<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Comic Book Urban Legends Revealed #174</title>
	<atom:link href="http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/09/25/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-174/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/09/25/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-174/</link>
	<description>Comic Book Resources Presents... Comics Should Be Good!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 04:44:45 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bob Hughes</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/09/25/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-174/comment-page-2/#comment-685714</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Hughes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 17:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=19285#comment-685714</guid>
		<description>Sijo: To clarify: my point was, an 18-year-old is usually considered an adult, or at least expected to think an act like one -Which is not always the case, true- not what the legal age for making deals or anything else was back then. 18 or 22, Kane was obviously smart enough to have created Batman (and I hear, exploited it well regardless.)

Except Bill Finger (age 24) created Batman.  All Bob Kane did was swipe some artwork, take credit for it and cleverly sign a contract guaranteeing him years of payment for stories he didn&#039;t even have to draw.   Clever yes, but not very admirable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sijo: To clarify: my point was, an 18-year-old is usually considered an adult, or at least expected to think an act like one -Which is not always the case, true- not what the legal age for making deals or anything else was back then. 18 or 22, Kane was obviously smart enough to have created Batman (and I hear, exploited it well regardless.)</p>
<p>Except Bill Finger (age 24) created Batman.  All Bob Kane did was swipe some artwork, take credit for it and cleverly sign a contract guaranteeing him years of payment for stories he didn't even have to draw.   Clever yes, but not very admirable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: -alistairw</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/09/25/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-174/comment-page-2/#comment-685615</link>
		<dc:creator>-alistairw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 04:18:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=19285#comment-685615</guid>
		<description>Wow, I had no idea Life of Reilly was going to book form. That&#039;s massively exciting. Good luck with that, Andrew.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, I had no idea Life of Reilly was going to book form. That's massively exciting. Good luck with that, Andrew.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kid Kyoto</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/09/25/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-174/comment-page-2/#comment-685614</link>
		<dc:creator>Kid Kyoto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 03:49:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=19285#comment-685614</guid>
		<description>&quot;About a year ago I decided to go back and do a book version of Life of Reilly that would correct some of the mistakes we thought were made by the online column. &quot;

I for one am looking forward to it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"About a year ago I decided to go back and do a book version of Life of Reilly that would correct some of the mistakes we thought were made by the online column. "</p>
<p>I for one am looking forward to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Perron</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/09/25/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-174/comment-page-2/#comment-685605</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Perron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 01:07:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=19285#comment-685605</guid>
		<description>Ugh.  Personally, I don&#039;t like &quot;WE MUST GET RID OF PETER/MJ&quot;.  There&#039;s no actual reason to, other than Marvel&#039;s fears about the character &quot;getting old&quot;.  Heck, JMS was brought in to revitalize the relationship, and did well until it all went to pieces.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ugh.  Personally, I don't like "WE MUST GET RID OF PETER/MJ".  There's no actual reason to, other than Marvel's fears about the character "getting old".  Heck, JMS was brought in to revitalize the relationship, and did well until it all went to pieces.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/09/25/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-174/comment-page-2/#comment-685598</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 23:09:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=19285#comment-685598</guid>
		<description>&lt;&gt;

That&#039;s what I was saying when the Clone Saga went south -- &quot;why not have the MJ that married Pete be a clone?&quot; At that point, you&#039;d only be &quot;losing&quot; 7 years of comic book continuity concerning the MJ character... and, you&#039;d still have MJ return. And you&#039;de have single Peter, without any mystical/magical explanations.

In my scenario, the real MJ was just jet setting around Europe, unaware her clone married Pete. The point where she got switched could have been interesting-- maybe MJ got cold feet and left Peter during their engagement, with a goodbye letter that he never received because whoever created &quot;clone MJ&quot; intercepted it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&lt;&gt;</p>
<p>That's what I was saying when the Clone Saga went south -- "why not have the MJ that married Pete be a clone?" At that point, you'd only be "losing" 7 years of comic book continuity concerning the MJ character... and, you'd still have MJ return. And you'de have single Peter, without any mystical/magical explanations.</p>
<p>In my scenario, the real MJ was just jet setting around Europe, unaware her clone married Pete. The point where she got switched could have been interesting-- maybe MJ got cold feet and left Peter during their engagement, with a goodbye letter that he never received because whoever created "clone MJ" intercepted it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenn Greenberg</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/09/25/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-174/comment-page-2/#comment-685594</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn Greenberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 20:52:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=19285#comment-685594</guid>
		<description>Sijo,

It&#039;s all in how the idea is executed.  Todd&#039;s idea could have worked, if it were executed well.  In retrospect, we should have given it greater consideration and at least tried to create a scenario around it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sijo,</p>
<p>It's all in how the idea is executed.  Todd's idea could have worked, if it were executed well.  In retrospect, we should have given it greater consideration and at least tried to create a scenario around it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kalorama</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/09/25/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-174/comment-page-2/#comment-685580</link>
		<dc:creator>kalorama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 15:51:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=19285#comment-685580</guid>
		<description>&quot;Damn, are those Leonardi art from the 80s?
Whats he doing now?&quot;

============================

He&#039;s drawing the upcoming Vigilante book at DC, with Marv Wolfman writing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"Damn, are those Leonardi art from the 80s?<br />
Whats he doing now?"</p>
<p>============================</p>
<p>He's drawing the upcoming Vigilante book at DC, with Marv Wolfman writing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sijo</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/09/25/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-174/comment-page-2/#comment-685578</link>
		<dc:creator>Sijo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 15:25:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=19285#comment-685578</guid>
		<description>So, Peter would have lost a wife, a baby AND found out he was married to the wrong person all along?

That&#039;s even worse than the Mephisto thing. :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, Peter would have lost a wife, a baby AND found out he was married to the wrong person all along?</p>
<p>That's even worse than the Mephisto thing. <img src='http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wilbur Lunch</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/09/25/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-174/comment-page-2/#comment-685545</link>
		<dc:creator>Wilbur Lunch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 00:00:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=19285#comment-685545</guid>
		<description>Oh yeah!!!! Mary Jane should have been a clone all along! That would have been a nice logical way to null the spidey marriage! That would have worked! Todd Dezago - you are an underappreciated genius sir!

Now, is it too late to retcon the Gwen Stacy who slept with Norman Osborn into being the Gwen Stacy clone?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh yeah!!!! Mary Jane should have been a clone all along! That would have been a nice logical way to null the spidey marriage! That would have worked! Todd Dezago - you are an underappreciated genius sir!</p>
<p>Now, is it too late to retcon the Gwen Stacy who slept with Norman Osborn into being the Gwen Stacy clone?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lynxara</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/09/25/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-174/comment-page-2/#comment-685537</link>
		<dc:creator>Lynxara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 21:37:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=19285#comment-685537</guid>
		<description>One thing to remember with the Clone Saga is that because it was so long and broken into so many smaller stories, the quality of the &quot;saga&quot; is not at all consistent. The early stories that launch the Clone Saga were awful, the stuff with Scarlet Spider and Ben Reilly&#039;s Spider-Suit was kinda dull and okayish, and the ending was abrupt like an execution-style bullet to the head. 

There were some fairly bad stories in the J.M.S. run-- Sins Past is by far the worst of the lot-- but even his worst stories don&#039;t compare to how awful the worst Clone Saga stories were. Hell, the worst J.M.S. stories don&#039;t even hold a candle to Paul Jenkins contemporary work in terms of sheer awfulness. In fact, the Jenkins stories were so much like certain J.M.S. stories that I wonder if fans may confuse them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing to remember with the Clone Saga is that because it was so long and broken into so many smaller stories, the quality of the "saga" is not at all consistent. The early stories that launch the Clone Saga were awful, the stuff with Scarlet Spider and Ben Reilly's Spider-Suit was kinda dull and okayish, and the ending was abrupt like an execution-style bullet to the head. </p>
<p>There were some fairly bad stories in the J.M.S. run-- Sins Past is by far the worst of the lot-- but even his worst stories don't compare to how awful the worst Clone Saga stories were. Hell, the worst J.M.S. stories don't even hold a candle to Paul Jenkins contemporary work in terms of sheer awfulness. In fact, the Jenkins stories were so much like certain J.M.S. stories that I wonder if fans may confuse them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yellowjacket</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/09/25/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-174/comment-page-2/#comment-685535</link>
		<dc:creator>yellowjacket</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 20:16:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=19285#comment-685535</guid>
		<description>Damn, are those Leonardi art from the 80s? 
Whats he doing now?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Damn, are those Leonardi art from the 80s?<br />
Whats he doing now?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenn Greenberg</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/09/25/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-174/comment-page-2/#comment-685532</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn Greenberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 19:20:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=19285#comment-685532</guid>
		<description>The solution we SHOULD have gone with for the Clone Saga was one suggested by Todd Dezago--that Ben Reilly was the clone all along--and that the pregnant Mary Jane was a clone as well.  The Jackal captured the real MJ years earlier and kept her in suspended animation all that time.  Ultimately, both Ben and Clone MJ disintegrate as a result of clone degeneration.  So Peter and the real MJ were never married.  As Todd wrote in his pitch, &quot;No baby! Peter&#039;s single! No clone! Disoriented MJ has to readjust! We play down the tragedy of Peter losing his family by having a &#039;new&#039; Mary Jane around... (Peter) will feel responsible in that she lost five years of her life and was drawn into it all because he was Spider-Man!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The solution we SHOULD have gone with for the Clone Saga was one suggested by Todd Dezago--that Ben Reilly was the clone all along--and that the pregnant Mary Jane was a clone as well.  The Jackal captured the real MJ years earlier and kept her in suspended animation all that time.  Ultimately, both Ben and Clone MJ disintegrate as a result of clone degeneration.  So Peter and the real MJ were never married.  As Todd wrote in his pitch, "No baby! Peter's single! No clone! Disoriented MJ has to readjust! We play down the tragedy of Peter losing his family by having a 'new' Mary Jane around... (Peter) will feel responsible in that she lost five years of her life and was drawn into it all because he was Spider-Man!"</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sijo</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/09/25/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-174/comment-page-2/#comment-685513</link>
		<dc:creator>Sijo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 14:39:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=19285#comment-685513</guid>
		<description>To clarify: my point was, an 18-year-old is usually considered an adult, or at least expected to think an act like one -Which is not always the case, true- not what the legal age for making deals or anything else was back then. 18 or 22, Kane was obviously smart enough to have created Batman (and I hear, exploited it well regardless.)

Oh, and Shooter DID create new characters right off the bat, and if the copyrights laws ever change (look what happened with Superboy) he could some day end up owning several LEGION characters. But again, not my point- only that in his case it WAS really amazing that he came up with such good stuff at such a young age!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To clarify: my point was, an 18-year-old is usually considered an adult, or at least expected to think an act like one -Which is not always the case, true- not what the legal age for making deals or anything else was back then. 18 or 22, Kane was obviously smart enough to have created Batman (and I hear, exploited it well regardless.)</p>
<p>Oh, and Shooter DID create new characters right off the bat, and if the copyrights laws ever change (look what happened with Superboy) he could some day end up owning several LEGION characters. But again, not my point- only that in his case it WAS really amazing that he came up with such good stuff at such a young age!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcus Vinicius de Medeiros</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/09/25/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-174/comment-page-2/#comment-685505</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcus Vinicius de Medeiros</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 10:27:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=19285#comment-685505</guid>
		<description>Just correcting:

Piece of crap! CRAP!, as it would say J.J. Jameson.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just correcting:</p>
<p>Piece of crap! CRAP!, as it would say J.J. Jameson.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcus Vinicius de Medeiros</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/09/25/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-174/comment-page-2/#comment-685504</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcus Vinicius de Medeiros</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 10:23:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=19285#comment-685504</guid>
		<description>ThatÂ´s not even an Urban Legend anymore. The Clone Saga was one of the most emblematic piece of creap of the so-called Dark Age, Iron Age, Modern Age, or whatever. Who cares, anyway? It was all about low-self steem, a kind of grunge or proto-emo superhero comic book period based on John ByrneÂ´s Man of Steel. And if there was some good stuff in all of taht, the credit is to master Dan Jurgens. His Superman was always inspiring and heroic. LetÂ´s not even start comparing Death of Superman with Pocket Universe/Supergir Saga. The EMO Superman started right there. Jurgens did well with the Spider-Man Clone Saga,  considering the fact that he was trapped by editorial mandatem and coudnÂ´t tell the stories he wanted - the essence of Lee/Ditko Peter Parker was there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ThatÂ´s not even an Urban Legend anymore. The Clone Saga was one of the most emblematic piece of creap of the so-called Dark Age, Iron Age, Modern Age, or whatever. Who cares, anyway? It was all about low-self steem, a kind of grunge or proto-emo superhero comic book period based on John ByrneÂ´s Man of Steel. And if there was some good stuff in all of taht, the credit is to master Dan Jurgens. His Superman was always inspiring and heroic. LetÂ´s not even start comparing Death of Superman with Pocket Universe/Supergir Saga. The EMO Superman started right there. Jurgens did well with the Spider-Man Clone Saga,  considering the fact that he was trapped by editorial mandatem and coudnÂ´t tell the stories he wanted - the essence of Lee/Ditko Peter Parker was there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zach Adams</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/09/25/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-174/comment-page-1/#comment-685496</link>
		<dc:creator>Zach Adams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 06:19:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=19285#comment-685496</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s also the fact that, at least in the versions of the story I&#039;ve heard, Shooter never *misrepresented* his age and was working largely with characters DC already owned outright.  If he had claimed to be 21 and created a franchise out of whole cloth instead of adding new characters to an existing strip, it might be different.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There's also the fact that, at least in the versions of the story I've heard, Shooter never *misrepresented* his age and was working largely with characters DC already owned outright.  If he had claimed to be 21 and created a franchise out of whole cloth instead of adding new characters to an existing strip, it might be different.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ajit</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/09/25/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-174/comment-page-1/#comment-685495</link>
		<dc:creator>Ajit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 06:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=19285#comment-685495</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Call me cynical, but I donâ€™t see the big deal of Kane having been only 18 when he created Batman. Would anyone would NOT consider that an adult, even back then?&lt;/i&gt;

Up until the 26th Amendment was passed in 1971 the legal age for voting -- usually accepted as the test of adulthood -- was 21, not 18.

Shooter was definitely not an adult when he started out on the Legion, but he has declared that he has no intention of taking it up with DC at this late date.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Call me cynical, but I donâ€™t see the big deal of Kane having been only 18 when he created Batman. Would anyone would NOT consider that an adult, even back then?</i></p>
<p>Up until the 26th Amendment was passed in 1971 the legal age for voting -- usually accepted as the test of adulthood -- was 21, not 18.</p>
<p>Shooter was definitely not an adult when he started out on the Legion, but he has declared that he has no intention of taking it up with DC at this late date.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beans4Comics</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/09/25/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-174/comment-page-1/#comment-685494</link>
		<dc:creator>Beans4Comics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 05:45:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=19285#comment-685494</guid>
		<description>from what i remember, the Rachel mini wasn&#039;t supposed to be about her future relationship with Franklin, but was supposed to be the story of her imprisonment by Mojo and fill in the gaps from Uncanny 209 (i think? whatever issue Rachel went off with Spiral) and the Excalibur special where Rachel&#039;s rescued by that team. not saying her relationship in the future with Franklin wouldn&#039;t be touched upon at all, but that&#039;s just what i remember hearing...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>from what i remember, the Rachel mini wasn't supposed to be about her future relationship with Franklin, but was supposed to be the story of her imprisonment by Mojo and fill in the gaps from Uncanny 209 (i think? whatever issue Rachel went off with Spiral) and the Excalibur special where Rachel's rescued by that team. not saying her relationship in the future with Franklin wouldn't be touched upon at all, but that's just what i remember hearing...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sijo</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/09/25/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-174/comment-page-1/#comment-685490</link>
		<dc:creator>Sijo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 03:43:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=19285#comment-685490</guid>
		<description>Call me cynical, but I don&#039;t see the big deal of Kane having been only 18 when he created Batman. Would anyone would NOT consider that an adult, even back then? Jim Shooter was THIRTEEN when he started writing Legion of Superheroes!!

The Time Loop thing would actually have been a better solution for the Clone Saga than what they did come up with. Though I still don&#039;t see Mephisto getting involved as a good idea. Seriously, Spidey should only run into that kind of menace when he&#039;s teaming up with Doctor Strange or similar characters.

Time travel, on the other hand, is part and parcel of what Rachel Summers has always been about, so I doubt that a miniseries covering her convoluted past would have been that confused -not to us comics fans, let&#039;s admit it. ;) The ONE thing I never understood about the character, is why she kept wearing that horrible &quot;Mutant Hound&quot; costume for so long. It was like a Holocaust Survivor wearing her Prison Camp Tattoo numbers all over her clothing. :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Call me cynical, but I don't see the big deal of Kane having been only 18 when he created Batman. Would anyone would NOT consider that an adult, even back then? Jim Shooter was THIRTEEN when he started writing Legion of Superheroes!!</p>
<p>The Time Loop thing would actually have been a better solution for the Clone Saga than what they did come up with. Though I still don't see Mephisto getting involved as a good idea. Seriously, Spidey should only run into that kind of menace when he's teaming up with Doctor Strange or similar characters.</p>
<p>Time travel, on the other hand, is part and parcel of what Rachel Summers has always been about, so I doubt that a miniseries covering her convoluted past would have been that confused -not to us comics fans, let's admit it. <img src='http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  The ONE thing I never understood about the character, is why she kept wearing that horrible "Mutant Hound" costume for so long. It was like a Holocaust Survivor wearing her Prison Camp Tattoo numbers all over her clothing. <img src='http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/09/25/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-174/comment-page-1/#comment-685489</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 03:13:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=19285#comment-685489</guid>
		<description>Dan Green still works on something. He inked a Leonardi Drawn Superman this past year.

I think people will say that the last two years that Stracynski wrote of Spider-man was the worst Spider-man story of all time. Yes, even the clone saga had redeeming qualities. I read an issue of the BND stuff and realized I didn&#039;t recognize this guy and if he&#039;s the same idiot from the previous two years I didn&#039;t care.
I thought it was embarrasing how bad it was, how do you do a story where everyone finds out who Spider-man is and don&#039;t do it as the &#039;big&#039; story and just have it as a small back story in the New Avengers crossover.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan Green still works on something. He inked a Leonardi Drawn Superman this past year.</p>
<p>I think people will say that the last two years that Stracynski wrote of Spider-man was the worst Spider-man story of all time. Yes, even the clone saga had redeeming qualities. I read an issue of the BND stuff and realized I didn't recognize this guy and if he's the same idiot from the previous two years I didn't care.<br />
I thought it was embarrasing how bad it was, how do you do a story where everyone finds out who Spider-man is and don't do it as the 'big' story and just have it as a small back story in the New Avengers crossover.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
