3rd part niko draws like ralph steadman and jack kirby had a baby.  and that baby is holding niko captive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Burgas</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/05/31/what-i-bought-29-may-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-664967</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Burgas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 18:52:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=16932#comment-664967</guid>
		<description>Shoot, Ivan, I went back and re-read the first review, and you&#039;re right, that&#039;s a stupid thing to write.  I had issues with the first chapter for other reasons, and I just brought up the way Aaron speaks as part of my musings, but the syntax of the review is terrible, so I apologize.  I did, however, like the second chapter a lot better, and I look forward to seeing where you&#039;re going with the story.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shoot, Ivan, I went back and re-read the first review, and you're right, that's a stupid thing to write.  I had issues with the first chapter for other reasons, and I just brought up the way Aaron speaks as part of my musings, but the syntax of the review is terrible, so I apologize.  I did, however, like the second chapter a lot better, and I look forward to seeing where you're going with the story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ivan brandon</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/05/31/what-i-bought-29-may-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-664966</link>
		<dc:creator>ivan brandon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 18:33:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=16932#comment-664966</guid>
		<description>also, the story does not take place before nextwave.  nextwave is directy and indirecty referenced in part 2.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>also, the story does not take place before nextwave.  nextwave is directy and indirecty referenced in part 2.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ivan brandon</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/05/31/what-i-bought-29-may-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-664963</link>
		<dc:creator>ivan brandon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 17:47:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=16932#comment-664963</guid>
		<description>to clarify, the issue i had with the review was that it states my story isn&#039;t very good BECAUSE the character doesn&#039;t talk the way it&#039;s supposed he should talk.

glad you liked the tiny celestial we created.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>to clarify, the issue i had with the review was that it states my story isn't very good BECAUSE the character doesn't talk the way it's supposed he should talk.</p>
<p>glad you liked the tiny celestial we created.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh P.</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/05/31/what-i-bought-29-may-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-664693</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh P.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 13:26:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=16932#comment-664693</guid>
		<description>Personally, I liked Tony Daniel&#039;s art circa X-Force #43 (right before Age of Apocalypse).  I thought it was his strongest stuff at the time and not as homogonized as it is now.

Just my two cents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I liked Tony Daniel's art circa X-Force #43 (right before Age of Apocalypse).  I thought it was his strongest stuff at the time and not as homogonized as it is now.</p>
<p>Just my two cents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Norris</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/05/31/what-i-bought-29-may-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-664639</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Norris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 02:27:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=16932#comment-664639</guid>
		<description>Hey, I wasn&#039;t telling you to shut up, just pointing out that there is a blurb (actually on the contents page of MCP #8, mybe that&#039;s why you missed it) that explicitly says &quot;before Nextwave&quot; (and other things). 
I don&#039;t necessarily share 100% of your tastes, or agree with all your interpretations of what we do happen to both read, but I definitely don&#039;t side with those who think that such disagreements need to be treated as a Big Important Serious Deal and that anyone who doesn&#039;t agree with me as to what is worth buying is an Imminent Threat to the Art Form.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, I wasn't telling you to shut up, just pointing out that there is a blurb (actually on the contents page of MCP #8, mybe that's why you missed it) that explicitly says "before Nextwave" (and other things).<br />
I don't necessarily share 100% of your tastes, or agree with all your interpretations of what we do happen to both read, but I definitely don't side with those who think that such disagreements need to be treated as a Big Important Serious Deal and that anyone who doesn't agree with me as to what is worth buying is an Imminent Threat to the Art Form.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Burgas</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/05/31/what-i-bought-29-may-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-664632</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Burgas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 21:42:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=16932#comment-664632</guid>
		<description>Hmm.  That&#039;s what I thought, Jack, but I didn&#039;t quite get that it took place before Nextwave.  I noticed the drinking thing, but didn&#039;t get that it was before it.  I guess I suck.  I&#039;ll have to shut up about it from now on!  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm.  That's what I thought, Jack, but I didn't quite get that it took place before Nextwave.  I noticed the drinking thing, but didn't get that it was before it.  I guess I suck.  I'll have to shut up about it from now on!  <img src='http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Norris</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/05/31/what-i-bought-29-may-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-664631</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Norris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 21:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=16932#comment-664631</guid>
		<description>So, I finally read the Machine Man story (in MCP 8, not the latest one but the &quot;previous&quot; one you mention) and it seems pretty clear to me that this is meant to explain how MM arrived at his current characterization. The intro explicitly mentions that the story takes place well before Nextwave and Ms. Marvel, and the character mentions to his therapist that he&#039;s started drinking, a feature of the Ellis version. 
The character is shown as confused and at something of a crossroads, broadcasting that this is a &quot;fill in the missing transition&quot; type of story  between the (kind of boring, IMO) old school portrayal of Machine Man and Ellis&#039;s demented drunk version. 
As far as why the writer didn&#039;t bring this up as an explanation, perhaps he felt that he shouldn&#039;t have to, or was too annoyed to feel he should be defending his actions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, I finally read the Machine Man story (in MCP 8, not the latest one but the "previous" one you mention) and it seems pretty clear to me that this is meant to explain how MM arrived at his current characterization. The intro explicitly mentions that the story takes place well before Nextwave and Ms. Marvel, and the character mentions to his therapist that he's started drinking, a feature of the Ellis version.<br />
The character is shown as confused and at something of a crossroads, broadcasting that this is a "fill in the missing transition" type of story  between the (kind of boring, IMO) old school portrayal of Machine Man and Ellis's demented drunk version.<br />
As far as why the writer didn't bring this up as an explanation, perhaps he felt that he shouldn't have to, or was too annoyed to feel he should be defending his actions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T.</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/05/31/what-i-bought-29-may-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-664630</link>
		<dc:creator>T.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 21:35:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=16932#comment-664630</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;As for why are a large number of women buying itâ€¦newsflashâ€¦women like porn just as much as men do. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Hahahahahahaaahhahaha, good one....wait, what?  You&#039;re &lt;i&gt;serious?&lt;/i&gt;  Ummm...okay.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>As for why are a large number of women buying itâ€¦newsflashâ€¦women like porn just as much as men do. </p></blockquote>
<p>Hahahahahahaaahhahaha, good one....wait, what?  You're <i>serious?</i>  Ummm...okay.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Collins</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/05/31/what-i-bought-29-may-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-664622</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Collins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 20:10:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=16932#comment-664622</guid>
		<description>Ladypeyton,
Stop. Just stop. I&#039;m not going to get into some idiotic &quot;Is it empowering or is it not?&quot; argument with you because like I said, that stuff is just subjective. I wasn&#039;t even taking a side on the issue, just pointing out there are different ways to look at it. If you don&#039;t like the book, then super, that&#039;s your prerogative, but don&#039;t use it as platform to take a couple shots at me when your own arguments don&#039;t even carry much weight.

To address your &#039;counterpoints&#039;...you&#039;re making a 1 for 1 comparison on Batman and Tarot&#039;s use of sexuality that doesn&#039;t apply because both are targeted to the same audience- males. Of course Batman isn&#039;t going to be used in the same fashion. A more apt comparison would be between Tarot and Yaoi manga or your Slash Fiction example. The men portrayed in those stories are about as realistic as Tarot is as a woman, and everybit as sexualized and fetishized. My referencing of Batman had nothing to do with the sex/sexuality but to do with the character on display. Batman/Bruce Wayne is a millionaire playboy who is also a master intellect, world class martial artist, and has a flawless physique. I don&#039;t know too many men who fit that description in real life. Do you? That&#039;s where the example of Batman as an idealized role model came from.

I also never said anything about 12 year old girls reading Tarot nor do I expect/want them to so that just seems silly of you to even go there and *NEWSFLASH* I know women like porn (or &quot;porm&quot; as you call it) because I watch it with my girlfriend and she likes it even more than I do.

I&#039;m aware of slash fiction and while it doesn&#039;t make me uncomfortable, I think of it in probably the same way you think of Tarot. But if you enjoy stories of Batman combing Wolverine&#039;s backhair while naked or something, you enjoy. I&#039;ll go back to my hot redhead witches...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ladypeyton,<br />
Stop. Just stop. I'm not going to get into some idiotic "Is it empowering or is it not?" argument with you because like I said, that stuff is just subjective. I wasn't even taking a side on the issue, just pointing out there are different ways to look at it. If you don't like the book, then super, that's your prerogative, but don't use it as platform to take a couple shots at me when your own arguments don't even carry much weight.</p>
<p>To address your 'counterpoints'...you're making a 1 for 1 comparison on Batman and Tarot's use of sexuality that doesn't apply because both are targeted to the same audience- males. Of course Batman isn't going to be used in the same fashion. A more apt comparison would be between Tarot and Yaoi manga or your Slash Fiction example. The men portrayed in those stories are about as realistic as Tarot is as a woman, and everybit as sexualized and fetishized. My referencing of Batman had nothing to do with the sex/sexuality but to do with the character on display. Batman/Bruce Wayne is a millionaire playboy who is also a master intellect, world class martial artist, and has a flawless physique. I don't know too many men who fit that description in real life. Do you? That's where the example of Batman as an idealized role model came from.</p>
<p>I also never said anything about 12 year old girls reading Tarot nor do I expect/want them to so that just seems silly of you to even go there and *NEWSFLASH* I know women like porn (or "porm" as you call it) because I watch it with my girlfriend and she likes it even more than I do.</p>
<p>I'm aware of slash fiction and while it doesn't make me uncomfortable, I think of it in probably the same way you think of Tarot. But if you enjoy stories of Batman combing Wolverine's backhair while naked or something, you enjoy. I'll go back to my hot redhead witches...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ladypeyton</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/05/31/what-i-bought-29-may-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-664607</link>
		<dc:creator>ladypeyton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 14:55:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=16932#comment-664607</guid>
		<description>Andrew said: &quot; You criticize Balent for drawing physically â€˜idealizedâ€™ women as role models, but how is that any different than, say, a 12-year old boy reading Batman and using him as a role model or substitute for reality?&quot;

Really?  That&#039;s the argument you&#039;re going to go with?  Just a question, how often is Batman naked or used as a sex toy in a Batman comic?  Just how many 12 year old girls do you think are reading Tarot?  I hope now you&#039;ve seen the ridiculousness of that argument.

As for why are a large number of women buying it...newsflash...women like porn just as much as men do.  That doesn&#039;t make it empowering, though.  Honestly, the most empowering form of porm in existence is probably slash fanfiction writing where women can get together and objectify men&#039;s bodies similarly to the way that men do women&#039;s bodies.

Of course, slash makes most men uncomfortable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew said: " You criticize Balent for drawing physically â€˜idealizedâ€™ women as role models, but how is that any different than, say, a 12-year old boy reading Batman and using him as a role model or substitute for reality?"</p>
<p>Really?  That's the argument you're going to go with?  Just a question, how often is Batman naked or used as a sex toy in a Batman comic?  Just how many 12 year old girls do you think are reading Tarot?  I hope now you've seen the ridiculousness of that argument.</p>
<p>As for why are a large number of women buying it...newsflash...women like porn just as much as men do.  That doesn't make it empowering, though.  Honestly, the most empowering form of porm in existence is probably slash fanfiction writing where women can get together and objectify men's bodies similarly to the way that men do women's bodies.</p>
<p>Of course, slash makes most men uncomfortable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Billy Doyle</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/05/31/what-i-bought-29-may-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-664603</link>
		<dc:creator>Billy Doyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 13:18:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=16932#comment-664603</guid>
		<description>I take offense at your view of Tarot, liking it does not make me a pervert!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I take offense at your view of Tarot, liking it does not make me a pervert!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wwk5d</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/05/31/what-i-bought-29-may-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-664590</link>
		<dc:creator>wwk5d</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 04:32:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=16932#comment-664590</guid>
		<description>I like Legacy. Yeah, it&#039;s aimed at the hardcore fan, but it&#039;s still enjoyable. Carey really has a good feel for the characters, and he does write them well. Yeah, there is a lot of continuity, and it can be hard for newer or casual X-fans to get all of the flashbacks (I mean, this guy is referencing the late 90s Alan Davis stuff). If nothing else, I see him and Brubaker just arranging the pieces for the new status that will be appearing soon when they all move to you-know-where. At least, that&#039;s how I see it. And I would love for him to stay once that new status-quo is established. Then again, I keep praying for someone to come along and reverse &#039;Decimation&#039; as well...

Tony Daniel has come a long way. Is he the best artist around now? Not quite, but he is a consistent, solid story teller. Let&#039;s just be glad his art doesn&#039;t look anything like his X-Force days ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like Legacy. Yeah, it's aimed at the hardcore fan, but it's still enjoyable. Carey really has a good feel for the characters, and he does write them well. Yeah, there is a lot of continuity, and it can be hard for newer or casual X-fans to get all of the flashbacks (I mean, this guy is referencing the late 90s Alan Davis stuff). If nothing else, I see him and Brubaker just arranging the pieces for the new status that will be appearing soon when they all move to you-know-where. At least, that's how I see it. And I would love for him to stay once that new status-quo is established. Then again, I keep praying for someone to come along and reverse 'Decimation' as well...</p>
<p>Tony Daniel has come a long way. Is he the best artist around now? Not quite, but he is a consistent, solid story teller. Let's just be glad his art doesn't look anything like his X-Force days <img src='http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FunkyGreenJerusalem</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/05/31/what-i-bought-29-may-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-664578</link>
		<dc:creator>FunkyGreenJerusalem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 01:47:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=16932#comment-664578</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Youâ€™re certainly correct that â€œfemale empowermentâ€ is an extremely subjective thing. If women gain empowerment from Tarot, thatâ€™s fine with me. I get a bit depressed that these days, in all media, â€œfemale empowermentâ€ has to do with women objectifying themselves before men can. Itâ€™s just my opinion, I know, but that saddens me.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I was the same with those Charlie&#039;s Angels films.
Now I only saw a part of the first one, but for a film being advertised as &#039;girl power&#039; all I saw was a lot of girls in tight revealing clothes having a camera linger on their breasts and buttocks.
If that&#039;s what &#039;girl power&#039; is cool (actually I think that&#039;s sad, but if they&#039;re happy doing that, I&#039;m happy to watch it), but I couldn&#039;t see any difference between that and Corman exploitation flicks, or even from the tamer Russ Myer films.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Youâ€™re certainly correct that â€œfemale empowermentâ€ is an extremely subjective thing. If women gain empowerment from Tarot, thatâ€™s fine with me. I get a bit depressed that these days, in all media, â€œfemale empowermentâ€ has to do with women objectifying themselves before men can. Itâ€™s just my opinion, I know, but that saddens me.</p></blockquote>
<p>I was the same with those Charlie's Angels films.<br />
Now I only saw a part of the first one, but for a film being advertised as 'girl power' all I saw was a lot of girls in tight revealing clothes having a camera linger on their breasts and buttocks.<br />
If that's what 'girl power' is cool (actually I think that's sad, but if they're happy doing that, I'm happy to watch it), but I couldn't see any difference between that and Corman exploitation flicks, or even from the tamer Russ Myer films.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/05/31/what-i-bought-29-may-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-664569</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 00:21:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=16932#comment-664569</guid>
		<description>Oh, and Greg H, to answer your question re: Tarot: The women you see basically have the same fetishes and issues as Balent. Yes, they exist, and they are scary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and Greg H, to answer your question re: Tarot: The women you see basically have the same fetishes and issues as Balent. Yes, they exist, and they are scary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Burgas</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/05/31/what-i-bought-29-may-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-664561</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Burgas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 22:46:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=16932#comment-664561</guid>
		<description>He&#039;s done a LOT less charity work in recent years, T.  I always liked the fact that he had a foundation and was doing stuff in the community.  That&#039;s a part of his life that DC has ignored for far too long (except, I suppose, during the earthquake, and even then it was limited) and if writers were to bring that back a bit, I think they would allay some of the criticism of what Bruce does with his money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He's done a LOT less charity work in recent years, T.  I always liked the fact that he had a foundation and was doing stuff in the community.  That's a part of his life that DC has ignored for far too long (except, I suppose, during the earthquake, and even then it was limited) and if writers were to bring that back a bit, I think they would allay some of the criticism of what Bruce does with his money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T.</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/05/31/what-i-bought-29-may-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-664560</link>
		<dc:creator>T.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 22:44:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=16932#comment-664560</guid>
		<description>Bruce Waynes uses his money to fund his war on crime and he&#039;s also shown doing a TON pf philanthropy.  He&#039;s always setting up some fund, cutting a ribbon at some new charity he set up or donating things to the less fortunate.  So between his crime fighting and his philanthropy, what positive use of his money is DC ignoring?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bruce Waynes uses his money to fund his war on crime and he's also shown doing a TON pf philanthropy.  He's always setting up some fund, cutting a ribbon at some new charity he set up or donating things to the less fortunate.  So between his crime fighting and his philanthropy, what positive use of his money is DC ignoring?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Birmy</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/05/31/what-i-bought-29-may-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-664555</link>
		<dc:creator>Birmy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 21:39:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=16932#comment-664555</guid>
		<description>&quot;Martinique Jason is Mastermind II and appeared during Joe Caseyâ€™s run on Uncanny, in the really bad X-corps story.&quot;

Actually, that was the only storyline of Casey&#039;s brief run that I thought actually worked.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"Martinique Jason is Mastermind II and appeared during Joe Caseyâ€™s run on Uncanny, in the really bad X-corps story."</p>
<p>Actually, that was the only storyline of Casey's brief run that I thought actually worked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stefan</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/05/31/what-i-bought-29-may-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-664554</link>
		<dc:creator>Stefan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 20:20:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=16932#comment-664554</guid>
		<description>Legacy started slowly, and yes, no matter how much you like it, you&#039;re going to like it more if you&#039;re an X-Men fan.  It&#039;s not a first-time-reader book.  What it is, instead, is a most remarkable payoff for a multitude of fans who&#039;ve been spending their hard-earned cash on X-books for decades.  He&#039;s bringing it all together.  It&#039;s not about continuity.  It&#039;s about drawing from all the disparate elements at work in the storyworld and bringing them into an integrated vision.  And it&#039;s not just about the X-Men either.  Carey&#039;s one of the deepest writers in comics and he&#039;s got the most powerful telepath in the world to play with.  cool, huh?

Only the first arc was set mostly in the past, and at the end of it Xavier decided he&#039;s not the same person hewas before, so while the past continues to inform his story, he&#039;s searching for a new direction.
We&#039;re five issues in now and it&#039;s gotten stronger with each step.  The second issue was better than the first, and the third (210) was the first truly wonderful one.  With 211 I got the point where I was enjoying it even more than I was before the title-change.

That&#039;s my two cents worth, Greg.  Pick up 211 &amp; 212, parts one and two of the present arc -- or even just the first one if you&#039;re skeptical -- and give it another shot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Legacy started slowly, and yes, no matter how much you like it, you're going to like it more if you're an X-Men fan.  It's not a first-time-reader book.  What it is, instead, is a most remarkable payoff for a multitude of fans who've been spending their hard-earned cash on X-books for decades.  He's bringing it all together.  It's not about continuity.  It's about drawing from all the disparate elements at work in the storyworld and bringing them into an integrated vision.  And it's not just about the X-Men either.  Carey's one of the deepest writers in comics and he's got the most powerful telepath in the world to play with.  cool, huh?</p>
<p>Only the first arc was set mostly in the past, and at the end of it Xavier decided he's not the same person hewas before, so while the past continues to inform his story, he's searching for a new direction.<br />
We're five issues in now and it's gotten stronger with each step.  The second issue was better than the first, and the third (210) was the first truly wonderful one.  With 211 I got the point where I was enjoying it even more than I was before the title-change.</p>
<p>That's my two cents worth, Greg.  Pick up 211 &amp; 212, parts one and two of the present arc -- or even just the first one if you're skeptical -- and give it another shot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
