<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 10/1 &#8211; Curious Cat Also Asks&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/10/01/101-curious-cat-also-asks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/10/01/101-curious-cat-also-asks/</link>
	<description>Comic Book Resources Presents... Comics Should Be Good!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:44:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vincent Paul Bartilucci</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/10/01/101-curious-cat-also-asks/comment-page-2/#comment-686579</link>
		<dc:creator>Vincent Paul Bartilucci</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 19:57:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=19421#comment-686579</guid>
		<description>Stefan, our discourse may be doomed before it&#039;s begun simply because of the example you use.  Y&#039;see, I&#039;m one of the few people who would not agree that the Giffen &amp; DeMatteis run of Justice League was &quot;one of the great runs on the book.&quot;  As a kid who grew up with the Satellite JLA, the sitcom-era League irked me to no end.  &quot;This is the &quot;World&#039;s Greatest Super-Heroes&quot; I&#039;d ask myself.  And still do, I suppose.  

I&#039;d say that a book like Justice League of America or the Avengers should primarily about &quot;super-hero theatrics.&quot;  If the writer is skilled enough to weave some other themes into the big hero / villain fight, cool.  If not, he/she shouldn&#039;t try.  In short, don&#039;t write &quot;important&quot; at the expense of fun.  

Part of my anger is directed at all these &quot;important&quot; stories like Civil War and Identity Crisis.  My reasoning is thus; if I read a bad story about a battle between Dr. Doom and the Fantastic Four, I&#039;m bummed for the length of that comic.  But, I figure, maybe next month I&#039;ll read a good story about a battle between Blastaar and the FF.  

OTOH if I read a bad &quot;important&quot; story about Hal Jordan going nuts and killing a whole lot of people, I&#039;ve got that crapt staring me in the face for years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stefan, our discourse may be doomed before it&#8217;s begun simply because of the example you use.  Y&#8217;see, I&#8217;m one of the few people who would not agree that the Giffen &amp; DeMatteis run of Justice League was &#8220;one of the great runs on the book.&#8221;  As a kid who grew up with the Satellite JLA, the sitcom-era League irked me to no end.  &#8220;This is the &#8220;World&#8217;s Greatest Super-Heroes&#8221; I&#8217;d ask myself.  And still do, I suppose.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;d say that a book like Justice League of America or the Avengers should primarily about &#8220;super-hero theatrics.&#8221;  If the writer is skilled enough to weave some other themes into the big hero / villain fight, cool.  If not, he/she shouldn&#8217;t try.  In short, don&#8217;t write &#8220;important&#8221; at the expense of fun.  </p>
<p>Part of my anger is directed at all these &#8220;important&#8221; stories like Civil War and Identity Crisis.  My reasoning is thus; if I read a bad story about a battle between Dr. Doom and the Fantastic Four, I&#8217;m bummed for the length of that comic.  But, I figure, maybe next month I&#8217;ll read a good story about a battle between Blastaar and the FF.  </p>
<p>OTOH if I read a bad &#8220;important&#8221; story about Hal Jordan going nuts and killing a whole lot of people, I&#8217;ve got that crapt staring me in the face for years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stefan</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/10/01/101-curious-cat-also-asks/comment-page-2/#comment-686486</link>
		<dc:creator>Stefan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 16:48:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=19421#comment-686486</guid>
		<description>Vincent, I understand from your post the idea that there should always be good ol&#039; superhero books on the shelves, even while other books go in different directions.  But why should it necessarily be Avengers or Justice League of America (for example) that stay the same?  Giffen &amp; J.M. DeMatteis&#039; Justice League was a fairly radical departure from mainstream superheroes at the time, and it remains one of the great runs on the book.  So why can&#039;t the Avengers be a more adult-oriented book for a while?  

Mainstream superhero readers still have plenty of titles to choose from - Amazing Spider-Man and Trinity both come to mind, or for that matter the present Justice League of America.  

Captain America&#039;s always been a more classical superhero book, except when Steranko wrote it and it became an espionage thriller that appeals more to adults; it reverted to being a normal superhero book again, most of the time, for the next 30 years, until Brubaker went back to the Steranko style.  And someday it&#039;ll probably become a superhero book again.

The Avengers were an extremely straightforward superhero book, for a long, long time, and Bendis is the only one that&#039;s tried to do the adult thing with it in many, many years... actually he may be the first ever, with that particular title.  It was probably one of the last titles left that had never really got a dose of that whole post-Watchmen &quot;What would these heroes be like if they had real, adult emotions and failings and so forth?,&quot; whereas the Justice League had gotten it right away.  

I do think the Anengers book(s) needed some grounding in a healthy dose of reality, and the characters merit some exploration as humans.  And I&#039;m not even a huge fan of Bendis&#039; Avengers.  I think he demystifies the characters far TOO much, to the point that they&#039;re not even heroes anymore half the time, and I don&#039;t think he pays enough attention to who the characters are before he gets his hands on them (only whom he wants them to become)... but it was still about time we saw an Avengers run that wasn&#039;t all superhero theatrics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vincent, I understand from your post the idea that there should always be good ol&#8217; superhero books on the shelves, even while other books go in different directions.  But why should it necessarily be Avengers or Justice League of America (for example) that stay the same?  Giffen &amp; J.M. DeMatteis&#8217; Justice League was a fairly radical departure from mainstream superheroes at the time, and it remains one of the great runs on the book.  So why can&#8217;t the Avengers be a more adult-oriented book for a while?  </p>
<p>Mainstream superhero readers still have plenty of titles to choose from &#8211; Amazing Spider-Man and Trinity both come to mind, or for that matter the present Justice League of America.  </p>
<p>Captain America&#8217;s always been a more classical superhero book, except when Steranko wrote it and it became an espionage thriller that appeals more to adults; it reverted to being a normal superhero book again, most of the time, for the next 30 years, until Brubaker went back to the Steranko style.  And someday it&#8217;ll probably become a superhero book again.</p>
<p>The Avengers were an extremely straightforward superhero book, for a long, long time, and Bendis is the only one that&#8217;s tried to do the adult thing with it in many, many years&#8230; actually he may be the first ever, with that particular title.  It was probably one of the last titles left that had never really got a dose of that whole post-Watchmen &#8220;What would these heroes be like if they had real, adult emotions and failings and so forth?,&#8221; whereas the Justice League had gotten it right away.  </p>
<p>I do think the Anengers book(s) needed some grounding in a healthy dose of reality, and the characters merit some exploration as humans.  And I&#8217;m not even a huge fan of Bendis&#8217; Avengers.  I think he demystifies the characters far TOO much, to the point that they&#8217;re not even heroes anymore half the time, and I don&#8217;t think he pays enough attention to who the characters are before he gets his hands on them (only whom he wants them to become)&#8230; but it was still about time we saw an Avengers run that wasn&#8217;t all superhero theatrics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vincent Paul Bartilucci</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/10/01/101-curious-cat-also-asks/comment-page-2/#comment-686484</link>
		<dc:creator>Vincent Paul Bartilucci</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 16:12:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=19421#comment-686484</guid>
		<description>Neither, JB.  I&#039;m just trying to defuse the inevitable, &quot;ah, man, you just want everything to stay the way it was when you were 12&quot; comments by embracing them.  

Quite frankly, when it comes to mainstream super-hero titles like the Avengers or the Justice League of America, that is precisely what I want.  That&#039;s not to say comics can&#039;t evolve or that super-hero comics can&#039;t explore other themes and stories.  I just don&#039;t think that evolution or exploration should take place in mainstream super-hero titles.  

Another cliche of mine: Just because I grew up doesn&#039;t mean Superman has to grow up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neither, JB.  I&#8217;m just trying to defuse the inevitable, &#8220;ah, man, you just want everything to stay the way it was when you were 12&#8243; comments by embracing them.  </p>
<p>Quite frankly, when it comes to mainstream super-hero titles like the Avengers or the Justice League of America, that is precisely what I want.  That&#8217;s not to say comics can&#8217;t evolve or that super-hero comics can&#8217;t explore other themes and stories.  I just don&#8217;t think that evolution or exploration should take place in mainstream super-hero titles.  </p>
<p>Another cliche of mine: Just because I grew up doesn&#8217;t mean Superman has to grow up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vichus Smith</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/10/01/101-curious-cat-also-asks/comment-page-2/#comment-686436</link>
		<dc:creator>Vichus Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 01:15:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=19421#comment-686436</guid>
		<description>While I don&#039;t think that Spider-man and Wolverine are characters that are bad for the Avengers, It always came across to me that the Avengers was a team of heroes who weren&#039;t overexposed or could hold their own in a solo series.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I don&#8217;t think that Spider-man and Wolverine are characters that are bad for the Avengers, It always came across to me that the Avengers was a team of heroes who weren&#8217;t overexposed or could hold their own in a solo series.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JB</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/10/01/101-curious-cat-also-asks/comment-page-1/#comment-686434</link>
		<dc:creator>JB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 01:11:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=19421#comment-686434</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t buy Luke Cage or Iron Fist as that big a stars.  Hawkeye could never carry a solo comic, especially in a different title.

Dr. Strange has also frequently failed to succeed in solos.

So you think Slott&#039;ll be more like say the 70&#039;s to 90&#039;s?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t buy Luke Cage or Iron Fist as that big a stars.  Hawkeye could never carry a solo comic, especially in a different title.</p>
<p>Dr. Strange has also frequently failed to succeed in solos.</p>
<p>So you think Slott&#8217;ll be more like say the 70&#8242;s to 90&#8242;s?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dalarsco</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/10/01/101-curious-cat-also-asks/comment-page-1/#comment-686430</link>
		<dc:creator>Dalarsco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 00:52:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=19421#comment-686430</guid>
		<description>I find it amusing that the current line-up is more in tune with the original line-up than it has been in years.  It was originally about taking the big stars of Marvel other than the FF and putting them together in one book.
Also, with Mighty Avengers we get both, especially now that Slott is writing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find it amusing that the current line-up is more in tune with the original line-up than it has been in years.  It was originally about taking the big stars of Marvel other than the FF and putting them together in one book.<br />
Also, with Mighty Avengers we get both, especially now that Slott is writing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dean</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/10/01/101-curious-cat-also-asks/comment-page-1/#comment-686427</link>
		<dc:creator>Dean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 00:26:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=19421#comment-686427</guid>
		<description>I was a DC kid first,so what interested me in the Avengers was what made them distinct from the JLA.

So, I thought it was cool that they weren&#039;t just a collection of the biggest guns in the Marvel U.  They seemed to have some organizing principle that excluded Spidey and Wolverine.  It made a group like the Defenders possible, since there were lots of second-tier Marvel characters that weren&#039;t able to carry solo titles, weren&#039;t going live in the X-Mansion and didn&#039;t fit on the Avengers.  

As the revolving door kept spinning, that line blurred more and more.  I just lost interest in the Avengers.

The fact that they tossed Spidey and Wolverine into the group didn&#039;t shock me.  Morrison&#039;s Big Gun version of the JLA was a huge hit and Marvel was bound to try it sooner or later.  I&#039;m sure a lot of people like it.  It just doesn&#039;t seem like the Avengers to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was a DC kid first,so what interested me in the Avengers was what made them distinct from the JLA.</p>
<p>So, I thought it was cool that they weren&#8217;t just a collection of the biggest guns in the Marvel U.  They seemed to have some organizing principle that excluded Spidey and Wolverine.  It made a group like the Defenders possible, since there were lots of second-tier Marvel characters that weren&#8217;t able to carry solo titles, weren&#8217;t going live in the X-Mansion and didn&#8217;t fit on the Avengers.  </p>
<p>As the revolving door kept spinning, that line blurred more and more.  I just lost interest in the Avengers.</p>
<p>The fact that they tossed Spidey and Wolverine into the group didn&#8217;t shock me.  Morrison&#8217;s Big Gun version of the JLA was a huge hit and Marvel was bound to try it sooner or later.  I&#8217;m sure a lot of people like it.  It just doesn&#8217;t seem like the Avengers to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JB</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/10/01/101-curious-cat-also-asks/comment-page-1/#comment-686424</link>
		<dc:creator>JB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 00:08:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=19421#comment-686424</guid>
		<description>So are you glad you&#039;re what&#039;s wrong with what&#039;s wrong with comics fandom or are you negating the other things you say?

If they wanted to put an X-man on the Avengers and have it not be Beast I&#039;d rather it be Storm or Iceman.  Or hell maybe when Jean comes back she should move away from the X.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So are you glad you&#8217;re what&#8217;s wrong with what&#8217;s wrong with comics fandom or are you negating the other things you say?</p>
<p>If they wanted to put an X-man on the Avengers and have it not be Beast I&#8217;d rather it be Storm or Iceman.  Or hell maybe when Jean comes back she should move away from the X.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vincent Paul Bartilucci</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/10/01/101-curious-cat-also-asks/comment-page-1/#comment-686423</link>
		<dc:creator>Vincent Paul Bartilucci</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 00:03:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=19421#comment-686423</guid>
		<description>Give me the Korvac-era Avengers and big battles with power mad super villains.  Give me Cap, Thor, and Ironman working together as friends.  Give me more fun stories and less important ones.

And for God&#039;s sake, keep Wolverine in the X-ghetto where he freakin&#039; belongs!  Spider-man can take a hike, too!

And i say it again, I am all that is wrong with comics&#039; fandom!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Give me the Korvac-era Avengers and big battles with power mad super villains.  Give me Cap, Thor, and Ironman working together as friends.  Give me more fun stories and less important ones.</p>
<p>And for God&#8217;s sake, keep Wolverine in the X-ghetto where he freakin&#8217; belongs!  Spider-man can take a hike, too!</p>
<p>And i say it again, I am all that is wrong with comics&#8217; fandom!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JB</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/10/01/101-curious-cat-also-asks/comment-page-1/#comment-686379</link>
		<dc:creator>JB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 17:53:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=19421#comment-686379</guid>
		<description>old style.  I only ever read the third volume, Busiek forward and not even all of that, but that was far superior to what they;re putting out now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>old style.  I only ever read the third volume, Busiek forward and not even all of that, but that was far superior to what they;re putting out now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/10/01/101-curious-cat-also-asks/comment-page-1/#comment-686308</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 06:20:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=19421#comment-686308</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s funny that someone said it should return to being the center-piece of the Marvel Universe since that&#039;s exactly what it became since Bendis joined the book. Pre-Bendis the book struck me as being &quot;JLA-with-Marvel-characters&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s funny that someone said it should return to being the center-piece of the Marvel Universe since that&#8217;s exactly what it became since Bendis joined the book. Pre-Bendis the book struck me as being &#8220;JLA-with-Marvel-characters&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Trumbull</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/10/01/101-curious-cat-also-asks/comment-page-1/#comment-686278</link>
		<dc:creator>John Trumbull</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 22:47:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=19421#comment-686278</guid>
		<description>Put me down for Old School Avengers.

I&#039;m not opposed to having membership shakeups or offbeat choices on the team, but it doesn&#039;t make ANY sense to me to have Wolverine, Luke Cage and Spider-Man as Avengers (especially when Wolverine is still an X-Man).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Put me down for Old School Avengers.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not opposed to having membership shakeups or offbeat choices on the team, but it doesn&#8217;t make ANY sense to me to have Wolverine, Luke Cage and Spider-Man as Avengers (especially when Wolverine is still an X-Man).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luis Dantas</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/10/01/101-curious-cat-also-asks/comment-page-1/#comment-686276</link>
		<dc:creator>Luis Dantas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 22:32:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=19421#comment-686276</guid>
		<description>I can see how Wolverine might want to be an Avenger to redeem himself.

Or rather, I could, if only he didn&#039;t have just as good opportunities as a member of so many other teams.  Besides, he gave up on that fairly quickly, didn&#039;t he?  He&#039;s now an X-Force member for crying out loud...

More to the point, he is not supposed to fit into the Avengers.  And he doesn&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can see how Wolverine might want to be an Avenger to redeem himself.</p>
<p>Or rather, I could, if only he didn&#8217;t have just as good opportunities as a member of so many other teams.  Besides, he gave up on that fairly quickly, didn&#8217;t he?  He&#8217;s now an X-Force member for crying out loud&#8230;</p>
<p>More to the point, he is not supposed to fit into the Avengers.  And he doesn&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JimZipCode</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/10/01/101-curious-cat-also-asks/comment-page-1/#comment-686262</link>
		<dc:creator>JimZipCode</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 20:42:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=19421#comment-686262</guid>
		<description>Avengers (both New and Mighty) is better-written and more interesting &amp; relevant now than it&#039;s been in at least a dozen years, and maybe since Stern was writing it -- and possibly since Shooter&#039;s first run in the late 70s.  I&#039;m amazed anyone would want to go back to (say) the lazy meandering soap opera of the Kurt Busiek run, or the obscure stuff of the Bob Harras run.  In fact, there have been far more bad runs on the book than good ones.

One comment here said Avengers was all about light upbeat soap-opera.  Avengers has been a terrible book when it was focused on that stuff (not the occasional story, but when that was the focus).  One of the reasons the book needed a drastic reboot like Disassembled was because it was all navel-gazing light soap opera.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Avengers (both New and Mighty) is better-written and more interesting &amp; relevant now than it&#8217;s been in at least a dozen years, and maybe since Stern was writing it &#8212; and possibly since Shooter&#8217;s first run in the late 70s.  I&#8217;m amazed anyone would want to go back to (say) the lazy meandering soap opera of the Kurt Busiek run, or the obscure stuff of the Bob Harras run.  In fact, there have been far more bad runs on the book than good ones.</p>
<p>One comment here said Avengers was all about light upbeat soap-opera.  Avengers has been a terrible book when it was focused on that stuff (not the occasional story, but when that was the focus).  One of the reasons the book needed a drastic reboot like Disassembled was because it was all navel-gazing light soap opera.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lord Paradise</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/10/01/101-curious-cat-also-asks/comment-page-1/#comment-686253</link>
		<dc:creator>Lord Paradise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 19:32:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=19421#comment-686253</guid>
		<description>The Avengers should be all about trying new things--the team almost completely changed very early in the Lee/Kirby run.

What they should really be doing, to preserve the &quot;let&#039;s beat up a giant menace&quot; feel, is creating some new ubervillains.  The old ones have all been worked into Annihilation, big events and single character books, so it&#039;s hard to work with them.  So it would be an exercise in creativity on Marvel&#039;s part to see if they can create a new menace who is original, untied from continuity, and reusable, and that can give the Avengers a real mission.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Avengers should be all about trying new things&#8211;the team almost completely changed very early in the Lee/Kirby run.</p>
<p>What they should really be doing, to preserve the &#8220;let&#8217;s beat up a giant menace&#8221; feel, is creating some new ubervillains.  The old ones have all been worked into Annihilation, big events and single character books, so it&#8217;s hard to work with them.  So it would be an exercise in creativity on Marvel&#8217;s part to see if they can create a new menace who is original, untied from continuity, and reusable, and that can give the Avengers a real mission.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nitz the Bloody</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/10/01/101-curious-cat-also-asks/comment-page-1/#comment-686240</link>
		<dc:creator>Nitz the Bloody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 17:44:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=19421#comment-686240</guid>
		<description>Prior to Bendis, Avengers was a book that few people gave a rat&#039;s ass about... it was popular during Heroes Return, if only decent in terms of quality, but waned in interest after Perez left, was largely forgettable during Johns&#039; short tenure, and was outright bad during Austen. These periods had the Avengers as a generic super-team like the JLA, except defined not by successful proven characters, but by an incestuous mix of characters from the Pym/Williams/Maximoff family tree that had dominated the book for too long.

Bendis&#039; Avengers had a shaky start, but it was at least a book where things happened that were interesting and entertaining. And since Civil War split the team in two, one the Rebellion and the other the Evil Empire, the franchise has finally gained a conceptual purpose beyond &quot; generic super-team &quot;.

Marvel would be foolish to regress to the old model of the Avengers being a clique of stereotypical do-gooders that hangs out in Tony&#039;s mansion club-house.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Prior to Bendis, Avengers was a book that few people gave a rat&#8217;s ass about&#8230; it was popular during Heroes Return, if only decent in terms of quality, but waned in interest after Perez left, was largely forgettable during Johns&#8217; short tenure, and was outright bad during Austen. These periods had the Avengers as a generic super-team like the JLA, except defined not by successful proven characters, but by an incestuous mix of characters from the Pym/Williams/Maximoff family tree that had dominated the book for too long.</p>
<p>Bendis&#8217; Avengers had a shaky start, but it was at least a book where things happened that were interesting and entertaining. And since Civil War split the team in two, one the Rebellion and the other the Evil Empire, the franchise has finally gained a conceptual purpose beyond &#8221; generic super-team &#8220;.</p>
<p>Marvel would be foolish to regress to the old model of the Avengers being a clique of stereotypical do-gooders that hangs out in Tony&#8217;s mansion club-house.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/10/01/101-curious-cat-also-asks/comment-page-1/#comment-686237</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 17:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=19421#comment-686237</guid>
		<description>I think the organized-ness of the Avengers is what they&#039;re all about.  And the Avengers is Cap, Iron Man and Thor, no argument.  So yeah, old-style.  Bendis makes &quot;Secret Defenders&quot; jokes but that&#039;s what his Avengers comes off as, a collection of random characters with not much idea or logic behind them.

Another thing, what is this &quot;Dark Avengers&quot; bullshit?  What&#039;s next, LESSER-SPOTTED AVENGERS?  AVENGERS IN LOVE?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the organized-ness of the Avengers is what they&#8217;re all about.  And the Avengers is Cap, Iron Man and Thor, no argument.  So yeah, old-style.  Bendis makes &#8220;Secret Defenders&#8221; jokes but that&#8217;s what his Avengers comes off as, a collection of random characters with not much idea or logic behind them.</p>
<p>Another thing, what is this &#8220;Dark Avengers&#8221; bullshit?  What&#8217;s next, LESSER-SPOTTED AVENGERS?  AVENGERS IN LOVE?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/10/01/101-curious-cat-also-asks/comment-page-1/#comment-686233</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 17:19:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=19421#comment-686233</guid>
		<description>See the problem is while I think this book should go back ( hah see R.J. Sterling I didnt do it this time) to its more traditional roots it really cant while Bendis is writing it. Honostly I think that Bendis has shown he really dosnt work well with traditional superhero story telling.Even the &quot;traditional book&quot; Mighty Avengers only managed about 2 old school story arcs (that were only about average)  before falling back to his usual slow moving character study stories. 
       And while there is nothing wrong with stories like this, Im not sure if they&#039;re right for what should be the center piece of the Marvel universe. Im not trying to bash him, in fact I think he is a very good writer, but the Avengers should be a action book, and I dont think Bendis is a action writer</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See the problem is while I think this book should go back ( hah see R.J. Sterling I didnt do it this time) to its more traditional roots it really cant while Bendis is writing it. Honostly I think that Bendis has shown he really dosnt work well with traditional superhero story telling.Even the &#8220;traditional book&#8221; Mighty Avengers only managed about 2 old school story arcs (that were only about average)  before falling back to his usual slow moving character study stories.<br />
       And while there is nothing wrong with stories like this, Im not sure if they&#8217;re right for what should be the center piece of the Marvel universe. Im not trying to bash him, in fact I think he is a very good writer, but the Avengers should be a action book, and I dont think Bendis is a action writer</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/10/01/101-curious-cat-also-asks/comment-page-1/#comment-686222</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 16:01:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=19421#comment-686222</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m totally for an old skool Avengers. For me the Avengers were the mainstream heroes. They were heroes who had to worry about public opinion and how they were perceived because they stood for something. Be that because they had to fight for a US government charter to aid their work, or had to defend the fact they had Namor on the team etc etc. The X-Men were the cool rebels who didnâ€™t give a heck just had to get the job done, even if the public didnâ€™t understand them.

They were two different team books, telling different sides of the superhero world. When I was a teenager and thought rebels were cool I was X-Men all the way. Then I stopped reading comics. When I got back into comics I gravitated to the Avengers and have ended up collecting in one form or another a complete set of Avengers comics. I love um. I think the reason is Iâ€™m older and now rebels arenâ€™t as cool to me as the rebels are the kids coursing trouble in my college library. Iâ€™ve learnt that life is about compromise and sometimes having to make the tough uncool choices.

Now Iâ€™m not saying the â€˜classicâ€™ Avengers is mature book â€“ thatâ€™d be bunkum, itâ€™s a silly fun Superhero book I happen to really like â€“ but its just the book that appeals to  my older more conservative self (with a small c a small c not the Tories for those that follow UK politics â€“ heaven forbid I every become Conservativeâ€¦ Iâ€™m getting off track) as it touches on the more conformist world my life now sits in. 

For me the New Avengers are just another bunch of cool rebel heroes. Even before Civil War they just didnâ€™t have the same feel to them. After Civil War, well I didnâ€™t recognise them at all as the heroes I used to love. Iâ€™ve stuck with it as I enjoy some of the stories and Iâ€™ve hoped that Bendis would turn things around. He hasnâ€™t and post Secret Invasion Iâ€™ll make a decision about whether enough is enough.

Yes the Mighty Avengers seems to be set up to be the old skool Avengers BUT the post Civil War set up just hasnâ€™t worked. I had enough of the two team getting to together for something or other and then Ms Marvel having to tell everyone â€“ nah weâ€™ll not arrest them for reasons x, y and z. Stop it already. So again with Mighty Avengers Iâ€™ll wait until after Secret Invasion and see how itâ€™s going. 

The Avengers titles just feels like a brand that happens to be written by the most popular writer of the minute and to heck with what it used to mean. It feels to me a bit like putting Coke in a 7up bottle but still expecting people to believe its 7up cos the labels the same. 

That said alas it doesnâ€™t matter what I think as while its doing so well and â€˜funâ€™ comics arenâ€™t, good luck to them and maybe its not a bad thing that old skool people like me are being left behind. I have my back issues and maybe the industry needs some new blood.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m totally for an old skool Avengers. For me the Avengers were the mainstream heroes. They were heroes who had to worry about public opinion and how they were perceived because they stood for something. Be that because they had to fight for a US government charter to aid their work, or had to defend the fact they had Namor on the team etc etc. The X-Men were the cool rebels who didnâ€™t give a heck just had to get the job done, even if the public didnâ€™t understand them.</p>
<p>They were two different team books, telling different sides of the superhero world. When I was a teenager and thought rebels were cool I was X-Men all the way. Then I stopped reading comics. When I got back into comics I gravitated to the Avengers and have ended up collecting in one form or another a complete set of Avengers comics. I love um. I think the reason is Iâ€™m older and now rebels arenâ€™t as cool to me as the rebels are the kids coursing trouble in my college library. Iâ€™ve learnt that life is about compromise and sometimes having to make the tough uncool choices.</p>
<p>Now Iâ€™m not saying the â€˜classicâ€™ Avengers is mature book â€“ thatâ€™d be bunkum, itâ€™s a silly fun Superhero book I happen to really like â€“ but its just the book that appeals to  my older more conservative self (with a small c a small c not the Tories for those that follow UK politics â€“ heaven forbid I every become Conservativeâ€¦ Iâ€™m getting off track) as it touches on the more conformist world my life now sits in. </p>
<p>For me the New Avengers are just another bunch of cool rebel heroes. Even before Civil War they just didnâ€™t have the same feel to them. After Civil War, well I didnâ€™t recognise them at all as the heroes I used to love. Iâ€™ve stuck with it as I enjoy some of the stories and Iâ€™ve hoped that Bendis would turn things around. He hasnâ€™t and post Secret Invasion Iâ€™ll make a decision about whether enough is enough.</p>
<p>Yes the Mighty Avengers seems to be set up to be the old skool Avengers BUT the post Civil War set up just hasnâ€™t worked. I had enough of the two team getting to together for something or other and then Ms Marvel having to tell everyone â€“ nah weâ€™ll not arrest them for reasons x, y and z. Stop it already. So again with Mighty Avengers Iâ€™ll wait until after Secret Invasion and see how itâ€™s going. </p>
<p>The Avengers titles just feels like a brand that happens to be written by the most popular writer of the minute and to heck with what it used to mean. It feels to me a bit like putting Coke in a 7up bottle but still expecting people to believe its 7up cos the labels the same. </p>
<p>That said alas it doesnâ€™t matter what I think as while its doing so well and â€˜funâ€™ comics arenâ€™t, good luck to them and maybe its not a bad thing that old skool people like me are being left behind. I have my back issues and maybe the industry needs some new blood.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Bird</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/10/01/101-curious-cat-also-asks/comment-page-1/#comment-686215</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Bird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 14:55:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=19421#comment-686215</guid>
		<description>Liefeld and Land sell well too.  Please, people, don&#039;t pull that out as &quot;proof of quality&quot; when it&#039;s convenient, then dump it when it&#039;s not.  And it&#039;s not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Liefeld and Land sell well too.  Please, people, don&#8217;t pull that out as &#8220;proof of quality&#8221; when it&#8217;s convenient, then dump it when it&#8217;s not.  And it&#8217;s not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

