<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stripping with Tom Russell: Deliberately Ephemeral</title>
	<atom:link href="http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2009/01/04/stripping-with-tom-russell-deliberately-ephemeral/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2009/01/04/stripping-with-tom-russell-deliberately-ephemeral/</link>
	<description>Comic Book Resources Presents... Comics Should Be Good!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 23:54:14 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Suzanne Baumann</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2009/01/04/stripping-with-tom-russell-deliberately-ephemeral/comment-page-1/#comment-700477</link>
		<dc:creator>Suzanne Baumann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 21:59:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=21538#comment-700477</guid>
		<description>Hi. I just saw this and wanted to confirm that yes, Tom&#039;s explanation of my (admittedly confusingly worded) quote is pretty much what I was getting at.  

Which is the more meaningful comics reading experience: A) Saving [or clipping from] a publication you&#039;d otherwise just throw out, because it contains a comic you really liked; or B) Holding onto a mediocre comic book  because you paid good money for it, and it&#039;s printed on such nice paper?* Take raised expectations and the anxiety of spending money out of the equation, and a lot more people will come to the happy surprise that they Actually Like Reading Comics. 

Anyway, nice article. Looking forward to reading all about Ted Forth!

*False dichotomy, I know; but if there weren&#039;t good cheap comics out there to attract new fans, there&#039;d be a lot fewer people willing to buy the pricey, well-produced ones.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi. I just saw this and wanted to confirm that yes, Tom's explanation of my (admittedly confusingly worded) quote is pretty much what I was getting at.  </p>
<p>Which is the more meaningful comics reading experience: A) Saving [or clipping from] a publication you'd otherwise just throw out, because it contains a comic you really liked; or B) Holding onto a mediocre comic book  because you paid good money for it, and it's printed on such nice paper?* Take raised expectations and the anxiety of spending money out of the equation, and a lot more people will come to the happy surprise that they Actually Like Reading Comics. </p>
<p>Anyway, nice article. Looking forward to reading all about Ted Forth!</p>
<p>*False dichotomy, I know; but if there weren't good cheap comics out there to attract new fans, there'd be a lot fewer people willing to buy the pricey, well-produced ones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Russell</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2009/01/04/stripping-with-tom-russell-deliberately-ephemeral/comment-page-1/#comment-699691</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Russell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 07:22:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=21538#comment-699691</guid>
		<description>Justin, I know _exactly_ what you&#039;re talking about with trying to convince people of the awesomeness of Sally Forth.  In fact, in an amusing coincidence, the working title of that next column is &quot;Sally Forth Is Actually Really Funny&quot;! :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Justin, I know _exactly_ what you're talking about with trying to convince people of the awesomeness of Sally Forth.  In fact, in an amusing coincidence, the working title of that next column is "Sally Forth Is Actually Really Funny"! <img src='http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2009/01/04/stripping-with-tom-russell-deliberately-ephemeral/comment-page-1/#comment-699686</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 06:20:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=21538#comment-699686</guid>
		<description>REALLY REALLY looking forward to the Ted Forth piece. Not even joking; I love Francesco Marciuliano&#039;s work on Sally Forth. It&#039;s slightly subversive; comics like Lio and Pearls Before Swine turn off the more conservative funny-page reader, but Marciuliano is able to sneak in some really idiosyncratic writing under the veneer of a &quot;safe&quot; office/family comic strip.

The downside is, of course, my friends don&#039;t believe them when I tell them Sally Forth is actually really funny.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>REALLY REALLY looking forward to the Ted Forth piece. Not even joking; I love Francesco Marciuliano's work on Sally Forth. It's slightly subversive; comics like Lio and Pearls Before Swine turn off the more conservative funny-page reader, but Marciuliano is able to sneak in some really idiosyncratic writing under the veneer of a "safe" office/family comic strip.</p>
<p>The downside is, of course, my friends don't believe them when I tell them Sally Forth is actually really funny.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grico</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2009/01/04/stripping-with-tom-russell-deliberately-ephemeral/comment-page-1/#comment-699654</link>
		<dc:creator>Grico</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 02:15:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=21538#comment-699654</guid>
		<description>Not relevant for the actual project, but alot of the comics can be found online at various newspaper websites. One I go to is:

http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/fun</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not relevant for the actual project, but alot of the comics can be found online at various newspaper websites. One I go to is:</p>
<p><a href="http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/fun" rel="nofollow">http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/fun</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Russell</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2009/01/04/stripping-with-tom-russell-deliberately-ephemeral/comment-page-1/#comment-699631</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Russell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 23:23:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=21538#comment-699631</guid>
		<description>@ Dalarsco: I don&#039;t think Baumann meant that comics-- whether they&#039;re comic books, minicomics, collections, or dailies-- should be actually disposed of, but rather that the appeal of comics is their accessibility to a mass audience.  That they&#039;re meant to be in print and cheap as opposed to, say, a Van Gogh painting.  Mo Willems said something somewhat similar to that in his introduction to one of the Peanuts books, in which he recounts having access to the originals.  I&#039;m paraphrasing from memory here, but basically what he said was that the original one-of-a-kind artwork wasn&#039;t comics in the way that the mass-produced comics were.

In any case, I was using the quote less to explore the point she was making and more as a leaping-off point about not only the actual physical disposability of daily comics (people generally don&#039;t file them away in long-boxes like they do magazines) but also about the mental disposability exhibited by many comics critics: that is, the way in which they are denied the attention and consideration they deserve, the way in which critics &quot;throw&quot; them away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Dalarsco: I don't think Baumann meant that comics-- whether they're comic books, minicomics, collections, or dailies-- should be actually disposed of, but rather that the appeal of comics is their accessibility to a mass audience.  That they're meant to be in print and cheap as opposed to, say, a Van Gogh painting.  Mo Willems said something somewhat similar to that in his introduction to one of the Peanuts books, in which he recounts having access to the originals.  I'm paraphrasing from memory here, but basically what he said was that the original one-of-a-kind artwork wasn't comics in the way that the mass-produced comics were.</p>
<p>In any case, I was using the quote less to explore the point she was making and more as a leaping-off point about not only the actual physical disposability of daily comics (people generally don't file them away in long-boxes like they do magazines) but also about the mental disposability exhibited by many comics critics: that is, the way in which they are denied the attention and consideration they deserve, the way in which critics "throw" them away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Reed</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2009/01/04/stripping-with-tom-russell-deliberately-ephemeral/comment-page-1/#comment-699617</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Reed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 20:38:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=21538#comment-699617</guid>
		<description>I am excited and intrigued by this new feature. I&#039;ve also felt that a lot of the supposed comics audience and critical circle ignores the strip form, especially the current stuff, and I&#039;m glad to see that on its way to some kind of rectification. Hurrah!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am excited and intrigued by this new feature. I've also felt that a lot of the supposed comics audience and critical circle ignores the strip form, especially the current stuff, and I'm glad to see that on its way to some kind of rectification. Hurrah!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MarkAndrew</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2009/01/04/stripping-with-tom-russell-deliberately-ephemeral/comment-page-1/#comment-699616</link>
		<dc:creator>MarkAndrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 20:36:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=21538#comment-699616</guid>
		<description>Huh.  Cool idea for a feature.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Huh.  Cool idea for a feature.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dalarsco</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2009/01/04/stripping-with-tom-russell-deliberately-ephemeral/comment-page-1/#comment-699599</link>
		<dc:creator>Dalarsco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 17:22:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=21538#comment-699599</guid>
		<description>That quote is so wrong to me.  I don&#039;t believe anything worth reading is completely disposable.  I don&#039;t buy collections of comic strips, but I respect their right to exist.  Nine Chickweed Lane is probably one of the greatest pieces of graphic literature ever produced.  I doubt anyone since Eisner has done such experimental things with a simple newspaper strip.  The paneling design is often more complex than most comic books.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That quote is so wrong to me.  I don't believe anything worth reading is completely disposable.  I don't buy collections of comic strips, but I respect their right to exist.  Nine Chickweed Lane is probably one of the greatest pieces of graphic literature ever produced.  I doubt anyone since Eisner has done such experimental things with a simple newspaper strip.  The paneling design is often more complex than most comic books.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
