<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Flippin&#039; through Previews - August 2008</title>
	<atom:link href="http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/08/04/flippin-through-previews-august-2008/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/08/04/flippin-through-previews-august-2008/</link>
	<description>Comic Book Resources Presents... Comics Should Be Good!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 23:31:55 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Collins</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/08/04/flippin-through-previews-august-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-677314</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Collins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 18:03:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=18161#comment-677314</guid>
		<description>Doug-
Thanks!

Blackjak-
Crossfire And Rainbow did get a 4-issue spin-off mini-series called, appropriately enough, CROSSFIRE AND RAINBOW. It came out around 1985/1986 and the last issue of it also featured a beautiful Dave Stevens cover paying homage to Elvis and Blue Hawaii. That mini-series was actually the first DNAgents I ever picked up (out of a bargain bin sometime in the early 90&#039;s) and led me to discovering the main two series. The basic gist of the mini-series was that it focused on Crossfire and Rainbow teaming up on adventures together and by the fourth issue they realized they were in love. It wasn&#039;t quite as cheesy at it sounds, as Evanier&#039;s writing kept it from being too much like a romance comic, but it was good stuff. Very Moonlighting-like. 

And you&#039;re right, even though the earlier issues of CROSSFIRE made plenty of DNAgent references, Rainbow was the only semi-regular in the book and the stories focused on Crossfire&#039;s adventures in Hollywood rather than as a superhero. After Rainbow&#039;s abrupt departure around issue #16 or so, the book stopped even referencing her and the other DNAgents beyond one or two times and instead became Evanier and Spiegle&#039;s vehicle to tell more noir-like stories, especially when the book went to B&amp;W.

And yeah, those early DNAgents issues were printed on nicer paper and looked fantastic for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doug-<br />
Thanks!</p>
<p>Blackjak-<br />
Crossfire And Rainbow did get a 4-issue spin-off mini-series called, appropriately enough, CROSSFIRE AND RAINBOW. It came out around 1985/1986 and the last issue of it also featured a beautiful Dave Stevens cover paying homage to Elvis and Blue Hawaii. That mini-series was actually the first DNAgents I ever picked up (out of a bargain bin sometime in the early 90's) and led me to discovering the main two series. The basic gist of the mini-series was that it focused on Crossfire and Rainbow teaming up on adventures together and by the fourth issue they realized they were in love. It wasn't quite as cheesy at it sounds, as Evanier's writing kept it from being too much like a romance comic, but it was good stuff. Very Moonlighting-like. </p>
<p>And you're right, even though the earlier issues of CROSSFIRE made plenty of DNAgent references, Rainbow was the only semi-regular in the book and the stories focused on Crossfire's adventures in Hollywood rather than as a superhero. After Rainbow's abrupt departure around issue #16 or so, the book stopped even referencing her and the other DNAgents beyond one or two times and instead became Evanier and Spiegle's vehicle to tell more noir-like stories, especially when the book went to B&amp;W.</p>
<p>And yeah, those early DNAgents issues were printed on nicer paper and looked fantastic for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Atkinson</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/08/04/flippin-through-previews-august-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-677274</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Atkinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 12:36:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=18161#comment-677274</guid>
		<description>&quot;God help me if I can remember the two copycat teamsâ€™ names (now Iâ€™M the one feeling oldâ€¦)&quot;

The DNAgents analogues in TTT were the Recombatants; the Titans analogues in DNAgents were Project: Youngblood.  (I remembered the first one, but had to Google the second.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"God help me if I can remember the two copycat teamsâ€™ names (now Iâ€™M the one feeling oldâ€¦)"</p>
<p>The DNAgents analogues in TTT were the Recombatants; the Titans analogues in DNAgents were Project: Youngblood.  (I remembered the first one, but had to Google the second.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blackjak</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/08/04/flippin-through-previews-august-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-677267</link>
		<dc:creator>Blackjak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 09:51:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=18161#comment-677267</guid>
		<description>You know what I&#039;ve realised from all this?  DNAgents was FAR more popular than I ever realised at the time!!
But all their fans are here on CSBG!

Andrew:  You&#039;re absolutely correct on the colour thing!  The only issue never in colour per se was the 3D issue...   Also, even though Crossfire and Rainbow had their little romance going , and one issue of Crossfire featured the other side of the Dave Stevens cover...  I don&#039;t really recall there being any other &quot;costumes&quot; in Crossfire...  Although I seem to remember talk about a &quot;Crossfire and Rainbow&quot;  miniseries...  I don&#039;t suppose that rings bells with anyone else???

The paper quality (particularly on the first volume) of DNAgents was actually much better than anything Marvel, DC or Dark Horse were doing at the time...  These would be great in a hardcover/colour collection... decent paper, etc...  

Time for a trawl on Amazon fro the Scout volumes... Hope they&#039;re available in the UK...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know what I've realised from all this?  DNAgents was FAR more popular than I ever realised at the time!!<br />
But all their fans are here on CSBG!</p>
<p>Andrew:  You're absolutely correct on the colour thing!  The only issue never in colour per se was the 3D issue...   Also, even though Crossfire and Rainbow had their little romance going , and one issue of Crossfire featured the other side of the Dave Stevens cover...  I don't really recall there being any other "costumes" in Crossfire...  Although I seem to remember talk about a "Crossfire and Rainbow"  miniseries...  I don't suppose that rings bells with anyone else???</p>
<p>The paper quality (particularly on the first volume) of DNAgents was actually much better than anything Marvel, DC or Dark Horse were doing at the time...  These would be great in a hardcover/colour collection... decent paper, etc...  </p>
<p>Time for a trawl on Amazon fro the Scout volumes... Hope they're available in the UK...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Collins</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/08/04/flippin-through-previews-august-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-677260</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Collins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 05:48:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=18161#comment-677260</guid>
		<description>Oh yeah, regarding the Titans/DNAgents &quot;crossover.&quot; That was covered in an article sometime ago in Back Issue magazine, where Mark Evanier confirmed that that was something he and Marv Wolfman worked out between them. The Titans (in the aforementioned issue drawn by Steve Rude) fought a team that was pretty much the DNAgents with name and color scheme changes. Likewise, the DNAgents in their own comic fought a team that was essentially the Titans in all but name and costume, with powers and personalities exactly like Dick, Donna, Wally, etc. God help me if I can remember the two copycat teams&#039; names (now I&#039;M the one feeling old...)

If you notice, in both comics the &quot;copycat&quot; team dies at the end of the story. Wolfman and Evanier each agreed to do this so that the copycats wouldn&#039;t live on and become regular characters in each other&#039;s universe. It was all very informal and each writer kept the subtle crossover from their editors, IIRC, so that no one caught it until after both issues had already come out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh yeah, regarding the Titans/DNAgents "crossover." That was covered in an article sometime ago in Back Issue magazine, where Mark Evanier confirmed that that was something he and Marv Wolfman worked out between them. The Titans (in the aforementioned issue drawn by Steve Rude) fought a team that was pretty much the DNAgents with name and color scheme changes. Likewise, the DNAgents in their own comic fought a team that was essentially the Titans in all but name and costume, with powers and personalities exactly like Dick, Donna, Wally, etc. God help me if I can remember the two copycat teams' names (now I'M the one feeling old...)</p>
<p>If you notice, in both comics the "copycat" team dies at the end of the story. Wolfman and Evanier each agreed to do this so that the copycats wouldn't live on and become regular characters in each other's universe. It was all very informal and each writer kept the subtle crossover from their editors, IIRC, so that no one caught it until after both issues had already come out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Mad Monkey</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/08/04/flippin-through-previews-august-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-677237</link>
		<dc:creator>The Mad Monkey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 00:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=18161#comment-677237</guid>
		<description>Andrew and Michael...
I stand corrected and humbled.  :-)
The last time I read DNAgents was when it was actually a &quot;new release&quot;...so I admit openly and freely to my memory not being very accurate.  I do, however, recall not being a fan of Crossfire...for some reason, I found it boring...lol.

As for the B&amp;W thing...
Yes, there were many of the bigger indies printing books in color before DH.
Again, I stand corrected.  :-)

Wow...getting old really sucks sometimes...lol.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew and Michael...<br />
I stand corrected and humbled.  <img src='http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
The last time I read DNAgents was when it was actually a "new release"...so I admit openly and freely to my memory not being very accurate.  I do, however, recall not being a fan of Crossfire...for some reason, I found it boring...lol.</p>
<p>As for the B&amp;W thing...<br />
Yes, there were many of the bigger indies printing books in color before DH.<br />
Again, I stand corrected.  <img src='http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Wow...getting old really sucks sometimes...lol.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/08/04/flippin-through-previews-august-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-677226</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 22:18:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=18161#comment-677226</guid>
		<description>&quot;Page 20 made me chuckle. Itâ€™s Amazing Spider-Man Annual #1! So not only does Joey Q want us to forget that Peter and Mary Jane were ever married, heâ€™s casually erased the comic in which it happened from existence! â€œAn Amazing Spider-Man Annual in 1987? Sorry, thatâ€™s impossible. This is the first one!â€&quot;

I *guess* the logic is that while ASM v2 (or whatever the current volume is) has &quot;caught up&quot; with the old numbers through artificial means, the annuals... haven&#039;t done that yet?

But, yes, it is quite hilarious that they&#039;ve stuck to the reset numbers for that specific title. I wish they&#039;d just fess up and admit &quot;okay, we were wrong for trying to whitewash our history&quot; with those re-numberings and return Cap and DD back to the original numbering.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"Page 20 made me chuckle. Itâ€™s Amazing Spider-Man Annual #1! So not only does Joey Q want us to forget that Peter and Mary Jane were ever married, heâ€™s casually erased the comic in which it happened from existence! â€œAn Amazing Spider-Man Annual in 1987? Sorry, thatâ€™s impossible. This is the first one!â€"</p>
<p>I *guess* the logic is that while ASM v2 (or whatever the current volume is) has "caught up" with the old numbers through artificial means, the annuals... haven't done that yet?</p>
<p>But, yes, it is quite hilarious that they've stuck to the reset numbers for that specific title. I wish they'd just fess up and admit "okay, we were wrong for trying to whitewash our history" with those re-numberings and return Cap and DD back to the original numbering.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Burgas</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/08/04/flippin-through-previews-august-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-677219</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Burgas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 21:27:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=18161#comment-677219</guid>
		<description>Andrew:  Good to know about those.  I haven&#039;t even seen the Scout trade yet, but I&#039;ll have to look for it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew:  Good to know about those.  I haven't even seen the Scout trade yet, but I'll have to look for it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Collins</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/08/04/flippin-through-previews-august-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-677215</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Collins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 20:22:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=18161#comment-677215</guid>
		<description>Mad Monkey-
Regarding the color/B&amp;W thing- it was the other way around. DNAgents was published in color during its entire run, which ended when volume 2 ended somewhere around 1987/1988 (and drawn by Erik Larsen). The spin-off Crossfire was also full color at first, but switched to B&amp;W towards the end to off set the cost as it wasn&#039;t selling very well. Which is sad, as it was the more interesting of the two series. 

Though I will say I was never happy with the way DNAgents ended so abruptly and how a major plot point dealing with Crossfire and Rainbow was never resolved. Instead, Evanier wrote the rest of Crossfire almost as if the incident never happened and pretty much ignored the whole superhero angle to the series&#039; earlier issues.

Greg B.-
IDW has solicited Badger trades up through volume 4 (volume 3 was just released last week...), so I&#039;m interested to see if we get anymore past that. Then again, a solicitation is no guarantee of a release, as in the case of the solicitation&#039;s for Maze Agency volumes 2 and 3 that never came out...

Blackjak-
Like Michael said, Dynamite is publishing the Scout series in trades. Volume 1 came out awhile back and reprints issues #1-7. Volume 2 just came out a week or two ago (after a long delay) and collects issues #8-16. No word yet on a volume 3.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mad Monkey-<br />
Regarding the color/B&amp;W thing- it was the other way around. DNAgents was published in color during its entire run, which ended when volume 2 ended somewhere around 1987/1988 (and drawn by Erik Larsen). The spin-off Crossfire was also full color at first, but switched to B&amp;W towards the end to off set the cost as it wasn't selling very well. Which is sad, as it was the more interesting of the two series. </p>
<p>Though I will say I was never happy with the way DNAgents ended so abruptly and how a major plot point dealing with Crossfire and Rainbow was never resolved. Instead, Evanier wrote the rest of Crossfire almost as if the incident never happened and pretty much ignored the whole superhero angle to the series' earlier issues.</p>
<p>Greg B.-<br />
IDW has solicited Badger trades up through volume 4 (volume 3 was just released last week...), so I'm interested to see if we get anymore past that. Then again, a solicitation is no guarantee of a release, as in the case of the solicitation's for Maze Agency volumes 2 and 3 that never came out...</p>
<p>Blackjak-<br />
Like Michael said, Dynamite is publishing the Scout series in trades. Volume 1 came out awhile back and reprints issues #1-7. Volume 2 just came out a week or two ago (after a long delay) and collects issues #8-16. No word yet on a volume 3.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blackjak</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/08/04/flippin-through-previews-august-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-677202</link>
		<dc:creator>Blackjak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 17:48:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=18161#comment-677202</guid>
		<description>Michael:

Thank you! 

Dynamite are getting interesting as a publisher...  Red Sonja was their first title wasn&#039;t it?  and they got a great variety of tie-ins/original series...

Sort of the way that I thought Devil&#039;s Due were originally going in...  Following the sort of Dark Horse path... a couple of licensed properties holding up the more experimental stuff... (though thinknig about it, i take that back... there&#039;s not that much experimental about the Dynamite line-up really is there?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael:</p>
<p>Thank you! </p>
<p>Dynamite are getting interesting as a publisher...  Red Sonja was their first title wasn't it?  and they got a great variety of tie-ins/original series...</p>
<p>Sort of the way that I thought Devil's Due were originally going in...  Following the sort of Dark Horse path... a couple of licensed properties holding up the more experimental stuff... (though thinknig about it, i take that back... there's not that much experimental about the Dynamite line-up really is there?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Rawdon</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/08/04/flippin-through-previews-august-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-677200</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Rawdon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 17:40:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=18161#comment-677200</guid>
		<description>Blackjak:

Companies which owned the rights to what they published (which I think included First, Eclipse and Comico) have often sat on those rights after they went out of business (since they&#039;re assets which could arguably be claimed by their creditors), but many of them have been reclaimed by either their creators or by other companies.  Sometimes after a lengthy procedure to repurchase those rights.  I don&#039;t know all the details, but this sort of thing is why we&#039;ve gotten new Nexus, Grendel, and GrimJack stories over the last 15 years - the creators managed to get the rights to the characters back.

I would guess that Mark Evanier got the rights to DNAgents and Crossfire and is publishing them through Image.  I bet most of Eclipse&#039;s intellectual property is still in limbo; not a whole lot of demand for them, if the creators didn&#039;t want to fight to reclaim the rights.

It looks like Tim Truman&#039;s Scout is being reprinted in paperback by Dynamite Entertainment.  I have no idea whether they expect there will be any new stories.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blackjak:</p>
<p>Companies which owned the rights to what they published (which I think included First, Eclipse and Comico) have often sat on those rights after they went out of business (since they're assets which could arguably be claimed by their creditors), but many of them have been reclaimed by either their creators or by other companies.  Sometimes after a lengthy procedure to repurchase those rights.  I don't know all the details, but this sort of thing is why we've gotten new Nexus, Grendel, and GrimJack stories over the last 15 years - the creators managed to get the rights to the characters back.</p>
<p>I would guess that Mark Evanier got the rights to DNAgents and Crossfire and is publishing them through Image.  I bet most of Eclipse's intellectual property is still in limbo; not a whole lot of demand for them, if the creators didn't want to fight to reclaim the rights.</p>
<p>It looks like Tim Truman's Scout is being reprinted in paperback by Dynamite Entertainment.  I have no idea whether they expect there will be any new stories.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blackjak</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/08/04/flippin-through-previews-august-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-677197</link>
		<dc:creator>Blackjak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 17:29:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=18161#comment-677197</guid>
		<description>Ahh... thanks for the clarification...

Like I said... At the time, I thought it was that DC were jealous... I was about ten or eleven, and had no idea which one was outselling which...  Just that I thought (and all my friends did too) that DNAgents was a better &quot;Teen&quot; title than titans... 

We still read both mind you... (actually our newsagent only got Tales of... but still...)

Also explains why Project Youngblood were so familiar...

So Image own the rights to the old Eclipse stuff?  What about Tim Truman&#039;s Scout??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahh... thanks for the clarification...</p>
<p>Like I said... At the time, I thought it was that DC were jealous... I was about ten or eleven, and had no idea which one was outselling which...  Just that I thought (and all my friends did too) that DNAgents was a better "Teen" title than titans... </p>
<p>We still read both mind you... (actually our newsagent only got Tales of... but still...)</p>
<p>Also explains why Project Youngblood were so familiar...</p>
<p>So Image own the rights to the old Eclipse stuff?  What about Tim Truman's Scout??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Burgas</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/08/04/flippin-through-previews-august-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-677196</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Burgas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 17:26:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=18161#comment-677196</guid>
		<description>Blackjak: Image is publishing it, under the Shadowline imprint.  It&#039;s in black and white, and it appears to be softcover.  It&#039;s listed as a &quot;TP&quot; rather than a &quot;HC,&quot; so I&#039;m going to assume it&#039;s softcover.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blackjak: Image is publishing it, under the Shadowline imprint.  It's in black and white, and it appears to be softcover.  It's listed as a "TP" rather than a "HC," so I'm going to assume it's softcover.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Rawdon</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/08/04/flippin-through-previews-august-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-677195</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Rawdon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 17:17:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=18161#comment-677195</guid>
		<description>Blackjak:

DC never bought the rights to &lt;b&gt;DNAgents&lt;/b&gt;, as far as I know.  The New Teen Titans story you&#039;re thinking of is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.comics.org/details.lasso?id=39272&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this one&lt;/a&gt;, where some characters based on the DNAgents went up against the Titans.  Steve Rude did most of the artwork.  It was one of those &quot;semi-crossover&quot; projects similar in spirit to the Squadron Supreme.

I doubt DC was jealous of the DNAgents, since &lt;b&gt;The New Teen Titans&lt;/b&gt; was a runaway smash hit for them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blackjak:</p>
<p>DC never bought the rights to <b>DNAgents</b>, as far as I know.  The New Teen Titans story you're thinking of is <a href="http://www.comics.org/details.lasso?id=39272" rel="nofollow">this one</a>, where some characters based on the DNAgents went up against the Titans.  Steve Rude did most of the artwork.  It was one of those "semi-crossover" projects similar in spirit to the Squadron Supreme.</p>
<p>I doubt DC was jealous of the DNAgents, since <b>The New Teen Titans</b> was a runaway smash hit for them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blackjak</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/08/04/flippin-through-previews-august-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-677192</link>
		<dc:creator>Blackjak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 17:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=18161#comment-677192</guid>
		<description>DNAgents!?!?!  YAHOO!!  

Hang on... Who&#039;s publishing it?

It was an Eclipse title to begin with, but don&#039;t I recall DC buying the right s to the title then killing them off/canning them in some kind of lame crossover with Teen Titans?  

Basically I thought that at the time, DC were jealous that DNAgents actually worked the whole teen-superhero story WAY better!

Mark Evanier was brilliant... And the last couple of issues of the second volume were some of Erik Larsen&#039;s first comics work weren&#039;t they?

If this does spin-off Crossfire as well, then even better!

Sorry, I also missed  - is this S/C or H/C, B/W or recoloured?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DNAgents!?!?!  YAHOO!!  </p>
<p>Hang on... Who's publishing it?</p>
<p>It was an Eclipse title to begin with, but don't I recall DC buying the right s to the title then killing them off/canning them in some kind of lame crossover with Teen Titans?  </p>
<p>Basically I thought that at the time, DC were jealous that DNAgents actually worked the whole teen-superhero story WAY better!</p>
<p>Mark Evanier was brilliant... And the last couple of issues of the second volume were some of Erik Larsen's first comics work weren't they?</p>
<p>If this does spin-off Crossfire as well, then even better!</p>
<p>Sorry, I also missed  - is this S/C or H/C, B/W or recoloured?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/08/04/flippin-through-previews-august-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-677189</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 16:39:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=18161#comment-677189</guid>
		<description>I feel compelled to plug Night School by Platinum Studios on page 323. Amy Tomlinson is an old friend of mine, and her webcomic Charby the Vampirate has quite a cult following. I can only imagine how much of that work was drawn while she sat in the corner of my living room...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel compelled to plug Night School by Platinum Studios on page 323. Amy Tomlinson is an old friend of mine, and her webcomic Charby the Vampirate has quite a cult following. I can only imagine how much of that work was drawn while she sat in the corner of my living room...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan K</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/08/04/flippin-through-previews-august-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-677178</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 14:44:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=18161#comment-677178</guid>
		<description>Glad to see Kill Your Boyfriend is getting a new printing. I was recently agonising over whether to buy it on ebay for a stupidly inflated price.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad to see Kill Your Boyfriend is getting a new printing. I was recently agonising over whether to buy it on ebay for a stupidly inflated price.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Rawdon</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/08/04/flippin-through-previews-august-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-677144</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Rawdon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 06:18:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=18161#comment-677144</guid>
		<description>Mad Monkey:

I think Eclipse, First and Comico (and maybe Pacific, too) were all publishing most of their titles in color before Dark Horse came along.  Besides which, &lt;b&gt;Dark Horse Presents&lt;/b&gt; was a B&amp;W title to start with.  I think it basically had to do with whether the company had the capital to make the jump to color in the first place.

Dark Horse has managed to do a lot of things right while those other companies went out of business, but I don&#039;t think they deserve the credit for bringing color to independent publishers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mad Monkey:</p>
<p>I think Eclipse, First and Comico (and maybe Pacific, too) were all publishing most of their titles in color before Dark Horse came along.  Besides which, <b>Dark Horse Presents</b> was a B&amp;W title to start with.  I think it basically had to do with whether the company had the capital to make the jump to color in the first place.</p>
<p>Dark Horse has managed to do a lot of things right while those other companies went out of business, but I don't think they deserve the credit for bringing color to independent publishers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Mad Monkey</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/08/04/flippin-through-previews-august-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-677134</link>
		<dc:creator>The Mad Monkey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 05:29:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=18161#comment-677134</guid>
		<description>I keep forgetting that this is mostly a new generation of comic geeks here...
I don&#039;t really mean that in a bad way...I just find myself often amazed by some of the things said by the contributing writers of the various columns on this site.  I say that only because I grew up when the DC multiverse DID make sense and it was fun and I (admittedly) forget that the comic world has completely changed since that time.  This old comic geek gives all due respect to the current generation of comic geeks.
With that said...
The news of Bogdanove&#039;s child-naming is about as recent as Ronald Reagan being elected President and the DNAgents was very much the precurser for books like John &quot;Ego&quot; Byrne&#039;s Next Men and Valiant&#039;s Harbinger series.  And DNAgents only gets better when you find out that the late Mike Sekowsky drew an issue.
If memory serves (I&#039;ve been watching too much Iron Chef lately), the original DNAgents series was in B&amp;W because it was a traditional thing for independent companies (such as Eclipse) to try and keep their costs down by not coloring them.  It took Dark Horse to break that habit.  The DNAgents second run was in color as Eclipse relaunched the series with a new Airboy comic (good readin&#039; there) in a reduced page/price format that Dark Horse tried, in the early &#039;90s, with their super-hero line.
As for Bogdanove...
Well...I sincerely hope his son learned how to defend himself from the beatings he probably got during elementary school recess...
It&#039;s one thing to get a Jon Bon Jovi-inspired tattoo...it&#039;s another to ruin the future life of your progeny just because you have a massive woody for a comic book character (no matter how iconic).
Of course, if I had kids, I&#039;d probably name them Brother Power and Obnoxio...so, I&#039;m not really one to talk about that...lol...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I keep forgetting that this is mostly a new generation of comic geeks here...<br />
I don't really mean that in a bad way...I just find myself often amazed by some of the things said by the contributing writers of the various columns on this site.  I say that only because I grew up when the DC multiverse DID make sense and it was fun and I (admittedly) forget that the comic world has completely changed since that time.  This old comic geek gives all due respect to the current generation of comic geeks.<br />
With that said...<br />
The news of Bogdanove's child-naming is about as recent as Ronald Reagan being elected President and the DNAgents was very much the precurser for books like John "Ego" Byrne's Next Men and Valiant's Harbinger series.  And DNAgents only gets better when you find out that the late Mike Sekowsky drew an issue.<br />
If memory serves (I've been watching too much Iron Chef lately), the original DNAgents series was in B&amp;W because it was a traditional thing for independent companies (such as Eclipse) to try and keep their costs down by not coloring them.  It took Dark Horse to break that habit.  The DNAgents second run was in color as Eclipse relaunched the series with a new Airboy comic (good readin' there) in a reduced page/price format that Dark Horse tried, in the early '90s, with their super-hero line.<br />
As for Bogdanove...<br />
Well...I sincerely hope his son learned how to defend himself from the beatings he probably got during elementary school recess...<br />
It's one thing to get a Jon Bon Jovi-inspired tattoo...it's another to ruin the future life of your progeny just because you have a massive woody for a comic book character (no matter how iconic).<br />
Of course, if I had kids, I'd probably name them Brother Power and Obnoxio...so, I'm not really one to talk about that...lol...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Norris</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/08/04/flippin-through-previews-august-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-677132</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Norris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 05:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=18161#comment-677132</guid>
		<description>Just FYI: That &quot;Tim Callahan&quot; link doesn&#039;t work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just FYI: That "Tim Callahan" link doesn't work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/08/04/flippin-through-previews-august-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-677131</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 05:14:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=18161#comment-677131</guid>
		<description>Putting Flash back in the army pretty much cinches that the driving force behind Brand New Day is to rehash Spider-Man&#039;s 1970s continuity.

Anyone want to offer odds on him falling in love with a girl from Fallujah?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Putting Flash back in the army pretty much cinches that the driving force behind Brand New Day is to rehash Spider-Man's 1970s continuity.</p>
<p>Anyone want to offer odds on him falling in love with a girl from Fallujah?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
