<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: When The Transitive Property Didn&#8217;t Work For Me In Comics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/09/03/when-the-transitive-property-didnt-work-for-me-in-comics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/09/03/when-the-transitive-property-didnt-work-for-me-in-comics/</link>
	<description>Comic Book Resources Presents... Comics Should Be Good!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:27:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scavenger</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/09/03/when-the-transitive-property-didnt-work-for-me-in-comics/comment-page-1/#comment-682735</link>
		<dc:creator>Scavenger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 05:17:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=18594#comment-682735</guid>
		<description>I think #3 starts with a false premise.

You don&#039;t seem to like Neil Gaiman comics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think #3 starts with a false premise.</p>
<p>You don&#8217;t seem to like Neil Gaiman comics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PÃ³l Rua</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/09/03/when-the-transitive-property-didnt-work-for-me-in-comics/comment-page-1/#comment-682714</link>
		<dc:creator>PÃ³l Rua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 03:19:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=18594#comment-682714</guid>
		<description>4. I like pro wrestling and luchadore iconography, I like laughing, so I should like Lucha Libre

Sonambulo&#039;s your hook-up.
Seriously.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>4. I like pro wrestling and luchadore iconography, I like laughing, so I should like Lucha Libre</p>
<p>Sonambulo&#8217;s your hook-up.<br />
Seriously.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DanCJ</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/09/03/when-the-transitive-property-didnt-work-for-me-in-comics/comment-page-1/#comment-682521</link>
		<dc:creator>DanCJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 08:29:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=18594#comment-682521</guid>
		<description>The cake is real!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The cake is real!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rene</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/09/03/when-the-transitive-property-didnt-work-for-me-in-comics/comment-page-1/#comment-682497</link>
		<dc:creator>Rene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 06:15:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=18594#comment-682497</guid>
		<description>Really? Last issue I read was 670, and I dunno... 

Except for the &quot;Clown at Midnight&quot; (the prose issue), Morrison&#039;s Batman seems to be less the tormented urban predator, and more like some sort of studly international man of mystery, or something. You know, not as many rainy Gotham nights, and more stuff in the Alps with sexy supermodels and ninja man-bats. I didn&#039;t think it was bad, but it was sort of a... disconnect.

But yeah, there are nine issues I didn&#039;t read yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really? Last issue I read was 670, and I dunno&#8230; </p>
<p>Except for the &#8220;Clown at Midnight&#8221; (the prose issue), Morrison&#8217;s Batman seems to be less the tormented urban predator, and more like some sort of studly international man of mystery, or something. You know, not as many rainy Gotham nights, and more stuff in the Alps with sexy supermodels and ninja man-bats. I didn&#8217;t think it was bad, but it was sort of a&#8230; disconnect.</p>
<p>But yeah, there are nine issues I didn&#8217;t read yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FunkyGreenJerusalem</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/09/03/when-the-transitive-property-didnt-work-for-me-in-comics/comment-page-1/#comment-682496</link>
		<dc:creator>FunkyGreenJerusalem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 06:14:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=18594#comment-682496</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Morrisonâ€™s BATMAN has been crazy, but not really non-dark. Itâ€™s more of a lurid pulp tone, as though Batman had been invented for sleazy dime novels instead of comic books.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Well, he is based on characters from sleazy dime novels...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Morrisonâ€™s BATMAN has been crazy, but not really non-dark. Itâ€™s more of a lurid pulp tone, as though Batman had been invented for sleazy dime novels instead of comic books.</p></blockquote>
<p>Well, he is based on characters from sleazy dime novels&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evan Waters</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/09/03/when-the-transitive-property-didnt-work-for-me-in-comics/comment-page-1/#comment-682483</link>
		<dc:creator>Evan Waters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 04:39:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=18594#comment-682483</guid>
		<description>Morrison&#039;s BATMAN has been crazy, but not really non-dark. It&#039;s more of a lurid pulp tone, as though Batman had been invented for sleazy dime novels instead of comic books.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Morrison&#8217;s BATMAN has been crazy, but not really non-dark. It&#8217;s more of a lurid pulp tone, as though Batman had been invented for sleazy dime novels instead of comic books.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Jones</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/09/03/when-the-transitive-property-didnt-work-for-me-in-comics/comment-page-1/#comment-682479</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 04:33:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=18594#comment-682479</guid>
		<description>Are you kidding with Batman not being dark enough?

It&#039;s one of the bleakest comics being produced today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you kidding with Batman not being dark enough?</p>
<p>It&#8217;s one of the bleakest comics being produced today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rene</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/09/03/when-the-transitive-property-didnt-work-for-me-in-comics/comment-page-1/#comment-682469</link>
		<dc:creator>Rene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 03:33:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=18594#comment-682469</guid>
		<description>Neil Gaiman. It&#039;s not so much about the medium, it&#039;s about the length. I think Gaiman is much better with shorter stories. I love his short stories, both in comics and in books. &quot;Smoke and Mirrors&quot; and &quot;Fragile Things&quot; were both great, I think. But I still liked his novels too. Just not as much.

And I like Arkham Asylum, but Morrison&#039;s recent run on Batman has been hit-or-miss with me too. I dunno... it&#039;s too... not-dark, you know? Bright and crazy. I&#039;m just too used to a dark and moody Batman, I suppose. Bright and crazy has worked well for Morrison on Superman and Invisibles and JLA, but not so much on Batman.

I never watched a episode of Buffy or Angel. Yeah, unbelievable, right? One day I will.

I don&#039;t understand the fascination Americans have for pro-wrestling. And this one, I never will.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neil Gaiman. It&#8217;s not so much about the medium, it&#8217;s about the length. I think Gaiman is much better with shorter stories. I love his short stories, both in comics and in books. &#8220;Smoke and Mirrors&#8221; and &#8220;Fragile Things&#8221; were both great, I think. But I still liked his novels too. Just not as much.</p>
<p>And I like Arkham Asylum, but Morrison&#8217;s recent run on Batman has been hit-or-miss with me too. I dunno&#8230; it&#8217;s too&#8230; not-dark, you know? Bright and crazy. I&#8217;m just too used to a dark and moody Batman, I suppose. Bright and crazy has worked well for Morrison on Superman and Invisibles and JLA, but not so much on Batman.</p>
<p>I never watched a episode of Buffy or Angel. Yeah, unbelievable, right? One day I will.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t understand the fascination Americans have for pro-wrestling. And this one, I never will.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua Strasburg</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/09/03/when-the-transitive-property-didnt-work-for-me-in-comics/comment-page-1/#comment-682467</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua Strasburg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 03:05:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=18594#comment-682467</guid>
		<description>I agree the transitive property does not always pan out with comics, but have some differing opinions.

1. Me, I&#039;ve never given a scat about Joss Whedon&#039;s TV or movie writing.  Buffy and Serenity (or whatever it&#039;s called) fly so far outside of my interest range as to rarely get a blip on the radar.  Paired with John Cassaday on Astonishing X-Men, though?  Sheer awesomeness.  I&#039;m a big X-nerd from back in the day, but I haven&#039;t read an X-book consistently in almost a decade.  The X-Men corner of the Marvel Universe usually sucks and most of the characters have been removed so far from their original/classic portrayals that I don&#039;t even see them as being the same characters.  Grant Morrison&#039;s run and Whedon&#039;s run are the only two exceptions that I stuck with.  Whedon was a worthy successor to Morrison (Austen not so much).

2. I will agree with you that Grant Morrison&#039;s Batman hasn&#039;t been all it could be.  The Black Glove storyline with the Club of Heroes is pure gold, though.  I love the hell out of that story.

3. For me the opposite is true: I don&#039;t like Neil Gaiman&#039;s comics (most of the time), so maybe I&#039;ll like his novels ... ?  Check.  Gaiman&#039;s prose is marvelous.  It&#039;s Bradbury-esque, which is a very, very good thing.

4. I don&#039;t care.

You know, it&#039;s actually quite enjoyable to just say whatever fool thing pops into my head.  You&#039;re onto something ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree the transitive property does not always pan out with comics, but have some differing opinions.</p>
<p>1. Me, I&#8217;ve never given a scat about Joss Whedon&#8217;s TV or movie writing.  Buffy and Serenity (or whatever it&#8217;s called) fly so far outside of my interest range as to rarely get a blip on the radar.  Paired with John Cassaday on Astonishing X-Men, though?  Sheer awesomeness.  I&#8217;m a big X-nerd from back in the day, but I haven&#8217;t read an X-book consistently in almost a decade.  The X-Men corner of the Marvel Universe usually sucks and most of the characters have been removed so far from their original/classic portrayals that I don&#8217;t even see them as being the same characters.  Grant Morrison&#8217;s run and Whedon&#8217;s run are the only two exceptions that I stuck with.  Whedon was a worthy successor to Morrison (Austen not so much).</p>
<p>2. I will agree with you that Grant Morrison&#8217;s Batman hasn&#8217;t been all it could be.  The Black Glove storyline with the Club of Heroes is pure gold, though.  I love the hell out of that story.</p>
<p>3. For me the opposite is true: I don&#8217;t like Neil Gaiman&#8217;s comics (most of the time), so maybe I&#8217;ll like his novels &#8230; ?  Check.  Gaiman&#8217;s prose is marvelous.  It&#8217;s Bradbury-esque, which is a very, very good thing.</p>
<p>4. I don&#8217;t care.</p>
<p>You know, it&#8217;s actually quite enjoyable to just say whatever fool thing pops into my head.  You&#8217;re onto something &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jbird</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/09/03/when-the-transitive-property-didnt-work-for-me-in-comics/comment-page-1/#comment-682463</link>
		<dc:creator>Jbird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 02:20:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=18594#comment-682463</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s strange but true. I can&#039;t stand anything Whedon&#039;s been responsible for onscreen, but I loved Astonishing. Go figure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s strange but true. I can&#8217;t stand anything Whedon&#8217;s been responsible for onscreen, but I loved Astonishing. Go figure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

