I'm not sure if they are comics or not. My initial thought was that, whether you think they are good or bad, they are not comics. My gut reaction is still that they are not.
But then I started thinking about books on tape. A book on tape is still a "book", even though there is no text. I think motion comics are pretty analogous to books on tape, so maybe they should be called "comics on tape" or "comics for the illiterate".
I am in agreement with Neal. Motion comics immediate analog is book->book on tape. It doesn't make them any less awkward, though. I was certainly open to them, and tried out Watchmen and Invincible on iTunes, but never followed them after the first segments.
I haven't seen Invincible, but Watchmen was a chore to watch. I liked the Batman: Black and White episodes quite a bit more, but they still don't hold up to the actual comics.
Some books on tape have been done well. I enjoyed Martha Plimpton's reading of Diary and Stephen King's reading of one of his early Gunslinger books. Some are godawful, like whoever read King's Wolves of the Calla (featuring Dr. Doom and Harry Potter!).
And maybe I missed DD's point. They're not comics, so maybe they can't be discussed exactly like comics. But like comics, they should be GOOD. And so far, they're not.
A couple of years ago, when I was asked to review something that was erroneously described as an animated webcomic, I came up with this definition of what "comics" means to me: a comic requires that the reader controls the pace of the reading/viewing experience, whether by clicking to move forward, or turning a page, or just deciding when to look at the next panel. The text has to be written, i.e., presented visually along with images, to be read by the end user at his or her own pace. If you have a soundtrack with someone else reading the words aloud, music and sound effects synchronized to the visuals -- and therefore, someone else deciding the speed at which the viewer moves through the story -- it's animation, not a comic.
A corollary of this is that a "book on tape" may be done wonderfully, but by my definition it's not a book: it's a recording of someone else reading a book. (Out loud, one hopes.)
I don't know, I'm kind of on the fence on this one--is there any overlap between the category of "comic" and "hideous abomination and offense to the eyes, the soul, and everything that is good and decent in life"? Because if there is, I think there's still some wiggle room here.
As far as other things that "motion comics" (a term that doesn't deserve the respect not using quotation marks would imply) might be: A waste of time? A scam?
If you've already read the comic, the best way of approximating the experience of one of these things is to remember reading it while damping down your imagination so that the motion you naturally imagined looks way lamer while burning some of your cash in an ashtray.
[...] well, I don’t know what to call them. Digicomics? iComics? Just don’t let it be motion comics– are these the future? Or are they the present? Is this What The People Want? Is it what I [...]
Comics Should Be Good accepts review copies. Anything sent to us will (for better or for worse) end up reviewed on the blog. See where to send the review copies.
20 Comments
Brack
January 30, 2009 at 1:16 pm
I agree Danson.
And they don't really qualify as cartoons either.
Michael
January 30, 2009 at 1:17 pm
I've only been saying it for years.
joshschr
January 30, 2009 at 1:19 pm
Does this include the Watchmen and Invincible motion comics? Because I can't say I'm a fan of those. 'B' for effort, 'D' for final result.
Blackjak
January 30, 2009 at 1:29 pm
yeah, the Watchmen "motion comic" really sucks... I suppose you could technically qualify it as "animation" but even that's stretching the term...
mrclam
January 30, 2009 at 1:37 pm
Are those 1960's Marvel cartoons "action comics?" You know, the ones where they simply make the mouths move on old Kirby drawings?
Rob Schamberger
January 30, 2009 at 2:15 pm
Word.
Scott MacIver
January 30, 2009 at 2:32 pm
Once the "reading" is removed, then it just becomes a poorly animated cartoon.
Art + Text = Comic
sgt rawk
January 30, 2009 at 2:46 pm
Then we are unanimous? No opposition? Nada?
RESOLVED!
Thanks, Derisive Danson!
(um .. I know I'm an idiot but what the what is a "motion" comic anyways? Sheesh!)
Neal K
January 30, 2009 at 3:14 pm
I'm not sure if they are comics or not. My initial thought was that, whether you think they are good or bad, they are not comics. My gut reaction is still that they are not.
But then I started thinking about books on tape. A book on tape is still a "book", even though there is no text. I think motion comics are pretty analogous to books on tape, so maybe they should be called "comics on tape" or "comics for the illiterate".
Patrick Joseph
January 30, 2009 at 3:39 pm
I am in agreement with Neal. Motion comics immediate analog is book->book on tape. It doesn't make them any less awkward, though. I was certainly open to them, and tried out Watchmen and Invincible on iTunes, but never followed them after the first segments.
Neal K
January 30, 2009 at 3:45 pm
I haven't seen Invincible, but Watchmen was a chore to watch. I liked the Batman: Black and White episodes quite a bit more, but they still don't hold up to the actual comics.
Apodaca
January 30, 2009 at 4:39 pm
"A book on tape is still a “book”, even though there is no text."
No, it's not. It's a story, or a biography, etc.
joshschr
January 30, 2009 at 4:46 pm
Some books on tape have been done well. I enjoyed Martha Plimpton's reading of Diary and Stephen King's reading of one of his early Gunslinger books. Some are godawful, like whoever read King's Wolves of the Calla (featuring Dr. Doom and Harry Potter!).
And maybe I missed DD's point. They're not comics, so maybe they can't be discussed exactly like comics. But like comics, they should be GOOD. And so far, they're not.
RAB
January 30, 2009 at 6:50 pm
A couple of years ago, when I was asked to review something that was erroneously described as an animated webcomic, I came up with this definition of what "comics" means to me: a comic requires that the reader controls the pace of the reading/viewing experience, whether by clicking to move forward, or turning a page, or just deciding when to look at the next panel. The text has to be written, i.e., presented visually along with images, to be read by the end user at his or her own pace. If you have a soundtrack with someone else reading the words aloud, music and sound effects synchronized to the visuals -- and therefore, someone else deciding the speed at which the viewer moves through the story -- it's animation, not a comic.
A corollary of this is that a "book on tape" may be done wonderfully, but by my definition it's not a book: it's a recording of someone else reading a book. (Out loud, one hopes.)
John Seavey
January 30, 2009 at 10:27 pm
I don't know, I'm kind of on the fence on this one--is there any overlap between the category of "comic" and "hideous abomination and offense to the eyes, the soul, and everything that is good and decent in life"? Because if there is, I think there's still some wiggle room here.
Rob III
January 30, 2009 at 10:50 pm
A book on tape is not a book, it's an audio book.
Of course a motion comic is not a comic, or else there would be no reason to call it something else.
Jack Norris
January 31, 2009 at 7:44 pm
As far as other things that "motion comics" (a term that doesn't deserve the respect not using quotation marks would imply) might be: A waste of time? A scam?
If you've already read the comic, the best way of approximating the experience of one of these things is to remember reading it while damping down your imagination so that the motion you naturally imagined looks way lamer while burning some of your cash in an ashtray.
fanboy d
February 1, 2009 at 2:48 pm
THANK you!
Nick Marino
February 2, 2009 at 9:41 am
Preach, Danson, preach!!!
Comics Should Be Good! @ Comic Book Resources » 2010: The Year We Switch to Digital?
February 9, 2009 at 11:46 am
[...] well, I don’t know what to call them. Digicomics? iComics? Just don’t let it be motion comics– are these the future? Or are they the present? Is this What The People Want? Is it what I [...]