web stats

CSBG Archive

What I bought – 25 March 2009

After last week’s mess, it’s back to sanity! Of course, that means far fewer comics and far fewer people telling me I’m crazy, but I can live with that!

Battlefields: Dear Billy #3 (of 3) by Garth Ennis (writer), Peter Snejbjerg (artist), Rob Steen (colorist), and Simon Bowland (letterer). $3.50, 22 pgs, FC, Dynamite Entertainment.

“Dear Billy” ends probably one of the few ways it could, and it’s a powerful statement about war and what it does to people. Ennis upsets our expectations mainly because we want Carrie to act a certain way, as does Billy, and when she acts a different way, it’s extremely powerful. We also expect Billy to act in a certain way, so Ennis is playing on our anticipation in more ways than one. Billy’s naïveté is interesting, not because Carrie hates it (as she points out, she shouldn’t expect Billy to be any different), but because of the way Ennis explains it. In three issues, Ennis has done as good as job as explaining the differences between men and women as he did in, say, 66 issues of Preacher. Carrie and Billy simply can’t understand each other, and that is the tragedy in this comic. Plus, Snejbjerg gets to draw a massacre, and he does so with horribly glory.

After the first arc of this series, I wasn’t sure if I was going to stick with it. If Ennis continues to write stories like this, however, where war is the backdrop but there’s a lot more going on, I might have to stick around. Of course, the next arc seems like it’s more of a straight-up war tale, but it’s drawn by Carlos Ezquerra, so it might be worth checking out. Speaking of worth checking out, “Dear Billy” is definitely that.

Hero Squared: Love and Death #2 (of 3) (“The Middle of the End!”) by Keith Giffen (plotter), J. M. DeMatteis (scripter), Nathan Watson (artist), Digikore Studios (colorists), and Ed Dukeshire (letterer). $3.99, 22 pgs, FC, Boom! Studios.

As the Giffen/DeMatteis team’s latest superhero epic somewhat languorously moves toward its conclusion (which comes next issue), it’s always worth noting that Giffen and DeMatteis are simply without peer among comic book writers in making conversations in comics fun and interesting. Almost this entire comic is devoted to four people talking about their problems, but it’s a great read, as Giffen and DeMatteis not only get to the heart of what is “wrong” with most superhero fantasies (I put it in quotes because “wrong” in this case is purely subjective), but also get to the heart of why Milo, Stephie, Captain Valor, and Caliginous are having problems. Sure, the answers to some of their problems are simplistic (why are people in all forms of fiction always scared of being happy?), but the dialogue still feels very naturalistic and organic, and the humor in the series always stems from “realistic” situations (as we are, after all, dealing with a superhero from another dimension). Watson is called upon to draw a lot of facial expressions (until the end, where he gets to draw the Captain Valor Corps, which is neat), and he does a good job with it. He’s a bit broader than, say, Kevin Maguire (unsurprisingly, I suppose), but he tells the story quite well.

So next issue we get the end of the saga. All in all, the epic of Captain Valor isn’t all that long (I’ll have to check, but it’s less than 15 issues), but it’s a humorous and poignant look at what makes someone a hero. I’ll interested to see how Giffen and DeMatteis will wrap everything up.

The Incredible Hercules #127 (“Dark Reign”) by Fred van Lente (writer), Greg Pak (writer), Dietrich Smith (penciler), Cory Hamscher (inker), Raúl Treviño (colorist), and Joe Caramagna (letterer). $2.99, 22 pgs, FC, Marvel.

A new arc, building on what has come before, begins and, as usual, it’s entertaining. It actually starts slowly, as Pak and van Lente dispatch a minor Marvel hero that I wished they hadn’t and Hera challenges Athena, Hercules, and Amadeus in a diner. (I should point out that I don’t have any great love for the hero who gets axed, to the point that I didn’t know he existed. At first I thought he was a van Lente/Pak creation, but later in the issue I learned he was not. However, the first few pages make him seem like he’s filling a nice niche in the Marvel U., and now he’s gone. Oh well.) The writing is fine, but doesn’t crackle like it often has – it’s expository to a large degree, so I just have to get through it. I suppose it probably works for someone who hasn’t been reading the book, but I have. And I love how the Furies are hotties in the Marvel U. – every single female in the Marvel U., apparently, is a hottie, more so than in the DCU, it seems. Then Norman Osborn shows up at Hera’s place of business, the book takes a darker turn, Delphyne reappears, and things get ugly. The second part of the book picks up a bit, but overall, this is a set-up issue, so not a ton happens. It’s not as good as most of the issues of this run have been, but Pak and van Lente are introducing (or re-introducing) a lot of elements, so I’m perfectly willing to let them off the hook.

Smith’s art is similar to the others who have come before him. I don’t know if Marvel is hiring artists who have similar styles or if the artists are changing their styles to suit the book. Herc’s body hair is a bit weird, but when Hera’s Olympus Group and Norman Osborn’s Faux Avengers show up at the end of the book, Smith does a nice job. And yay! Ares is back to fight Herc. Good times.

I should point out that there are FIVE footnotes in this comic, referencing stuff that didn’t even occur in this comic (only one refers to something that happened in this title). It’s not distracting at all, and it deepens the connection between this book and the rest of the Marvel U. It seems like Mark Paniccia, the editor, is being a bit goofy with them, but I don’t care – I want more! I doubt if there needs to be a ton of effort to do this, so I’m glad this book, at least, utilizes them. FOOTNOTES RULE!!!!

The Umbrella Academy: Dallas #5 (of 6) (“All the Animals in the Zoo”) by Gerard Way (writer), Gabriel Bá (artist), Dave Stewart (colorist), and Nate Piekos (letterer). $2.99, 22 pgs, FC, Dark Horse.

You know, at this point, I’m probably better off just re-reading the entire series when issue #6 comes out, because I’m a bit lost. Didn’t issue #4 end in a way that seems to beg an explanation? And yet, here we are, back in 1963, in the jungles of Vietnam, and things are weirder than ever. Yes, I love the fact that on one page, a character says “Protect that mummy!” and that on another page, Viet Cong vampires attack our heroes, and that Number Five takes charge of the JFK assassination in a hilarious way, but I’m still confused. It doesn’t help that time travel makes my head hurt. I’m just along for the ride right now, soaking in Bá’s glorious art. Seriously, the action scenes in this comic are stunning, and the splash page of the jungle is exquisite. I can live with being lost in the story (that’s not to say I’m not enjoying it, just that I’m lost) is the art is this good. And it is.

So next issue we find out what’s going on. I hope Mister Pennycrumb plays a crucial role!

(The mummy, by the way, was a real person. In case you were wondering and didn’t feel like Googling it.)

Unknown Soldier #6 (“Haunted House: Conclusion”) by Joshua Dysart (writer), Alberto Ponticelli (artist), Oscar Celestini (colorist), and Clem Robins (letterer). $2.99, 22 pgs, FC, DC/Vertigo.

The first arc of Unknown Soldier comes to an end, and this is usually the spot where I decide if I want to keep buying something or not. I’m going to keep getting this, because Dysart is at least trying something different, even if I’m not sure about his execution. His text pieces, which detail the recent bloody history of Uganda, are more interesting than the actual comic, mainly because in the comic, he seems to be taking a relatively simplistic (from a moralistic standpoint) view of the conflict. Moses, after all, can’t stop the war simply by shooting everyone who’s evil. While Dysart might be acting out some kind of power fantasy through the book, as he seems to imply from editorial comments in the text piece, that doesn’t completely excuse it. Yes, it’s a very exciting and harrowing comic, and the way Moses has descended into madness throughout the book is at its heart, and Dysart does that very well, but glossing over the very real decisions people in this region have to make (especially regarding the child soldiers) rubs me the wrong way. Ultimately, any psychological profiling this arc has done is against a backdrop that, as Dysart reminds us, is horrible and, incredibly, ongoing (when was the last time the Congo War or Joseph Kory got any press in the U. S.?), and that cheapens it slightly. Dysart has explained that he wants this to be a kick-ass adventure comic, which is fine to a degree, and if he goes into the real-world politics too much he might lose readers and the book will get cancelled, so I understand the dilemma he’s in. I’m going to keep reading, both because Moses’s odyssey is fascinating and Ponticelli’s art is very good, but I have a feeling I’m going to be worried about this as long as I do read.

At least Dysart is explaining the situation, even if he’s doing it in the text pieces. The Ugandan problem is a huge tragedy, and any light on it is good.

And that’s the week! I noticed an interesting fact as I was purchasing, reading, and reviewing this week’s books in this, the final week of March: I bought one (1) mainstream DC comic this month, and that would be Secret Six. Through cancellations (Blue Beetle and, before that, Catwoman) and creators jumping ship (Morrison on Batman, although he’ll be back), I’m just not interested in much of what’s coming out of the DCU. That’s fairly amazing, considering I’ve always thought DC published better comics overall than Marvel. I’m not buying a ton of regular Marvel stuff (last week notwithstanding), but I’m still getting more than from DC. Of course, Vertigo is picking up the slack a bit, as the imprint seems to be publishing quite a good bunch of comics recently. It’s just something I noticed. I apologize for reading weird books that don’t angry up the blood and therefore don’t draw grumpy comments about how I’m an idiot. I try, really I do!

No one guessed last week’s totally random lyrics, which made me sad. After all my talk about Wolverine’s son, couldn’t you have guessed I’d go with Dokken lyrics? Yes, the lyrics were from “Dream Warriors,” a bad song from a bad movie. But George Lynch can play some guitar, man! Let’s get to some new totally random lyrics, shall we?

“Our story begins in a schoolyard
A little girl skipping rope with her friends
A tisket, a tasket, no lunch in her basket
Just school books for the fight she would be in
One day over this hoodie
She got beat for some clothes and her rep
With her chin up, she scolded all y’alls molded
When I’m rich, on your neck I will step
And step she did to the straight A’s
Then college, the master degree
She hired the heifers that jumped her
And made everyone of them work for free”

Yeah, I’m not sure what the end of the seventh line means either. But so what? Guess away!

30 Comments

The Eyeball Kid

March 26, 2009 at 2:48 pm

Awwwwwwwww….Pu**y Control! Oh!

Dang, too easy. Oh well. Technically, the song is called “P Control,” so there’s no need to censor yourself!

“And I love how the Furies are hotties in the Marvel U. – every single female in the Marvel U., apparently, is a hottie”

When they’re mythological beings, I think that barring some specific tradition that their appearance is somehow marred, it’s probably actually a good artistic assumption that they be beautiful.

As regards every other female character, well, this is new how? I don’t recall Kirby or Romita drawing a lot of unattractive ladies (Ditko’s another matter but most of his characters were glam’d up by Romita anyway).

Omar Karindu, with the power of SUPER-hypocrisy!

March 26, 2009 at 3:04 pm

Honestly, the setup issues of Herc are often at least as good as the big fightin’ issues, and the way Pak and Van Lente are actually using the mythology is a lot of fun. (In many ways, this is what Thor could’ve been at Marvel had Lee and Kirby not set out on a very different path.)

I’ve always liked the way Hera is a big a narcissist and a jerk in myth as Zeus, albeit in her own way. If this arc has Hercules tossing out some variant of “I didn’t ask to be born!” it’ll be fantastic. And it seems like it’d be fun for someone to point out that Herc’s mother was betrayed by Zeus’s disguise in a way not far different than his betrayals of Hera…not that she’d care, but the point is waiting to be made.

I’m in the same boat regarding Marvel and DC. I’m not getting anything from DC proper (Vertigo is, indeed, the only lively part of the publishing house these days), but I’m getting several Marvel books. Several! Gasp!

Wraith: I have no point, really. I just find it interesting that DC actually does have unattractive women occasionally (not often, but occasionally), but Marvel doesn’t. Maybe they do, but I can’t think of any. If any women in the Marvel U. could be unattractive, I would think the Furies would be great candidates. But even they get prettied up. That’s all. No grand sociological point to make.

That’s weird, Bill. Why is DC so uninteresting these days????

You should’ve waited for this week to buy all of Marvel’s books, Greg!

Guardians of the Galaxy, Nova, Daredevil, Immortal Iron Fist all came out this week; great comics 100% Bendis-free.

By the way, didn’t Elephantmen come out this week too?

Gail Simone’s Secret Six is both interesting and has featured less then attractive ladies.

Well, one less then attractive lady.

“…every single female in the Marvel U., apparently, is a hottie.”

Well, of course they are. That’s the reason Marvel outsells DC. It’s the only way the fanboys in Mom’s basement can get erections.

You should buy and review all Marvel titles again the first week of April. There are about 30 Marvel titles coming out that week.

Correction–May, not April. Although, that may be true of April, too.

i’m in total agreement…

FOOTNOTES DO RULE!!!

Why is DC so uninteresting these days????

Because Wednesday Comics hasn’t come out yet.

Greg, that’s okay, I think we’re all free to make points or just ramble as we choose, on the internet. :)

Dude: Elephantmen did come out this week. I always review it late, because Starkings nicely sends it to me. I’m sure I’ll review it next week or the week after.

As for the Marvel stuff – I have found that I like their space stuff these days, but I just read it in trade, because I never know where it starts and stops (and it seems to cross over to different titles often). I dropped Daredevil a long time ago because Brubaker’s run was so crushingly depressing (well written, but it made me suicidal) and I just couldn’t get into Swierczynski’s work on Iron Fist. I may one day read Brubaker’s run on Daredevil, but I’m not sure if I’m going to spend money on it.

Just because they are not drawn like Power Girl doesn’t mean they’re unattractive.

I’d lay right down for Amanda Waller.

The line in Herc about diners being the Greeks greatest gift to the modern world made the whole ish worth $2.99.

I’ve had the same shift from DC to Marvel in terms of my big two purchases over the last year. I attribute it to Marvel hiring interesting writers to work on their b-list books, while DC has guys with names from Wes Anderson films that I’ve never heard of. I don’t buy anything Bendis, Millar or Johns written, but I’m damn sure going to check out a Jason Aaron, Jonathon Hickman or Fred Van Lente book before one by Royal Leiberman.

Also, what Mutt said. Etta Candy makes me feel like I’m climbing the rope in gym class.

Are you planning to pick up Booster Gold for the Blue Beetle backups in June (or at least take a look at the back up before you decide)?

The back-ups are going to tempt me, I’ll tell you that much (isn’t Manhunter going to be in some?). I’ll have to think about it.

When I say DC has “unattractive” women, I’m not implying they’re butt-ugly. I just appreciate that not every DC woman looks like an airbrushed bikini model. Amanda Waller and Etta Candy are two good examples.

My thinking is that the back-ups will, as back-ups always do, prove to be inviable in the end, but they’ll produce enough to do at least one trade paperback collection of them– and that’s how I’ll get my Blue Beetle fix, at any rate.

I grew up almost exclusively on Marvel comics, but when I got back in after a 5+ year hiatus it was on exclusively DC comics. And for almost a decade I was way more DC than Marvel. But now in the past year or so I’ve realized I’m getting way more Marvel, too. And as someone mentioned, it’s pretty much all on their B-list stuff. I don’t buy anything with Bendis or Millar in the credits. But titles like Herc, Guardians, and Iron Fist have been great. Plus you’ve got the phenomenal Captain America by Brubaker and the new Fraction Iron Man. I didn’t buy Secret Invasion, but every regular title I bought that tied in did it in such a way that I was able to enjoy the story, without getting the main book. That’s a good crossover. Add that to the fact that after 10 years of DC reading I still feel like I hardly know who any of the villains are (even with reading Secret Six and Salvation Run). And yet The Marvel U was pretty easy to slip back into after a long absence. Basically, this long and rambling post is trying to say that I think Marvel is not only currently telling better stories as a whole, but is doing a better job with the shared universe/continuity idea, too.

I think the main reason Marvel outsells DC is that for better or for worse, the entire company has a fairly consistent image and direction that all their books follow, creating a sense of cohesion. By and large, all the writers at Marvel seem to be on the same page so that even when their books are taken over by editorial mandates, they can still present the illusion that it is a coherent flow of the story. It doesn’t help that with maybe 2 or 3 exceptions, Marvel has all the top-tier writing talent in the superhero genre working for them anyway.

DC, meanwhile, places almost zero importance on writers unless your name is Geoff Johns or Grant Morrison. Everyone else is completely subject to editorial whim, to the point where series will be conceived and announced without a creative team even attached to them. They’re not interested in what ideas a writer has for a character, they’re interested in how faithfully that writer will implement editorial’s ideas for where the series should go. Their entire direction feels like a desperate attempt to throw shit at the wall and see what sticks, and creative teams are regularly displaced by editorial interference to the detriment of the series in question (witness the disastrous end of Bart Allen’s tenure as flash once sales dropped, Jim Shooter’s run on Legion once Geoff Johns decided he wanted to do another reboot, or Chuck Dixon’s involvement with the bat-books specifically or DC in general once Batman RIP was announced, to name a few examples). Final Crisis was a crossover that barely tied into anything, meaning that there was nothing to boost sales in lesser-read series that traditionally benefit from crossovers, and the fact that apparently so few people understood what happened in it at all means that no book is able to deal with any repercussions coming out of it. When your gigantic crossover event of the year has negligible impact on the direction of your line in today’s market, you should know something went horribly wrong.

While I applaud DC’s willingness to experiment with formats like 52 or Wednesday Comics, the simple fact at this point they do not have a high enough level of talent to give the majority of their “experiments” any kind of reliable success.

Dave just basically said what I was trying to say, but in a much more comprehensible fashion. So just put me down as a big “ditto.”

Matthew Johnson

March 27, 2009 at 6:30 am

“When they’re mythological beings, I think that barring some specific tradition that their appearance is somehow marred, it’s probably actually a good artistic assumption that they be beautiful.”

Well, tradition has it that the appearance of the Furies in Aeschylus’ _The Kindly Ones_ caused pregnant women in the audience to miscarry, so make of that what you will…

(BTW, did anyone else think that Norman Osborn’s last line was a shout-out to Season 2 of _The Wire_? Or am I reaching?)

Start reviewing every book released every week by every publisher.

Just do it!

DO IT!

DO IT!

Ack, I forgot Hero Squared was coming out. Thanks Greg!

jazzbo sed: Add that to the fact that after 10 years of DC reading I still feel like I hardly know who any of the villains are (even with reading Secret Six and Salvation Run)

I had this exact same revelation reading Secret Six. In the waves of attacking villains, a bunch of them I had no clue who they were. And I’m not a DC neophyte..I’ve read different DC books for years.

Whereas with Marvel, the civilian name of some obscure villain gets mentioned in passing on the new Spider-Man cartoon and I know who they’re talking about.

I wonder if this is common…a number of the b-c-d list villains at Marvel come from the Stan Lee days…did he just give characters such hooks that they stick? Is it that no one seems to be minding the store at DC (there’s a lightning bolt head guy in both Secret Six and Terror Titans, who look alike, but aren’t..).

I need to figure out a forum to ponder this in.

Personally, I don’t think Aunt May is that hot, but tastes differ.

FunkyGreenJerusalem

March 29, 2009 at 5:51 pm

That’s weird, Bill. Why is DC so uninteresting these days????

It’s not – you’re just not buying any of the books.

[...] What I bought – 25 March 2009 (goodcomics.comicbookresources.com) Filed under: Book Reviews Tags: Amanda Waller, Janus Directive, Justice Society of America, Keith Giffen, Lois Lane, Rick Flag, Suicide Squad, World War II [...]

Leave a Comment

 

Categories

Review Copies

Comics Should Be Good accepts review copies. Anything sent to us will (for better or for worse) end up reviewed on the blog. See where to send the review copies.

Browse the Archives