CSBG Archive
What I bought – 17 December 2008
If you ask me, I think it’s presumptuous of people to release a “best of” list before the year, you know, ends. I guess everyone is better than I am and gets all their comics weeks ahead of time. I have to wait until they’re actually released! So although our Dread Lord and Master, who not only gets present comics downloaded directly into his brain but future comics as well (he’s read through 2011, I believe), can post his list, I will wait until the calendar turns over. In the meantime, it’s weekly stuff! That’s cool, isn’t it? I mean, this post has a geopolitical rant in it! Who doesn’t want to look below the jump?
Air #5 by G. Willow Wilson (writer), M. K. Perker (artist), Chris Chuckry (colorist), and Jared K. Fletcher (letterer). $2.99, 22 pgs, FC, DC/Vertigo.
As you know, I’ve been on the fence about Air, and I’m giving it my requisite six issues before I decide to continue with it. At least Wilson does some ’splainin’ in this issue, as we learn some very interesting things about Clearfleet, Blythe’s airline, and why terrorists are after one of its planes. It’s an interesting idea, certainly, and Wilson does a decent job with what is largely an infodump issue, as she throws in a floating Casablanca-type airport/trading post just to give Perker something fun to draw. There’s a surprise ending for anyone who hasn’t been paying attention to the solicitations, and Blythe learns why she’s an employee of the airline and how to beat her acrophobia. It’s a weird issue, but it follows the thread that has been wending its way through the series so far, and Wilson has done a decent job introducing a lot of different wild ideas in a short amount of time. That’s both a good and a bad thing, as it keeps things jumping but doesn’t allow us to really take in whatever is going on in any particular issue before we zip on to the next one. In a book like Young Liars, this isn’t a problem as much because it’s deliberately high-octane, but it seems like Air is going for a bit more of a meditative bent, but we never have time to contemplate, because we have to wrap our minds around the next strange thing that comes down the pike. It’s a frustrating read, because Wilson has a gigantic story to tell, it seems, but I’m not sure if I want to wait that long for it to coalesce.
I would like to rant a bit as a warm-up to my later rant. My only question is, if the Aztecs possessed technology to fly through the air using the weird “technology as symbolism” thing as explained in the book, wouldn’t they have invented flush toilets along the way? Attributing fantastic technology to groups that were wiped out by evil Europeans always annoys me, because we know that the Aztecs, for all their wonders, weren’t wonderful benevolent scientists inventing environmentally-friendly super-engines, and I always believe authors are taking a subtle shot at the evil Europeans for taking away these glories from us with their smallpox and lust for gold. I would have been happier if the technology in this book had been attributed to Atlanteans. At least we don’t know anything about them, if they happened to exist. We know the Aztecs couldn’t have invented what they are claimed to have invented, and it’s annoying to see it.
Okay, rant over. I’m just getting started, believe me.
Elephantmen #14 by Richard Starkings (writer/letterer), Ian Churchill (breakdowner), Boo Cook (finisher), and Gabriel Bautista (colorist). $2.99, 25 pgs, FC, Image.
It’s been quite a while since an issue of Elephantmen hit the stands, and part of the reason must be because Moritat is no longer on the book, as Starkings explains at the back of the book. He requested a leave of absence, so we’ll see if he returns. Interestingly, he left San Diego early in July, and from what I heard, he was just tired of the whole scene. Moritat, if you’ve never met him, is a hell of a nice guy, and I hope if he’s burned out, he’s somewhere relaxing. [Note: That was all speculation about what his reasons are. He did leave the con early, and he did seemed exhausted, but I don't know if that and his leaving the book are connected. If they are, I hope he's relaxing on a beach. That's all I meant.]
So Churchill and Cook step into place, and they do a fine job with it. The art has a slightly rougher look than when Moritat was pencilling, but other than that, it still looks very good. Churchill and Cook capture the horror of the spores on the beach infecting humans, and the full-page drawing of Obadiah Horn lying on an operating table manages to make him majestic and pathetic at the same time. It’s nicely done.
The story is excellent, as Starkings, who has spent a few years setting the table with regard to all these characters, is now putting them through their paces, and the increased speed of events works well, mainly because we know the characters so well. It’s a terrifying issue, as the meteor from space that landed in Santa Monica seemingly five years ago (given the space between issues) reveals that it contains the virus that wiped out Europe during the wars of conquest for which the elephantmen were bred, and therefore extreme measures must be taken. It’s shocking to see the way the Los Angeles Police Department deals with the threat, and truly sad to see what happens to Miki, even though I have a feeling she’ll get a last-minute reprieve next issue. Meanwhile, Sahara’s father moves to take Obadiah off the board. There hasn’t really been a bad issue of this marvelous series, but this ratchets up the stakes considerably, and it’s wonderful to read along.
Starkings sent this to me in the mail, so it’s been out for a week (I’m fairly certain it came out on 10 December). It’s difficult to jump right into this series, which is why the trades are a better option, but even if you choose to pick this up cold, you won’t be disappointed. And I’d like to thank Starkings, again, for sending it to me. I’d still spend 3 dollars on it, but it’s nice not to!
Ex Machina #40 by Brian K. Vaughan (writer), Tony Harris (penciller), Jim Clark (inker), JD Mettler (colorist), and Jared K. Fletcher (letterer). $2.99, 22 pgs, FC, DC/Wildstorm.
It’s only been a month since the last issue of Ex Machina, which is fairly unusual. Tony Harris, one of the characters in this comic, even comments on writers having no respect for deadlines on the first page, which is pretty funny. Actually, most of this issue is funny. Yes, it’s a meta-fictional issue, one in which Harris and Brian K. Vaughan show up in the book to audition for the gig of putting Mitchell Hundred’s life in comic book form. It’s all an elaborate joke, of course, including the obvious-but-still-humorous ending. Vaughan and Harris get to make fun of themselves (well, mostly Vaughan), and Vaughan gets to explain what New York means to him without being too maudlin. It’s a nifty little issue, one that allows us to get a sense of why New Yorkers are always so insufferable about why they love their damned city so much. They’re still insufferable, but Vaughan does a nice job giving them a reason to be. And, of course: Dracula werebears!
Fables #79 by Bill Willingham (writer), Mark Buckingham (penciller), Andrew Pepoy (inker), Lee Loughridge (colorist), and Todd Klein (letterer). Back-up story by Bill Willingham (writer), Peter Gross (artist), Lee Loughridge (colorist), and Todd Klein (letterer). $2.99, 22 pgs, FC, DC/Vertigo.
Okay, it’s time for my geopolitical rant (although it’s not really a rant, just an off-topic essay). Why here? Well, it’s an issue of Fables, which means it’s excellent. Blah blah blah. But let’s consider what Willingham is implying with these issues in the aftermath of Geppetto’s fall and imprisonment. Yes, I’m going to attempt to suss out what a writer thinks by his use of fictional characters. This usually gets me in trouble. But do I learn my lesson? I do not!
Okay, so the scuttlebutt is that Willingham is conservative. I have no idea if that’s true, or if people writing that are basing it on hearsay or even just from fictional stuff he writes. But I’ve read it enough that I’m going to go with it. Note I did not write Republican, as the Republican Party these days is not terribly conservative in either the classical sense or even in the more modern sense. I don’t know what the hell you would call the Republicans these days. Anyway, even if we don’t accept that Willingham is conservative, it’s interesting that he’s writing a story arc in Fables that mirrors conservative criticism of European history over the past, let’s say 200 years. Let’s consider: A dictatorship (monarchy) is overthrown and the empire splintered. This monarchy was, at times, extremely malevolent, but also rather benevolent at other times. The forces that destroyed this monarchy claimed they were fighting for freedom from oppression, which is reasonable in the context of the comic. Once they succeed, however, they realize that granting freedom to everyone means granting freedom to some people who might not be particularly ready for freedom and might, indeed, use their new freedom to rise up and set themselves up as the new power, albeit on a smaller scope than the original monarchy. The forces that toppled the monarchy begin to see that there are some benefits to absolutism, even though the idea is repugnant to them.
What’s interesting about this scenario is that it encapsulates a theory of history about how the great monarchies of Europe fell apart over the course of 150 years or so, from the French Revolution to World War II. Napoleon was feared not because he was such a great general, but because he represented a threat to the “natural” order – that is, he wasn’t a king descended from a long line of kings. He knew this himself, which is why he tried to marry into the great lines and legitimize his rule by proclaiming himself emperor. At the Congress of Vienna in 1815, the Great Powers (England, France under the restored Bourbons, Russia, Austria, and Prussia) tried to put the world back together the way it was before the French Revolution, and they held it that way for a century. The most conservative entity in Europe before World War I wasn’t Russia, it was Austria-Hungary, which ruled a motley collection of different nationalities. World War I shattered that arrangement, and Woodrow Wilson, believing he was acting in the best interest of humanity, tried to hasten the idea of “self-determination” – that is, the Serbs know how to best govern themselves, the Hungarians know how to best govern themselves, and so on (Wilson’s largesse didn’t extend to the Middle East, where he actively assisted the British and French in carving up the defunct Ottoman Empire, but that’s another story). The dismemberment of the Austrian patrimony began a trend that led, after World War II, to the decolonization of the British and French empires in Africa and Asia.
This is, for the most part, a good thing. Why shouldn’t people have self-determination? Why should an Austrian emperor rule over ethnic groups like Slavs who don’t even speak the same language as he does? Why should white people in Whitehall decide what’s best for people in sub-Saharan Africa or Southeast Asia? A conservative view has evolved over the years, however, that doesn’t think this is a terribly good thing. If we look at the horrible problems in the Balkans recently, we might admit they have a point. After the Austrian Empire fell apart, Tito moved in and forged Yugoslavia, simply substituting one strongman for another. When he died and Yugoslavia disintegrated and the various ethnic groups clamored for independence, we got years of genocide as the groups fought it out. We can call these the “birth pangs” of democracy, as Condoleeza Rice famously did a few years back when referring to Iraq, but actual people are dying, and the argument is that these groups of people who hate each other were better off under a strong, non-democratic ruler who held them down and also focused their hatred on the ruler. The Slavs in Croatia, Bosnia, Serbia, Montenegro, and Bulgaria lived in relative peace for centuries, loathing their rulers in Vienna or Istanbul. Once those rulers were taken away, they turned on each other.
It’s a tough question: How much is freedom worth? Many people in the United States say, “It’s worth everything.” Those are the people who have always lived with freedom and don’t really know what it is to have a good life without that freedom. What’s interesting about Fables is that Willingham is examining this idea. The Fables in New York were under the constant threat that the Adversary would attack them, but they also led fairly decent lives. As we got glimpses of the worlds under Geppetto’s rule, we didn’t see a lot of the horrors he had perpetuated on the inhabitants. We saw some of it, of course, but we also saw a lot of the peace he had brought to the worlds. Now, the inhabitants of Fabletown have to deal with the social order breaking down because of their own actions, while ancient horrors that were dealt with severely by the iron fist of a tyrant are being let loose by the very freedom the Fables have brought. Of course, for dramatic purposes, the book works better this way, because we have to have good guys and bad guys. But it’s interesting that Willingham is showing that “freedom” might not be everything that it’s cracked up to be. We still have this debate in this country today. The Bush Administration’s sins in this regard are well-known, but consider that many Democrats want to basically censor conservative talk radio if they can. Do we have the courage to grant freedom to people we don’t like? Or do some people need the iron fist of a dictator? And who makes that call? Willingham is bringing up these points in Fables, and it’s kind of neat seeing it. He hasn’t made it too explicit yet, but it’s there. It’s one of the reasons why this comic is such an interesting read, month in and month out.
Fallen Angel #32 by Peter David (writer), J. K. Woodward (artist), and Neil Uyetake (letterer). $3.99, 22 pgs, FC, IDW.
The penultimate issue of the regular series shows, once again, why David is such a good comic book writer. He paces issues very well, and constantly subverts our expectations. Lee, Jude, and Mariah were fighting over the Sword last issue, which is its power – it destroys people who fight over it because they’re unworthy. Of course, they secure the blade, which makes us think their problems are over, or at least mitigated somewhat. After they leave Babel, however, Nimrod gets a visit from a tennis-racket-carrying young person (seriously), and it’s implied that things are still bad. Then, when our heroes return to Bete Noire, we find out that yes, things are still bad. David does a wonderful job of setting the story up so that we think it will read like a standard “triumph over evil” plot, but then yanks the rug out from under us. He does this constantly, too, and while you might noy enjoy that, it always keeps things interesting.
I’m curious to see who will survive next issue, and what David has in store for later in the year (when the book returns). Whatever happens, I probably won’t see it coming.
Ghost Rider #30 by Jason Aaron (writer), Tan Eng Huat (artist), José Villarrubia (colorist), and Joe Caramagna (letterer). $2.99, 22 pgs, FC, Marvel.
Every December/January, I try to cull my list of comics I read, and this year, Ghost Rider is on the block. I haven’t been buying it that long, of course, and I’m only getting it because I like Jason Aaron, but as I’ve mentioned before, he hasn’t been able to replicate the absolute insanity of his first arc, and I’m out of patience. There are a few nice moments in this issue (Huat’s double-paged spread of Zadkiel’s army attacking Heaven, for one), but it’s just not that interesting. In the past few issues, it’s just been superheroes beating on each other. It’s well done, but that’s not for me. Oh well. Scalped is still going strong!
Hellblazer #250. “Happy New Fucking Year” by Dave Gibbons (writer), Sean Phillips (artist/letterer), and Val Staples (colorist); “Christmas Cards” by Jamie Delano (writer), David Lloyd (artist/colorist), and Jared K. Fletcher (letterer); “All I Goat For Christmas” by Brian Azzarello (writer), Rafael Grampá (artist), Marcus Penna (colorist), and Jared K. Fletcher (letterer); “The Curse Of Christmas” by Peter Milligan (writer), Eddie Campbell (artist), Dominic Regan (colorist), and Jared K. Fletcher (letterer); “Snow Had Fallen” by China Miéville (writer), Giuseppe Camuncoli (breakdowner), Stefano Landini (finisher), Jamie Grant (colorist), and Jared K. Fletcher (guess). $3.99, 38 pgs, FC, DC/Vertigo.
I’m going to start buying Hellblazer next issue, when Milligan comes on as regular writer (at least for a while, to see if Milligan has his mojo working), so I figured I’d get this, as it features stories by several excellent creators. It’s the first of two $3.99-comics from the Big Two that I bought this week that are actually stuffed with content, which is always nice. You get your money’s worth with this one, for instance. Gibbons and Phillips contribute a funny story about a man who wants to live forever; Delano and Lloyd’s tale is about a poker game that takes some unusual turns when a ruthless player has an attack of conscience; Azzarello and Grampá send Constantine to Chicago to exorcise the “curse” on the Cubs (suck it, Cubs fans!); Milligan starts off with a nasty and cynical story about a death curse on Christmas; and Miéville and Camuncoli (who’s the new artist, I believe) give us a story that we think is going to be a typically nasty Constantine yarn but turns into something a bit more hopeful. They’re all good stories about who John Constantine is and why he’s not a complete bastard. Constantine himself gets the last word in the book: “I’m on the side of angels.” Well, it’s Christmas, after all!
This is a nice package from DC. It’s neat to see creators who have been associated with Hellblazer in the past, as well as getting a glimpse of the kind of story Milligan has in him. Even if you haven’t bought Hellblazer for some time (and I haven’t), this a good issue to get.
Manhunter #37 by Marc Andreyko (writer), Michael Gaydos (artist), Carlos Magno (artist), Dennis Calero (artist), Travis Lanham (letterer), and José Villarrubia (colorist). $2.99, 22 pgs, FC, DC.
Andreyko uses the freedom of cancellation to pull a strange narrative trick: He jumps forward in time 15 years and tells a story that includes Kate’s son, Ramsey, as a superhero learning the ropes. It’s an odd choice, and it doesn’t really work that well. It’s a weird shift, especially because Andreyko hadn’t really resolved much of what he had set up by the end of issue #36. And, because next issue is the last one, he’s not really going to have much time to clear up nagging questions about the characters, is he? The story itself isn’t horrible, but it really doesn’t suck us in as well as it should, because we keep wondering what the hell happened “in the past.” Maybe next issue will clear some things up before the comic goes gently into that good night. We’ll see.
Moon Knight #25 by Mike Benson (writer), Mark Texeira (artist), Javier Saltares (layouts), Dan Brown (colorist), and Joe Caramagna (letterer). $2.99, 23 pgs, FC, Marvel.
I usually don’t like Suydam’s covers, but I dig that one. It’s neat-o.
“The Death of Marc Spector” arc comes to an end with, well, the death of Marc Spector. Bullseye tracks Moon Knight back to his lair, and Spector decides that if he can’t beat the Thunderbolts, he might as well fall back on that hoariest of clichés – he fakes his death! This is actually a weaker issue, because Marvel has already spoiled what has happened in the solicitations, plus it’s kind of anticlimactic by design, as Marc realizes early on that he can’t beat Bullseye, so he doesn’t even try. But it continues to be an interesting series, mainly because of those two points – the hero simply gives up in this issue, which stems from his rejection by Khonshu earlier in the storyline. There’s simply no reason for him to fight – he’s beating up criminals, but in the brave new Marvel world, that’s not good enough. Whereas most Marvel writers have decided to ignore the ramifications of Civil War, Benson has done a good job examining what it means – how should we react to vigilantes who break the law but only beat up “bad” guys? Famously, other writers have Carol Danvers repeatedly letting the Avengers go, but Benson doesn’t take that easy way out. He drives Marc out of the country, which is much more logical in this context. Why are all these unregistered superheroes allowed to operate in the open? Because of money for Marvel, of course – nobody cares what happens to Moon Knight, but God forbid Spider-Man gets hounded out of New York. So Benson has more freedom to make this comic more “realistic,” meaning that Marc decides to abandon his country and become a mysterious gringo south of the border somewhere. I hope that Marvel allows Benson to explore this aspect of Marc’s new life. Unfortunately, Frank Castle shows up next issue, so I’ll have to deal with that, but I still appreciate Benson taking the risks he has with this comic.
Rex Mundi #15 by Arvid Nelson (writer/letterer) and Juan Ferreyra (artist/colorist). $2.99, 24 pgs, FC, Dark Horse.
Ah, another issue of Rex Mundi, as we hurtle toward a conclusion. Seriously, I don’t even want to review this anymore. It’s absolutely gorgeous to look at, Nelson moves the story along nicely, with betrayals and revelations and confrontations and despicable characters and heroic actions. If you’re not on board yet, you’re not going to start now, so what’s the point, right? But I encourage you to pick up the trades, because this is a marvelous comic book.
And Gerard Way does the cover. That’s weird.
Thor: God-Size Special by Matt Fraction (writer), Dan Brereton (artist, part one), Doug Braithwaite (artist, part two), Andy Troy (colorist, part two), Mike Allred (artist, part three), Laura Allred (colorist, part three), Miguel Ángel Sepulveda (artist, part four), Frank D’Armata (colorist, part four), and Joe Caramagna (letterer). Back-up story: reprint of Thor #362 by Walter Simonson (writer/artist), John Workman (letterer), and Max Scheele (colorist). $3.99, 38 pgs + 22 pgs of back-up story, FC, Marvel.
I looked through this at the comic book shoppe, and I told the proprietor, “I can’t not buy this.” Consider: It’s 4 dollars. For that you get a 38-page story PLUS a complete 22-page story of an old issue of The Mighty Thor. Said issue of Thor is written and drawn by Walt Simonson. Said issue of Thor, in fact, is the classic story in which Skurge the Executioner holds the bridge out of Hel so that Thor and a bunch of innocent souls can escape, and Skurge holds it with two automatic rifles and nothing else against the demon hordes. It’s a favorite of Dave Campbell, and if you never knew why, now you can find out for yourself. But that’s just the back-up story! The main story features Fraction, who is awesome, telling a new story about Skurge, one that first recaps the original Simonson story and then explores why Thor, Balder, and Loki don’t remember Skurge exactly as he lived. That leads to a tale of love gone horribly wrong and what some people will do to recapture that love and how best to honor the dead. It’s a cool story, but that’s not all! The recap of Skurge’s stand at the bridge is drawn by the awesome Dan Brereton, and then we get a section by Doug Braithwaite, who’s a fine artist, and then another section by Mike Allred, and finally the climax by Sepulveda, whose name I recognize but whose very good art I didn’t. That’s 60 pages of AWESOME, all for $3.99.
The question is not how can I not buy it, but how can anyone not buy it? THIS is the kind of comic Marvel should be publishing if they’re going to charge 4 lousy bucks for an issue. Will they continue this trend? Probably not. But for once, the Big Two did something right in regard to content versus price. Good move, Joey Q!
Uncanny X-Men #505 by Matt Fraction (writer), Terry Dodson (penciler), Rachel Dodson (inker), Justin Ponsor (colorist), and Joe Caramagna (letterer). $2.99, 22 pgs, FC, Marvel.
Speaking of Fraction, after last issue, I thought he had all his problems with Uncanny X-Men out of his system, but it looks like he still has some. It’s not the actual writing this time, because that’s fine, for the most part. No, it’s the old anti-mutant thing that Fraction has revived. Well, not revived, because it’s never gone away, but it’s been kind of in the background for a while, and now Fraction is bringing it to the forefront, and it’s just not a fresh take anymore. When the X-Men moved to San Francisco, I was hoping that Fraction and Brubaker would begin to explore what happens when humans start to accept mutants, but instead, they went back to the old well, and now that Brubaker is no longer on the book, Fraction looks like he’s going to plough that row yet again. Sigh. And the evil bad guy from Peter’s past is interesting, I suppose, but it’s another one of those things that bugs me about comics in general – every bad guy has to have some kind of connection with the hero, so we get more and more people inserted into their back stories. Finally, it’s the return of the annoying identification narration. I almost wept when I saw the tags. Oh, and finally (really, I mean it this time!), I like how Ororo actually wears real clothing when she’s hanging out, but Emma still wears fetish gear when she’s just sitting around drinking wine and Scott never seems to take his costume off. Whatever.
However, there were parts of the book I loved. The whole sequence in Canada was pretty awesome, which isn’t surprising, as it features Dr. Nemesis, whom I love. I like what Fraction is doing with that part of the book. And the X-23 scene was neat. And whoever put Pixie in a T-shirt that reads “Doolittle” is clever, even though that album and band suck. Yes. I. Went. There.
As usual, I’m still feeling this title out. I give it a bit more rope because I love the X-Men so much, and Fraction obviously has some cool things going on. I guess the disappointing parts are more disappointing because the awesome parts are quite awesome.
X-Factor #38 by Peter David (writer), Nelson (artist), Larry Stroman (penciler), Jon Sibal (inker), Jeromy Cox (colorist), Rob Schwager (colorist), and Cory Petit (letterer). $2.99, 22 pgs, FC, Marvel.
Dear Lord, is it too much to ask for X-Factor to have a regular artist? I don’t even know how many different artists have worked on this book, but I’m tempted to go through my run and find out. It’s ridiculous. Here we get Stroman for four pages and then Nelson for the rest. Their styles clash completely (Nelson’s art in this issue looks like Tom Grummett’s), and although I’m more of a story guy and as long as the art doesn’t actually suck to the point my eyes bleed I can put up with it, it’s really annoying that this book can’t keep an artist. Seriously, fuck the heck?
David, as usual, doesn’t let our heroes fall into superhero clichés, so they get out of trouble in a nice way. And bad things swirl around Teresa and her baby, even though nothing actually happens to the unborn baby (it’s not that kind of book). Next issue: The Birth! And, presumably, a new artist. Sheesh.
Zorro #9 by Matt Wagner (writer), Cezar Rezik (artist), Salvatore Aiala (colorist), and Simon Bowland (letterer). $3.50, 22 pgs, FC, Dynamite Entertainment.
The next story arc of Zorro begins with a new artist but the same general theme – Diego acts like a buffoon around his father while chafing under the boot of the oppressors and he can’t wait to put on his black leather and carry his whip and dish out some punishment! Wow, that makes the book sound a lot more disturbing than it really is. Wagner begins by linking this story to the first arc, as the priest from the latter issues is recruited by Zorro to re-distribute the wealth he’s stolen from the rich. I’d make some crack about Communism here, but apparently redistribution of wealth is all-American now, so I guess I’ll just salute Zorro’s initiative! Wagner sets up this arc by bringing in a love interest for Diego, which will presumably give him a more vested interest in beating the bad guy (who also has his eye on Lolita Maria Immaculata de la Pulido – she’s an ancestor of Brian Pulido, I’m sure!) even if he doesn’t end up with her, and Rezik’s art, while not spectacular, looks fine. It’s a little less cartoony and slightly more polished than Francavilla’s, which is a bit to the detriment of the book, as Zorro ought to look a bit dusty and rough, but it still looks fine.
Zorro isn’t a great comic, but it’s entertaining, and now that Wagner has the origin out of the way, he can concentrate on the swash-buckling. This is a good start.
And so we reach the end of another week’s purchases. Lots of fine books out there, people! You know they’re there! But before you run out and buy things simply on my say-so, here are some totally random lyrics!
“It’s not as if this barricade
Blocks the only road
It’s not as if you’re all alone
In wanting to explode
Someone set a bad example
Made surrender seem all right
The act of a noble warrior
Who lost the will to fight”
Testify!
- Posted on December 19, 2008 @ 06:32 PM




















55 Comments
Anonymous
December 19, 2008 at 6:51 pm
The Pixies are one of the best bands of all time. Rush is one of the worst bands of all time.
Other than that, nice post.
ninjawookie
December 19, 2008 at 7:09 pm
On Bill Willingham being a conservative.
The ‘Giuliani’ and ‘Young Republicans’ quip was read both ways in March of the Wooden Soldiers. Apparently both Liberals and Conservatives.
I think I read Snow White’s stance on abortion as just her medieval upbringing, rather than a conservative viewpoint of Willingham.
Also there is still the matter of how Frau Totenkinder gets her power.
Israel is something that both Democrats and Republicans support, so you can argue either way.
Although I’m not particularly convinced Willingham is a fully fledged conservative, the way certain political and social issues that pop up in story lines are are interesting enough to follow in itself, and the fact that people don’t know what his political affiliation is make it a positive for both liberal conservative or inbetweeners to still read.
HCE
December 19, 2008 at 7:39 pm
Wasn’t Willingham pretty up-front about being a conservative in interviews about that “Decisions” miniseries? I think it’s pretty unquestionable, though he’s probably more a “classical” conservative than a modern one, based on the work of his I’ve read. I do think that his beliefs bleed through enough to bother me occasionally in Fables, particularly when they seem to extend to his views on gender, but he rarely gets ham-handed with things – and this time, as Burgas points out, he’s asking some thought-provoking questions.
test
December 19, 2008 at 7:50 pm
was pixie even a lower-half squirt from daddy when “Doolittle” was released? Besides, she’s totally rocking a Hot Topic repro anyway. Poseur.
Jack Norris
December 19, 2008 at 9:02 pm
even though that album and band suck
You’re confused. The band you’re thinking of is called “Pearl Jam.”
Greg Burgas
December 19, 2008 at 9:06 pm
Well, that’s pretty much the only Rush song I like. On the other hand, if you like screechy non-melodic music, off-key singing, and meaningless lyrics, the Pixies are for you! And yeah, Pixie is a poseur for wearing that T-shirt.
Aaron Walther
December 19, 2008 at 9:11 pm
Greg, I’m glad I glossed over your review of Uncanny X-men(because I’m not reading it) because I just don’t have the wherewithal to argue about the Pixies right now.
Jack Norris
December 19, 2008 at 9:19 pm
The logic that showing an interest in a band that’s before your time makes you a poseur is garbage reasoning.
This from someone who was there & didn’t bother seeing them on their reunion tours because I’d seen them before the original break up, and has had to listen to peers get all douchey about “kids acting all into stuff they’re too young to know anything about”. And douchiness is all that kind of talk ever amounts to. If a kid wants to expand their interests beyond the Jonas Brothers or HSM, the only proper response is encouragement and assistance.
Michael Mayket
December 19, 2008 at 9:35 pm
Actually neither Pixies or Pearl Jam suck (especially that middle No Code, Yield era), but that first dude was totally right about Rush!
Michael Mayket
December 19, 2008 at 9:43 pm
English magicians, mutant detectives, Norse mythology and living fairy tales are fine, but when you start having flying Aztecs you are going too far missy… too far!
Greg Burgas
December 19, 2008 at 9:45 pm
Apparently talking about the Pixies touches way too many nerves. I always find it strange that a shitty band can inspire such rabid loyalty, but they do. Who knew that whether you like the Pixies is really all that matters in judging a person?
I would never say that, Jack. I think it’s great to learn about bands from before your time and like them. From what I know about Pixie, though (and let’s all keep in mind that she’s a fictional character and wearing a Doolittle T-shirt has nothing to do with her musical taste but is instead a pun by one or both creators), I’d say she’s a poseur. That’s a fun argument to have: Does Pixie like the band that shares her name? Discuss!
Bill Reed
December 19, 2008 at 9:46 pm
I usually wait until the year’s over too, but, you know, I also like to jump on bandwagons. Comics aren’t like movies, anyway– nothing good hits in December. Hee hee.
Greg Burgas
December 19, 2008 at 9:50 pm
Michael: It’s not really that, specifically. In most comics, the world of the comic is so divorced from our world that it doesn’t matter what kind of strangeness is introduced into it. With other comics, the strangeness is supposed to be in contrast to the “real,” which is supposed to be much like our own. Air takes place in a world that is similar to ours, which makes the fantastic elements more fantastic. In that sense, the fact that Aztecs developed flying machines is fine, but on the other hand, we have to assume the Aztecs in the comic were the “same” Aztecs that lived in our world, and all I’m saying is that if they had the technology to create efficient, environmentally-friendly airplanes, they would have invented flush toilets first.
Bill Reed
December 19, 2008 at 10:04 pm
Also, I fell asleep during your Fables review (kidding!).
I still think Ghost Rider is worth picking up, although it’s kinda turning into a flaming-skull-headed version of Frubaker’s Iron Fist, a book I got bored with.
I’ve never read a single issue of Hellblazer before, but I’m totally picking it up for Milligan.
Thor God-Sized sounds good. And that issue with Skurge is a classic.
davidwynne
December 19, 2008 at 10:07 pm
if you like screechy non-melodic music, off-key singing, and meaningless lyrics, the Pixies are for you!
What an excellent summation of why I like them so much!
Michael Mayket
December 19, 2008 at 10:14 pm
I was just having fun with ya.
Dan Bailey
December 19, 2008 at 10:20 pm
>>if you like screechy non-melodic music, off-key singing, and meaningless lyrics,
& you thiink those descriptions apply to the Pixies, then you probably know about as much about music as I do about nuclear physics!
Jason
December 19, 2008 at 11:04 pm
Ex Macchina was metalicious . . . and Mitchell’s choice for writer and artist for his story? Interesting . . . though I think his pick for penciller seems to pander to fanboys in 2005. What would his fellow middle-aged fans think of that pick?
ZZZ
December 20, 2008 at 12:30 am
People, please! Can’t we all just agree that anyone who thinks whether someone does or doesn’t like a particular band is any reflection on their personal merit is a douchebag who probably listens to Fallout Boy?
Evan Waters
December 20, 2008 at 1:02 am
No Beanworld Holiday Special? I’d figure that would merit at least some coverage here.
Fisk
December 20, 2008 at 1:11 am
The “classical conservative” history analysis in your Fables review is very interesting. Without a common enemy sometimes it seems that people (nations) cannot work together in peace and harmony.
But this sentence just isn’t true:
“The most conservative entity in Europe before World War I wasn’t Russia, it was Austria-Hungary, which ruled a motley collection of different nationalities.”
Out of curiosity: how did you come to this conclusion?
Blackjak
December 20, 2008 at 5:04 am
Love the Boo Cook cover on Elephantmen… Suits him down to the ground. Should be a really good fill-in for Moritat!
Greg Burgas
December 20, 2008 at 8:05 am
Evan: I thought I ordered the Beanworld book (I did get the new printing of the trade that’s coming out), but I didn’t, and my shoppe didn’t get a copy. I’m going to look around this weekend for a copy, because I’ve read good things about it. I’m sure MarkAndrew will have something about it, as he’s our resident Beanworld guru.
Fisk: Russia had several relatively progressive czars prior to World War I, including Alexander II, who got blown up for his troubles in 1881. Then they had a revolution in 1905, which severely curtailed Nicholas II’s power. Nicholas himself was very conservative, but he lost absolute power over the course of his reign. Austria, on the other hand, remained an absolute monarchy, as feeble as Franz Joseph was late in life. Even the compromise with the Hungarians in 1867 wasn’t really a nod toward progress, just a recognition that the Hungarians were as powerful as the Austrians and wanted in on the power. After 1867, Hungary became as conservative as Austria, both sides wanting to hold onto their power. Rudolf Hapsburg was supposedly quite liberal, but he was killed in 1889. Franz Ferdinand was just as conservative as Franz Joseph.
I suppose it’s not an argument that really matters – both states were very conservative. I just see the Hapsburgs as more so.
T.
December 20, 2008 at 8:28 am
Well keep in mind, liberals are MUCH more sensitive to reading opposing viewpoints than conservatives are. Most conservative writers like Beau Smith, Chuck Dixon and Willingham can’t get as preachy and heavyhanded with it as Winick because they would lose all their readership. Conservatives are used to having liberal viewpoints pushed on them in their media, we just bitch about it a little but put up with it unless it gets especially obnoxious because if we cut out entertainment just for being a little liberal we’d have almost nothing to watch. But in a comic book or TV show, if you just reveal you have a conservative leaning AT ALL, not even rabidly, just reveal that you are sympathetic to conservatism at all, liberals will really consider dropping your show or comic unless it’s ESPECIALLY compelling. So trust me, based on interviews Willingham is definitely conservative, but he’s also a smart businessman and realizes he can’t wear his views on his sleeve when writing the way Winick can.
alex cox
December 20, 2008 at 8:33 am
“And whoever put Pixie in a T-shirt that reads “Doolittle†is clever, even though that album and band suck. Yes. I. Went. There.”
You really don’t know what you’re talking about. It’s sad.
Greg Hatcher
December 20, 2008 at 8:36 am
I’m pretty sure I won’t be getting any new books until January and anyway, I was stuck for a column idea so I lunged at that “best of the year” thing like a bass. Hey, Brian ASKED.
However, if I have a comics-related moment of happiness in the next ten days that tops any of the ones I listed, I will immediately revise the column to reflect it. I have a hunch no one will care, though, they’re having too much fun yelling at me about the Hulk. Honest to God, I never know WHAT’s going to light ‘em up around here.
evdk
December 20, 2008 at 8:51 am
Greg: You might want to look up the 19th century Austrian Civil Code.
anon
December 20, 2008 at 10:51 am
“Conservatives are used to having liberal viewpoints pushed on them in their media, we just bitch about it a little but put up with it unless it gets especially obnoxious because if we cut out entertainment just for being a little liberal we’d have almost nothing to watch. But in a comic book or TV show, if you just reveal you have a conservative leaning AT ALL, not even rabidly, just reveal that you are sympathetic to conservatism at all, liberals will really consider dropping your show or comic unless it’s ESPECIALLY compelling.”
- T
Yeah, conservatives always say this, usually right after they go on a tear about how the culture of victimization is destroying America’s robust character. On one hand, feeling sorry for yourself and inventing artificial persecution are a form of weakness and antithetical to a powerful and healthy society but on the other hand… the media hates me! I can’t get a fair shake!
T.
December 20, 2008 at 10:59 am
Anon -
Never said conservatives never get offended. I said that they can tolerate seeing opposing views in their entertainment better than liberals can simply because they HAVE to be able to tolerate those views, otherwise there’d be virtually nothing they could watch or listen to. Say for example I tried to boycott everything in music and movies and TV with even a subtle liberal bias or that bashed Bush? How much pop culture stuff would I be able to watch? Most of it would be off-limits.
T.
December 20, 2008 at 11:01 am
Nice observational rant, but it doesn’t prove me wrong in the least. All it does is claim that conservatives are hypocrites.
Stefan
December 20, 2008 at 11:34 am
“But in a comic book or TV show, if you just reveal you have a conservative leaning AT ALL, not even rabidly, just reveal that you are sympathetic to conservatism at all, liberals will really consider dropping your show or comic unless it’s ESPECIALLY compelling.â€
Playing devil’s advocate here a little bit…
There’s a school of thought that suggests that the best fiction is that which tells the truth even better than the facts can. While I don’t find it necessary that an author or a lyricist have the same viewpoints I do, I do find it important that their creations ring true for me. And certainly the viewpoints of some staunch conservatives would not ring true for me. Is it possible that the story such a staunch conservative would tell could be transcendent enough that it would be free of their own blindspots, to the degree that they would ring true for me? Yeah, possibly. But you do have to be an especially talented writer not to let your own “stuff,” your own cultural biases, get in the way of your story, whether you’re a conservative or a liberal or whatever. So yeah, I’d say it’s reasonable to demand that a comic be ESPECIALLY compelling, just to transcend an author’s cultural biases enough that it appeals to people on the other side of the spectrum.
test
December 20, 2008 at 11:49 am
”
The logic that showing an interest in a band that’s before your time makes you a poseur is garbage reasoning.
This from someone who was there & didn’t bother seeing them on their reunion tours because I’d seen them before the original break up, and has had to listen to peers get all douchey about “kids acting all into stuff they’re too young to know anything aboutâ€. And douchiness is all that kind of talk ever amounts to. If a kid wants to expand their interests beyond the Jonas Brothers or HSM, the only proper response is encouragement and assistance.
”
Pipe down, grampa. Your meds are on the way.
Glen Newman
December 20, 2008 at 12:36 pm
I love Ex Machina but hated the latest issue. Writers always walk a fine line with this “meta fiction” stuff and i think Vaughn totally crossed over into self indulgence with this issue. Maybe I’m being harsh but it was an effort for me to even finish the issue to be honest.
Still, the next issue will probably be awesome.
Fisk
December 20, 2008 at 12:53 pm
Greg: thanks for the answer. I cannot agree with you because Russia was a ‘real’ absolute monarchy until 1917 while Austria-Hungary wasn’t.
It had elections with ‘modern’ opposing parties and guarantueed much broader civil rights to religions and minorities (as mentioned by evdk, too) than the Russian empire. The world’s first minority law was accepted in Hungary in 1868 which granted cultural, educational, administrative autonomy.
Until the end of world war I the minorities in the Habsburg monarchy did not really rebel against Franz Joseph’s country because they all feared that they will come under much worse Russian domination.
My last nitpicking is that Rudolph wasn’t killed but commited suicide with his lover in 1889.
Greg Burgas
December 20, 2008 at 1:42 pm
Fisk: Good points, all. I don’t suppose it matters which state was more conservative – both gave rights to minorities throughout the 19th and 20th centuries, usually grudgingly, as the rulers decided it would be better to live with some rights for their people than chance getting killed. I would argue that Hungary received those rights (which you and evdk are correct to point out was a sweeping reform) not because Franz Joseph suddenly saw the light, but because he was pragmatic (which he was). But I accept your argument, too.
According to recent scholarship, the likelihood of Rudolf being killed is fairly high. I don’t know if it’s been accepted by a majority of scholars, but it seems like the evidence is mounting for it being assassination rather than suicide. I always though it was a suicide, too, but apparently there’s plenty of doubt. I suppose we’ll have to see if more evidence comes to light.
Glen: I thought Ex Machina was a tiny bit self-indulgent, but I also thought Vaughan’s earnestness helped mitigate that. Plus, the jokes worked for me.
Tracer Bullet
December 20, 2008 at 2:15 pm
The death of Skurge might be my favorite issue of Thor. Also, your favorite band sucks and your political party is peopled entirely by idiots.
Ian A.
December 20, 2008 at 2:41 pm
I don’t think you can overstate the importance of The Pixies on the modern music scene. They were, effectively, the progenitors of the quiet-LOUD-quiet style that has become synonymous with, hell, everything.
Also: I hope Hellblazer #250 marks the start of a long relationship between Grampa and Vertigo. His work is really deserving of wider, mainstream recognition.
And, yeah, Cammo is the new artist on the series.
Speaking of artists, Valentine de Landro is supposed to be the regular artist on X-Factor. I’m not sure why he didn’t do this issue, but he’s solicited to draw the series through the March issue, at least. Maybe the book will finally settle on an artist after so many shake-ups. You should, by all means, go through and make a list of how many artists have worked on the title because it has been ridiculous. I can think of at least four others off the top of my head (Ryan Sook, Dennis Calero, Khoi Pham, Pablo Raimondi), and I’m sure I’m forgetting a few. Has any other book seen that kind of artistic turnover in such a short amount of time? Maybe Supergirl…
Apodaca
December 20, 2008 at 2:41 pm
“I don’t know what the hell you would call the Republicans these days.”
There are so many things, but Brian probably doesn’t want that kind of language in the comments.
As for the Pixies, screechy guitars can be very awesome and are extremely representative of “rock and roll”, the singing is not at all off-key, actually (listen to Gigantic for inarguable proof), and the lyrics aren’t meaningless, they’re just incomprehensible to you. It seems like your complaint is really that the music isn’t obvious enough for you, and that’s the talk of a philistine. No one should be proud of that kind of sentiment.
Apodaca
December 20, 2008 at 2:43 pm
“People, please! Can’t we all just agree that anyone who thinks whether someone does or doesn’t like a particular band is any reflection on their personal merit is a douchebag who probably listens to Fallout Boy?”
That was well done. I almost wrote an actual response.
Greg Burgas
December 20, 2008 at 4:12 pm
Dan, you know I respect your commenting, but as usual, you just love trying to piss people off. Just because I don’t like something you like doesn’t make me an idiot. Again, I’m not sure why the Pixies, in particular, inspire such devotion among their fans. So I don’t like the Pixies? So what? If you think something is meaningless, should I call you an idiot? I guess I’ll just live my sad little life without the Pixies to make me happy. My loss.
manvstrees
December 20, 2008 at 5:32 pm
you guys are going to stick to talking about comics, because trying to rip on the pixies in 08 is about as insane and futile as calling kirby a hack
Dan Bailey
December 20, 2008 at 6:13 pm
>>You really don’t know what you’re talking about. It’s sad.
It DOES appear to be true that the otherwise estimable Greg has amazingly abysmal taste in music (anyone who’s admitted, IIRC, to listening to Styx makes himself an utter laughingstock by calling just about ANY band, Pixies or not, “shitty”), but what the hell … he knows his comics, & that’s why he’s here. (He may also be on a blog somewhere called something like “Music Should be Unlistenable Dreck,” but just to be on the safe side I’m not going to go Googling.)
I mean, my gf has ABYSMAL taste in TV — she’s pretty much a junkie for *shudder* reality shows — but that doesn’t make her evil or anything. It just means she has abysmal taste in TV.
Greg Burgas
December 20, 2008 at 6:33 pm
My top five favorite musical acts, all time, just to prove (or disprove) Dan’s point:
1. Marillion
2. ABBA
3. Led Zeppelin
4. Prince
5. James
Mock away!
Oh, and Kirby was a hack! I mean, seriously – everyone’s square! What’s up with that?
Mike Loughlin
December 20, 2008 at 7:42 pm
You do realize that your comment about the Pixies automatically invalidates your opinions on everything else ever, right? To think, I used to read stuff you’d recommend… I think I retroactively can’t like Rex Mundi or The Nightmarist anymore.
Dan Bailey
December 20, 2008 at 7:45 pm
You’ll be relieved to know, Greg, that #s 4 & 5, at least, meet with my approval. You’ll be wanting to replace #s 1-3 with (off the top of my head) Wire, Joy Division & the Mekons, though. I’ll also accept Pulp & The Fall.* I know I’m forgetting any number of absolutely crucial acts — like, oh, pre-’69 Dylan (except that I just mentioned him, which means by definition that I didn’t forget him, doesn’t it) — but that’ll do in the meantime.
Toodles!
Dan Bailey
December 20, 2008 at 7:47 pm
Oh, yeah — my * above was supposed to lead to some sort of comment about how The Fall is probably out if you can’t handle the Pixies’ vocals & lyrics … Black Francis & co. might as well be Joan Baez in comparison.
T.
December 20, 2008 at 7:48 pm
I actually like the Pixies and they were one of my favorites growing up, but honestly, I can TOTALLY understand why someone else wouldn’t like them.
Dan Bailey
December 20, 2008 at 8:01 pm
Actually, I think I’m just bitter because Greg wrote about only 2 comics that I read — FALLEN ANGEL & MANHUNTER — & the first of those didn’t show up in my LCS this week. MANHUNTER I just haven’t gotten around to reading … since I sorta, y’know, had to read all recently acquired 28 issues of GLOOMCOOKIE first. I guess I should be ashamed. Oh, well.
Bill Reed
December 20, 2008 at 8:09 pm
Oh, c’mon. Styx is awesome. (But you have heard of/enjoy Pulp, so I’ll let that one slide.)
Dan Bailey
December 20, 2008 at 8:16 pm
Bill –
I only THOUGHT I couldn’t stand Styx till I moved to this hideous hellhole (Montgomery, AL), whose only claim to fame in the last 50-odd years (ever since Hank Williams’ death … he’s buried about 2 miles from where I’m sitting here typing, as it happens … & Nat King Cole’s departure, I guess) is producing Tommy Shaw. Like that’s something to be proud of. Bleahnhhh.
Dan Bailey
December 20, 2008 at 8:17 pm
“whose only MUSICAL claim to fame,” that is.
I gather there was some sort of bus boycott about 5 decades ago …
Ted
December 21, 2008 at 1:58 am
I’m not exactly sure what it says about this blog that there’s many more times as much commenting and vitriol about a throwaway line about music rather than the massive political rant, but I guess it lets the trolls know where they stand.
To T, we could argue about who is the more sensitive, what with conservatives stocking up with enough arms to ride out the apocalypse now Obama’s been elected, but its fairly pointless either way. Things will look liberal biased to you because you are conservative and conservative biased to me because I am liberal. Neither you nor me nor anyone can look at bias objectively, as we ourselves are biased. The argument is useless. A more important question for you to ask yourself, T, would be why so many more people in the media are liberal than conservative.
That being said, even though I don’t necessarily agree with T, I could see why he might be right. To simplify the argument extremely, the difference to me is that liberals see the media as contributing to culture and therefore having a real effect, where as conservatives believe in personal responsibility and therefore don’t really believe that culture can have real effect. Therefore to a conservative liberal biased media is merely bemusing, while to a liberal conservative media has a destructive quality.
T.
December 21, 2008 at 2:23 pm
Even though you disagree with me, I 100% agree with this conclusion. Of course there are exceptions on both sides, but in general I think your overall point stands.
That’s why I think its much harder for a conservative to be as preachy and over the top with expressing his beliefs in entertainment than for a liberal writer. When a liberal writer does it, more conservative readers will either be bemused with “Oh brother, another hippie rant” or they’ll just bitch about the preachiness and threaten to boycott the book. When a conservative writer does overtly unapologetic conservative stuff, he’s advocating evil and the rollback of civil liberties and human rights. It’s why Denny O’Neil’s blatantly biased stuff is viewed as preachy but ultimately praiseworthy because it’s well-intentioned and principled, while Ditko’s biased stuff is viewed as the rantings of a deranged crackpot, even though ultimately both are just two equally personal manifestos taking opposing sides to the same argument.
So my point to the earlier commenter is just because Willingham is not as in-your-face with his views as Winick doesn’t mean he’s not truly conservative. He simply can’t afford to be as in your face with his views as Winick because his views are too unpopular.
Well, I had been a hardcore liberal for much longer than I’ve been a conservative. I’m not a lifelong conservative. So I actually have seen the media from both sides, as a liberal and a conservative. I found myself dealing with contrary political views in my entertainment MUCH less as a liberal than as I now do as a conservative. The one exception is the abortion issue. Even the more liberal entertainment sources seem afraid to show a sympathetic female character getting an abortion, or at least being relatively unaffected by one. I believe Greg Burgas made this point a few weeks ago too.
tk.
December 22, 2008 at 8:42 am
X-Factor is already easily my favorite comic month after month, a regular artist would be nice icing on the cake, though.
David B
December 24, 2008 at 12:24 pm
One of the things I like about Willingham is his ability to remember that no one* thinks of themself as a villian. – everyone is the protagonist of his/her own story, and evil is often perpetrated by people with the noblest of intentions. Willingham does not shy away from that, and he allows his characters to behave naturally according to their internal motivations. Refreshing!
* except, of course, for Culp from James Robinson’s Starman, who proudly declared himself to be “a villian, black as night