<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stripping with Tom Russell: Deliberately Ephemeral</title>
	<atom:link href="http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2009/01/04/stripping-with-tom-russell-deliberately-ephemeral/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2009/01/04/stripping-with-tom-russell-deliberately-ephemeral/</link>
	<description>Comic Book Resources Presents... Comics Should Be Good!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:48:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Suzanne Baumann</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2009/01/04/stripping-with-tom-russell-deliberately-ephemeral/comment-page-1/#comment-700477</link>
		<dc:creator>Suzanne Baumann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 21:59:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=21538#comment-700477</guid>
		<description>Hi. I just saw this and wanted to confirm that yes, Tom&#039;s explanation of my (admittedly confusingly worded) quote is pretty much what I was getting at.  

Which is the more meaningful comics reading experience: A) Saving [or clipping from] a publication you&#039;d otherwise just throw out, because it contains a comic you really liked; or B) Holding onto a mediocre comic book  because you paid good money for it, and it&#039;s printed on such nice paper?* Take raised expectations and the anxiety of spending money out of the equation, and a lot more people will come to the happy surprise that they Actually Like Reading Comics. 

Anyway, nice article. Looking forward to reading all about Ted Forth!

*False dichotomy, I know; but if there weren&#039;t good cheap comics out there to attract new fans, there&#039;d be a lot fewer people willing to buy the pricey, well-produced ones.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi. I just saw this and wanted to confirm that yes, Tom&#8217;s explanation of my (admittedly confusingly worded) quote is pretty much what I was getting at.  </p>
<p>Which is the more meaningful comics reading experience: A) Saving [or clipping from] a publication you&#8217;d otherwise just throw out, because it contains a comic you really liked; or B) Holding onto a mediocre comic book  because you paid good money for it, and it&#8217;s printed on such nice paper?* Take raised expectations and the anxiety of spending money out of the equation, and a lot more people will come to the happy surprise that they Actually Like Reading Comics. </p>
<p>Anyway, nice article. Looking forward to reading all about Ted Forth!</p>
<p>*False dichotomy, I know; but if there weren&#8217;t good cheap comics out there to attract new fans, there&#8217;d be a lot fewer people willing to buy the pricey, well-produced ones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Russell</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2009/01/04/stripping-with-tom-russell-deliberately-ephemeral/comment-page-1/#comment-699691</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Russell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 07:22:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=21538#comment-699691</guid>
		<description>Justin, I know _exactly_ what you&#039;re talking about with trying to convince people of the awesomeness of Sally Forth.  In fact, in an amusing coincidence, the working title of that next column is &quot;Sally Forth Is Actually Really Funny&quot;! :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Justin, I know _exactly_ what you&#8217;re talking about with trying to convince people of the awesomeness of Sally Forth.  In fact, in an amusing coincidence, the working title of that next column is &#8220;Sally Forth Is Actually Really Funny&#8221;! <img src='http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2009/01/04/stripping-with-tom-russell-deliberately-ephemeral/comment-page-1/#comment-699686</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 06:20:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=21538#comment-699686</guid>
		<description>REALLY REALLY looking forward to the Ted Forth piece. Not even joking; I love Francesco Marciuliano&#039;s work on Sally Forth. It&#039;s slightly subversive; comics like Lio and Pearls Before Swine turn off the more conservative funny-page reader, but Marciuliano is able to sneak in some really idiosyncratic writing under the veneer of a &quot;safe&quot; office/family comic strip.

The downside is, of course, my friends don&#039;t believe them when I tell them Sally Forth is actually really funny.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>REALLY REALLY looking forward to the Ted Forth piece. Not even joking; I love Francesco Marciuliano&#8217;s work on Sally Forth. It&#8217;s slightly subversive; comics like Lio and Pearls Before Swine turn off the more conservative funny-page reader, but Marciuliano is able to sneak in some really idiosyncratic writing under the veneer of a &#8220;safe&#8221; office/family comic strip.</p>
<p>The downside is, of course, my friends don&#8217;t believe them when I tell them Sally Forth is actually really funny.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grico</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2009/01/04/stripping-with-tom-russell-deliberately-ephemeral/comment-page-1/#comment-699654</link>
		<dc:creator>Grico</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 02:15:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=21538#comment-699654</guid>
		<description>Not relevant for the actual project, but alot of the comics can be found online at various newspaper websites. One I go to is:

http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/fun</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not relevant for the actual project, but alot of the comics can be found online at various newspaper websites. One I go to is:</p>
<p><a href="http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/fun" rel="nofollow">http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/fun</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Russell</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2009/01/04/stripping-with-tom-russell-deliberately-ephemeral/comment-page-1/#comment-699631</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Russell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 23:23:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=21538#comment-699631</guid>
		<description>@ Dalarsco: I don&#039;t think Baumann meant that comics-- whether they&#039;re comic books, minicomics, collections, or dailies-- should be actually disposed of, but rather that the appeal of comics is their accessibility to a mass audience.  That they&#039;re meant to be in print and cheap as opposed to, say, a Van Gogh painting.  Mo Willems said something somewhat similar to that in his introduction to one of the Peanuts books, in which he recounts having access to the originals.  I&#039;m paraphrasing from memory here, but basically what he said was that the original one-of-a-kind artwork wasn&#039;t comics in the way that the mass-produced comics were.

In any case, I was using the quote less to explore the point she was making and more as a leaping-off point about not only the actual physical disposability of daily comics (people generally don&#039;t file them away in long-boxes like they do magazines) but also about the mental disposability exhibited by many comics critics: that is, the way in which they are denied the attention and consideration they deserve, the way in which critics &quot;throw&quot; them away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Dalarsco: I don&#8217;t think Baumann meant that comics&#8211; whether they&#8217;re comic books, minicomics, collections, or dailies&#8211; should be actually disposed of, but rather that the appeal of comics is their accessibility to a mass audience.  That they&#8217;re meant to be in print and cheap as opposed to, say, a Van Gogh painting.  Mo Willems said something somewhat similar to that in his introduction to one of the Peanuts books, in which he recounts having access to the originals.  I&#8217;m paraphrasing from memory here, but basically what he said was that the original one-of-a-kind artwork wasn&#8217;t comics in the way that the mass-produced comics were.</p>
<p>In any case, I was using the quote less to explore the point she was making and more as a leaping-off point about not only the actual physical disposability of daily comics (people generally don&#8217;t file them away in long-boxes like they do magazines) but also about the mental disposability exhibited by many comics critics: that is, the way in which they are denied the attention and consideration they deserve, the way in which critics &#8220;throw&#8221; them away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Reed</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2009/01/04/stripping-with-tom-russell-deliberately-ephemeral/comment-page-1/#comment-699617</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Reed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 20:38:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=21538#comment-699617</guid>
		<description>I am excited and intrigued by this new feature. I&#039;ve also felt that a lot of the supposed comics audience and critical circle ignores the strip form, especially the current stuff, and I&#039;m glad to see that on its way to some kind of rectification. Hurrah!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am excited and intrigued by this new feature. I&#8217;ve also felt that a lot of the supposed comics audience and critical circle ignores the strip form, especially the current stuff, and I&#8217;m glad to see that on its way to some kind of rectification. Hurrah!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MarkAndrew</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2009/01/04/stripping-with-tom-russell-deliberately-ephemeral/comment-page-1/#comment-699616</link>
		<dc:creator>MarkAndrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 20:36:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=21538#comment-699616</guid>
		<description>Huh.  Cool idea for a feature.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Huh.  Cool idea for a feature.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dalarsco</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2009/01/04/stripping-with-tom-russell-deliberately-ephemeral/comment-page-1/#comment-699599</link>
		<dc:creator>Dalarsco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 17:22:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=21538#comment-699599</guid>
		<description>That quote is so wrong to me.  I don&#039;t believe anything worth reading is completely disposable.  I don&#039;t buy collections of comic strips, but I respect their right to exist.  Nine Chickweed Lane is probably one of the greatest pieces of graphic literature ever produced.  I doubt anyone since Eisner has done such experimental things with a simple newspaper strip.  The paneling design is often more complex than most comic books.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That quote is so wrong to me.  I don&#8217;t believe anything worth reading is completely disposable.  I don&#8217;t buy collections of comic strips, but I respect their right to exist.  Nine Chickweed Lane is probably one of the greatest pieces of graphic literature ever produced.  I doubt anyone since Eisner has done such experimental things with a simple newspaper strip.  The paneling design is often more complex than most comic books.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

