CBI Archive
What I bought - 17 September 2008
Friday, September 19th, 2008 at 2:54 PM EST
Updated: Friday, September 19th, 2008 at 2:54 PM EST
I’m kind of a Marvel Zombie this week. Not a complete one, but enough so I feel like a corporate tool. Feel free to ignore these reviews. Oh, wait - most people already do! Feel free to ignore them and take shots at me for being a shill for Joey Q!
And, because I like being depressed, I’m going to list the sales figures for each comic from last month. These are the numbers directly from ICv2. I’m not going to analyze them like the excellent Marc-Oliver Frisch and Paul O’Brien do over at The Beat, just list the numbers. Because there’s nothing more fun than seeing books you like teetering on the edge of extinction!
Air #2 by G. Willow Wilson (writer), M. K. Perker (artist), Chris Chuckry (colorist), and Jared K. Fletcher (letterer). $2.99, 23 pgs, FC, DC/Vertigo.
The second issue of Air is as odd as the first, which doesn’t make it bad but doesn’t necessarily make it good. It makes it interesting, I suppose, and as I mentioned with the first issue, I’m willing to give it a few issues to see where Wilson is going with this. There’s something off about it, though, in both the writing and the art, and it’s keeping me from enjoying this totally.
Blythe’s dilemma takes a different turn, as she discovers what Narimar - the country from which Zayn sent his letter last issue - is and how to get there (come on, it’s a comic book - you didn’t think there would be an imaginary country named and then there would be no way to get there, did you?). She ends up in Narimar with her pal Fletcher (no, not Chevy Chase, but the flight attendant from last issue) and Mrs. Battacharya, who works for the airline in some capacity. She goes there because Zayn (or Javad, as is apparently his “real” name) has disappeared, and she thinks she can help him. Of course, things go pear-shaped pretty quickly, and we’re left wondering if Blythe and her gang will survive her little excursion.
The plot isn’t bad, although after the mystery of the first issue, it becomes a bit more “action-adventure” in this one. Not too much, and not to the point where everything is explained, but the overall plot seems a bit less interesting than it was in the first issue. I don’t have that big of a problem with it, because it’s only the second issue and Wilson has some time to work it out, but it’s worrisome. More than that, though, is the problems with the characters. Javad (as I’ll call him from now on) isn’t in the issue all that much, but his scene with Blythe early on is rather nice. Mrs. Battacharya is a typical wise old exotic person, but her and Fletcher’s decision to go with Blythe is rather weird, especially because all three of them have jobs (yes, Blythe claims to her boss that they’re all sick, but that’s a lame excuse, isn’t it?). I’m trying not to read this as “realistic” (it features an imaginary country, after all), but little things like that always bug me. These aren’t people who have jobs that lend themselves to heading off on adventures, so when they do, it seems strange. Plus, the answer about Narimar rankled me a bit as well. If I want to discover something quickly, I turn to Google. If the answer to the mystery of Narimar is what Blythe discovers it is, it’s probably on the Internet. Come on, Blythe, you can check it out while in your bath robe!
I know that’s nitpicking, but that’s part of the problem with the book. We come to a comic with a healthy suspension of disbelief, sure, but we also come to it with a baseline of reality, which is ours. If that reality is immediately done away with, as in superhero comics, then we can adjust to it. So far in Air, “our” “reality” is still established, and the presence of an imaginary country is treated as it would in “our” world - with skepticism. So we have to assume that this is “our” world, and therefore Google exists. The tension of the book comes because Blythe, who is fairly normal, suddenly finds herself thrust into a shadow world where strange things happen, and while that’s a good foundation for interesting fiction, it doesn’t work if we think Blythe is unaware of things in her world. It causes us to lose sympathy for her, and then we don’t care anymore. And that’s not good.
I should point out I’m thinking a lot about Air even though I’m not completely sold on it, which isn’t a bad thing at all. I want it to be better, but it’s still pretty intriguing. We’ll see if it improves next issue!
Latest sales figures (August, #1): 11,094. Rank: 163. Does Vertigo even care about singles sales?
Atomic Robo: Dogs of War #2 (of 5) by Brian Clevinger (writer), Scott Wegener (artist), Ronda Pattison (colorist), and Jeff Powell (letterer). Back-up story by Brian Clevinger (writer), Derrick Fish (artist), and Jeff Powell (letterer). $2.95, 26 pgs, FC, Red 5 Comics.
After a first issue that was entertaining but lacked the spark of the first series, Clevinger allows Robo to loosen up a bit in this issue, cracking wise while he’s cracking robot heads, and the result is a much more enjoyable issue. This is basically an issue featuring Robo beating up on the Nazi robots that are tying to stop the Allied invasion of Italy, so there’s lots of fighting, explosions, and wry humor. I laughed out loud at a few lines, including the one where Robo renames a soldier “Tex” just because it sounds better. The last line of the comic, amazingly enough, is hilarious but also somewhat poignant. I’m not sure how Clevinger did that. And in the back-up story, the first page, which features what appears to be a giant robot mummy, is one of the funniest exchanges in a comic in a while. Good stuff.
And I can’t say enough about Wegener’s art. It’s fantastic. Not only are the facial expressions of the soldiers great, but his fight scenes are breathtaking. If he learned about drawing fight scenes from looking at Ryan Ottley’s work, I wouldn’t be surprised. But Ryan Ottley’s great, so there’s nothing wrong with studying his stuff!
I didn’t really have a problem with the first issue, but I did wish it was a little more fun. This issue makes up for that and also keeps the petal on the metal in terms of action. And it’s four cents cheaper than your regular DC or Marvel book! You can’t beat that!
Latest sales figures (August, #1): 5,666. Rank: 221. I have no idea if this is good or not.
Captain Britain and MI 13 #5 by Paul Cornell (writer), Pat Olliffe (penciler), Paul Neary (inker), Brian Reber (colorist), Raul Trevino (colorist), and Joe Caramagna (letterer). $2.99, 22 pgs, FC, Marvel.
You know, I could have sworn someone in MI 13 knew that Spitfire was a vampire. Because bringing Blade onto the team wouldn’t have been the smartest move if they had known. Oh well.
Olliffe does a nice job with the art in the issue, in what I assume is a guest pencilling gig (comics rarely call people “guest” artists anymore, have you noticed?), as he and Neary give it a nice, clean look, pleasant but unspectacular. Cornell takes the time to organize the team and give the members some down time, which is always nice. The highlight of the issue is Dane and Faiza’s visit to her parents so she can explain the fact that she’s joining the team. Faiza is, of course, the Sensational Character Find of 2008, so it’s not surprising that Dane’s meeting with them is delightful. It’s nice to see Cornell introduce Muslim characters who are culturally Muslim but not religiously Muslim (Faiza’s father says he’s not religious). You might think that “Muslim” means someone is religious, but it’s interesting to see a family that, like many Christians, are “Christian” in a vague sense but not necessarily when confronted with it. It doesn’t make them bad people, just like the Hussains aren’t bad people because they’re not hard core Muslim. They’re just people. It’s nice that Cornell is treating them that way.
The other members of the team get some face time, too, and the next story arc kicks in when Captain Midlands calls in with an emergency. It’s a satisfying issue. I do wish that Spitfire wasn’t so modern. I recently learned that she’s from the 1940s (which, yes, I should have known, but I hope you’ll forgive me) and in the comic in which I learned this, Ron Marz (of all people) does a nice job with the faint culture shock she feels. I get that she’s been young and modern for a while now, but I don’t think we’ve gotten enough of a sense so far in this series that she’s a Captain America kind of figure. Maybe I just missed it because I didn’t know she was (literally) olde-skool.
That’s a minor point - I don’t even know if it qualifies as a complaint. This is a fun, relatively quiet issue that builds on what has come before and moves us forward. How about that for a comic book? It’s practically revolutionary!
Latest sales figures (August, issue #4): 36,826. Rank: 63. Let’s see if people stay after the Skrulls aren’t tying into the book.
Checkmate #30 by Bruce Jones (writer), Manuel Garcia (artist), Travis Lanham (letterer), and Santiago Arcas (colorist). $2.99, 22 pgs, FC, DC.
Um, yeah. As you know, I can’t really defend buying this. I’m just doing it because next issue is the last one, and I might as well finish it out. Yes, it’s a silly attitude, but I did really want to see what Jones did with the book. Not much, as it turns out. I mean, in this issue, the Black King (Khalid) tells the members of the Global Guardians, “Each of you also realizes it is only in a time of direst emergency would Checkmate reach out to deputize any metas.” Even if we ignore the tortured syntax, didn’t Checkmate just deputize the Justice League in Rucka’s last story arc? As I’ve mentioned, Jones has turned this into a superhero book, and while probably nothing he could have done would have saved this, it’s just not interesting anymore. I do hope Garcia gets a better gig, though, because his art is very nice.
Oh well. We’ll see if Jones can rescue it next issue. I doubt it.
Latest sales figures (August, #29): 13,000. Rank: 146. That’s why it got cancelled.
Ghost Rider #27 by Jason Aaron (writer), Tan Eng Huat (artist), José Villarrubia (colorist), and Joe Caramagna (letterer). $2.99, 22 pgs, FC, Marvel.
This issue puzzles me. Maybe I haven’t been paying attention (it’s certainly possible) or maybe I should go out and buy the 1990s Ghost Rider series (which is not an option), but does Johnny Blaze not know that Danny is alive? He seems surprised to see him in this comic. Maybe I missed something. Anyway, we’re hip deep in GR history in this issue, and although the last issue was as well, I didn’t mind it as much. It seems like this issue is much more involved, what with the nun discovering weird things about Ghost Rider and Blaze speaking cryptically. I knew that all the weird characters in the last issue were old Ghost Rider bad guys, but it didn’t matter too much, as they didn’t hang around long. Now, it seems like Aaron wants us to figure things out by re-reading our old Ghost Rider comics, and I don’t own any. I’m still enjoying his run so far, but this issue felt off. I like albino vampires bashing people over the head with grave markers and nuns beating up truckers as much as the next guy, but there was something missing from this issue, and I’m not sure what it was.
Huat’s art is still quite nice, but I still don’t think it fits the mood perfectly. He draws a great Ghost Rider, I’ll admit, and the final page is very impressive, but it’s still a bit too clean for what Aaron is going for. Oh well - it’s still the best art I’ve ever seen from Huat, so I’ll give him a pass. But would it kill him to grit it up a bit?
Latest sales figures (August, #26): 27,026. Rank: 95. Sales are stable if low.
Gødland #25 by Joe Casey (writer), Tom Scioli (artist), Bill Crabtree (colorist), and Rus Wooton (letterer). $2.99, 20 pgs, FC, Image.
You know, for the first nine pages of this comic publication, it’s fairly normal. Well, “normal” for Gødland, which means Adam Archer is practicing teleportation and blasting off from Cape Canaveral to look for his sister, Neela. So, you know, normal. Then we turn onto page 10, and the caption reads “Twelve thousand luminous light years ago” and a voice from off-panel says, “Galactic greatness … a living and breathing Dynolux! Passion and fertility!” and the void of space is filled with pink and green ooze (and what looks like a face off to the side) and the book becomes even more insane than it already was. Yes, somehow that’s possible. Scioli goes full-on Kirby-Crazy on us, with “feral bipeds” and “gelatinous slugs” fighting on a virgin world while N’ull Pax Mizer - an “eventualist” - flies overhead, speeding up evolution while his enemies, Leviticus (with his serrated sail) and Vayikra (that’s them on the cover), attempt to stop him. Before you can say “What in the name of L-Ron –?!” (which Mizer says at one point), there’s time travel, fat jokes, evolved feral bipeds, and creatures getting sliced in half, into which Adam suddenly teleports! The final 11 pages of this issue are a tour-de-force of comics awesomeness. You can try to resist, but you cannot! And why the hell would you, anyway?
I have no idea where Casey and Scioli are going with this, but I’m locked in. If you don’t like breathtaking insanely entertaining comics, then I wouldn’t buy this. But you’re not that person, are you? Are you?????
Latest sales figures: You know, I couldn’t find it. The idea that this didn’t make the Top 300 in sales for July (when the last issue came out) is just too depressing to contemplate.
The Incredible Hercules #121 by Greg Pak (writer), Fred van Lente (writer), Clayton Henry (artist), Guru eFX (colorists), and Joe Caramagna (letterer). $2.99, 22 pgs, FC, Marvel.
You know, The Incredible Hercules has reached the point where there’s really nothing new to say. I mean, I’m not sure how Pak and Van Lente can keep it this consistently awesome, but I don’t care how they’re doing it, just that they are. I mean, this is the beginning of a new story but it still continues stuff that has already been introduced, so it works well if you’ve been reading along, but it’s also a fantastic single issue that would be a wonderful introduction to the series if, for some really bad reason (it would have to be bad), you haven’t been reading so far. I mean, Pak and Van Lente throw in more mythology, which is always nice, but the crux of the issue is Amadeus getting kidnapped by Amazons, which sounds a lot more fun than it really is. Pak and Van Lente, in one issue, manage to make Marvel’s Amazons as much or more kick-ass than DC’s have ever been. It’s a blast to read, and Henry’s clean art works well for the story. Plus, in a book that’s largely about sex, there’s a sound effect that made me chuckle: “SHTUUUUP!”
I have one problem with the book. When Delphyne takes Amadeus to Artume’s boudoir, she mentions that he was chosen because he’s Hercules’ “eromenos.” Thanks to Google (see, Blythe, everyone can use it!), I learned that an eromenos was the young boy in Classical Greece who was in a sexual relationship with an older man. I mean, I probably could have figured that out for myself, but I just wanted to be sure! Anyway, Amadeus really freaks out about it. On the one hand, he’s sixteen and still immature. On the other hand, he’s been portrayed as wiser than his years, and more cosmopolitan than you might expect. I’m not saying he wouldn’t be offended by the implication, but his reaction seems a bit more homophobic than I thought. It seems like it’s in the book just for some cheap humor, and in a book that has a lot of smart humor, it doesn’t feel right. Or is that just me?
Other than that, it’s a typically excellent issue of The Incredible Hercules. Come on - we learn there’s a sex position called the Atlantean “crab hold”! Good times.
Latest sales figures (August, #120): 51,100. Rank: 38. This got a big jump from Secret Invasion.
Moon Knight #22 by Mike Benson (writer), Mark Texeira (artist), Javier Saltares (layouts), Dan Brown (colorist), and Joe Caramagna (letterer). $2.99, 23 pgs, FC, Marvel.
In order to make Joe Rice’s head explode, I think I’ll have to attest that this book is much better than All Star Superman. It’s that awesome!
Okay, it’s not as good as All Star Superman. Happy, Joe? But it’s still a great comic, even though I risk the wrath of noted smart guy Tim Callahan, who was unimpressed with the first issue of this arc. But where he sees “faux-intense” and a book lacking a sense of humor, I see a comic that doesn’t need a goddamned sense of humor and is attempting to examine serious themes, so it’s “actual-intense.” As I’ve always said with this comic, Huston and now Benson (and I’ve never seen Entourage, so I can’t speak to Tim’s assertion that it’s “jokey” and “unimpressive”) are taking a long view of what happens when a hero goes insane and how a government that regulates heroes would deal with that. I will admit that Moon Knight moves slowly. It’s possible (or even probable) that Benson is doing it because of the trade paperback ramifications, but it also fits the comic, because it shouldn’t feel compressed - this is the slow degradation of a hero and how those close to him deal with it. So I’m sure Tim won’t like this issue either, as there’s more talking. Of course, shit does blow up, but the interesting parts of the book, to me, are when Crawley goes to visit Frenchie and Marlene and tries to get them to help Marc. I’m sure it helps to have read prior Moon Knight series, but even if you don’t have their full history, the conversations Crawley has with Marc’s closest friends are painful because they sound like things actual people would say. I mean, I guess that’s just an opinion, but that’s all we have, right? I also thought the fight between Marc and the Thunderbolts worked really well. Neither side came off perfectly, and as this book has been doing since the beginning, we see the effects of the violence that these people can inflict upon each other.
Tim’s a smart guy, but he’s not, you know, perfect. And isn’t that a good thing? Life would be dull if Perfect Boy was living among us reviewing comics, wouldn’t it?
Latest sales figures (August, #21): 30,900. Rank: 78. That’s a big jump, but this has been shedding readers. FOOLS!!!!!
Scalped #21 by Jason Aaron (writer), R. M. Guera (artist), Giulia Brusco (colorist), and Steve Wands (letterer). $2.99, 22 pgs, FC, DC/Vertigo.
Well, it’s yet another issue of Scalped I didn’t read, because I’m waiting for the third trade (which comes out in two weeks, I believe), but damn, that’s a cool cover. Jock (wait for it) rocks.
Latest sales figures (August, #20): 7,034. Rank: 199. Egad. That’s ugly.
All Star Superman #12 by Grant “12 issues in 3 years is pretty good, right, fanboys?” Morrison (writer), Frank Quitely (penciller), Jamie Grant (inker/colorist), and Travis Lanham (letterer). $2.99, 22 pgs, FC, DC.
So it ends. I’m not quite as in love with it as Joe Rice, who probably bought two copies, one to read and the other to make into underwear (think about it), but it’s still something, isn’t it? I think a lot of its success has to do with Quitely, because he is a master at facial expressions and body language, especially when Luthor is monologuing and looks remarkably bored. Luthor wants Superman to show up, and we get that through Quitely’s art. You may not like Quitely’s style, but he always does a wonderful job making sure we understand what the characters are thinking.
As for Morrison’s story … Well, parts of this 12-issue epic were quite bumpy, and the emotional payoffs weren’t quite as powerful as Morrison perhaps wanted them to be, mainly because there’s nothing terribly original about this. Sure, Morrison writes what is essentially a Silver Age story remarkably well, but in the end, it’s just a Silver Age superhero story. Because Morrison is such a great writer, we get some wonderful little touches, like Jimmy making sure Clark’s secret is safe, and the overall plot, while familiar, is intricately put together, but I really did find myself wondering what the point of it was. The Superman-as-Jesus metaphor is always fairly heavy-handed, so even Morrison can’t escape bludgeoning us over the head with it, and Morrison points out the obvious, that Lex could have saved the world if he really wanted to. I like this a lot, and will probably appreciate it more once I sit down and re-read the 12 issues, but there’s something missing. I think that Morrison’s glorious failures like The Filth are more fascinating than this well-constructed love letter to 50-year-old comics. I like this more than I like The Filth, but I admire The Filth more.
Ultimately, this is a fairly standard superhero comic. There’s absolutely nothing wrong with that, but the hype that has surrounded it has blinded us to that fact. It does nothing we haven’t seen a thousand times before, and although Morrison does some small things better than almost anyone, it doesn’t change that fact. I think its aspirations are such that it’s a bit disappointing, because when Morrison does something, I think it should change the comics landscape in some way. He’s just that good. His aspirations in this comic come to very little, and that’s what bugs me. Morrison’s other pure superhero comic, JLA, was far less ambitious and worked a little better. Certainly, Quitely’s art is better than Porter’s, but Morrison seemed focused on telling big-ass action stories in that and not belaboring his prose with Christ imagery.
I’m glad we got this comic out of Morrison and Quitely, because it’s an impressive read. Now maybe Morrison can concentrate on the Seaguy sequels. That’s a comic I want to read!
Latest sales figures (May, #11): 70,355. Rank: 24. Best-selling Superman book by a considerable margin.
True Believers #3 (of 5) by Cary Bates (writer), Paul Gulacy (artist), Rain Beredo (colorist), and Dave Lanphear (letterer). $2.99, 22 pgs, FC, Marvel.
Now that everyone’s ignoring me to sharpen their proverbial knives, I’ll move on. As this is the third issue of a five-issue mini-series, we can expect a bit of padding and, especially in a series with new characters, the origin issue! And so we get it, although there’s less padding than you’d expect, but plenty o’ origins. It’s kind of a neat effect Bates goes for, as the entire issue takes place, technically, in about a 30-second time frame. However, because we get a bunch o’ flashbacks, we get a ton of information about Mavis, her father, and how she became Payback. It’s a somewhat typical superhero origin story, as Mavis becomes a superhero through some weird science and then has to learn how to do things, but it’s still an nice, entertaining read. I’m a tad bit disappointed at why Mavis is doing what she’s doing, but if Bates pulls it together in the final two issues, I won’t worry about it. There had to be a reason behind it, after all, and the reason is decent as it goes.
This continues to be a solid comic. I’m sure its sales are in the tank (see below), but at least it will exist for future generations!
Latest sales figures (August, #2): 12,845. Rank: 149. But the trade will live on!
Uncanny X-Men #502 by Ed Brubaker (writer), Matt Fraction (writer), Greg Land (penciler), Jay Leisten (inker), Justin Ponsor (colorist), and Joe Caramagna (letterer). $2.99, 22 pgs, FC, Marvel.
You may wonder why I’m still buying this, as I really haven’t liked the last two issues. Well, as you know, when comics are being produced by writers I really like (and this is) and feature characters I really like (I don’t love all the X-Men on this team, but the X-Men remain near and dear to my heart), I tend to give the books more rope even if it’s not working for me. Plus, the fact that I don’t like Greg Land means I might have to wait until the first Dodson arc to really decide on this book. But it’s rough.
It’s really bothering me that I don’t like this comic more. I want so much to like it, but I just can’t. I mean, Dazzler is in this issue, for crying out loud! Dazzler is one of my five favorite female characters in comics (I’m so not joking, by the way). It pains me that this isn’t the awesomest book out there, even with Land on art. Seriously. This is worse than when Austen was writing it, because that run was so bad I could drop it with a clear conscience. Based on a few neat ideas here and there and the fact that the two writers have produced some of the best comics on the market over the past four years or so, I get depressed reading this. I suppose I should break it down just a bit, even though it’s upsetting.
The descriptive tags are back, and I tried to ignore them. I made my peace with them, and now must move on. On page 2, Scott tells Logan and Kurt to make sure to keep one bad guy alive, and Kurt asks, “Why is Scott so convinced we’re suddenly killers?” Well, beyond the fact that Logan has always been a killer, Scott recently put together a team with Logan on it whose sole purpose is to kill people. Now, I don’t mind if Frubaker wants to ignore X-Force (God knows we all should), but Marvel does publish it, so someone should force them to acknowledge it. Kurt telling Logan he kvetches like an old woman sounds really off coming from Kurt. I don’t know why, it just does. I thought the bad guy pissing his pants was just, well, dumb. It’s immature. I’m going to skip over Land’s art for the most part, but Ali’s first appearance creeped me out. I can barely look at it. Alison’s appearance, which made me happy, quickly became annoying. I’m a bit protective of Dazzler, because I think that writers post-Claremont haven’t really respected her, but I can’t deal with her telling Pixie, “Then come dance for me. At my shows. Let’s let that dust of yours make everything just that much more crazy. Won’t that just be, like, completely awesome?” Alison isn’t 15, last time I checked, and her dad was a lawyer, so she’s not an idiot. That line made me sad. Don’t even use Alison if you’re going to make her an idiot. Then, we get a descriptive tag that confused me. Logan is listening to Joe Walsh, and the tag says “His Masarati does 185.” That would be clever if, you know, Wolverine were driving a Masarati. I suppose he could have one stashed in the garage, but it’s just weird to mention it when he’s working on a Mustang. Anyway, his chat with Pixie is actually nicely done, and part of why so much of this book pains me. Then there’s the fight, which isn’t bad, to be honest. I’m not quite sure why Manuel, who’s a mutant, thinks other mutants are abominations. I mean, it’s one thing to deny your homosexuality and hate homosexuals, but Manuel is actually using his mutant powers, so it seems kind of strange for him to hate mutants. I guess I don’t get why he’s running an anti-mutant hate group.
I know Brubaker reads the blog occasionally, so I do feel bad about not liking Uncanny X-Men more, because I hate writing this about someone who is gracious enough to comment here. I wish I did like it. As I wrote above, I’ll probably hang around through the end of the first Dodson arc, because I wonder if part of the disappointment I feel has to do with Land (although I doubt it). It’s frustrating, because of the nice little nuggets sprinkled in the three issues of the Fraction/Brubaker story, plus I can always think nostalgically about the first time I saw Greg Land’s work, back on that Nightwing mini-series. That was some decent art. Oh well.
Latest sales figures (August, #501): 85,398. Rank: 10. This will always sell well, won’t it? That means Joey Q will let me do whatever I want when I write it!
X-Factor #35 by Peter David (writer), Larry Stroman (penciler), Jon Sibal (inker), Jeromy Cox (colorist), and Cory Petit (letterer). $2.99, 22 pgs, FC, Marvel.
I’ve been reading some of the comments about Stroman’s art and how people don’t like it. That’s perfectly reasonable, as it’s kind of an acquired taste. But I wondered if anything was different about it from when I first dug it, back in the early 1990s. I think, in this case, he needs a new inker. Thanks to Google (another time I used it!), I found out that Al Milgrom inked Stroman at least for a while on the old X-Factor. Milgrom’s inks were much heavier and solid, anchoring Stroman’s rather odd style. Sibal’s inks are much lighter, and Stroman’s figures are more ethereal and ill-defined. Milgrom, it seemed, gave the strangeness of Stroman’s lines solidity, whereas Sibal lets them go wild. Stroman’s art, I will admit, works better when it’s more heavily inked. I still like his art, and I’m glad to see it on this book, but I wish Sibal would either change his style or they get a new inker.
Anyway, another one of my favorite mutants, Longshot, shows up in this issue (again, not joking), and it’s really him this time! Well, at least we think it’s him, but knowing David, he’ll just turn out to be a Skrull again just to mess with our heads (especially after Longshot gives a convoluted explanation about why he’s not a Skrull). It’s an interesting story that actually gives X-Factor a mystery to solve - remember when that was kind of the point of the series? - and introduces a typically nasty threat. It ends really weirdly, but that’s okay. It’s a good issue, and David seems to be setting things up well for the post-invasion status quo. And it has Longshot!
Of course, I’m not necessarily in love with how Longshot is written. Like Dazzler, these characters are used so infrequently that there’s no excuse for writers to ignore the way they’ve been written in the past. Batman, of course, has so many different personalities that it’s pointless to even try to adhere to a core set of traits. But Longshot isn’t all that popular, so the way David writes him seems to clash with a lot of what has come before. I appreciate that Longshot clears up why he and Dazzler aren’t together anymore, but Longshot, who has always been a bit naïve, seems a bit more worldly for someone who keeps getting his mind wiped clean. When he does act naïve, it feels forced. I know I’m nitpicking, but it bothered me. And I don’t have a problem with his DNA being hardwired to draw “the opposite sex” (his words), but that just allows David to set up kind of a lame joke about the cop being gay. I wish Longshot simply attracted everyone, and it takes a herculean effort from Guido, say, to resist him. The cop isn’t the opposite sex, for instance, so it’s kind of a silly way for Longshot to describe himself. I’m sure his DNA could be hardwired to simply stimulate whatever turns anyone on, whether they’re straight or gay. But I’m rambling a bit, aren’t I?
You’d think I’d be happier with two of my favorite characters showing up in the same week. I’m fickle that way, aren’t I?
Latest sales figures (August, #34): 50,416. Rank: 40. Thanks to Secret Invasion, unfortunately. Maybe some will stay.
Nobody came up with last week’s totally random lyrics, which was taken from “Tether,” a fantastic song off the Indigo Girls’ 2004 album All That We Let In. And here are some more totally random lyrics!
“I had to roam so I picked up the phone
Dialed Ali up to see what was going down
Told him I pick him up so we could drive around
Took the Dodge Dart, a ‘74
My mother left a yard but I needed one more
Shaheed had me covered with a hundred greenbacks
So we left Brooklyn and we made big tracks
Drove down the Belt, got on the Conduit
Came to a toll, we paid and went through it
Had no destination, we was on a quest
Ali laid in the back so he could get rest”
Dodge Darts are awesome, man.



















45 Comments
Dan Bailey
September 19, 2008 at 3:26 pm
The only Dodge Dart I ever drove was a ‘66-or-so that was my then-in-laws’ spare vehicle. The speedometer wasn’t functioning. That was … interesting.
Didn’t read any of the above, though my copy of Godland is in the to-be-perused stack by my bed at home. Now that that Skrull crap is over, I’m sure I’ll resume buying Incredible Hercules.
Got tired of All-Star Superman about 3 issues ago & stopped buying it then. It’s nicely done & all, but as you say it’s also “a fairly standard superhero comic.” Joe Rice & all the other folks bleating over how it’s the bestest comic EVAR must not’ve ever read any good Silver Age Superman. I cut my teeth on Superman 80-Page Giants as a kid, though, so I guess I’m just a lot harder to bowl over.
nadir
September 19, 2008 at 3:41 pm
those are totaly tribe called quest left my wallet in el segundo lyrics
2nd best tribe song after bonita applebum
Suzene
September 19, 2008 at 4:56 pm
Aw, man…some of those numbers really are cringe-worthy.
And Frubaker is a Skrull. It’s the only explanation. Well, that and Land’s art makes a mediocre book with embarrassing low points an ugly mediocre book with even more embarrassing low points.
Anonymous
September 19, 2008 at 5:09 pm
Kurt doesn’t know about X-Force, nobody really does other than the actual team, Angel, and Elixir
Scott H
September 19, 2008 at 6:29 pm
The thing with Spitfire is that she may have started in the 1940s, but she lived through all the intervening decades, then got made young again very recently. Having had all the time in the world to adjust to changing times, she doesn’t have Steve’s excuse for feeling like a fish out of water.
Pretty much the same thing goes for Captain Midlands, except he likes acting the old curmudgeon anyway.
ZZZ
September 19, 2008 at 6:39 pm
I don’t have the issue in front of me, but if memory serves, the next line (or an upcoming line) in the song Logan is singing while working on his car is “My Masarati does 185/I lost my license, now I don’t drive.” Still pretty random (and it would have made more sense to actually draw him working on a Masarati - personally, I don’t know enough about cars to have known that it wasn’t a Masarati; maybe it was supposed to be but, like me, Land doesn’t know what one looks like) but that’s what that was about.
stealthwise
September 19, 2008 at 7:22 pm
Why does “Silver Age story” read like an insult in your review and how does it work that way? The Silver Age had a ton of great crap within it, but few of the stories had the emotional depth and painstaking care put into the construction of its art either.
And a glorious failure is still a failure. You can try and make a strawberry shortcake with rotten meat, and while it’ll be interesting, it’ll also be impossible to keep down.
Greg Burgas
September 19, 2008 at 7:29 pm
It’s not an insult, stealthwise, except it’s not, you know, the Silver Age anymore. I have no problem reading 1950s comics or even appreciating them, but I don’t think recreating them is really what comics should be about, and that’s what I feel like when I read All Star Superman. I like it a lot, as I mentioned, but I just feel like Morrison and Quitely’s talents could be put to better use elsewhere. And sure, a failure is still a failure, but at least Morrison and Weston went nuts and tried something crazy on The Filth.
Yeah, ZZZ, those lyrics are in the comic. It doesn’t change anything!!!!
Thanks for the info, Scott H. I didn’t feel like digging through Spitfire’s history to figure that out.
MarkAndrew
September 19, 2008 at 7:35 pm
More to the point, like Moore’s Supreme, it was Silver Age Superman without the angry, bitter streak that made the Silver Age Superman interesting. The conceptual weirdness is fine, but I’d like to see a homage to all those pissed off Jerry Seigel stories. “Supergirl HAS to work in service of humanity, and CAN NOT reveal her existence to the public, so she has to brood away her days in an orphanage, no Ma and Pa Kent and engage in secret, faceless toil to protect people who don’t give a shit about her from unknown dangers. Hey Kids! Comics!”
Michael
September 19, 2008 at 7:49 pm
I read Amadeus’s freak-out as more in response to the pedophilia aspects of being an eromenos.
Thok
September 19, 2008 at 8:18 pm
Honestly, Silver Age Superman reads like a sitcom. Superman’s the straight man, and he to keep an eye on the wacky antics of Lois, Jimmy, and Lex.
Of course, we’ve seen Superman done as a sitcom, with Dean Cain as Superman.
Tom Fitzpatrick
September 19, 2008 at 8:35 pm
Scalped # 21 at #199 with sales of 7,034?
Yeeesh! I sure hope that’s just the pre-ordered sales and NOT the final sales after comic book day.
Cuz’ if that number stays as is, then I’m sure Vertigo won’t be too long in cancelling this fine book!
Andrew
September 19, 2008 at 9:38 pm
Michael, I think it’s oversimplifying it a bit too much to read Amadeus’s freak-out as just a response to the implied pedophilia. After all, he seems pretty excited about the prospect of being a 16-year-old male and doinking a mythic Amazonian.
That being said, I’ve known quite a few 16 year old males in my life (in fact, I was one myself for about a year), and I think it’s believable that even the wisest and most liberal-minded of 16 year old males might throw a fit at being misrepresented on such a highly personal issue as sexual identity, especially when said male hasn’t had a lot of opportunity to assert his own sexual identity.
However, I also think that, given the historical treatment of homosexuality in Marvel comics, Pak could have done better by the idea in this one. In other words, I think his treatment of Amadeus was reasonable, but not ideal.
Zapz
September 19, 2008 at 9:53 pm
I disagree that it is “just a silver age Superman story”. There are homages and touches reminiscent of the silver age but I think there’s a lot more going on in terms of characterization and plot development etc. Personally, I see it as a love letter to the Superman concept in general rather than the Silver Age in particular.
Rohan Williams
September 19, 2008 at 10:21 pm
I realise nobody’s ever going to sell you on All-Star Superman, and that’s fine, but the reason I see ‘it’s just a Silver Age Superman story’ as an odd criticism is because it’s a bit reductive. Is ‘2001′ just a sci-fi movie? Is ‘Unforgiven’ just a Western?
Containing elements of the genre (and homages to work of a certain time period) doesn’t prevent the work from transcending that genre and period. IMO, All-Star Supes does just that.
TimCallahan
September 20, 2008 at 1:09 am
If being perfect means liking Moon Knight these days, then….
I can’t even finish that sentence, because I am, indeed, far from perfect.
But the “faux-intense” feel I get (and I haven’t read the recent issue) comes from the really poor dialogue and the heavy sense of foreboding. Everyone in the comic talks like Ben Stiller’s Mr. Furious, except without a sense of irony and with less acting chops.
I want to like Moon Knight more than you want to like Uncanny X-Men.
chris
September 20, 2008 at 1:54 am
Greg, we usually see eye-to-eye on the books you review that I actually read, and I echo the sentiments on two of those three books above: Moon Knight is possibly Marvel’s most underrated book right, it’s just that bad-ass. And yes, Uncanny X-Men is proving to be a huge fustercluck that’s so depressing due to how good we know Brubaker can be (sorry Fraction, just not a fan).
As for Ghost Rider, well, yes, this story-arc IS a bone thrown to the OG Ghost Rider fans (myself being one of them), but I think Aaron is still keeping up that “grindhouse cinema” feel that he introduced to the book. With that said, however, I think he may have peaked with his first arc, which was just straight up AWESOME.
jazzbo
September 20, 2008 at 2:27 am
Yeah, I can’t imagine there’s too many 16 year old boys in the world that wouldn’t loudly object to be called the sex-toy of an older man, whether they’re straight or not. I think you’re just being overly PC if you consider that a homophobic reaction. He’s a kid, that’s how the vast majority of kids would react.
Codename assassin
September 20, 2008 at 5:38 am
This is the only sub-section of this blog i look forward to, the others don’t have this much humor or a proper grasp on the comic industry as a whole (and that you’re the only Jay Faerber fan here
).
Mecha-Shiva
September 20, 2008 at 7:18 am
About your Uncanny review…. just be comfortable with not liking it. Brubaker’s been writing for long enough to know that not everyone’s going to like everything he does. You’re not the type to attack a creator personally, and I think that and dishonesty are the only two things you should feel bad about in a review.
I was weirded out by the entire Dazzler scene, mostly the way she was staring right at the camera (or whatever the proper word would be) with almost the exact same smile on her face in every panel.
Greg Burgas
September 20, 2008 at 7:24 am
With regard to Amadeus, I don’t have a problem with him denying it loudly (and that’s an interesting point about the pedophilia aspect, although I’m not sure I agree with it), but I think Pak/Van Lente went a bit too far with it. After the initial shock of realizing that’s what people think, he keeps harping on it. But it’s just a minor point!
As for All Star Superman … I see what everyone’s saying, but I, personally, don’t think it transcends the genre all that much. It’s well done, but not stunning. And like I said, maybe I’ll change my mind when I read it all at once and pick up more of the clues. It’s tough to remember panels from three years ago!
Bill Reed
September 20, 2008 at 8:46 am
All Star Superman doesn’t transcend the genre, no, but I say it has hit the pinnacle of the genre. It’s everything I want out of superhero comics: adventure, hope, mad ideas. It reflects the Silver Age, sure, but it also draws material in from all eras. This is a love letter to the Superman character.
But I haven’t read #12 yet, so maybe it’s all about cats.
Ian A.
September 20, 2008 at 9:15 am
Er, yeah. Like Anonymous said, X-Force is a covert operation. Only Cyclops, Wolverine, and the rest of the X-Force cast know it exists. Someone — possibly Elixir — might blow the whistle eventually, but, for now, it’s hush-hush, hence Nightcrawler being in the dark.
But, as you mentioned, Logan’s always been a killer. So, Kurt’s objection is still rather moot. The comment was probably supposed to be an ironic wink-nudge at X-Force.
Also: I can’t believe you didn’t mention Dazzler’s star-burst crotch. Her new costume is hideous.
Alan Coil
September 20, 2008 at 9:26 am
“It’s tough to remember panels from three years ago!”
Brain getting old?
Mike Loughlin
September 20, 2008 at 11:18 am
Greg, it sounds like you did not connect with All-Star Superman 12 on an emotional level (which is not a criticism of your reaction, just an assumption as to why you didn’t love it). You speak to the craft Morrison & Quitely brought to the comic, but don’t seem to be moved by it. As in the best Silver-Age Superman stories (e.g. when he travels back in time to pre-explosion Krypton but can’t save it, the original “Death of Superman” story), the sucess of the comic depends on how well the reader connects to the characters and events. I was moved by Superman’s sacrifice, Lex’s revelation, and Lois’ devotion. You don’t seem to be. That may account for why you don’t seem to have enjoyed it as much as some of us.
Greg Burgas
September 20, 2008 at 12:15 pm
Alan: Yeah, my brain is probably getting old! Although I like to think I have better things to remember than comic book panels from three years ago …
Mike: I agree with that summation completely. The way a comic book connects with you emotionally is a HUGE part of why you love something. Much of Morrison’s work, for me, hinges on whether he can connect emotionally with the audience, because in his best work, he does, and in his lesser stuff, he doesn’t (at least according to me). He does it better in All Star Superman than in some of his other comics (like The Filth, to use my example from the review), which is why I like it, but I don’t think he does it as successfully as he does in other of his comics, which is why I don’t think this is as fantastic as many think. But I definitely agree with you that the people who do love it identify with it on a deeper emotional level than I do.
Michael Mayket
September 20, 2008 at 12:19 pm
My bad reason for not reading The Incredible Hercules is that it would not be possible for me to care less about the character. It might be the greatest Marvel Hercules book ever written, but it’s still about Hercules. Now The Incredible Recorder… that’s a book I would read.
Michael Mayket
September 20, 2008 at 12:25 pm
I’m a bit protective of Dazzler, because I think that writers post-Claremont haven’t really respected her, but I can’t deal with her telling Pixie, “Then come dance for me. At my shows. Let’s let that dust of yours make everything just that much more crazy. Won’t that just be, like, completely awesome?” Alison isn’t 15, last time I checked, and her dad was a lawyer, so she’s not an idiot. That line made me sad.
I’m not defending Dazzler’s quoted dialogue, but are you suggesting that it’s not possible to be the child of a lawyer and an idiot? That sentence made me sad.
Nitz the Bloody
September 20, 2008 at 12:54 pm
” And Frubaker is a Skrull. It’s the only explanation. Well, that and Land’s art makes a mediocre book with embarrassing low points an ugly mediocre book with even more embarrassing low points. ”
No, the real Skrull is Land. I’m half-convinced that he was sent here by the Skrull empire to dismantle the comic industry by dramatically lowering its standards in terms of art.
T.
September 20, 2008 at 1:19 pm
Uh, most actual lawyers themselves tend to be idiots, why is it far-fetched that the daughter of one would not be too bright?
Greg Burgas
September 20, 2008 at 1:54 pm
Well, T., I know three lawyers, and they’re all smarter than I am (granted, not that hard), so I’ll just ignore your statement!
It’s not that Dazzler couldn’t be an idiot, it’s that most writers have written her as having chosen singing over law school, and she could have been a lawyer if not for her desire to sing. So there’s that. But in general, Alison hasn’t been written like Britney Spears, so I’m a bit annoyed that she acts like a vacuous pop star here.
T.
September 20, 2008 at 4:30 pm
In that case they’re smart people who just happen to be lawyers I’d say. But I don’t think one needs really that much in the way of intelligence to be a lawyer. Keep in mind that I’m a lawyer myself and interact with lawyers daily. I really do not think they are a bright bunch. They’re very good at faking smarts, and that makes sense because much of being a lawyer requires being an intellectual and emotional chameleon, taking viewpoints you may or may not agree with and acting like you do and making them sound plausible. I consider it an intellectual version of used car sales, whether you know you’re selling a winner or a lemon you find the way to take what you’ve been given to sell and get someone to buy into it. The same way being a used car salesman doesn’t make you especially likely to be very smart, yet I’m sure there are many incredibly smart used car salesman out there, I feel the same applies to lawyers.
ZZZ
September 20, 2008 at 6:44 pm
I had no problem with Dazzler’s diologue in theory - many adults dumb down their speech and try to sound “cool” when talking to young people, especially when trying to get them enthusiastic about something. Furthermore, aside from a brief stint with Excalibur, her most recent long term conversational companions have been the X-Babies and Longshot (who’s usually written as not exactly the sharpest throwing blade in the bandolier).
The problem, in practice, is that I have a hard time believing that’s what Frubaker was going for. When a character has as little screen time as Dazzler did, you have to assume their speech is representative of how they actually talk. To bring someone in for one scene and intentionally have them act out of character would be odd. It seems like comic book characters are particularly vulnerable to what the TV Tropes Wiki Web site calls “Flanderization” (when a single character trait becomes exaggerated over time until it dominates a character’s personality). Characters are passed from writer to writer, many of whom have no previous experience with the character, and they latch on to one quirk (like Dazzler being a pop singer, or Nightcrawler being religious, or Longshot being naive for that matter) and use it to define the character.
What bothered me a lot more than Ali’s dialogue, though, was the idea that she wants Pixie to spray mind-affecting dust over her audience. That seems a tad irresponsible, like dosing all the food at a venue with ecstasy, to “make everything just that much more crazy.” Granted, I can’t remember ever seeing Pixie actually USE her oft-mentioned “Pixie dust” powers, so maybe they just make people happy (and I’m sure the X-Men have tested them extensively to make sure they don’t have the same possible side effects as the ecstasy idea) but even if they’re sure it’s safe, is having a mutant indiscriminately use her powers on large groups the best way to convince normal humans that they have no reason to be afraid of mutants?
T.
September 20, 2008 at 6:53 pm
It’s funny that TV Tropes calles it Flanderization, when I think a more central character is a worse victim of that phenomenon: Homer. His boorish, insensitive stupidity has so dominated the character over the years that it’s dominated every other aspect of the character. They should call it Homerization.
Pedro Bouça
September 20, 2008 at 7:44 pm
As for Uncanny, I have an explanation: Axel Alonso! I’ve enjoyed precious few comics he edited - and detested the vast majority of them.
I now actively avoid comics that Axel Alonso edits.
Stefan
September 20, 2008 at 8:37 pm
Y’all don’t know what yer talkin’ about. Uncanny’s the best it’s ever been, writing-wise. Land stunts the book, yes, but it’s still not enough to cancel out Fraction’s fantastic script.
Nitz the Bloody
September 20, 2008 at 9:13 pm
” It’s funny that TV Tropes calles it Flanderization, when I think a more central character is a worse victim of that phenomenon: Homer. His boorish, insensitive stupidity has so dominated the character over the years that it’s dominated every other aspect of the character. They should call it Homerization. ”
The reason it’s called Flanderization when Homer and for that matter every other character on the damn show exhibits it, is because Ned Flanders’ dominant trait– his devout Christianity– was never meant to be anything more than a background detail. Originally Ned was just the perfect neighbor that Homer felt constantly jealous of, and being a committed Christian did little more than help cement that point. Over the course of the series, it became all Ned was known for, and today he’s just a caricature of the Religious Right.
At least Homer was always an idiotic blowhard, even if he wasn’t so egregious until later episodes.
ZZZ
September 20, 2008 at 10:30 pm
The site discusses the phenomenon with regards to Homer under the “Jerkass” entry.
s1rude
September 21, 2008 at 8:32 am
Not to pile on, but I’m done with Uncanny until the Dodsons’ next issue. I only thought I despised Greg Land’s work before, having been able to avoid reading anything with him on interior art. The draw of some Brubaction was too much, though, so I’ve tried to get through the last two issues. And I honestly can’t even judge the writing because the art is so distractingly awful that I can’t stay in the story for more than a panel or two. Why does everyone smile like they’re in a toothpaste ad regardless of the situation? Why do all the breasts have to have an equal to or greater than volume in comparison to the volume of the rest of the woman’s body? (Except for Pixie of course - even though her face looks exactly like all of the other female characters, we know she’s young because…no boobs!) Are we not supposed to notice, or worse - is it supposed to be “clever” - that two pages end with the exact same panel?
In other news: Air is a weird comic, but the second issue was an improvement, I thought.
I thought that Cornell established Spitfire’s vampiric “secret” in a previous issue of CD&MI13? Like in a conversation or monologue during her fight in issue 1?
I buy Scalped in trade…do I need to be supporting the singles in order to make sure Aaron & Guera can finish it the way they intend to?
Ghost Rider, Herc, ASS and Moon Knight are all awesome, but very different. Viva la comics!
Thanks for the recommendation on True Believers. I’m all caught up and enjoying it immensely.
Greg Burgas
September 21, 2008 at 10:21 am
I think ending the page with the exact same drawing was supposed to be clever - the Red Queen changes her appearance to look exactly like Emma, and when you’re using photographs, you can make them look exactly the same. That bothered me, but at least I understood what Land was doing.
If Cornell did that, I probably forgot. As noted above, I’m old and slipping gently into senility.
I started buying the singles of Scalped for that reason exactly. I don’t know if it will help, or if the trade sales are good enough that Vertigo/DC will just let them do what they want, confident that they’ll pick up the slack in trades.
No problem on True Believers. It’s a fun book.
FunkyGreenJerusalem
September 21, 2008 at 7:47 pm
I remember once before you said you considered him a hack - or you called him one but then said you didn’t think he was - but Ron Marz is a pretty solid writer, and little character bits like that are the sort of thing he does well, so I find it odd that you give him an ‘of all people’.
He might not be a ground-breaking big ideas writer, but he is the sort of writer who knows their continuity and uses it to their advantage, unlike someone like Millar or Bendis, who often show they don’t know much about the characters they are writing.
If you go and take a look at his part of the Justice Society Returns mini-series/event from ‘99, you’ll see what I mean.
(That was the series of one shots of titles the JSA characters used to appear in, headed up by James Robinson and David Goyer).
Jerry C
September 22, 2008 at 4:43 am
I think Herc’s book is the best writing going at this time. One of the little differences that make it great writing was the reference to “eromenos” and Amadeus’ reaction to it is totally in character for even a super smart teenager, because he is still a teenager and that is an important point for the writer to establish. Also, the fact that “web sites” are speculating about the superhero’s sex life is something that we as readers suddenly realize is certainly happening in this fantasy universe, same as Herc having to take a leak once in a while.
Of course people raised in different cultures, alien or ancient, would have different values on touchy subjects like sex. Being able to bring this element into the story in a humerous way instead of being preachy shows the great writing. You can’t praise the book but then complain that it’s different.
Greg Burgas
September 22, 2008 at 6:49 am
Jerry: Of course I can! This is America!
Jerry C
September 22, 2008 at 9:14 am
Heh. Ya got me!
BTW, a search of eromenos gives the information that the relationship was not always a homosexual relationship between the man and young boy, but might involve the man instructing the boy by taking him along to the right orgys or sharing courtesans. So in the comic, Herc is getting pretty close to the definition of eromenos by worrying about the boy still being a virgin.
s1rude
September 23, 2008 at 8:53 am
Hey Greg - dug out the earlier issues of Captain Britain last night, and the only thing is a panel in issue 2 where Spitfire refuses to try to pull Excalibur, saying, “I’m not worthy. I’m sorry, Pete, but that’s just it” (or something really close to that). I thought it was more explicit, so looks like we both suffer from memory issues.