<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Watchmen Film Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2009/02/25/watchmen-film-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2009/02/25/watchmen-film-review/</link>
	<description>Comic Book Resources Presents... Comics Should Be Good!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:19:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: coffee</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2009/02/25/watchmen-film-review/comment-page-2/#comment-710062</link>
		<dc:creator>coffee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 23:10:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=22327#comment-710062</guid>
		<description>I kept thinking that the guy who played the Comedian was Javier Bardem (I found out later that it&#039;s actually Jeffrey Dean Morgan), but the two actors definitely look alike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I kept thinking that the guy who played the Comedian was Javier Bardem (I found out later that it&#8217;s actually Jeffrey Dean Morgan), but the two actors definitely look alike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Comics Should Be Good! @ Comic Book Resources &#187; Yeah, So, I Saw That Watchmen Movie</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2009/02/25/watchmen-film-review/comment-page-2/#comment-708964</link>
		<dc:creator>Comics Should Be Good! @ Comic Book Resources &#187; Yeah, So, I Saw That Watchmen Movie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 04:17:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=22327#comment-708964</guid>
		<description>[...] just fell flat for me. While I didn&#8217;t find the foreshadowing of his heel turn quite as bad as Rohan did, but I agree about the lack of nobility. I think it&#8217;s telling that Ozy&#8217;s scene in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] just fell flat for me. While I didn&#8217;t find the foreshadowing of his heel turn quite as bad as Rohan did, but I agree about the lack of nobility. I think it&#8217;s telling that Ozy&#8217;s scene in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fourthworlder</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2009/02/25/watchmen-film-review/comment-page-2/#comment-707920</link>
		<dc:creator>fourthworlder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 04:24:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=22327#comment-707920</guid>
		<description>Another difficulty for some less-than-enthused new readers can be that Watchmen is so much a period piece, reflecting in so many ways the world of Reagan and Thatcher. It&#039;s as much a product of the Cold War as Dr. Strangelove. The newsman&#039;s reaction to the headline &quot;Russia Invades Afghanistan&quot; (&quot;inna final analysis...&quot;) was chilling in 1986. To a new reader now I think it might all feel a bit dated.

Looking forward to next weekend&#039;s thread when we all pick this long awaited/dreaded beast apart!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another difficulty for some less-than-enthused new readers can be that Watchmen is so much a period piece, reflecting in so many ways the world of Reagan and Thatcher. It&#8217;s as much a product of the Cold War as Dr. Strangelove. The newsman&#8217;s reaction to the headline &#8220;Russia Invades Afghanistan&#8221; (&#8220;inna final analysis&#8230;&#8221;) was chilling in 1986. To a new reader now I think it might all feel a bit dated.</p>
<p>Looking forward to next weekend&#8217;s thread when we all pick this long awaited/dreaded beast apart!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sacred Mantle</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2009/02/25/watchmen-film-review/comment-page-2/#comment-707873</link>
		<dc:creator>Sacred Mantle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 20:51:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=22327#comment-707873</guid>
		<description>At best, all we can do is try our best to expose our best friends to comics as best we can by persuading them to read the best of the best.  And the worst part is that with the best in new technology, the best movie makers,  and the best source material, the common man in the western world can enjoy some of the worst film adaptations ever.  
Such a samll percentage of comic based movies are actually good.  I believe Watchmen will be adequate enough but I really have my doubts about changing anyone&#039;s current opinion on comics through movies.  
BOTTOM LINE: READING TAKES EFFORT AND IN OUR SOCIETY, THAT WORD IS ABOUT AS NASTY AS THEY COME.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At best, all we can do is try our best to expose our best friends to comics as best we can by persuading them to read the best of the best.  And the worst part is that with the best in new technology, the best movie makers,  and the best source material, the common man in the western world can enjoy some of the worst film adaptations ever.<br />
Such a samll percentage of comic based movies are actually good.  I believe Watchmen will be adequate enough but I really have my doubts about changing anyone&#8217;s current opinion on comics through movies.<br />
BOTTOM LINE: READING TAKES EFFORT AND IN OUR SOCIETY, THAT WORD IS ABOUT AS NASTY AS THEY COME.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rikk Odinson</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2009/02/25/watchmen-film-review/comment-page-2/#comment-707867</link>
		<dc:creator>Rikk Odinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 20:29:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=22327#comment-707867</guid>
		<description>&quot; I bought a bunch of my friends copies of the book for them to read before seeing the movie&quot;

I wonder just how many of the sales of the trade are purchases like this where a comic fan is buying the book for a friend(s)? 

I&#039;m a pretty blatant comics fan (anyone that knows me knpws I read &#039;em) and I have yet to hear of anyone that has bought this aside from one guy that I know and he only bought it because I was visiting him and wanted to know where a comic shop was and when he took me there, he picked it up because we were in the store. he pretty much told me that he wouldn&#039;t have bought it if we didn&#039;t make the trip that day.

So, if all it is really, is comic fans buyin the book for people that won&#039;t read another comic unless it&#039;s purchased for them, then I can&#039;t see how that&#039;s anything to crow about at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8221; I bought a bunch of my friends copies of the book for them to read before seeing the movie&#8221;</p>
<p>I wonder just how many of the sales of the trade are purchases like this where a comic fan is buying the book for a friend(s)? </p>
<p>I&#8217;m a pretty blatant comics fan (anyone that knows me knpws I read &#8216;em) and I have yet to hear of anyone that has bought this aside from one guy that I know and he only bought it because I was visiting him and wanted to know where a comic shop was and when he took me there, he picked it up because we were in the store. he pretty much told me that he wouldn&#8217;t have bought it if we didn&#8217;t make the trip that day.</p>
<p>So, if all it is really, is comic fans buyin the book for people that won&#8217;t read another comic unless it&#8217;s purchased for them, then I can&#8217;t see how that&#8217;s anything to crow about at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sacred Mantle</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2009/02/25/watchmen-film-review/comment-page-2/#comment-707831</link>
		<dc:creator>Sacred Mantle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 16:09:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=22327#comment-707831</guid>
		<description>Hey, quick question: 
Aside from &quot;Re-reading Watchmen&quot; on this website, where can I find more intelligent analysis of the book?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, quick question:<br />
Aside from &#8220;Re-reading Watchmen&#8221; on this website, where can I find more intelligent analysis of the book?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blackjak</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2009/02/25/watchmen-film-review/comment-page-2/#comment-707817</link>
		<dc:creator>Blackjak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 14:44:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=22327#comment-707817</guid>
		<description>I can understand the Squid Swap.  

Still looking forward to it.

Just as enjoyed the adaptation of Lord of the Rings despite it not having Tom Bombadil or Saruman taking over Bag End...

I like seeing other people&#039;s takes on the same story...  

For that matter, how many Bond movies are true to the source material?

I&#039;m just glad it wasn&#039;t made into a movie back in the late 80s...  Or Joel Schumacher had got his hands on it...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can understand the Squid Swap.  </p>
<p>Still looking forward to it.</p>
<p>Just as enjoyed the adaptation of Lord of the Rings despite it not having Tom Bombadil or Saruman taking over Bag End&#8230;</p>
<p>I like seeing other people&#8217;s takes on the same story&#8230;  </p>
<p>For that matter, how many Bond movies are true to the source material?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m just glad it wasn&#8217;t made into a movie back in the late 80s&#8230;  Or Joel Schumacher had got his hands on it&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derrick</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2009/02/25/watchmen-film-review/comment-page-1/#comment-707810</link>
		<dc:creator>Derrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 14:10:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=22327#comment-707810</guid>
		<description>I just came upon this: http://www.beyondhollywood.com/zack-snyder-confirms-alternate-watchmen-ending/, where a couple of comments below the article in it have some logical reasons why the squid HAD to be in the movie for it to work, unless the movie makes other drastic changes...which in that case would probably make for a different story altogether. They are very interesting points indeed.

Please note that the link above spoils the ending. The comments I&#039;m speficifically referring to are ones made by the user names &quot;Calliope&quot; and &quot;abietto. &quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just came upon this: <a href="http://www.beyondhollywood.com/zack-snyder-confirms-alternate-watchmen-ending/" rel="nofollow">http://www.beyondhollywood.com/zack-snyder-confirms-alternate-watchmen-ending/</a>, where a couple of comments below the article in it have some logical reasons why the squid HAD to be in the movie for it to work, unless the movie makes other drastic changes&#8230;which in that case would probably make for a different story altogether. They are very interesting points indeed.</p>
<p>Please note that the link above spoils the ending. The comments I&#8217;m speficifically referring to are ones made by the user names &#8220;Calliope&#8221; and &#8220;abietto. &#8220;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fourthworlder</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2009/02/25/watchmen-film-review/comment-page-1/#comment-707784</link>
		<dc:creator>fourthworlder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 08:12:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=22327#comment-707784</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t think DK was a turd of a movie, but to me it was definately over-hyped and tediously slow at times, redeemed only by that brilliant Best Supporting Actor guy chewing up the scenery so joyously.

I&#039;m eagerly dreading the Watchmen. I want to find a vintage t-shirt place that sells a Squiddley Diddly shirt I can wear to it. I agree with alex that the squid was integral to the story and will no doubt scoff at whatever ending they&#039;ve come up with, no matter how brilliant it may be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t think DK was a turd of a movie, but to me it was definately over-hyped and tediously slow at times, redeemed only by that brilliant Best Supporting Actor guy chewing up the scenery so joyously.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m eagerly dreading the Watchmen. I want to find a vintage t-shirt place that sells a Squiddley Diddly shirt I can wear to it. I agree with alex that the squid was integral to the story and will no doubt scoff at whatever ending they&#8217;ve come up with, no matter how brilliant it may be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FunkyGreenJerusalem</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2009/02/25/watchmen-film-review/comment-page-1/#comment-707733</link>
		<dc:creator>FunkyGreenJerusalem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 23:47:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=22327#comment-707733</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I have no faith in movie critics and especially not top critics. Dark Knight was a shitty turd of a flick, but the critics loved it overwhelmingly, and the ‘top critics” showed even worse taste than the regular critics by rating it even higher than the regular ones.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

What are you talking about?
Rotten Tomotoes critics don&#039;t use a scale, although RT does use one itself based on how many critics liked, as opposed to those who panned it - which isn&#039;t the most reliable, as they only have love or hate, and some lukewarm reviews (At best) get rated a love.
But anyway, the standard critics on Rotten Tomatoes had a 94% love for it.
The top critics had 90%.
The fans had 94% as well.

So, that kind of blows you&#039;re argument out - the top critics didn&#039;t like it as much as the other critics or the public.

Also worth pointing out that you are considering it a shitty turd of a flick is because it doesn&#039;t line up with the Batman you like from the comics, not as a piece of filmmaking, which is what all the critics on RT are judging it by.

Watchmen currently has a 76% on the critics meter, but doesn&#039;t have enough reviews posted by the top critics to have a percentage yet, although both that have posted have given it a negative.
It only got a 71% from fans who have posted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I have no faith in movie critics and especially not top critics. Dark Knight was a shitty turd of a flick, but the critics loved it overwhelmingly, and the ‘top critics” showed even worse taste than the regular critics by rating it even higher than the regular ones.</p></blockquote>
<p>What are you talking about?<br />
Rotten Tomotoes critics don&#8217;t use a scale, although RT does use one itself based on how many critics liked, as opposed to those who panned it &#8211; which isn&#8217;t the most reliable, as they only have love or hate, and some lukewarm reviews (At best) get rated a love.<br />
But anyway, the standard critics on Rotten Tomatoes had a 94% love for it.<br />
The top critics had 90%.<br />
The fans had 94% as well.</p>
<p>So, that kind of blows you&#8217;re argument out &#8211; the top critics didn&#8217;t like it as much as the other critics or the public.</p>
<p>Also worth pointing out that you are considering it a shitty turd of a flick is because it doesn&#8217;t line up with the Batman you like from the comics, not as a piece of filmmaking, which is what all the critics on RT are judging it by.</p>
<p>Watchmen currently has a 76% on the critics meter, but doesn&#8217;t have enough reviews posted by the top critics to have a percentage yet, although both that have posted have given it a negative.<br />
It only got a 71% from fans who have posted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lord Paradise</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2009/02/25/watchmen-film-review/comment-page-1/#comment-707724</link>
		<dc:creator>Lord Paradise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 22:20:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=22327#comment-707724</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve gotten a few friends to read Watchmen, and they&#039;ve all read or are going to read other things.  The next step is to get them to read Sandman.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve gotten a few friends to read Watchmen, and they&#8217;ve all read or are going to read other things.  The next step is to get them to read Sandman.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dunc</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2009/02/25/watchmen-film-review/comment-page-1/#comment-707686</link>
		<dc:creator>Dunc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 17:56:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=22327#comment-707686</guid>
		<description>Bill - 

Almost every action sequence features slow-mo in some form. Sometimes it works but it&#039;s over-used.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill &#8211; </p>
<p>Almost every action sequence features slow-mo in some form. Sometimes it works but it&#8217;s over-used.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sacred Mantle</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2009/02/25/watchmen-film-review/comment-page-1/#comment-707668</link>
		<dc:creator>Sacred Mantle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 16:36:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=22327#comment-707668</guid>
		<description>Why doesn&#039;t EVERYBODY in the world love comics as much as we do?!  If only they knew!  They should have become comic lovers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why doesn&#8217;t EVERYBODY in the world love comics as much as we do?!  If only they knew!  They should have become comic lovers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lynxara</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2009/02/25/watchmen-film-review/comment-page-1/#comment-707661</link>
		<dc:creator>Lynxara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 16:03:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=22327#comment-707661</guid>
		<description>I actually have quite a few acquaintances that went from reading Watchmen as part of the movie hype cycle to trying to read everything Alan Moore ever wrote. They&#039;ll only buy from bookstores, though, and have absolutely no interest in hearing about or reading Moore runs that haven&#039;t been completely collected yet-- or good runs that aren&#039;t by Moore. Hell, I can&#039;t even interest them in other stuff drawn by Dave Gibbons...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually have quite a few acquaintances that went from reading Watchmen as part of the movie hype cycle to trying to read everything Alan Moore ever wrote. They&#8217;ll only buy from bookstores, though, and have absolutely no interest in hearing about or reading Moore runs that haven&#8217;t been completely collected yet&#8211; or good runs that aren&#8217;t by Moore. Hell, I can&#8217;t even interest them in other stuff drawn by Dave Gibbons&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alex</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2009/02/25/watchmen-film-review/comment-page-1/#comment-707658</link>
		<dc:creator>alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 15:24:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=22327#comment-707658</guid>
		<description>If only a quarter of the people that bought WATCHMEN last summer alone come back for more comics, that&#039;s 250,000 new customers.

That&#039;s a quarter of three months worth of sales. And I don&#039;t think that&#039;s an unreasonable guess, that 1 in 4 folks might buy another graphic novel.

NOT TOO SHABBY.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If only a quarter of the people that bought WATCHMEN last summer alone come back for more comics, that&#8217;s 250,000 new customers.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s a quarter of three months worth of sales. And I don&#8217;t think that&#8217;s an unreasonable guess, that 1 in 4 folks might buy another graphic novel.</p>
<p>NOT TOO SHABBY.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: davidwynne</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2009/02/25/watchmen-film-review/comment-page-1/#comment-707646</link>
		<dc:creator>davidwynne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 14:09:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=22327#comment-707646</guid>
		<description>GUH

Will Watchmen help comics sales overall? Maybe, maybe not. There isn&#039;t a previous case like this that we can compare it to.

This is the first high profile, heavily marketed movie adaptation of a stand alone book that also has pretty broad commercial potential, and is part of popular and widely available genre within the comics industry- V For Vendetta, for example, is not a book that a lot of people will enjoy because of it&#039;s lear political bias and relentlessly dark tone; while Iron Man, Batman, etc all suffer from the problem that people have no idea where to start with the books; and 300, Sin City, Road To Perdition, 30 Days Od Night etc are markedly different in genre from everything else on the comics rack.

This is a superhero blockbuster, with easily identifiable and available source material, that has also, let&#039;s not forget, proven in the past to be a &quot;gateway comic&quot; for a huge proportion of people.

Maybe people will stop with Watchmen, maybe they won&#039;t, but there&#039;s no yardstick for this. The fact that it didn&#039;t work with 300 or Dark Knight has no real significance.

ther IS a difference between being pessimistic and being realistic, but there&#039;s also such a thing as simply having no way of knowing, in which case optimism is entirely acceptable.

###

As for the movie? It&#039;s completely impossible for it to stand up to the book. I just hope it&#039;s enjoyable, and it sounds like it will be to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GUH</p>
<p>Will Watchmen help comics sales overall? Maybe, maybe not. There isn&#8217;t a previous case like this that we can compare it to.</p>
<p>This is the first high profile, heavily marketed movie adaptation of a stand alone book that also has pretty broad commercial potential, and is part of popular and widely available genre within the comics industry- V For Vendetta, for example, is not a book that a lot of people will enjoy because of it&#8217;s lear political bias and relentlessly dark tone; while Iron Man, Batman, etc all suffer from the problem that people have no idea where to start with the books; and 300, Sin City, Road To Perdition, 30 Days Od Night etc are markedly different in genre from everything else on the comics rack.</p>
<p>This is a superhero blockbuster, with easily identifiable and available source material, that has also, let&#8217;s not forget, proven in the past to be a &#8220;gateway comic&#8221; for a huge proportion of people.</p>
<p>Maybe people will stop with Watchmen, maybe they won&#8217;t, but there&#8217;s no yardstick for this. The fact that it didn&#8217;t work with 300 or Dark Knight has no real significance.</p>
<p>ther IS a difference between being pessimistic and being realistic, but there&#8217;s also such a thing as simply having no way of knowing, in which case optimism is entirely acceptable.</p>
<p>###</p>
<p>As for the movie? It&#8217;s completely impossible for it to stand up to the book. I just hope it&#8217;s enjoyable, and it sounds like it will be to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rohan Williams</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2009/02/25/watchmen-film-review/comment-page-1/#comment-707623</link>
		<dc:creator>Rohan Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 10:24:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=22327#comment-707623</guid>
		<description>I agree the squid is thematically important to the comic, Alex, but I&#039;m curious how they would have adequately explained it in the space of two and a half hours. Really, the ending they use instead is pretty cool, and will probably make more sense to most audiences.

The adaptation has bigger problems than the squid, trust me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree the squid is thematically important to the comic, Alex, but I&#8217;m curious how they would have adequately explained it in the space of two and a half hours. Really, the ending they use instead is pretty cool, and will probably make more sense to most audiences.</p>
<p>The adaptation has bigger problems than the squid, trust me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T.</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2009/02/25/watchmen-film-review/comment-page-1/#comment-707598</link>
		<dc:creator>T.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 05:08:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=22327#comment-707598</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;None of the ‘top critics’ have posted reviews though.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I have no faith in movie critics and especially not top critics.  Dark Knight was a shitty turd of a flick, but the critics loved it overwhelmingly, and the &#039;top critics&quot; showed even worse taste than the regular critics by rating it even higher than the regular ones.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>None of the ‘top critics’ have posted reviews though.</p></blockquote>
<p>I have no faith in movie critics and especially not top critics.  Dark Knight was a shitty turd of a flick, but the critics loved it overwhelmingly, and the &#8216;top critics&#8221; showed even worse taste than the regular critics by rating it even higher than the regular ones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T.</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2009/02/25/watchmen-film-review/comment-page-1/#comment-707597</link>
		<dc:creator>T.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 05:05:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=22327#comment-707597</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Honestly though… regardless of the “faithfulness” of the adaptation, it has already gotten more people reading comics (sales of Watchmen have gone through the roof). For some reason, Watchman seems to have already had a bigger effect on sales that even Iron Man, Spider-Man, and The Dark Knight.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

It&#039;s not hard to figure out why?  if you are a noncomics fan and you watch Iron Man, Spider-Man and Dark Knight movies, which comic do you go to in order to follow up on the comics?  You have over 40 years of comics and trade paperbacks to choose from.  If you want to follow up on Watchmen interest by reading a comic book however, all you have to do is by one self-contained graphic novel.  Therefore all the Watchmen-generated interest gets focused on one graphic novel while interest generated by the other heroes gets diffused across a ton of books and publications.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Honestly though… regardless of the “faithfulness” of the adaptation, it has already gotten more people reading comics (sales of Watchmen have gone through the roof). For some reason, Watchman seems to have already had a bigger effect on sales that even Iron Man, Spider-Man, and The Dark Knight.</p></blockquote>
<p>It&#8217;s not hard to figure out why?  if you are a noncomics fan and you watch Iron Man, Spider-Man and Dark Knight movies, which comic do you go to in order to follow up on the comics?  You have over 40 years of comics and trade paperbacks to choose from.  If you want to follow up on Watchmen interest by reading a comic book however, all you have to do is by one self-contained graphic novel.  Therefore all the Watchmen-generated interest gets focused on one graphic novel while interest generated by the other heroes gets diffused across a ton of books and publications.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alex</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2009/02/25/watchmen-film-review/comment-page-1/#comment-707595</link>
		<dc:creator>alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 04:41:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=22327#comment-707595</guid>
		<description>The squid is important.

The squid is a fiction with a fiction within a fiction. It is the ultimate underscore of one of the most important aspects of the book.

When you remove it, you remove a thematic element that lies at the heart of the plot, and the it&#039;s not just a silly macguffin that look silly on screen (or whatever).

For all the talk about how &quot;realistic&quot; Watchmen is, it&#039;s not, nor is it supposed to be. And the ultimate fiction of the Squid, at the end, is the focal point that these layers of imagined worlds work around.

I don&#039;t give a shit about the movie or what they change, but that&#039;s a pretty hefty chunk to cut, thematically.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The squid is important.</p>
<p>The squid is a fiction with a fiction within a fiction. It is the ultimate underscore of one of the most important aspects of the book.</p>
<p>When you remove it, you remove a thematic element that lies at the heart of the plot, and the it&#8217;s not just a silly macguffin that look silly on screen (or whatever).</p>
<p>For all the talk about how &#8220;realistic&#8221; Watchmen is, it&#8217;s not, nor is it supposed to be. And the ultimate fiction of the Squid, at the end, is the focal point that these layers of imagined worlds work around.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t give a shit about the movie or what they change, but that&#8217;s a pretty hefty chunk to cut, thematically.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

