<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Comic Book Urban Legends Revealed #161</title>
	<atom:link href="http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/06/26/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-161/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/06/26/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-161/</link>
	<description>Comic Book Resources Presents... Comics Should Be Good!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:27:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Cronin</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/06/26/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-161/comment-page-1/#comment-850410</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Cronin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 05:12:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=17426#comment-850410</guid>
		<description>The difference is so slight it seems pretty easy to believe Claremont just either misheard the &quot;Dancer&quot; part of misstated it 15 years later at the panel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The difference is so slight it seems pretty easy to believe Claremont just either misheard the &#8220;Dancer&#8221; part of misstated it 15 years later at the panel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/06/26/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-161/comment-page-1/#comment-850408</link>
		<dc:creator>D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 05:06:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=17426#comment-850408</guid>
		<description>I was in a panel with Claremont once in 1995ish. He claimed that Dazzler was brought to him as a character called &quot;Disco Dancer&quot;. He said he told the hire-ups there was no way in hell he was going to be involved in a character with that name. I also asked Shooter. He said the name &quot;Disco Dancer&quot; was never one of the choices, only &quot;Disco Dazzler&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was in a panel with Claremont once in 1995ish. He claimed that Dazzler was brought to him as a character called &#8220;Disco Dancer&#8221;. He said he told the hire-ups there was no way in hell he was going to be involved in a character with that name. I also asked Shooter. He said the name &#8220;Disco Dancer&#8221; was never one of the choices, only &#8220;Disco Dazzler&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blog@Newsarama &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Keeping It In The Family: The X-Factor We Never Saw</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/06/26/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-161/comment-page-1/#comment-847250</link>
		<dc:creator>Blog@Newsarama &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Keeping It In The Family: The X-Factor We Never Saw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 16:18:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=17426#comment-847250</guid>
		<description>[...] of the book than the one that actually saw print (Admittedly, I&#8217;d really have rather read the version that had Dazzler in the team, but that&#8217;s just my bias for roller-skating disco divas coming out). Think of all the angst [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of the book than the one that actually saw print (Admittedly, I&#8217;d really have rather read the version that had Dazzler in the team, but that&#8217;s just my bias for roller-skating disco divas coming out). Think of all the angst [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Godel x Uzumeri #7: Debut of a Disco Dazzler (X-Men 125-131) &#171; Kangarat Murder Society</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/06/26/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-161/comment-page-1/#comment-832286</link>
		<dc:creator>Godel x Uzumeri #7: Debut of a Disco Dazzler (X-Men 125-131) &#171; Kangarat Murder Society</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2011 03:57:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=17426#comment-832286</guid>
		<description>[...] have featured Cher, Donna Summer, KISS, the Village People, and Robin Williams. You can read more here &#8211; but I think for our purposes what you see in this comic is what you [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] have featured Cher, Donna Summer, KISS, the Village People, and Robin Williams. You can read more here &#8211; but I think for our purposes what you see in this comic is what you [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zatoichi</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/06/26/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-161/comment-page-1/#comment-803877</link>
		<dc:creator>Zatoichi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2010 14:32:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=17426#comment-803877</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m way late but who cares.  Claremont and Byrne were critical of Dazzler as seen in her appearance in X-Men 130.  She was out of place in 1980, an anachronism.  Music had moved into punk/new wave.  Dazzler on the other hand was so 70s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m way late but who cares.  Claremont and Byrne were critical of Dazzler as seen in her appearance in X-Men 130.  She was out of place in 1980, an anachronism.  Music had moved into punk/new wave.  Dazzler on the other hand was so 70s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Comics Should Be Good! @ Comic Book Resources &#187; Comic Book Legends Revealed #204</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/06/26/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-161/comment-page-1/#comment-716858</link>
		<dc:creator>Comics Should Be Good! @ Comic Book Resources &#187; Comic Book Legends Revealed #204</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 11:44:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=17426#comment-716858</guid>
		<description>[...] scratched our first story idea and shifted creative gears to tell the return of Jean Grey [See this Comic Book Legend installment to get a view of who the original fifth member of X-Factor was going to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] scratched our first story idea and shifted creative gears to tell the return of Jean Grey [See this Comic Book Legend installment to get a view of who the original fifth member of X-Factor was going to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Comics Should Be Good! @ Comic Book Resources &#187; Comic Book Legends Revealed #201</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/06/26/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-161/comment-page-1/#comment-713833</link>
		<dc:creator>Comics Should Be Good! @ Comic Book Resources &#187; Comic Book Legends Revealed #201</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 14:24:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=17426#comment-713833</guid>
		<description>[...] and John Byrne, for instance, had nothing to do with the creation of Dazzler (as discussed in this installment of Comic Book Legends Revealed), yet Uncanny X-Men #130 was the first printed appearance of the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and John Byrne, for instance, had nothing to do with the creation of Dazzler (as discussed in this installment of Comic Book Legends Revealed), yet Uncanny X-Men #130 was the first printed appearance of the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Desert Son</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/06/26/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-161/comment-page-1/#comment-673988</link>
		<dc:creator>Desert Son</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 22:39:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=17426#comment-673988</guid>
		<description>So Spider-Woman has breast implants.  Women DO get those, y&#039;know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So Spider-Woman has breast implants.  Women DO get those, y&#8217;know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Comics Should Be Good! &#187; That X-Factor Cover I was talking about&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/06/26/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-161/comment-page-1/#comment-668391</link>
		<dc:creator>Comics Should Be Good! &#187; That X-Factor Cover I was talking about&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 12:23:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=17426#comment-668391</guid>
		<description>[...] this past week&#8217;s Comic Book Urban Legends Revealed, courtesy of reader PJ Perez, who scanned it from an issue of Marvel Age (click to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] this past week&#8217;s Comic Book Urban Legends Revealed, courtesy of reader PJ Perez, who scanned it from an issue of Marvel Age (click to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ozwell</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/06/26/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-161/comment-page-1/#comment-668089</link>
		<dc:creator>Ozwell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 06:29:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=17426#comment-668089</guid>
		<description>Wow. 
Twenty years on and there&#039;s still so much of the Dazzler story to tell!
I can appreciate that Marvel has had some ups and downs with the character, but she still has quite a fanbase for a character who regularly makes those &quot;worst of&quot; lists.  I hope that the Essential trade is doing well.  
A year or two back I sent Marvel a proposal for a Dazzler mini - I know, I know. Marvel is doing fine without my help ; )
I haven&#039;t been following the X books lately - has Dazz been a victim of the current mutant cull? Or is she still safely below the radar?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow.<br />
Twenty years on and there&#8217;s still so much of the Dazzler story to tell!<br />
I can appreciate that Marvel has had some ups and downs with the character, but she still has quite a fanbase for a character who regularly makes those &#8220;worst of&#8221; lists.  I hope that the Essential trade is doing well.<br />
A year or two back I sent Marvel a proposal for a Dazzler mini &#8211; I know, I know. Marvel is doing fine without my help ; )<br />
I haven&#8217;t been following the X books lately &#8211; has Dazz been a victim of the current mutant cull? Or is she still safely below the radar?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian from Canada</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/06/26/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-161/comment-page-1/#comment-668035</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian from Canada</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 19:32:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=17426#comment-668035</guid>
		<description>Put me down as another person who&#039;d love to see that script somewhere â€” heck, if Twomorrows put it in a Dazzler Companion book I&#039;d be sure to buy it!

As for it coming from Shooterâ€¦ I know the man&#039;s got a harsh reputation, but this just reinforces how much I think he actually respects the fans and readers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Put me down as another person who&#8217;d love to see that script somewhere â€” heck, if Twomorrows put it in a Dazzler Companion book I&#8217;d be sure to buy it!</p>
<p>As for it coming from Shooterâ€¦ I know the man&#8217;s got a harsh reputation, but this just reinforces how much I think he actually respects the fans and readers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kamino Neko</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/06/26/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-161/comment-page-1/#comment-668030</link>
		<dc:creator>Kamino Neko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 17:56:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=17426#comment-668030</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Man, I would love to have seen what Ellison would have come up with as a four-day Dazzler treatment.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Heh, knowing Ellison, he&#039;d have waited 3 days to respond then sent a note saying &#039;F--- you, Shooter&#039;.

The resulting one-day treatment from Shooter would have been interesting, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Man, I would love to have seen what Ellison would have come up with as a four-day Dazzler treatment.</p></blockquote>
<p>Heh, knowing Ellison, he&#8217;d have waited 3 days to respond then sent a note saying &#8216;F&#8212; you, Shooter&#8217;.</p>
<p>The resulting one-day treatment from Shooter would have been interesting, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Means &#187; Blog Archive &#187; links for 2008-06-28</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/06/26/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-161/comment-page-1/#comment-668025</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Means &#187; Blog Archive &#187; links for 2008-06-28</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 17:33:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=17426#comment-668025</guid>
		<description>[...] Comics Should Be Good! Â» Comic Book Urban Legends Revealed #161 Dazzler themed. Deal with it. (tags: comics) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Comics Should Be Good! Â» Comic Book Urban Legends Revealed #161 Dazzler themed. Deal with it. (tags: comics) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Atkinson</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/06/26/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-161/comment-page-1/#comment-667944</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Atkinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 01:10:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=17426#comment-667944</guid>
		<description>&quot;Busiek wrote an introduction to a trade paperback where he admitted it. I kind of remember reading the intro and thinking, â€œThis is an odd place to bring this up,â€ so I donâ€™t think it was in an intro to a TPB that reprinted those early issues (does one of those even exist?)&quot;

It was the &quot;X-Men: Phoenix Rising&quot; TPB, which reprinted the Avengers issue where they found the energy cocoon, the FF issue where they open it up, and X-Factor #1.

&quot;I seem to recall that it wasnâ€™t so much that Busiek pitched the idea so much as he wrote an angry letter after her death in which he stated that something like that was the only way to justify her actions.&quot;

According to his introduction, it was an idea he came up with in response to hearing that the only way Jim Shooter would allow her back was if she could somehow not be responsible for genocide.  Busiek didn&#039;t actually pitch the idea so much as mention it to people  through whom it made its way to Marvel, IIRC.

&quot;So yeah, itâ€™s no surprise you found that tidbit on the Dazzler page. And itâ€™ll probably be there and enforced by some power-tripping Admin for the next decade.&quot;

Actually, it was fixed in March 2005 and hasn&#039;t been put back since.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Busiek wrote an introduction to a trade paperback where he admitted it. I kind of remember reading the intro and thinking, â€œThis is an odd place to bring this up,â€ so I donâ€™t think it was in an intro to a TPB that reprinted those early issues (does one of those even exist?)&#8221;</p>
<p>It was the &#8220;X-Men: Phoenix Rising&#8221; TPB, which reprinted the Avengers issue where they found the energy cocoon, the FF issue where they open it up, and X-Factor #1.</p>
<p>&#8220;I seem to recall that it wasnâ€™t so much that Busiek pitched the idea so much as he wrote an angry letter after her death in which he stated that something like that was the only way to justify her actions.&#8221;</p>
<p>According to his introduction, it was an idea he came up with in response to hearing that the only way Jim Shooter would allow her back was if she could somehow not be responsible for genocide.  Busiek didn&#8217;t actually pitch the idea so much as mention it to people  through whom it made its way to Marvel, IIRC.</p>
<p>&#8220;So yeah, itâ€™s no surprise you found that tidbit on the Dazzler page. And itâ€™ll probably be there and enforced by some power-tripping Admin for the next decade.&#8221;</p>
<p>Actually, it was fixed in March 2005 and hasn&#8217;t been put back since.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OM</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/06/26/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-161/comment-page-1/#comment-667938</link>
		<dc:creator>OM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 00:06:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=17426#comment-667938</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;&quot;In fact, just recently, Wikipedia had Claremont and Byrne down as the co-creators of Dazzler.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

...The problem is that most Wikipedia articles that are genre-based - Comic Books, TV Shows, Movies, Music - tend to get taken over by little &quot;cabals&quot; of teen punks who band together to get one or more of their little clique awarded Admin rights, and then abuse those rights to force total control over those articles and prevent outsiders from making positive contributions and/or make corrections. The outsiders find their changes reverted, and if/when they complain about it, the group&#039;s admin shows up, defends the reverts, and usually bans the outsider from Wikipedia - especially if the outsider has *not* vandalized the article, but has improved its accuracy. Then, after the flack has died down, one of the &quot;cabal&quot; will go back and make the correction and claim the credit for it - especially on their User Page.

...It&#039;s why I don&#039;t contribute to Wikipedia either in knowledge or money, and I&#039;ve let Jimbo Wales know this. Granted, he&#039;s vowed to look into it, but so much of it is going on that it would take a complete elimination of all Admins and recruiting new ones that it&#039;s just not going to happen. Until some solution is found - say, banning anyone under the age of 18, especially if they go to schools in Englandland - it&#039;s going to be a classic tragic case of the inmates running the asylum, and a blow to the credibility of Wikipedia.

So yeah, it&#039;s no surprise you found that tidbit on the &lt;I&gt;Dazzler&lt;/i&gt; page. And it&#039;ll probably be there and enforced by some power-tripping Admin for the next decade. Especially if Jim Shooter himself makes the correction, because they&#039;ll hide behind both the &quot;Original Research&quot; and &quot;Citation Needed&quot; excuses...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8220;In fact, just recently, Wikipedia had Claremont and Byrne down as the co-creators of Dazzler.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>&#8230;The problem is that most Wikipedia articles that are genre-based &#8211; Comic Books, TV Shows, Movies, Music &#8211; tend to get taken over by little &#8220;cabals&#8221; of teen punks who band together to get one or more of their little clique awarded Admin rights, and then abuse those rights to force total control over those articles and prevent outsiders from making positive contributions and/or make corrections. The outsiders find their changes reverted, and if/when they complain about it, the group&#8217;s admin shows up, defends the reverts, and usually bans the outsider from Wikipedia &#8211; especially if the outsider has *not* vandalized the article, but has improved its accuracy. Then, after the flack has died down, one of the &#8220;cabal&#8221; will go back and make the correction and claim the credit for it &#8211; especially on their User Page.</p>
<p>&#8230;It&#8217;s why I don&#8217;t contribute to Wikipedia either in knowledge or money, and I&#8217;ve let Jimbo Wales know this. Granted, he&#8217;s vowed to look into it, but so much of it is going on that it would take a complete elimination of all Admins and recruiting new ones that it&#8217;s just not going to happen. Until some solution is found &#8211; say, banning anyone under the age of 18, especially if they go to schools in Englandland &#8211; it&#8217;s going to be a classic tragic case of the inmates running the asylum, and a blow to the credibility of Wikipedia.</p>
<p>So yeah, it&#8217;s no surprise you found that tidbit on the <i>Dazzler</i> page. And it&#8217;ll probably be there and enforced by some power-tripping Admin for the next decade. Especially if Jim Shooter himself makes the correction, because they&#8217;ll hide behind both the &#8220;Original Research&#8221; and &#8220;Citation Needed&#8221; excuses&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Apodaca</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/06/26/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-161/comment-page-1/#comment-667927</link>
		<dc:creator>Apodaca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 22:41:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=17426#comment-667927</guid>
		<description>Just checked Wikipedia, the mini was Spider-Woman: Origin by Bendis and the Luna Brothers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just checked Wikipedia, the mini was Spider-Woman: Origin by Bendis and the Luna Brothers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Bird</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/06/26/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-161/comment-page-1/#comment-667920</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Bird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 20:49:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=17426#comment-667920</guid>
		<description>Yeah, that angry letter from young fan Busiek was printed in... issue #144, maybe?  Somewhere right around there.  

Great story, Brian.  We demand the Dazzler treatment!

IIRC, on the Superman: The Movie DVD, they talk about the bizarre early drafts which were floating around, and someone mentions that in one of them, Superman would fly around saying hello to people like Telly Savalas in character as Kojak.  Again, I assume, this was a &quot;shared talent pool&quot; issue.  

John Derek, coked to the gills, trying to struggle through She-Hulk #1.  Does it get any better than that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, that angry letter from young fan Busiek was printed in&#8230; issue #144, maybe?  Somewhere right around there.  </p>
<p>Great story, Brian.  We demand the Dazzler treatment!</p>
<p>IIRC, on the Superman: The Movie DVD, they talk about the bizarre early drafts which were floating around, and someone mentions that in one of them, Superman would fly around saying hello to people like Telly Savalas in character as Kojak.  Again, I assume, this was a &#8220;shared talent pool&#8221; issue.  </p>
<p>John Derek, coked to the gills, trying to struggle through She-Hulk #1.  Does it get any better than that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Apodaca</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/06/26/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-161/comment-page-1/#comment-667918</link>
		<dc:creator>Apodaca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 20:35:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=17426#comment-667918</guid>
		<description>I believe the inclusion of the breast implants was an in-joke by the artist (Either Cho or a Dodson), in reference to their predilection towards fake-looking breasts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe the inclusion of the breast implants was an in-joke by the artist (Either Cho or a Dodson), in reference to their predilection towards fake-looking breasts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dalarsco</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/06/26/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-161/comment-page-1/#comment-667916</link>
		<dc:creator>Dalarsco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 20:30:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=17426#comment-667916</guid>
		<description>Worse?!  Sgt. Pepper kicks ass, and Dazzler would have kicked even more ass for pure weirdness.
And I think Layton is slightly incorrect about how Jean Grey came back.  I seem to recall that it wasn&#039;t so much that Busiek pitched the idea so much as he wrote an angry letter after her death in which he stated that something like that was the only way to justify her actions.  Sadly I can&#039;t confirm this because I don&#039;t remember the issue it was printed in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Worse?!  Sgt. Pepper kicks ass, and Dazzler would have kicked even more ass for pure weirdness.<br />
And I think Layton is slightly incorrect about how Jean Grey came back.  I seem to recall that it wasn&#8217;t so much that Busiek pitched the idea so much as he wrote an angry letter after her death in which he stated that something like that was the only way to justify her actions.  Sadly I can&#8217;t confirm this because I don&#8217;t remember the issue it was printed in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hoosier X</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/06/26/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-161/comment-page-1/#comment-667915</link>
		<dc:creator>Hoosier X</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 20:16:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=17426#comment-667915</guid>
		<description>I just saw &quot;The Apple&quot; from 1980, and I can&#039;t help but think that the Dazzler movie described here would have been much like that fascinating film.

&quot;The Apple&quot; is to musicals what &quot;Frankenstein Island&quot; is to horror films.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just saw &#8220;The Apple&#8221; from 1980, and I can&#8217;t help but think that the Dazzler movie described here would have been much like that fascinating film.</p>
<p>&#8220;The Apple&#8221; is to musicals what &#8220;Frankenstein Island&#8221; is to horror films.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

