<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Test Your Comic Book Knowledge for 8/25</title>
	<atom:link href="http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/08/25/test-your-comic-book-knowledge-for-825/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/08/25/test-your-comic-book-knowledge-for-825/</link>
	<description>Comic Book Resources Presents... Comics Should Be Good!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 07:50:50 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mary Warner</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/08/25/test-your-comic-book-knowledge-for-825/comment-page-1/#comment-733831</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary Warner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 18:46:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=18443#comment-733831</guid>
		<description>I only knew X-Men #300 and #304.  Which is strange, because I wasn&#039;t buying X-Men regularly at that time.  I know these fancy covers were a gimmick to boost sales, but the strategy backfired on me, because I couldn&#039;t ever afford to buy any of them.  (I acquired some dirt cheap in later years, though, which indicates how lousy the stories often were.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I only knew X-Men #300 and #304.  Which is strange, because I wasn't buying X-Men regularly at that time.  I know these fancy covers were a gimmick to boost sales, but the strategy backfired on me, because I couldn't ever afford to buy any of them.  (I acquired some dirt cheap in later years, though, which indicates how lousy the stories often were.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe rock</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/08/25/test-your-comic-book-knowledge-for-825/comment-page-1/#comment-685433</link>
		<dc:creator>joe rock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 16:03:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=18443#comment-685433</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m surprised that Superman # 75 didn&#039;t make the list. With it&#039;s black armband polybagged in all it&#039;s glory. The first &quot; Ghost Rider &quot; glow in the dark cover was awesome !!! I seem to remember this MALIBU comic that had a BULLET HOLE !i!i!    WOW ! What a wierd time. &quot; Continuity Comics &quot; anyone?  They ruled/sucked at the wierd cover angle. And doesn&#039;t &quot; Valiant &quot; get props for gold logos and the first flat black cover? ( Solarman) I bought  ALL that stuff. Damn Image age of comics...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm surprised that Superman # 75 didn't make the list. With it's black armband polybagged in all it's glory. The first " Ghost Rider " glow in the dark cover was awesome !!! I seem to remember this MALIBU comic that had a BULLET HOLE !i!i!    WOW ! What a wierd time. " Continuity Comics " anyone?  They ruled/sucked at the wierd cover angle. And doesn't " Valiant " get props for gold logos and the first flat black cover? ( Solarman) I bought  ALL that stuff. Damn Image age of comics...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan_Gerous</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/08/25/test-your-comic-book-knowledge-for-825/comment-page-1/#comment-681234</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan_Gerous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 08:57:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=18443#comment-681234</guid>
		<description>The Shadowhawk II #3 cover folded out to a posterof Shadowhawk removing his helmet as his identity had only been revealed in the previous issue.

I still like chromium covers the best.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Shadowhawk II #3 cover folded out to a posterof Shadowhawk removing his helmet as his identity had only been revealed in the previous issue.</p>
<p>I still like chromium covers the best.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan_Gerous</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/08/25/test-your-comic-book-knowledge-for-825/comment-page-1/#comment-681233</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan_Gerous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 08:55:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=18443#comment-681233</guid>
		<description>The Shadow</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Shadow</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blackjak</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/08/25/test-your-comic-book-knowledge-for-825/comment-page-1/#comment-681150</link>
		<dc:creator>Blackjak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 17:42:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=18443#comment-681150</guid>
		<description>Spectre #8 was a good story too!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spectre #8 was a good story too!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mambrose</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/08/25/test-your-comic-book-knowledge-for-825/comment-page-1/#comment-681126</link>
		<dc:creator>mambrose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 15:04:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=18443#comment-681126</guid>
		<description>&quot;I donâ€™t think â€œfold out coverâ€ is an accurate enough description of Shadowhawk II #3â€™s cover - it was a very specific kind of fold out.&quot;

It was a fold-out unmasking, if I&#039;m not mistaken.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"I donâ€™t think â€œfold out coverâ€ is an accurate enough description of Shadowhawk II #3â€™s cover - it was a very specific kind of fold out."</p>
<p>It was a fold-out unmasking, if I'm not mistaken.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/08/25/test-your-comic-book-knowledge-for-825/comment-page-1/#comment-681098</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 12:27:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=18443#comment-681098</guid>
		<description>&quot;I think the covers were probably better then the dreck contained within anyway, far more imaginitive!&quot;

That&#039;s pretty harsh, especially with Flash (that was the &quot;Waid is going to kill off Wally!&quot; swerve that introduced the Speed Force - not exactly unimaginative, and in fact probably Waid&#039;s biggest addition to the Flash mythos.) GA was pretty good (although the important stuff happened the NEXT issue, which always makes me think someone lost count of how many issues they needed to wrap up Ollie&#039;s storylines before the move to Connor), and Wonder Woman was the last issue of the pre-Byrne era (although from looking it up on Mile High, I like the &quot;regular&quot; cover a lot more) which wrapped up a ton of storylines. Some good stuff amongst them, even if Justice League was stagnant by then and it was increasingly obvious the decks needed to be swept.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"I think the covers were probably better then the dreck contained within anyway, far more imaginitive!"</p>
<p>That's pretty harsh, especially with Flash (that was the "Waid is going to kill off Wally!" swerve that introduced the Speed Force - not exactly unimaginative, and in fact probably Waid's biggest addition to the Flash mythos.) GA was pretty good (although the important stuff happened the NEXT issue, which always makes me think someone lost count of how many issues they needed to wrap up Ollie's storylines before the move to Connor), and Wonder Woman was the last issue of the pre-Byrne era (although from looking it up on Mile High, I like the "regular" cover a lot more) which wrapped up a ton of storylines. Some good stuff amongst them, even if Justice League was stagnant by then and it was increasingly obvious the decks needed to be swept.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Coil</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/08/25/test-your-comic-book-knowledge-for-825/comment-page-1/#comment-681051</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Coil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 01:02:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=18443#comment-681051</guid>
		<description>Like Ajit, the only one I knew was Spectre.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like Ajit, the only one I knew was Spectre.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/08/25/test-your-comic-book-knowledge-for-825/comment-page-1/#comment-681037</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 23:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=18443#comment-681037</guid>
		<description>The Chromium cover was on Superman #82, it was the final part of Reign of the Supermen. Pretty neat cover too but it could hurt your eyes if it caught the light in a certain way! 

Action Comics 695 was foil-embossed to mark the historic first appearance of the now-classic Superman villian...the mighty Cauldron! We all remember him right? ;) It featured Lobo too IIRC which seemed like reason enough to make a cover enhancement in the 90s! 

Lobo was in MOS #30 too, it was a World&#039;s Collide crossover with Milestone and had the acetate clingy stickers so that you could make your own cover.

Flash 100 had foil-etched writing. I think Superman, Green Arrow, JLA and Wonder Woman#100 all had it too but I cant remember the story in Flash 100. I think the covers were probably better then the dreck contained within anyway, far more imaginitive!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Chromium cover was on Superman #82, it was the final part of Reign of the Supermen. Pretty neat cover too but it could hurt your eyes if it caught the light in a certain way! </p>
<p>Action Comics 695 was foil-embossed to mark the historic first appearance of the now-classic Superman villian...the mighty Cauldron! We all remember him right? <img src='http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  It featured Lobo too IIRC which seemed like reason enough to make a cover enhancement in the 90s! </p>
<p>Lobo was in MOS #30 too, it was a World's Collide crossover with Milestone and had the acetate clingy stickers so that you could make your own cover.</p>
<p>Flash 100 had foil-etched writing. I think Superman, Green Arrow, JLA and Wonder Woman#100 all had it too but I cant remember the story in Flash 100. I think the covers were probably better then the dreck contained within anyway, far more imaginitive!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Cronin</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/08/25/test-your-comic-book-knowledge-for-825/comment-page-1/#comment-681024</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Cronin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 21:29:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=18443#comment-681024</guid>
		<description>Stephen, re: Superman #82&#039;s cover - now, yeah, it doesn&#039;t look that different, but at the time, a &quot;Chromium&quot; cover was actually a big deal, so that was considered an impressive cover at the time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stephen, re: Superman #82's cover - now, yeah, it doesn't look that different, but at the time, a "Chromium" cover was actually a big deal, so that was considered an impressive cover at the time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Cronin</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/08/25/test-your-comic-book-knowledge-for-825/comment-page-1/#comment-681023</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Cronin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 21:28:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=18443#comment-681023</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think &quot;fold out cover&quot; is an accurate enough description of Shadowhawk II #3&#039;s cover - it was a very specific kind of fold out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don't think "fold out cover" is an accurate enough description of Shadowhawk II #3's cover - it was a very specific kind of fold out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Collins</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/08/25/test-your-comic-book-knowledge-for-825/comment-page-1/#comment-681021</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Collins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 21:23:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=18443#comment-681021</guid>
		<description>Phantom Longbox is right, Man Of Steel #30 was the one with the little Superman and Lobo colorform characters that could be stuck to the cover and arranged to &quot;make your own.&quot; I actually thought that one was kind of fun at the time...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phantom Longbox is right, Man Of Steel #30 was the one with the little Superman and Lobo colorform characters that could be stuck to the cover and arranged to "make your own." I actually thought that one was kind of fun at the time...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nic S</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/08/25/test-your-comic-book-knowledge-for-825/comment-page-1/#comment-681002</link>
		<dc:creator>Nic S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 19:46:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=18443#comment-681002</guid>
		<description>What about Eclipso #1 with that horrible platic &quot;diamond&quot; glued to the front cover.

Ah the nineties!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about Eclipso #1 with that horrible platic "diamond" glued to the front cover.</p>
<p>Ah the nineties!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/08/25/test-your-comic-book-knowledge-for-825/comment-page-1/#comment-680995</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 19:26:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=18443#comment-680995</guid>
		<description>When I went into the shop to get Superman #83, I was actually surprised that was all the cover was. I mean, it&#039;s the finale to one of the biggest stories in comics history, everyone else is throwing gimmick covers on anything they can find... and all it gets is a shinier cardstock cover, especially after the nice cover of Batman #500 from around that same period (the old costume die-cut to reveal the new one).

Next idea for one of those &quot;examine a DC cover theme&quot; pieces, Brian: the &quot;words&quot; covers, such as Flash #100. I know there were probably a dozen out there, but I can&#039;t be bothered to track them down on Mile High. I know one was the Superman &quot;The Death of Clark Kent&quot; storyline, but I can&#039;t find it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I went into the shop to get Superman #83, I was actually surprised that was all the cover was. I mean, it's the finale to one of the biggest stories in comics history, everyone else is throwing gimmick covers on anything they can find... and all it gets is a shinier cardstock cover, especially after the nice cover of Batman #500 from around that same period (the old costume die-cut to reveal the new one).</p>
<p>Next idea for one of those "examine a DC cover theme" pieces, Brian: the "words" covers, such as Flash #100. I know there were probably a dozen out there, but I can't be bothered to track them down on Mile High. I know one was the Superman "The Death of Clark Kent" storyline, but I can't find it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc Kandel</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/08/25/test-your-comic-book-knowledge-for-825/comment-page-1/#comment-680991</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc Kandel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 19:11:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=18443#comment-680991</guid>
		<description>Well, whether its included or not, out of all the comics listed there, I still recall that particular issue being  to my tastes, the best read out of all the above comics, and sad to say, I read quite a few on that list.

In fact, the Wolverine one just flat out annoyed me, not merely because of the cost breaking lame holo-cover, but because according to the nature of adamantium (when Magneto has left the room and as there&#039;s no mention of a molecular re-arranger in the X-comics), ol&#039; Logan should still be in a tank somewhere, with spools of unbreakable, unmalleable material jutting out of random points in his body.  I dunno, I bring this up every now and then, and it still bothers me- one second Logan has tendrils of the stuff exploding out of him (which if you look, is how Magneto left him) and then next, Logan is in bad shape, but all the adamantium is separate from him, and not only that, its conveniently collected, in liquid form no less, in glass cylanders in the X-jet.

Yeah, as far as I&#039;m concerned, the covers, irritating and wallet-raping though they were, were not even the most objectionable problems of the content.

Ah,  Forget it Jake, its 1990&#039;s 616.  I mean, this is the era that gave us Capwolf.  And a Logan-wolf whose unbreakable adamantium actually morphed with the rest of his body into a wolfen skeleton.  And I actually know this information.  Ok, I&#039;m offically a sad panda now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, whether its included or not, out of all the comics listed there, I still recall that particular issue being  to my tastes, the best read out of all the above comics, and sad to say, I read quite a few on that list.</p>
<p>In fact, the Wolverine one just flat out annoyed me, not merely because of the cost breaking lame holo-cover, but because according to the nature of adamantium (when Magneto has left the room and as there's no mention of a molecular re-arranger in the X-comics), ol' Logan should still be in a tank somewhere, with spools of unbreakable, unmalleable material jutting out of random points in his body.  I dunno, I bring this up every now and then, and it still bothers me- one second Logan has tendrils of the stuff exploding out of him (which if you look, is how Magneto left him) and then next, Logan is in bad shape, but all the adamantium is separate from him, and not only that, its conveniently collected, in liquid form no less, in glass cylanders in the X-jet.</p>
<p>Yeah, as far as I'm concerned, the covers, irritating and wallet-raping though they were, were not even the most objectionable problems of the content.</p>
<p>Ah,  Forget it Jake, its 1990's 616.  I mean, this is the era that gave us Capwolf.  And a Logan-wolf whose unbreakable adamantium actually morphed with the rest of his body into a wolfen skeleton.  And I actually know this information.  Ok, I'm offically a sad panda now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blackjak</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/08/25/test-your-comic-book-knowledge-for-825/comment-page-1/#comment-680984</link>
		<dc:creator>Blackjak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 18:52:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=18443#comment-680984</guid>
		<description>Marc, hate to break it to you... SS#50 (the one with Thanos) isn&#039;t actually included in the list... It&#039;s used as an example...

I do agree with you though.. I think the gimmicks were used to cover up bad storylines... I too cut back heavily in the early 90s... Think I stuck to Hellblazer, Sandman and Cerebus with the occasional Flash...

Spider-Man got put down after I actually got so used to the Recycled-Villian-of-the-Month pattern that I predicted the next two villians correctly...  I thought that Spectacular Spider-man was telling a much better story that was seemingly being ignored... So anyway - I quit before the Scarlet Spider thing...

weird though... Most early-mid 90s comics (particularly Marvel) are almost screaming &quot;PLEASE!! PICK ME OFF THE SHELF!! TAKE ME HOME!&quot;  In a very pathetic way... THe art all looks samey, adn crass... Almost desperate..  Was that the same sort of time as the Chapter 11 filing?? Did they really need the cash that badly??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marc, hate to break it to you... SS#50 (the one with Thanos) isn't actually included in the list... It's used as an example...</p>
<p>I do agree with you though.. I think the gimmicks were used to cover up bad storylines... I too cut back heavily in the early 90s... Think I stuck to Hellblazer, Sandman and Cerebus with the occasional Flash...</p>
<p>Spider-Man got put down after I actually got so used to the Recycled-Villian-of-the-Month pattern that I predicted the next two villians correctly...  I thought that Spectacular Spider-man was telling a much better story that was seemingly being ignored... So anyway - I quit before the Scarlet Spider thing...</p>
<p>weird though... Most early-mid 90s comics (particularly Marvel) are almost screaming "PLEASE!! PICK ME OFF THE SHELF!! TAKE ME HOME!"  In a very pathetic way... THe art all looks samey, adn crass... Almost desperate..  Was that the same sort of time as the Chapter 11 filing?? Did they really need the cash that badly??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc Kandel</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/08/25/test-your-comic-book-knowledge-for-825/comment-page-1/#comment-680975</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc Kandel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 18:25:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=18443#comment-680975</guid>
		<description>From what I can remember about any of those, Silver Surfer was probably the best read, cover aside.  Thanos&#039; resurrection had a point, there was some great exploration of Surfer&#039;s character, and I enjoyed Lim&#039;s art.  In fact I think I liked Surfer&#039;s arcs with Thanos better than the actual Infinity Gauntlet series it became.

Damn but I was such a dumb ass in the 90&#039;s.  Fortunately, the quality began to suffer across the board so badly that even I noticed (cough-- clones--cough), and quickly terminated subscriptions to everything save for Doom 2099- and they even had to fuck that up eventually as well with the final issues and story arc being nigh unintelligible, and certainly not enjoyable either in art or writing- not even John Francis Moore&#039;s return to write the final issue amounted to anything more than an obligatory closing of the circle to one of Marvel&#039;s most imaginative, addictive titles to come from that period.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From what I can remember about any of those, Silver Surfer was probably the best read, cover aside.  Thanos' resurrection had a point, there was some great exploration of Surfer's character, and I enjoyed Lim's art.  In fact I think I liked Surfer's arcs with Thanos better than the actual Infinity Gauntlet series it became.</p>
<p>Damn but I was such a dumb ass in the 90's.  Fortunately, the quality began to suffer across the board so badly that even I noticed (cough-- clones--cough), and quickly terminated subscriptions to everything save for Doom 2099- and they even had to fuck that up eventually as well with the final issues and story arc being nigh unintelligible, and certainly not enjoyable either in art or writing- not even John Francis Moore's return to write the final issue amounted to anything more than an obligatory closing of the circle to one of Marvel's most imaginative, addictive titles to come from that period.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Bird</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/08/25/test-your-comic-book-knowledge-for-825/comment-page-1/#comment-680952</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Bird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 17:21:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=18443#comment-680952</guid>
		<description>Reading this list makes me so happy I went cold turkey off comics in 1992.  SS #50 was the only one I bought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reading this list makes me so happy I went cold turkey off comics in 1992.  SS #50 was the only one I bought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Ryan</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/08/25/test-your-comic-book-knowledge-for-825/comment-page-1/#comment-680942</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 17:03:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=18443#comment-680942</guid>
		<description>I remember one letters column for a really unnecessary special cover (it wasn&#039;t a 50th issue or the end of a storyline), and the editors&#039; note said how they hated special covers and it took extra time and energy, and made them raise the cost of the book a dollar and change. But they were determined to do it, becuase it was what we the fans wanted.

Sales probably increased for the special-cover issues, so in a way I guess we did want it. But a regular-length Guardians of the Galaxy isn&#039;t worth $3.50.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember one letters column for a really unnecessary special cover (it wasn't a 50th issue or the end of a storyline), and the editors' note said how they hated special covers and it took extra time and energy, and made them raise the cost of the book a dollar and change. But they were determined to do it, becuase it was what we the fans wanted.</p>
<p>Sales probably increased for the special-cover issues, so in a way I guess we did want it. But a regular-length Guardians of the Galaxy isn't worth $3.50.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blackjak</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/08/25/test-your-comic-book-knowledge-for-825/comment-page-1/#comment-680937</link>
		<dc:creator>Blackjak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 16:49:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=18443#comment-680937</guid>
		<description>Scavenger:  Silver Surfer #50 and #75 were exceedingly similar... Though I think #75 has the Holofoil the Mad Monkey googled... - it has a sort of rainbow look to the foil...

The Hologram covers I always thought looked cr@p honestly... I had one for (I *think*) Web of SpiderMan #50... looked awful... 

Some gimmicks were just pointless...

Though I did like the really subtle Glow-in-the-dark inking on Wraithspawn #1(?) recently (last year?)

I don&#039;t mind gimmicks if they are original or well-done...

It&#039;s the unoriginal and/or badly-done ones that suck...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scavenger:  Silver Surfer #50 and #75 were exceedingly similar... Though I think #75 has the Holofoil the Mad Monkey googled... - it has a sort of rainbow look to the foil...</p>
<p>The Hologram covers I always thought looked cr@p honestly... I had one for (I *think*) Web of SpiderMan #50... looked awful... </p>
<p>Some gimmicks were just pointless...</p>
<p>Though I did like the really subtle Glow-in-the-dark inking on Wraithspawn #1(?) recently (last year?)</p>
<p>I don't mind gimmicks if they are original or well-done...</p>
<p>It's the unoriginal and/or badly-done ones that suck...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
