web stats

CSBG Archive

Comics You Should Own – Hellblazer #41-50; 52-83

Why don’t we take a look at a somewhat problematic but still worthy run by a Mister Ennis, shall we?

Hellblazer by Garth Ennis (writer), Will Simpson (penciller, issues #41-47, 50, 52-55, 59-61, 75), Mike Hoffman (penciller, issue #48), Steve Dillon (artist, issues #49, 57-58, 62-76, 78-83, Special #1), David Lloyd (artist/colorist, issue #56), Peter Snejbjerg (artist, issue #77), Mark Pennington (inker, issues #41-42, 46), Malcolm Jones III (inker, issues #43), Tom Sutton (inker, issues #44-45), Mark McKenna (inker, issues #46-), Kim DeMulder (inker, issues #46, 59-60), Stan Woch (inker, issues #46-48), Mike Barreiro (inker, issue #59-61), Tom Ziuko (colorist, issues #41-50, 52-55, 57, 59-69, 71-83, Special #1), Daniel Vozzo (colorist, issue #58), Stuart Chaifetz (colorist, issue #70, 75), Gaspar (letterer, issues #41-50, 52-55, 57-66, 68-71, 73-74, Special #1), Elitta Fell (letterer, issue #56), Todd Klein (letterer, issue #67), and Clem Robins (letterer, issue #72, 75-83).

DC/Vertigo, 43 issues (#41-50, 51-83, and Hellblazer Special #1, which comes between issues #71 and 72), cover dated May 1991-November 1994.

As usual, SPOILERS play a large part of this post. Be warned!

When I wrote about the Top 100 runs, I claimed I would put Ennis’s run on Hellblazer above Preacher. Now that I’ve re-read his run on Hellblazer, I may have to retract that statement. Of course, I’ll have to see how I feel about Preacher once I get to it.

It’s not that I don’t like this run. I think they are Comics You Should Own, after all. But there are problems with the run, and they make this, instead of a truly great comic, more of a comic that is far more interesting to read in order to dissect it and what’s wrong and right with it. It’s certainly “better” than several comics I’ve looked at in this column, but its ambitions are also much higher, and therefore we must hold it to that standard.

Ennis was 21 (!) when his first issue on this title came out, and that’s part of the problem. This is a young man’s comic masquerading as a more mature work. I often have an issue with older people trying to write young people and teenagers and failing miserably, but Ennis goes the opposite way. His John Constantine, who turns 40 in the middle of the run (and that issue, interestingly enough, acts as a moral fulcrum for the run), is written oddly, as if he’s desperate to be taken seriously but is often caught prancing around playing dress-up, because he’s so immature. This is true when Ennis wants it to do it deliberately, as he often does (Constantine is immature, which is part of what makes him so charming), but it also comes through in the heavy-handed writing style and when Ennis wants to write “mature” adults. Ironically, the only times he really does a good job with portraying adults is when he writes certain women, Kit Ryan included. It’s this difficulty with Constantine – both deliberate and accidental – that makes much of this series tough to swallow. We’re never supposed to really like John, after all, because he is, as he often narrates, the kind of person who leaves his friends to die. But in much of this run, we not only dislike John but find him ridiculous, and we get the distinct feeling that Ennis wasn’t going for that.

Part of the problem is that Ennis is torn between writing straight horror, a cultural critique, and an examination of friendship. He is very good at quiet moments between people who care about each other but can’t necessarily get along, as he shows in later works. In Hellblazer, he began that tradition, and those are the best issues or moments in the run. Ennis tends to overdo the drinking in this comic without really pointing out that Constantine is an alcoholic, but when his characters sit down and talk, it’s often brilliant, because the people speak like real people without falling into Bendis-like stuttering. He starts this early on, as in issue #42 John visits Brendan Finn, who is drinking himself to death. This is part of Ennis’s first story arc, “Dangerous Habits,” the famous one in which John finds out he’s dying of lung cancer. In #42, John figures out a way to cheat the Devil of Brendan’s soul (Brendan having sold his soul to amass the greatest collection of alcohol ever), earning him the enmity of that particular evil entity and shaping the run in general, as Satan schemes to figure out a way to take John to Hell (especially after John cheats him of his own soul in issue #45). Before the confrontation with Satan, though, John and Brendan talk about their lives and the choices they’ve made. Brendan, interestingly enough, becomes a key figure in John’s life, even though he’s dead early on. He shows up later as a ghost, and we also get a flashback to when John first met Kit, back when she was with Brendan. This kind of issue, where John talks to friends of his (and issue #70, “Heartland,” which doesn’t feature John at all, instead showing Kit back in Belfast getting re-integrated into her world), make us realize what an excellent writer Ennis is. It’s very hard to make conversations in comics compelling, but Ennis manages it.

Hellblazer is a horror comic, though, so Ennis can’t simply write stories about John and the way he grows up throughout the run. His plots, for the most part, are excellent. The way they play out aren’t always, but the premise of the run and the individual plots are superb. Let’s break them down quickly:
Issues #41-46: “Dangerous Habits.” John finds out he has lung cancer from smoking all those Silk Cut for so many years, and he doesn’t want to die, naturally. So he concocts a brilliant scheme in which he sells his soul to two different demons even though Satan already has a claim on it. With three competing claims, the demons have no choice but to heal his disease and keep him alive, lest a war in Hell erupt.
Issues #47-48: A two-part ghost story in which deceased pub owners take some nasty revenge on those who killed them.
Issue #49: The Christmas issue, an odd cross-”Vertigo” theme for that month (Vertigo didn’t exist yet, but Swamp Thing, Doom Patrol, and Shade all had Christmas-themed issues). Ennis introduced the Lord of the Dance, a pre-Christian deity who’s bummed out because no one drinks anymore. Well, until John shows him differently.
Issue #50: John meets the King of the Vampires. An almost perfect example of the best and worst of the run, as the execution is very clever, but the writing is often overwrought.
Issues #52-55: “Royal Blood.” After a guest writer in #51 (and a creepy tale set in a laundromat), this is a story of a member of the royal family (Prince Charles, most likely, although he’s never named) being possessed by a demon and going on a killing spree. Charming stuff.
Issue #56: The story of a man haunted by his diary. One of the more horrifying of the run.
Issues #57-58: John and Chas try to find out why Chas’s uncle’s body was stolen from its grave. It ain’t pleasant.
Issues #59-61: “Guys and Dolls.” Ellie, a demon John knows, comes to him with a problem: Satan is after her. He helps her hide, but she owes him one. Well, two really, as we find out how John helped her a decade earlier. And he collects on both debts, big-time, later.
Issue #62: John and Kit visit John’s sister Cheryl, who tells him that his niece, Gemma, is experimenting with magic. Kit talks to her, while John tracks down the kid who got her into it. It’s another very good issue about John’s family and its history and what Kit means to him. It also includes one of the best sentences in the run: “And there’s just a tiny murder in the night.”
Issue #63: John’s fortieth birthday. Another nice issue, guest-starring Zatanna and Swamp Thing.
Issues #64-66: “Fear and Loathing.” John gets involved in politics, as the National Front, a racist organization, makes a move on him. Meanwhile, the angel Gabriel, who has been hanging out with the racists, begins to question God’s plan, which has pretty bad consequences for him.
Issue #67: Kit leaves John because he couldn’t keep his shenanigans out of her life. He then freaks out at Chas, burns all his bridges, and drinks himself into a stupor.
Issues #68-69: Living on the street, John is found by the King of the Vampires. Even drunk, John is more than a match for him.
Issue #70: Kit gets re-acquainted with her friends in Belfast. A brilliant issue, as I mentioned above.
Issue #71: John hallucinates about a World War II fighter pilot, and it’s enough to get him back on his feet. Another good issue, and an early example of Ennis’s love of war comics.
Hellblazer Special #1: John sees a man who once gave him a lift and tried to molest him, and the man tells him his story. This ties back into John’s continuing battle with Satan
Issues #72-75: John visits New York and gets trapped in a strange dreamland by Papa Midnite, the antagonist from the earliest issues of the title. This is probably the weakest story arc in the run.
Issue #76: On the way back to England, John makes a pit stop in Dublin and meets Brendan Finn’s ghost. More reminiscing about the old days, and we find out how more of John’s friends died.
Issue #77: Chas tells a story about John and a strange exorcism. Another strong standalone issue.
Issues #78-83: “Rake at the Gates of Hell.” Satan figures out how to hurt John, and he proceeds to cut a swath through his friends. Just for fun, there’s a race riot in London, and John tries to get an old friend off heroin. An impressive ending to the run.

These plots are interesting not necessarily because of their execution, although Ennis usually does well with planning them out and tying up the loose ends. They’re interesting because of what they tell us about the comic itself and what Ennis is really doing. Consider the actors in these plots and what they’re doing. In the first arc, John is trying cure his lung cancer, and does. This doesn’t stop him from smoking, naturally, especially because he now believes himself to be invincible. After this, he gets into problems almost solely of his own design, with “Royal Blood” and the issues he has with the National Front the only exceptions. Everything that follows in the run is from his problems with smoking and how he “solves” it. This leads us to a fascinating conclusion about the run in general: it’s almost all about addiction.

Consider: John is addicted to smoking. He’s also an alcoholic. Out of 43 issues, 24 of them show John (or, in the case of #70, Kit) drinking in some way or another. That may not seem like a lot, but it’s over half and far more drinking than we usually see in a comic. John’s smoking causes problems, but except for issues #67-71, Ennis doesn’t show any problems his drinking causes him, and after he decides to live in issue #71, it’s never a concern again. In issue #71, John thinks, “You never gave up. You knew the precious thing you had, and you scraped and clawed and fought to the last drop of blood for life –” He’s thinking about the fighter pilot whose skeleton he has uncovered, who didn’t give up even though his plane was shot to pieces. It’s an inspiring speech, but alcoholism isn’t overcome by pretty speeches about how great life is. John is an addict, but in more ways than one. He’s not only addicted to alcoholism, he’s addicted to the rush of magic. When we read this run, we always have to remember that DC had a vested interest in making sure Constantine doesn’t change, just like all their other characters, but it’s fascinating to read as Ennis sets up two sides of John’s life: the one we know, and the one with Kit. Kit constantly reminds him to keep the magic part of his life separate from their relationship, and she leaves him because he can’t. He has a wonderful relationship, but he can’t turn away from screwing around in his life. Of course, he has a reason for it, on the one hand – he knows Satan is coming after him, and a great deal of what he does in the run is in preparation for their final showdown. It’s ironic that the situation in which Kit is threatened has very little to do with John’s problems with Satan. Even Kit can’t keep John away from messing around. His love is not strong enough.

What makes Kit and John’s relationship interesting is that she herself is an enabler, to a certain degree. When she breaks it off with him, she says, “I don’t want you to be perfect. I just want a quiet life without some bastard kicking my door down and coming at me with a switchblade.” A not unreasonable request, you might think. Then, when he’s about to leave, she tells him, “You’re a stupid, selfish bastard, John. And you’ve never really cared about anyone.” Of course she’s right and wrong, because he does love her, but not completely. She’s in the wrong, too, and Ennis makes this point rather subtly (one of the few times he ever does things subtly, I know): Kit never asks him to choose. She made all the compromises in the relationship, and although I know what we would have gotten if she had issued an ultimatum – a lot of whining from both John himself and the fanbase that “she just doesn’t get him” and that changing would destroy what she loves about him in the first place – an adult relationship requires compromise from both parties. Most relationships, it seem, fall apart because one or both parties are not willing to do that. Kit never asks him to change anything. She doesn’t want him shitting where he lives, but that’s not the same thing. She simply allows John to carry on with what he’s doing even though it makes her uncomfortable and she’d already been in a relationship – with Brendan – where the man refused to change and eventually died because of it. She accepts him as he is, and as noble as that is, maybe John does need to change. This is hammered home in issue #82, when Kit returns. It’s another wonderfully written issue, and even though John promises to give it all up for her, she sees right through him. She tells him a story about Brendan drinking himself to death and how noble he thought it was and how she sees John doing the exact same thing. Then she and John have a good-bye fuck, and we’re supposed to believe that she’s leaving him for the last time. But the point is: John is too charming. Kit came back, and there’s no reason to think that she won’t again. John might not get the love of a good woman, but he doesn’t want that anyway. If he did, he really would do what he promised and ditch it all for her. Of course, given that Kit was Ennis’s pet character, she doesn’t come back, but the way Ennis writes it, we don’t necessarily believe she’s gone for good.

An interesting parallel to Kit is Sarah, the woman John is sleeping with at the beginning of “Rake at the Gates of Hell.” We know nothing about her, and before we can find anything about their relationship, John asks her for a favor. He sees an old friend, Helen, who’s a hooker strung out on heroin. In order to keep her away from her pimp, he asks Sarah to set something up privately with her sister, who’s a nurse. He can’t take her to a hospital, because the police will get involved, and her pimp could find her too easily. Of course, it all goes to hell, because her pimp does find her, and although no one dies, Helen ends up in the hospital anyway, and John can’t do anything except hire some thugs to beat the shit out of the pimp. Sarah doesn’t put up with John’s crap like Kit did for too long. John can’t face Helen in the hospital, and when he asks Sarah if Helen’s pimp raped her, Sarah lights him up:

Why? Isn’t it bad enough for you yet? … You really are something, d’you know that? You want it that way so it’s really bad! So you can get good and angry enough to go out there and commit whatever atrocity you’ve got in mind for that guy! It won’t help Helen one bit — but you don’t care because you know you’re no good at helping her anyway! ‘Cos all you’ve got left in your frigging revenge!! I’ve got news for you, chum! The reason you felt useless in there is because you are! You’re like every other stupid macho bastard I’ve known: You can’t think with anything except your dick or your fists! You think you know it all! You think you’re trying to help! And all you’re doing is making things worse!!

She shouts this last line as John flees from the hospital, and it’s the mark of a complete coward that John runs from her and goes right out and does what she accuses him of – finding the pimp and making sure he gets beaten. It’s a devastating attack on our hero, because even though he has always left his friends to die and is therefore not a terribly sympathetic character, he (and the audience) always justifies it because he’s doing it for the greater good. Even in this situation, he’s doing it for Helen, but he’s not willing to put in the work to make sure Helen is okay. He leaves the dirty work to Sarah’s sister and another nurse, both of whom (along with Helen) pay far more than John does. Why? Because he’s addicted to being the “hero,” the white knight who saves people but doesn’t want to soil his armor. Yes, he often gets down and dirty in his schemes, but John makes sure that someone else always suffers more. It’s a disturbing idea to consider, because we want to admire John. Ennis doesn’t allow us to. John is an addict, and addiction is never pretty or admirable.

What’s interesting about this is that so many other characters in this run are addicted, too. The major antagonist of Ennis’s Hellblazer is the Devil, and his obsession with Constantine is addictive and blinds him to what causes his downfall. Of course, pride is the deadly sin that Satan is usually pinned with (this isn’t Lucifer, as this was back when the “Vertigo” books still maintained some continuity, so there are several references to Lucifer giving up his throne to Hell, an event that occurred in Sandman), and in this book, pride is what causes both John’s and Satan’s problems. Satan is so sure that John belongs to him in “Dangerous Habits” that he ignores the trap John sets for him, and in “Rake at the Gates of Hell,” he misses the fact that someone close to him is betraying him. Papa Midnite, the other main antagonist in the run, is also so blinded by hatred of Constantine that he too misses someone close to him betraying him (interestingly, both traitors are women). Satan has only himself to blame for his predicament – John tricks him, in issue #42, into drinking holy water, and Brendan Finn’s soul escapes Hell because of it. In classic James Bond villain mode, Satan is so sure that he can’t be touched that he allows himself to gloat, and you never gloat if you’re a villain! His addiction to revenge ultimately costs him, and it’s interesting to consider how little difference there is between the Devil and John himself. Ennis doesn’t exactly make it subtle, but it’s interesting because we’re conditioned to think of Satan as, well, evil, while John is supposedly “good.” But their final conversation is revelatory, not because of what Ennis thinks of the Devil’s relationship with God (this is the first reference in Ennis’s fiction of God as a drooling, masturbatory madman, but it won’t be the last), but because of how John sees exactly what Satan is. The Devil says, “But ever since I fell, I’ve wondered down the eons what he meant for me … What sense of purpose dredged me from within that mind …? What the point of someone he could talk to, if he wouldn’t even listen? And that has torn at me since –” John interrupts with “You’re his conscience.” This strikes John as funny, and Satan loses it, saying something John himself might say: “Don’t you laugh at me, you little bastard! I tried to make it better!” At the end, John is the same – he tries to make it better, and it usually turns to shit. But John has one more friend than the Devil, and that’s why he wins. But that doesn’t mean he’s any better than the Devil himself.

This idea of addiction is wedded to the other main theme of the book, which is the use and abuse of power. This isn’t a terribly original theme, as most mainstream comic books have some element of the idea of power and how the powerful abuse it (perhaps because most mainstream comic books are written by men, who seem to have an unhealthy obsession with power, but that’s a theory for another day), but that doesn’t stop Ennis from exploring it through the prism of addiction. Naturally, power is addictive in this book, as it is most places, and what’s fascinating about Ennis’s thoughts on power is that the more Constantine has, the less in control he seems to be. This is reflected throughout the book with almost every character. Constantine is always at his best when he has a plan that goes awry and people are dying around him and he needs to pull something out of his ass. Ennis suggests that this chaotic way of dealing with life is more ideal (certainly it’s more interesting, fictionally) than those people who cling to the illusion of power. Satan, of course, is the obvious example of someone whose lust for power blinds him to everything else. Not only does he allow his addiction to “getting” John obscure his vision, but his desire to control everything allows someone who promises that control get close to him and ultimately betray him. Papa Midnite, as we’ve seen, is the same way. But there are other powerful people in the book, and Ennis delights in showing us how powerless they really are. The King of the Vampires, who appears twice, is the classic example – in issue #50, John asks a fantastic question of him: “And just so we’re sure who’s better off, why don’t we sit here together and watch the sun come up in an hour or so?” John has his weaknesses, sure, but he knows what they are and can live with them. The King of the Vampires can’t. Ennis, like most writers, enjoys taking the powerful down a peg, but what’s so compelling about this is that Constantine can’t really match power for power. He gets by on guile, and those very few times he has power, he loses it quickly. This is most evident in the final storyline, when he deals with Helen. He is in command with her for most of the time, and when her pimp beats her up again, John responds by using what power he has and destroying the pimp. It’s an ugly side to John, but it’s the best way Ennis can point out that power does corrupt, because the rest of the powerful in the book are already so corrupt he can’t make that point with them.

Despite these very interesting themes, there is plenty wrong with Ennis’s Hellblazer. His brief forays into politics don’t work terribly well, because he doesn’t bring the same nuances to them as he does to the interpersonal relationships in the comic. “Royal Blood” is the main political story, and the “big idea” of the arc is that the demon possessing Prince Charles (or whoever it is) is no different than any other royal, because, as Peter Marston puts it, “What has our royal family ever done … except feed off the blood of the people?” It’s a fairly derivative idea, and the entire story, which is not an awful horror yarn, doesn’t really work as political commentary. In the other overtly political arc, “Damnation’s Flame,” John makes his way through an American nightmare landscape, and although the point Ennis makes about Kennedy and our obsession with him is valid (Kennedy, who becomes John’s spirit guide, says that the idealization of him has crippled the American body politic and kept us from moving on, which is true to a certain extent), his idea of America as a pimp and the rest of the world as whores isn’t particularly original or compelling (and, in hindsight, the country rising in the East ought to be China, not Japan), and the idea of the completely noble American Indian is childish and a bit insulting. “Rake at the Gates of Hell” has as a subplot the confrontation between the racist police and the inhabitants of a largely black housing project, and it works mainly because it’s about the characters, not about any grand political screed. The race riot begins because two cops try to bust George, an acquaintance of John’s, for marijuana dealing and his mother gets killed in the process. George freaks out, kills one of the cops, and things spiral from there. It’s less a political statement, even though Ennis manages to work politics into it. Earlier in the run, the evil racist Charlie Patterson, who sends punks to hurt Kit, which is the impetus for her to leave John, doesn’t even have a plan, really. He says he does, but we never learn what it is. It’s probably for the best, as it’s not all that pertinent to the story, and it probably wouldn’t be terribly deep anyway. Ennis obviously wears his politics on his sleeve, but that’s not the best place to wear them if you’re going to write good political stories. It doesn’t hurt the run too much, but it does keep it from being as great as it could be.

Ennis took a lot of the themes he explored in this comic and used them in his next two long-running series, Preacher and Hitman. Those books were a bit more mature than this, which is to be expected, but Hellblazer has one advantage in that readers knew what to expect from a John Constantine story, so when Ennis subverted those expectations, it worked in his favor. It has another advantage over Preacher: Ennis doesn’t turn the book into his personal soapbox as much as he does in the later comic. This keeps things moving along at a faster clip than in Preacher, which often grinds to a halt so Jessie and Cassidy can rant about whatever it is that bothers Ennis on that particular day. Despite that, Hellblazer has its faults, but that shouldn’t stop us from reading it and appreciating what Ennis did with John Constantine. He pulled back on some of the horror (not all, but some) and showed us a Constantine who was weak and a bit immature. He also gave John a reason to get out of the “business” in Kit, and the great tragedy of John’s life is that he is unable to change. Of course, this is the mandate of DC, because they want to keep publishing the adventures of Mr. Constantine, but Ennis, to his credit, makes this a profound character flaw in John, and it adds a level of sadness to the comic that wasn’t present before, even with all of John’s friends dying. When Header and Rick and Nigel die, it’s not because John was saving the world and sacrificing them in the process. It’s because he’s completely ineffectual and can’t stop it. That’s a world of difference. Even Helen, who does get off smack thanks to John, tells him in the final Ennis issue, “I’m not sayin’ I’ll never end up whorin’ again, or even goin’ back to bein’ a smackhead, ’cause I haven’t a clue what’ll happen to me.” The tragedy of John Constantine is that he doesn’t care: he was her hero, and he isn’t interested in keeping her off the heroin or out of prostitution, because that’s where the hard work is – Helen has to do it for herself, of course, but it always helps if we have someone who cares. Ultimately, John got what he wanted – someone to tell him he’s okay, after so many others told him he was a shit. It allows Ennis to end his run on a high note, but it’s a false high note, and that’s what makes it more resonant.

Ennis’s run has been collected in several different trade paperbacks: “Dangerous Habits,” “Bloodlines,” “Fear and Loathing,” “Tainted Love,” “Damnation’s Flame,” “Rake at the Gates of Hell,” and “Rare Cuts,” which has the standalone issue #56 along with a bunch of other stories by different writers. It’s an excellent run that shows what Ennis is capable of. And nobody has sex with a giant meat puppet, so that’s a plus.

If you’re interested, please peruse the Comics You Should Own archive. It’s either that or Everybody Loves Raymond reruns, and nobody wants to see those! Finally, John has a message for us all:

Oh, he’s a charmer, that one!

21 Comments

I collected this whole run, but also have mixed feelings about it. My first issue of it was 50, with the Lord of the Vampires, and I loved the way John thwarted him, and figured Ennis was a writer worth following for a bit.

Besides heavy-handed politics and the somewhat tiresome prominence of alcohol, I found the biggest weakness to be how so many intriguing plots had lackluster resolutions, often with John employing magic in a way that comes from out of nowhere. I was often left thinking “Well, if I’d know he could do that, I wouldn’t have bothered to worry for the past three issues.” The ending often felt like a cheat (the Damnation’s Flame arc had a particularly weak ending).

The arcs that I liked the most were the classic Dangerous Habits as well as Fear and Loathing, which had a twist ending I didn’t see coming at all (although remembering it did telegraph a recent development in the current Andy Diggle run).

The stand-alone issues you mention were very good reading as well.

I should probably re-read the run someday. Along with the first 12 Delano issues, which still occupy a place in my heart as the really classic Constantine stuff. It’d be interesting to see which run holds up the most.

Good essay. I love examining good-but-not-great runs to see where they went right, and where they went right, and where they went wrong.

A point that I’ve often heard, and agree with somewhat, is that many Vertigo books, especially in its earlier years, were written a lot like they they were going for an Alan Moore style. I found this to be especially true for most Constantine stories. It makes sense, since John first appeared in Moore’s Swamp Thing. Still, it is annoyingly obvious at times. Ennis probably did it less than most writers, and is one of the reasons his run stands out.

I have to read this again, because I just didn’t see what you’re saying, Greg. I didn’t find John “ridiculous” or unsympathetic in Ennis’s run. I thought it was one of the few times when John was actually very sympathetic (as opposed to the Delano run, when John was portrayed as a real bastard).

It’s probably my favorite of Ennis’s works, maybe because it’s less caricatural and less macho than his other stuff.

Rene: I think part of what Ennis is doing is deliberate – he’s writing John as sympathetic (and I agree, he’s more sympathetic than previously), but John isn’t very good at NOT being a bastard. I don’t know if Ennis was trying to highlight this problem with John’s personality or if it’s a problem with his writing skills, but as John tries harder to be less of a jerk, he often acts more and more immature. Of course, all this might be just the way I see it.

I would recommend you read it again, because it was interesting for me to revisit it after probably eight years or so. Maybe in eight more years I’ll view it completely differently!

Well, bad things kept happening to John’s friends even in Ennis’s run, but I’m not sure I see it as entirely John’s fault. I tend to find it more tragic than disturbing. If anything, my sympathy for him is greater, because he inhabits a very gray, very f*ked-up world, with no easy solutions. It’s not just that John is an asshole and because he is an asshole things keep getting screwed-up around him. It’s more that John’s WORLD is a very dark one, and even someone with more skill and drive and compassion than usual will only be able to do so much, and will fall very short from being a “hero”. But he still tries.

But okay, it’s been many years since I’ve read it too, maybe I should take a look at it again. Still, I believe John only looks bad when you compare him to your more ordinary comic book hero. When you start with the assumption that John is only a guy, and that his world is a pretty complicated one, I think Ennis’s version is pretty admirable, flaws and all.

I’d even give Ennis credit. After Hellblazer, all his stories tend to have protagonists that are just too perfect in their own bad-ass way. Jesse Custer, Hitman, the Boys, they’re all sort of the moral authorities of their worlds. Even Hitman, being… well, a Hitman, is the guy that is always right and always cool. I think it’s great that John Constantine wasn’t always right and always cool.

Tom Fitzpatrick

July 9, 2008 at 5:33 am

Just curious, how come you didn’t include “Son of Man” run by Ennis & Higgins re: Hellblazer # 129-133?

Tom: That’s so removed from the original run that I figured I’d skip it. It’s a decent horror story, but isn’t part of “Ennis’s run,” so I left it out. Plus, it’s not as good as these are!

I very recently re-read this run, and now that you mention Ennis was 21 at the time? The tone makes a lot more sense. This is a young man’s response to an unfair world. That his anger by “Rake of the Gates of Hell” hasn’t cooled, only matured is interesting when you take the writer’s maturation into account, too.

But what I enjoy most about it is the exploration of John’s addictive personality and inability (not refusal) to change. It made him a much more nuanced character, which I found I missed in later runs by Azzarrello and Diggle (Cary’s run was good, but lost focus and went on about a year too long).

Matthew Lazorwitz

July 9, 2008 at 8:14 am

Excellent essay, Greg. I agree with just about everything you say there. I read these in trade, so I read the middle chunk that was just collected out of order, as I had to track them down in single issue form, and this makes me want to go back and read all of it in order to see the build better.

Out of curiosity, was there a reason you didn’t mention the “Heartland” special, the follow up to the classic issue you mentioned a couple times?

I’m ashamed to say, Matthew, that I don’t own the “Heartland” special. I’ve looked for it, but haven’t found it. Maybe I’ll find it at San Diego this year – it’s on my list!

Yeah, Heartland is awesome!

Matthew Lazorwitz

July 9, 2008 at 9:15 am

I might be able to help you there, Greg. It’s in the “Rake at the Gates of Hell” trade, which I own, and I think I still have the single. I’d be more then willing to work somehting out to get you the copy. I just need to make sure I can find it in the ol’ collection.

I have all of Ennis’ run and it’s where I first got interested in the character. (I stopped years ago because I simply got bored with it, but that’s another story.) And I tend to agree with the overall assessment made of the complete work done here.

However, I do recall one thing at the end of Ennis’ run that I thought at the time and part of me still thinks to this day with the death of Header, Rick, etc. “Great. Here’s another writer killing off a bunch of characters they created so that no one else can use them/will screw them up.” Ennis had built up the world around Constantine so he wasn’t just this amoral wandering interfering pain in the ass, but had his own environment and history with real relationships and depth. And then he slaughtered it all away. I get the concept of “Constantine goes alone, leaves his friends to die, etc.”, but in this case it read to me like the actions of a selfish writer who didn’t want anyone else playing with his toys. The deaths didn’t seem necessary to the story that was being told 9at least that was my impression at the time), but was just a clearing of the slate in the big climatic storyline before the next guy took over.

I did really like the vicious manipulator Constantine that Ennis did with Brendan’s salvation and Constantine’s “fix” for his cancer. Nasty as hell and a good story.

Let me know, Matt! My e-mail address should be on the site somewhere (in the “Contact us” section, if I’m not mistaken).

Josh: I felt that way a little bit, too, but I didn’t want to get into it and make the post even longer. It seems like a lot of writers – not just Ennis – do that when they leave a title. They bring in all these new people and then kill them off or make it impossible, somehow, for a new writer to use them. I think it’s probably something to do with the fact that they’re either not allowed to kill of any main characters or, if they do kill them, the company will just bring them back. So they kill off their own creations, and usually nobody wants anything to do with them again. But I agree that it was a bit depressing to see the swath Satan cut through John’s friends.

I’ve always considered that though clearly Ennis is using Hellblazer as his soapbox, they are nonetheless utterly believable beliefs as part of Constantine’s makeup. Much of what he rants about in these issues, and the predictable results of the dangerous underground, hard-drinking, hard-life culture he inhabits – alcoholism and violence with a bucketful of conspiracy theories – are perfect examples of the thoughts of and social circles he moves in during the early 90′s. As did many others of his age with a solid British working-class background who grew up with the heady inventive days of the punk ethic and now found themselves either in dead-end jobs and the more nihilistic world of post-punk or often more frustratingly in ways of life which went totally against their original ethic. Growing up as it happens, and the bliss of youth destroyed. Disillusionment and frustration (the classic Constantime two-fingers and ‘bo**ocks) attitude is classic.

Wearing your politics on your sleeve may not be desirable, but it’s normal. The political polemic expressed was a definite view of the times, both concerning the Royal Family (this is pre-death of Diana) and the feelings about America and the rest of the world – something that still hasn’t really changed down the years, I’m afraid.

That Ennis was so young seems to be used as both an excuse and a criticism. I’d suggest that being able to see the times in the stories today shows just how mature he was. Personally I reckon the inter-relationship vignettes and ‘discussions’, and the emotional fall-out, work extremely well. They work because they are utterly plausible snapshots of real life at the time (I’m talking here about the life side – not the supernatural elements, of course). And the juxtaposition of the slightly (ok very) seedy times with the lurking horrors works to highlight both – evil in it’s many forms.

As an aside, I’d be interested to know how many of those who have commented are English – possibly a case of ‘you had to be there to understand it’ – meant in the nicest possible way, not as a criticism.

Cheers!

This was when I started reading Hellblazer. I knew Constantine from Swamp Thing, but had found Delano’s run too confusing and screeching-preachy and the art too muddy for my teenaged tastes. By the time Ennis started I was older, and figured I’d try the new jumping-on point. I continued through his whole run, sometimes only barely (71-75), but consistently. Then I stayed through Campbell and (most of?) Jenkins, then never picked it up again consistently until Diggle’s run.

I was about 21 at the time, so maybe that’s part of why it appealed– but until today I’d had no idea that Ennis was the same age.

The dreary politics I took as being true to character– it was part of what had turned me off from Delano’s run earlier, but when it all came up again with Ennis I got comfortable with thinking that that’s just part of the Constantine shtick. It was only when it got transported to America that I reacted by saying, “huh– Ennis doesn’t have any idea what he’s talking about, and it’s pretty annoying.”

The continuity thing is tricky. I’m pretty sure it had to be a retcon that Hellblazer’s First wasn’t Lucifer. Gaiman overturned Hell’s applecart in Season of Mists, and Ennis had to hastily come up with a Satan/ Lucifer distinction.

The Snob (Gabirel) was probably my favorite antagonist of the run, and Ellie my favorite ally. John’s eventual betrayal of Ellie (was that under Ellis?) was what led me to drop the book, and I’m pleased Diggle’s moved it into the category of ‘bygones.’

When I was a kid I dropped Hellblazer after Delano left, thinking there was no point in continuing to pick up the book since no one could possibly handle the character as well.

Whoops.

Greg, love of the columns that you’ve written thus far. Keep’em coming, because I know there can only be better stuff you talk about.

[...] Comics You Should Own – Hellblazer #41-50; 52-83 [...]

You can really see Ennis mature as he works his way through the title. This was the period I dropped it, just after Ellie had the baby. Financial reasons mostly but it just wasn’t lighting me on fire the way it previously had. (Delano’s run was spotty, too.) Maybe I just got sick of John as a character.

I love Warren Ellis’ John because he’s unrepentant bastard and once in a while, you see him do what John always does, lament his friends … and it seems more poignant. He doesn’t half whinge on a bit about all his dead mates, does our John. (That’s why I got sick of him.)

After digging through the back issue boxes of the comic shop I just got a job at, I found most of this run for 2$ an issue, and 41 for only 3$. After some work online just yesterday I finally finished collecting all of them. This will be my first time reading Ennis’s Hellblazer but after the first arc alone I can already see myself liking this more than Preacher.

With regards to how much your column contains spoilers: I generally appreciative for a more complete and in depth look at the work as a whole. And if I haven’t read whatever you’re talking about I usually just read the introduction and conclusion to see if the comic would be something up my alley which avoids the spoilers anyway.

Leave a Comment

 

Categories

Review Copies

Comics Should Be Good accepts review copies. Anything sent to us will (for better or for worse) end up reviewed on the blog. See where to send the review copies.

Browse the Archives