web stats

CSBG Archive

Great JMS Interview

Robert Taylor has the first part of his Reflections interview with J. Michael Straczynski up, and it’s quite an engrossing read, with most of it having to do with Straczynski’s current movie work.

Perhaps particularly of note to readers are Straczynski’s thoughts on Marvel (and Joe Quesada specifically):

When I’m left to my own devices, I can do what I feel is a competent job. When I start to get mandates and edicts written into my ear and am suddenly being pulled into events and crossovers and being yanked one way or the other, I don’t do my best work because I can feel the hand on my shoulder. Cases like those are the low point moments.

To credit Marvel and [Editor-in-Chief] Joe [Quesada] and [Publisher] Dan [Buckley], every so often, everyone runs into a bump with those above in the creative food chain. As executive producer I would have to step in with writers working below me and tell them something had to be done a certain way, and we would argue, but in the end I had the pointy hat and I won. At Marvel, I have to respect that, at the end of the day, they have the pointy hat. When we disagree, it is because we care passionately about what we are working on. No one cares more about Spider-Man than Joe Quesada. He has strong ideas, I have strong ideas, and sometimes they run into each other. But anyone who says anything negative about Joe Quesada has to go through me first. I say that sincerely. I’m sure the writers under me said that when we argued and they were overridden were their low points. Ultimately, it comes down to the person at the top of the ladder making the tough decisions. Fans can yell about Joe and Dan, but he turned that company around from a company that was bankrupt to something of value. People tend to forget that.

9 Comments

I don’t think anyone forgets what Quesada did for Marvel in the beginning of his tenure. It’s just vastly overshadowed by the work he’s done since to erase that progress.

Except that Quesada is still, you know, making lots of money for Marvel. People seem to keep forgetting that part…

Really? I haven’t seen anyone accusing him of causing financial damage to the company.

And do any fans really care if he’s making the company rich? Their main concern is the product.

“Fans can yell about Joe and Dan, but he turned that company around from a company that was bankrupt to something of value.”

No. Wrong. Absolutely wrong. The Spider-Man movie turned Marvel around. Quesada had nothing to do with the movie.

And this is not an anti-Joe statement by me. Nor is it about the quality of the books done by Marvel. It is simply untrue that Quesada turned around the bankruptcy.

“And do any fans really care if he’s making the company rich? Their main concern is the product.”

But that’s the difference between fans and business. Quesada’s #1 job is to make sure Marvel makes as much money as possible. His #2 job is to make sure his company is putting out quality stories that fans will enjoy.

And if the whole “magic divorce” deal ends up making the Spidey books sell more in the long run (and frankly, it seems like it has so far), then Quesada has done his job. Sure, it makes no sense from a story standpoint and fans can say that they know 150 ways that THEY’VE would’ve done it better, but in the long run its a business decision. Fan goodwill is a good thing and can certainly help sales, but as Mark Waid recently pointed out fans as a whole frequently claim they want a book that is fun and has little to do with company crossovers, yet Brave & the Bold has underperformed.

I can’t believe I’m about to say this, but…

Didn’t “the turn around” occur during the Bill Jemas era?

In any case, the real credit should go to Avi Arad and Ike Perlmutter. They are the reason Marvel Entertainment Group is financially sound and profitable.

The Publishing arm is making money, sure… but it’s mostly due to increased prices. The way I see it, the market base is still shrinking.

Maybe one of you future MBA’s can set me straight…

When there is a consistent decline in the consumer base , is it still called “negative growth”? …a question mark? …a dog?

Except that Quesada is still, you know, making lots of money for Marvel. People seem to keep forgetting that part

And I’m sure Marvel are deeply grateful for that but why should the fans be? Speaking as fan I will always take books I enjoy over ones which make more money simply because while I am reading the book, I’m not getting the money.

Peope who knock Queseda (and I’m not one for the record) do it because they find the books released under his reign less enjoyable then they could be. How does the fact that he’s making money for a bunch of people they don’t know change that? I think people are confusing criticism of Quesada’s artistic talents (if such a word can be applied to editing) with criticism of his ability to do his job. The fact that he’s effective at making money for his empoyers shouldn’t exempt him from criticism over the quality of the products he releases.

FunkyGreenJerusalem

June 29, 2008 at 7:02 pm

Fan goodwill is a good thing and can certainly help sales, but as Mark Waid recently pointed out fans as a whole frequently claim they want a book that is fun and has little to do with company crossovers, yet Brave & the Bold has underperformed.

So it’s not that he’s writing a book that isn’t as good as it could be?

I haven’t read it, doesn’t sound like my thing – although I do like Mark Waid as a writer – but I’m sick of creators and companies going ‘You all say you want ‘X’ but when we gave you ‘Book Y’ you didn’t like it, so you obviously don’t really want ‘X’.
It’s a stupid argument – for example, Marvel saying there’s no money in books aimed at girls, because ‘Trouble’ didn’t sell… that didn’t prove there was no market for girls, it just proves that Trouble was a piece of shit.

Perhaps it’s because I stayed away from each and every “mainstream” book after slogging through the Clone Saga as a child, but what regime at Marvel has produced BETTER stories than Quesada has as a whole? For all the shit he gets because of One More Day (which I think is totally justified), I think he’s done a superb job compared to basically every other era of Marvel. He’s even showed that he can make major changes when he needs to — for example, most of the books under his tenure did away with thought balloons, presumably to give the books a more mature feel, yet arguably their flagship superhero title — Amazing Spider-Man — is filled with the things, now. I think he’s good at figuring out when to do what, without picking up too many crazy crusades beyond his apparent hatred for Mary Jane and Peter Parker as a couple. Obviously, he can do better, but considering the recent past, he’s really doing a fantastic job.

Leave a Comment

 

Categories

Review Copies

Comics Should Be Good accepts review copies. Anything sent to us will (for better or for worse) end up reviewed on the blog. See where to send the review copies.

Browse the Archives