CSBG Archive
Good Luck, Bob Schreck
- by Brian Cronin
- in General
- 19 Comments
I was quite surprised to see that Bob Schreck, only one of the most acclaimed editors in the comic industry, was let go by DC Comics today.
I’ll remember Schreck for his great work at Oni Press, his hiring of both Greg Rucka on Detective Comics as well as Ed Brubaker on Batman and, of course, editing All Star Superman (he apparently also got Frank Miller to do Dark Knight Strikes Again – that’s awesome, too!).
Best of luck with any future endeavors, Bob!






19 Comments
DubipR
January 23, 2009 at 2:34 pm
Sad to hear this news as Bob was a great driving force in DC’s editorial. Personally, they let go of the wrong editor (and other editors) but that’s another story. I’m sure Bob will land on his feet shortly with a good company, like Marvel or a Boom!
Bill Reed
January 23, 2009 at 2:35 pm
Yeah, that seemed a bit weird and sudden. I’m sure someone will snatch him up, though.
Ricardo
January 23, 2009 at 2:50 pm
Really weird. He was a talent magnet. He was also responsible for bringing Matt Wagner and Mike Kaluta to Madame Xanadu… Don´t understand what the criteria was. There might be something else, like a deal in which he could go back to an indie press or so…
Chris Jones
January 23, 2009 at 2:52 pm
He’ll bounce back. He’s too good to be out of comics for long.
Doesn’t bode well for DC’s future, though.
Bright-Raven
January 23, 2009 at 3:00 pm
Typical corporate mismanagement. Fire the most professional and respected party you have on staff, instead of the jackasses who are running the company into the ground.
Carl
January 23, 2009 at 3:14 pm
Layoffs are always sudden and pretty much come down to dollars and cents. If it’s between two guys essentially in the same role, the guy making more is usually the one to go.
Ryan
January 23, 2009 at 3:21 pm
qft Carl. Bright-Raven needs to think of the decision from a business standpoint, not a fanboy’s.
Tom Fitzpatrick
January 23, 2009 at 3:47 pm
Maybe he’ll get a job with Dark Horse Comics.
Or with Image.
Or with Dynamite Entertainment.
Or ….
Or ….
Good luck.
Jack Norris
January 23, 2009 at 9:07 pm
“Bright-Raven needs to think of the decision from a business standpoint, not a fanboy’s.”
Well, no, he doesn’t really “need to.” As he’s not on DC’s payroll, and comments here aren’t some kind of power-wielding official memo, he can feel free to be as big a fanboy about it as he pleases.
Tom Fitzpatrick
January 23, 2009 at 9:39 pm
Maybe, they should’ve fired Didiot instead of Schreck.
They might have saved a truckload of money then.
Dan Bailey
January 23, 2009 at 9:54 pm
Didiot is probably much better at schmoozing & related activities. I can’t imagine anything else he’d be better at …
stealthwise
January 23, 2009 at 10:09 pm
Yeah, I gotta agree with BR, despite the salary concern, you don’t toss out that much experience in a business where you’re looking at putting the best talent on each title and sell as many copies as you can based on quality and entertainment. Schreck’s track record speaks for itself.
Bright-Raven
January 24, 2009 at 12:43 am
Ryan:
“Bright-Raven needs to think of the decision from a business standpoint, not a fanboy’s.”
Ryan, I’m a fifteen year professional in the comics, RPG, science fiction and fantasy fiction industries. I have been an Art Director, Submissions Editor, Editor, published writer, penciler, and inker and I have also run two different art studios during that time. Not to be snarky, but I probably know a whole lot more about this industry than you do. And my commentary IS from the business standpoint.
But to illuminate it for you:
So, I’m Time-Warner Management, and I need to cut staff / costs.
Do I fire an editor with twenty five years experience between multiple publishers, who has a nigh irreproachable track record of handling his business with complete and total courtesy and respect for his employers, the creators he has handled, and the creative community on the whole?
OR…
Do I fire the editor(s) who have proven time and again that they work under their own personal agendas: Repeatedly hiring creators with bad track records either in meeting deadlines, have low sales, or both. Unable to enforce proper scheduling on their books. Who try to use their editorial position as a springboard to their own creative endeavors (usually to the detriment of the books they edit). Who fire creators under them who are handling their obligations correctly in favor of hiring personal friends, causing strife and discontent amongst the ranks of the creative talent. Who are afraid of getting their hands (and reputations) dirty and dump all the nastiness on their assistants to make THEM unlikeable within the creative community, thereby undercutting the supposed competition from getting a leg up.
This is not about dollars and cents, but about common sense. You don’t fire the best you have to cut costs. You fire the incompetents and the backstabbing politicos, and replace them when you have the means to do so. That’s just good business, Ryan. Not that anyone at a megacorp like Time-Warner will take that worldview, because they lack the comprehension that having honesty and personal integrity as your trademark is more valuable in the public eye than any dollar amount you “save”, because inregrity is what builds trust – trust in your brand, trust in your product, trust in your people.
We are in a period in our history in this business where the trust between any given facet of the industry, from corporate to creative, publisher to distributor to retailer, from publisher to fandom, has been consistently shrinking, and all sides have a deep seated sense of jadedness and disenchantment with each other. The only way to combat this problem is to recognize that which holds integrity and support it.
Time-Warner failed to do this in this instance. And they will likely suffer for it in the long run.
Tracer Bullet
January 24, 2009 at 4:57 am
Yeah, uh, he might want to leave DK2 off the resume.
Dan Bailey
January 24, 2009 at 10:41 am
>>You don’t fire the best you have to cut costs. You fire the incompetents and the backstabbing politicos, and replace them when you have the means to do so.
I’m not surprised, Bright-Raven, to see that your experience does *not* appear to include working in newspapers … else you would never have made such an outlandish statement.
(Why, yes, newspapers are in dire straits right now, come to think of it.)
stealthwise
January 24, 2009 at 6:39 pm
Da Fug? So even though he’s worked in the industry we’re discussing, but has never worked at a freaking NEWSPAPER, his opinion is invalid?
Mr. Bailey’s posts have just jumped the proverbial internet shark.
Dan Bailey
January 24, 2009 at 7:00 pm
Good god, Stealthwise — please go buy a new irony meter, assumng you ever had an old one.
All I was saying was that the scenario of corporate stupidity that Bright-Raven laments is, unfortunately, tragically common in at least one industry (& no doubt in others, of course — comics unfortunately included).
I’m going to give you the benefit of the doubt & assume that you’re drunk or really, really tired, as opposed to really, really dense.
kirbydotter
January 25, 2009 at 9:14 am
I too also think DC has let go the wrong editor. I don’t see how this is going to help DC. On the other hand, if Dan Didiot was the one to get the boot… Ah well, an old DC fan can only dream…
FunkyGreenJerusalem
January 26, 2009 at 5:18 pm
Why?
That motherfucker sold!
And still sells today…
Schreck’s the guy who can get Miller to come back to Batman after 20 odd years, and was there for Sin City at the start – you put that up the front of your resume.