<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Amazing Spider-Man #578 Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/11/25/amazing-spider-man-578-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/11/25/amazing-spider-man-578-review/</link>
	<description>Comic Book Resources Presents... Comics Should Be Good!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 21:55:34 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/11/25/amazing-spider-man-578-review/comment-page-1/#comment-693875</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 20:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=20650#comment-693875</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not puzzled by his style. I just don&#039;t think it&#039;s very good wrt compositions and figure drawing. There are others who do similar styles better, like Rivera. I hope you&#039;ll realize that and change your mind.

I think JR Jr is still underrated. I suspect that people can&#039;t see past his simple, blocky surface to see the good-to-excellent compositions and practically unmatched dynamic poses beneath.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm not puzzled by his style. I just don't think it's very good wrt compositions and figure drawing. There are others who do similar styles better, like Rivera. I hope you'll realize that and change your mind.</p>
<p>I think JR Jr is still underrated. I suspect that people can't see past his simple, blocky surface to see the good-to-excellent compositions and practically unmatched dynamic poses beneath.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leocomix</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/11/25/amazing-spider-man-578-review/comment-page-1/#comment-693824</link>
		<dc:creator>Leocomix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 10:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=20650#comment-693824</guid>
		<description>OMD needed to happen because the writers need a single Parker in order to have the right feel for the character. Marcos Martin is currently the best Spider-Man artist. I understand that some people are puzzled by his style but I think they will change their mind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OMD needed to happen because the writers need a single Parker in order to have the right feel for the character. Marcos Martin is currently the best Spider-Man artist. I understand that some people are puzzled by his style but I think they will change their mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glen Newman</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/11/25/amazing-spider-man-578-review/comment-page-1/#comment-693766</link>
		<dc:creator>Glen Newman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 22:22:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=20650#comment-693766</guid>
		<description>With this, New Ways To Die and Joe Kelly&#039;s recent two parter, BND seems to have finally hit it&#039;s stride. I still only seem to buy ASM depending on the creative teams though but now i coming back more regulary. Oh, and with this issue, Marcos Martin just became my favourite penciller at the moment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With this, New Ways To Die and Joe Kelly's recent two parter, BND seems to have finally hit it's stride. I still only seem to buy ASM depending on the creative teams though but now i coming back more regulary. Oh, and with this issue, Marcos Martin just became my favourite penciller at the moment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony Cheng</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/11/25/amazing-spider-man-578-review/comment-page-1/#comment-693744</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Cheng</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 20:56:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=20650#comment-693744</guid>
		<description>But this begs the question: was that little snippet critical to telling the story Waid set out to tell (especially considering its dropped immediately when the &quot;real&quot; action starts)? If I could step into his brain, I would guess the elements of this particular plot have been in his head well before OMD.

Going over the whole BND run, most &quot;single Peter&quot; moments are about this trivial. Even the new Betty &amp; Veronica angle they cooked up early on fizzled out completely. The (largely nonsensical) Lilly Hollister subplot is the only outlier, and even THAT doesn&#039;t require a single Peter to work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But this begs the question: was that little snippet critical to telling the story Waid set out to tell (especially considering its dropped immediately when the "real" action starts)? If I could step into his brain, I would guess the elements of this particular plot have been in his head well before OMD.</p>
<p>Going over the whole BND run, most "single Peter" moments are about this trivial. Even the new Betty &amp; Veronica angle they cooked up early on fizzled out completely. The (largely nonsensical) Lilly Hollister subplot is the only outlier, and even THAT doesn't require a single Peter to work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Cronin</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/11/25/amazing-spider-man-578-review/comment-page-1/#comment-693729</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Cronin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 19:57:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=20650#comment-693729</guid>
		<description>The model scene is in the issue because of Peter being single - if he were married, it wouldn&#039;t be there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The model scene is in the issue because of Peter being single - if he were married, it wouldn't be there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony Cheng</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/11/25/amazing-spider-man-578-review/comment-page-1/#comment-693720</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Cheng</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 19:16:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=20650#comment-693720</guid>
		<description>I agree, this issue was par excellence for Spidey. And in general, the BND run has been pretty good.

I only wonder why OMD had to happen to get good Spidey books again. Nothing in Waid&#039;s story required a magically single Peter Parker to work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, this issue was par excellence for Spidey. And in general, the BND run has been pretty good.</p>
<p>I only wonder why OMD had to happen to get good Spidey books again. Nothing in Waid's story required a magically single Peter Parker to work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MarkAndrew</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/11/25/amazing-spider-man-578-review/comment-page-1/#comment-693714</link>
		<dc:creator>MarkAndrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 19:01:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=20650#comment-693714</guid>
		<description>Yeah.  Man.  That was really good!  Alternately goofy and moody in &#039;bout equal measure.  I&#039;m quite glad you posted the Marcos Martin scans way-back-when.  Now I&#039;m buying all his issues.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah.  Man.  That was really good!  Alternately goofy and moody in 'bout equal measure.  I'm quite glad you posted the Marcos Martin scans way-back-when.  Now I'm buying all his issues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tk.</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/11/25/amazing-spider-man-578-review/comment-page-1/#comment-693676</link>
		<dc:creator>tk.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 16:59:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=20650#comment-693676</guid>
		<description>Personally, I&#039;m a huge fan of Bachalo, and although I don&#039;t collect ASM too much these days, I had to pick up the issues that he did and it was definitely worth it.  I can&#039;t wait to see him back on something regularly, and I certainly wouldn&#039;t mind if he went back to UXM.  I think JRJR is at his best doing Thor, though, his Asgardian costumes rock.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I'm a huge fan of Bachalo, and although I don't collect ASM too much these days, I had to pick up the issues that he did and it was definitely worth it.  I can't wait to see him back on something regularly, and I certainly wouldn't mind if he went back to UXM.  I think JRJR is at his best doing Thor, though, his Asgardian costumes rock.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe H</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/11/25/amazing-spider-man-578-review/comment-page-1/#comment-693639</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 15:34:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=20650#comment-693639</guid>
		<description>Ever since New Ways to Die there hasn&#039;t been a bad Spidey story and that was, what, two months ago? Not so long, but that&#039;s six great Spidey issues. Man, I love getting Amazing 3 times a month.
But so far my favorite artists on this title have been Bachalo, Rivera, Martin, JRJr, and McNiven.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ever since New Ways to Die there hasn't been a bad Spidey story and that was, what, two months ago? Not so long, but that's six great Spidey issues. Man, I love getting Amazing 3 times a month.<br />
But so far my favorite artists on this title have been Bachalo, Rivera, Martin, JRJr, and McNiven.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/11/25/amazing-spider-man-578-review/comment-page-1/#comment-693633</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 15:22:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=20650#comment-693633</guid>
		<description>Matt D - that&#039;s from Keith Giffen&#039;s most recent column on CBR.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt D - that's from Keith Giffen's most recent column on CBR.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rusty Priske</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/11/25/amazing-spider-man-578-review/comment-page-1/#comment-693618</link>
		<dc:creator>Rusty Priske</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 14:18:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=20650#comment-693618</guid>
		<description>I REALLY don&#039;t like Marcos Martin&#039;s work... but this issue was a LOT better than his previous Spidey appearance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I REALLY don't like Marcos Martin's work... but this issue was a LOT better than his previous Spidey appearance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I. Glow</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/11/25/amazing-spider-man-578-review/comment-page-1/#comment-693607</link>
		<dc:creator>I. Glow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 13:45:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=20650#comment-693607</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s neat that Rivera and Martin were put back to back, there&#039;s kind of consistency that way. I prefer Rivera and #577 in general, but Waid and Martin have definitely proved themselves as &quot;buy on sight&quot; names for this title to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's neat that Rivera and Martin were put back to back, there's kind of consistency that way. I prefer Rivera and #577 in general, but Waid and Martin have definitely proved themselves as "buy on sight" names for this title to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt D</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/11/25/amazing-spider-man-578-review/comment-page-1/#comment-693601</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 13:10:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=20650#comment-693601</guid>
		<description>A sort of interesting question there is whether stories can just exist as stories in 2008 or whether they need something more. I forget where I saw it, but I swear sometime in the last week I heard someone ask &quot;Doesn&#039;t anyone ever just rob banks anymore?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A sort of interesting question there is whether stories can just exist as stories in 2008 or whether they need something more. I forget where I saw it, but I swear sometime in the last week I heard someone ask "Doesn't anyone ever just rob banks anymore?"</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/11/25/amazing-spider-man-578-review/comment-page-1/#comment-693593</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 11:48:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=20650#comment-693593</guid>
		<description>Marcos Martin is ok, but both JR Jr and the last issue&#039;s Paolo Rivera are better. Martin&#039;s easily better than Barry Kitson (ASM #574) and narrowly better than Chris Bachalo, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marcos Martin is ok, but both JR Jr and the last issue's Paolo Rivera are better. Martin's easily better than Barry Kitson (ASM #574) and narrowly better than Chris Bachalo, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bat2supe</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/11/25/amazing-spider-man-578-review/comment-page-1/#comment-693590</link>
		<dc:creator>Bat2supe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 11:07:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=20650#comment-693590</guid>
		<description>I enjoyed this issue  &amp; Amazing Spider-Man so far, it needed a reboot &amp; it&#039;s way better that the pre-OMD stories ( doesn&#039;t mean that OMD was good, hell no !!!).

My only concern, &amp; that&#039;s why I dig this issue, is the way Peter Parker/Spider-Man is depicted.
The writers tend to make him way too juvenile, sometimes even a newbie &amp; that doesn&#039;t work for me, maybe they tried too hard to expose the &quot;new&quot; , post-OMD Peter Parker/Spider-Man. 

Although they sometimes push too far the comedy aspect of the character &amp; it&#039;s like the latest Eddy Murphy flick simply NOT FUNNY.

Coming back to the subject: nice issue Waid &amp; Martin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I enjoyed this issue  &amp; Amazing Spider-Man so far, it needed a reboot &amp; it's way better that the pre-OMD stories ( doesn't mean that OMD was good, hell no !!!).</p>
<p>My only concern, &amp; that's why I dig this issue, is the way Peter Parker/Spider-Man is depicted.<br />
The writers tend to make him way too juvenile, sometimes even a newbie &amp; that doesn't work for me, maybe they tried too hard to expose the "new" , post-OMD Peter Parker/Spider-Man. </p>
<p>Although they sometimes push too far the comedy aspect of the character &amp; it's like the latest Eddy Murphy flick simply NOT FUNNY.</p>
<p>Coming back to the subject: nice issue Waid &amp; Martin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
