web stats

CSBG Archive

Some Responses to the New Avengers Blog-a-thon.

Over at GraphiContent.

(Which is raising money for the Comic Book Legal Defense Fund and it would be swell if you’d GO DONATE!, and tell Chad via a comment on his blog that you did.)

Man, I hated these comics.

1) Well, y’know, I actually library dropped New Avengers. “Library dropping? What’s that, MarkAndrew?” Due to the unfortunate combination of (A) really liking comics, (B) being REALLY cheap, and (C) being REALLY broke, I tend to read most of my NEW Marvel and DC comics through borrowing the trades off unsuspecting friends, plopping my fat arse down in Barnes and Noble or (mostly) from the Iowa City public library or interlibrary loan at my school. (This waste of academic resources might make me a bad person. On the other hand, I was paying out of state tuition.)

The upside: I read a lot of comics. The downside: My memory is like a 50 cent Goodwill discount sieve. So I ran by the Iowa City library, grabbed everything in their Avengers section in stock, and thought I’d settle down for a little pretend conversation with C. Nevett.

Hey, did I say donate? Go DONATE! I thought I’d catch myself up, and toss off some comments on Chad’s work at the same time.

HE’S covering everything even cross-wise tangentally related to Bendis’ New Avengers, including issues of Punisher War Journal, the Pulse, Captain America, and Ladies Golf Quarterly but I’m only responding to the strictly New Avengers-y stuff. So you’re spared my “Why Brubaker’s Captain America run doesn’t work as a Captain America story” piece until a later day. ;)

When I quote Chad at GraphiContent, his thoughts will be in beautiful italics.

Blogathon 2: Avengers Dissasembled

Chad: I’ve gone back and read in trades, so I don’t have a firsthand experience with Avengers Disassembled, a story that I’m told may have pissed off a lot of the hardcore Avengers fanbase. If that’s the case, then I love it even more. Pissing off the fanbase is good, it shakes it up a bit. You shouldn’t cater to them anyway, you should be doing new things and making people feel uneasy.

While Chad seemed to rate this book in the solid “B minus” range, I’d personally lean towards the latter part of the alphabet, grade-wise.

BUT that doesn’t mean I disagree with ALL his points. It was almost worth reading ‘em to here the wailing and gnashing of teeth – Honestly, while I have a really-strong-and-potentially-unhealthy-emotional connection to ARTISTS who’s work I enjoy…

I am honestly somewhat terrified by people that freak-the-fuck out when a fictional character is presented in a way they don’t like? Well, them folks make me all sorts of nervous. And being (again) kind of a bad person, I enjoy the silly, silly pain they undergo when a character they like is presented in a way they don’t like.

So watching the classic Avengers fans flip out almost made reading these books worthwhile. But not quite:

1) There’s David Finch’s art, which is REALLY shaky in it’s depiction of emotion and panel-to-panel movement.

2) It wasn’t too cool for Bendis’ FIRST Avengers gig to involve taking the team apart. It feels to me that you should have to prove that you can write a decent Avengers story before dissasembling ‘em. I wasn’t a huge fan of Busiek’s Avengers, neither, but I feel he (or Geoff Johns, or Chuck Austen) had earned the right to kill the team off in a way Bendis didn’t.

3) We get a few glimpses of Bendis’s attempts at team writing and he’s still new at it, so it’s not great.

Yeah, see, that’s what killed the book for me. Everybody… like… talks the same. (“Talks the Same? Yeah. The Same? Yep. Oh.”) The rhythms and structures of their dialog is recognizably Bendis, but it does very little to define the character. On the books that revolve around a single, man character this doesn’t bother me so much. Here, though, it drives me nuts.

Blogathon 04: Secret War

I lied when I said I was only responding to the New Avengers posts.

Secret War plays to Bendis’s strengths: a compelling story grounded in real characters told in a slow series of reveals. I think it’s him at his best

Again, I don’t actually REMEMBER much ’bout it, exept the photo-realistic art bothered me. But I did locate my critical notes ion the story.

Well, GOSH. If this comic was ice cream it would be chocolate chip sucky-butt flavored.

I am nothing if not succinct.

Now SECRET WAR features one of my favorite superhero story types, all random heroes thrust together and taken out of there element – I loved the crap outta Art Adams and Walt Simonson’s New Fantastic Four and Dwayne MacDuffie and Skott Kolins Beyond. And there’s always a chance I was Boy-PMSing when I read the book the first time. What d’you guys think? Worth a re-read?

Blogathon 06: New Avengers Breakout

Luke Cage and Spider-Woman are Bendis’s pet characters and every new team line-up has those — every one, so don’t pretend like Bendis invented it.

yes. Yes. YES! Good. Freaking. Point. Roger Stern had Captain Marvel, Hercules, and Doctor Druid. Roy Thomas turned a character he created into the heart-and-soul of the Avengers. Steve Engelhart brought in the Beast and Moondragon. Jim Shooter… OK, actually now that I think of it probably really hated Ms. Marvel. Bad example.

Anyway, Breakout. When I read this, I wasn’t bone-crushed by The Awesome!, but I thought it had some decent potential to evolve into somethin’. Chad says Especially as Bendis goes out of his way to have Captain America spell out for us that this is just like that first time! It’s fate! And, yeah, THAT all got on my nerves, but they run around fighting dinosaurs (Yay!) and a Black Widow that didn’t seem to have all that much to do with the Black Widow from that cool Bill Sienkiewicz Black Widow series from a while back (much less Yay!)

But Spider-man was FINALLY on the Avengers, and I’ll forgive a hell of a lot for that. (Why wasn’t Spider-man on the Avengers in the first place? I heard it was ’cause Kirby didn’t want to draw the Ditko characters, but the King’s drawn Spider-man hell of times. No logic! No sense!)

Anyway, you could feel Bendis getting his team-book sea legs, and I liked Finch slightly better here than in the past. These weren’t GOOD comics per-se, but…

I’d loved Jinx, and Fortune and Glory, and Powers and Ultimate Spider-man and Daredevil and I figured it would all work out fine.

Blogathon 08: New Avengers: The Sentry

Until we had an Avengers story where only the Sentry and Emma Frost ended up with anything interesting to do.

While I had high hopes for Bendis bringing back the Sentry, he falls down here. It is just brutal how much he screws this up through worthless, bullshit changes that don’t add anything.

Annnnd about that “fine” thing? I was wrong. On every level. Mr. Nevett is, if anything, overly charitable here. Head over to GraphiContent, ’cause C.N. does quite a commendable job of tearing this sick, drippy puppy a new bottom-hole, and I gots nuttin’ to add.

Blogathon 10: Blogathon 10: New Avengers: Secrets & Lies

The library had a copy in stock, so I JUST re-read this one. So no going off half-fomed and probably inaccurate memories here.

It was sometimes kinda good, sometimes kinda bad. This is what “C minuses” were invented for.

In the content/promise of content area, this trade/set of issues does a decent job. A kind of lacklustre “Ronin” story sets up two character-based issues that tell good stories. All that’s set up is Spider-Woman’s possible betrayal in the future and that there’s a new Avengers team.

Not only do I agree with this, but I think it’s indicative of how the series as a whole works. The action sequences as a whole, can be represented by the “climatic” final scene where Iron Man zaps a bunch of ninjas and they fall down and then the whole thing is stupid. The down-time character pieces are, conversely, generally quite good and often somewhat moving.

But I believe we speak for bloggers everywhere when we say “Reading Ms. Marvel’s attempt at a blog was painful. Make the hurting stop, please.”)

Blogathon 12: New Avengers: The Collective

And here’s where I library dropped the damn thing.

We’re fast approaching the end of the pre-Civil War New Avengers run and all of a week has passed. It was during my reading of this arc that I realised that. Decompressed storytelling in action, folks. A GODDAMN WEEK HAS PASSED!

That’s a GOOD point, and it’s one that really bugs me ’bout this book. Historically, the Avengers have been a series of fast-paced, Epic adventures. It’s a dangerous world with an ever-changing status quo. In New Avengers…

Everything happens veeeeeeerrrrrrrrrrryy slowwwwwwllllllly. (In this issue: Wolverine finally completes his epic quest to lace up his right boot! Next Issue: Will he start on the left?)

And there seems to be an inverse relationship in these books between tension and narrative speed. If the story takes to long to tell, all the tension leaks right out and the result is… kinda boring. Since I can’t work up any epic hate about how “OMG! My Avengers that I grew up on are being destroyded!” I didn’t have much of a reason to care.


Now, the brutal slaughter of Alpha Flight? That is cheap. This guy kills them in two seconds and yet doesn’t kill a single Avenger? That’s not good writing and the worthless sacrifice of characters for no reason other than an “Oh wow cool awesome!” moment.

But this… This got my dander up.

I have a theory about comic writing: If you’re going to kill characters off, you should show you understand them first. (J.M. Dematties and Mike Zeck’s spectacular Kraven’s Last Hunt storyline is my go-to example for how to do this right.) If we adopt the oft used metaphor of the “Toybox” of Marvel concepts, the creative team on New Avengers is grabbing toys and random and jumping up and down on them and flushing them down the toilet. PLAY with your toys first. Then you can decide if you want to break ‘em.

Blogathon 18: New Avengers: Disassembled

Damn, Chad is REALLY fast. It would take me waaaay longer’n half an hour to write an equivalent sized post and spell everything right and be mostly correct grammar-wise.

I’m reading these issues for the first time today – I’d previously got ‘em out of the library, but decided “no” when it came time to sit down and actually read ‘em – And the statistical mean of the five very different stories is “not bad.” Although I’ve already forgotten what happened in the Sentry one.

By far the best issue in this arc and one of the best New Avengers issues period is #22, the Luke Cage/Jessica Jones issue (those issues are always damn good).

Bendis has really done some nice work with the former-blacksploitation stereotype Power Man. (Although I miss the yellow shirt and pretty, pretty, princess tiara.) When these books move towards “characters try to make sense of their lives” and less towards “big action-y set-pieces” everything goes down SO much smoother.

Also: I completely disagree with Scott Harris in the comments, and I think this comes down to (again) me being a fan or artists more than characters. Or me having sat down and plowed through nigh-on hundred issues of Captain America in the space of a week and liked most of ‘em a hell of a lot, but realized that the various interpretations (Englehart, Bynre, Kirby, and Dematties among ‘em) don’t even TRY to match up. I don’t really need to see linear character development in my superhero comics. I don’t see these as real “characters” per se, and I don’t expect them to develop as I would in self-contained or single author works. They’re more as a big cluster of themes and ideas. And what’s interesting to me is to see which of these themes are important to certain authors. Or, in another sense, it’s interesting to see which of the past writers they choose to “collaborate” (so ta speak ) with and who they choose to ignore.

Blogathon 21: New Avengers: Revolution

I’ve never read this one, and the library copy, while SUPPOSEDLY checked in, is not physically there. Since I’m not doing anything drastic like buying a New Avengers comic, I’m gonna pass.

Blogathon 23: Thunderbolts: Faith in Monsters.

Warren Ellis’s Thunderbolts stuff with Mike Deodato are the best comics I will discuss today. Out of around 230 comics, these 12 make up the best without question.

I know I was only going to cover the New Avengers stuff, but I just gotta nod in agreement here. What a great, brillom evil, black-hearted, NASTY, but somehow less-cynical-than-much-of-Marvel’s-output-these-days line ‘o books. *I* spent actual money on these comics. (Bought the trades used for 1/2 price. But still….)

Blogathon 26: New Avengers: The Trust

Sigh. Puns make me sad.

Yu continues to do some great art. I like his rough style here. His character don’t always look how they do elsewhere, but that doesn’t bother me.

I’m still sitting here going “Move faster, Story! GiddddeeeYUP!” but I’m certainly enjoying these issues more than the first few, and I’m chalking ‘at up as much to the change in the artist as I am to the altered tone of the stories. The Hood comes out lookin’ decently freaky. (I like him more here than the Kyle Holtz or Skott Kolins versions, both of which were nifty in their own ways.) And the big-beat splash pages seem to MEAN something. (Which is not true of every volume of this series.)

So, hey, I’m caught up! (And the library only had one more volume anyway.)

So, let’s summarize:

Chad liked the Bendis/Cho/Finch/Yu/Maleev/Gaydos/McNiven stories more than I did, but I liked them more than I expected or remembered.

EXCEPT for the Collective, which was truly horrible.

Even still, none of this is as good as the GOOD Bendis work, and it’s kind of depressing that everybody’s buying this when they didn’t shell out for Powers or Daredevil

And it still moves too slowly.

But how many years did it take Lee and Kirby to turn Fantastic Four into a great book? Y’all READ those first 20-or-so issues? Yeesh.

So all the Avengers books are at least back on my “library pull-list.”

There is, of course, a HELL of a lot more over on GraphiContent. Read commentary on Civil War! House of M! Matt Fractions Iron Man! And the worst mini-series of 2007 coming… right….now!

Also. You can donate. :)

23 Comments

I think it was Michelinie that really hated Ms Marvel, not Shooter.

Shooter hated Hank Pym.

I love this post. It was just what I needed to give me some extra encouragement right now. Thanks a lot.

” Bendis has really done some nice work with the former-blacksploitation stereotype Power Man. (Although I miss the yellow shirt and pretty, pretty, princess tiara.) When these books move towards “characters try to make sense of their lives” and less towards “big action-y set-pieces” everything goes down SO much smoother. ”

Perfect summary of New Avengers, and why I’ve stuck with this book despite many things I haven’t agreed with.

“But how many years did it take Lee and Kirby to turn Fantastic Four into a great book? Y’all READ those first 20-or-so issues? Yeesh.”

No argument, but Bendis has had a lot longer on the Avengers at this point than it took Stan and Jack.

oh god you left the italics tag on

” No argument, but Bendis has had a lot longer on the Avengers at this point than it took Stan and Jack. ”

True, but more important in that comparison is the fact that Lee and Kirby were creating new characters and stories in accordance with an Orwellian Comics Code, while Bendis has had thousands of characters and 40 years of stories to play with ( and a lot of creative freedom from Marvel ). In terms of genre material and history, one could describe even the embryonic early FF as Lee and Kirby making working stories IN A CAVE WITH A BOX OF SCRAPS.

Bendis hasn’t really created anything new on New Avengers, merely arranged existing elements in a palatable way. More troubling is the fact that several of his stories have REDUCED the characters available ( for example, making the Hood, created by Vaughan as a narcisstic younh screw-up nearly in a Chuck Palahniuk vein, into a generic Kingpin figure ).

I have two different responses, so I’m going to split them up into two comments. I hope that doesn’t breach protocol.

Firstly, I actually agree with much of what you’re saying in the paragraph where you’re disagreeing with me, if that makes any sense. It is interesting to see what different writers do with characters and ideas, what threads they pick up from previous creators, what they ignore, what they emphasize, etc. But I still believe that development of a character should be just that: development, progression, not just an arbitrary change imposed upon a character to fit a new creator’s vision. I think that if you are going to maintain an ongoing, shared universe like Marvel does, there has to be some consistency in characterization otherwise there’s no point to having an ongoing universe in the first place. Which is fine; DC obviously chooses to reboot their universe every so often just for this reason, so they can re-imagine the characters without being bogged down with old ideas. But unless Marvel does this, I think the changes that take place within the MU should be a case of a character’s personality changing rather than being supplanted. I’m all for change, but it should be change that makes sense within the context of the character; otherwise, I have to ask why even use that character to begin with?

Watchmen might be a good example of what I mean, since it was initially conceived as a series using established characters but then was changed when DC decided it didn’t want the characters to be changed in that way. They wanted to maintain the Charlton guys the way they were at that time. Just as you suggest, Moore was more interested in dealing with the “themes and ideas” rather than with the established continuity and personalities. And I think the result, of moving Watchmen to a self-contained universe, made for a better story.

I’m all for changes in the MU. Bring back Bucky, kill Cap, whatever, as long as the changes are organic to the character. Show me why the character is changing, don’t just tell me that they’ve changed. Because if you just want to replace a character with some all new, radical personality without any explanation, well, why write the story in the MU at all? Isn’t that what the Ultimate universe was made for?

The other thing I wanted to comment on is this:

“I’ve gone back and read in trades, so I don’t have a firsthand experience with Avengers Disassembled, a story that I’m told may have pissed off a lot of the hardcore Avengers fanbase. If that’s the case, then I love it even more.”

and

“So watching the classic Avengers fans flip out almost made reading these books worthwhile.”

I don’t really get this. I’ve seen a lot of this kind of attitude around, not just regarding Disassembled and Avengers fans, and I have to say I find it a bit dickish. I’m not trying to be rude here, but this is what I think of as the Too Cool For School attitude. There seems to be some sort of snide antipathy towards fans who form any sort of emotional bond with characters and comics. It’s like you’re saying, well, I enjoy comics because I can appreciate the art form, but these nerds actually care about superheroes.

The thing is, these stances aren’t mutually exclusive. You can appreciate the art form and the medium of comics while still caring about the characters. I would argue that most good stories are predicated on making the audience care about the character; you don’t have to love the character, you don’t have to like what happens to the character, but you have to care on some level in order for the story to be effective. Good writers are able to make the audience care about the characters; and so, by extension, if you read enough good stories about a character, chances are you’re going to end up caring what happens to them.

Luckily, I’ve read lots of good stories about the Avengers during my lifetime so I’m not ashamed to say I do care what happens to them. But the key point that I don’t think you’re recognizing is that what I care about mostly is seeing my favorite characters in good stories. I’ve read lots of stories over the past 25 years where my favorite characters were killed or maimed or had their hearts broken or were defiled or replaced or whatever. And some of them I absolutely loved because the stories were good. But both your comments and Chad’s comments carry the implication that Avengers fans freaked out because something bad happened to the Avengers, which I think is somewhat condescending. You’re implying that criticism from Avengers fans is somehow invalid because they care about the characters too much. The fact is, though, that if Bendis had published these same stories in some other title, I still would think they were bad. The only difference is, I would be indifferent about how much they suck instead of pissed off by it.

Anyway, I guess that’s about it. It’s just, considering we’re all posting on a blog about comics that’s on a website about comics, designed so people who read comics can talk to each other about comics, I’m just not quite sure how caring about comic characters makes someone a target for hipster schadenfreude.

Interesting comments. I admit to getting a lot of trades from the library myself.

Why have Americans started writing “arse” instead of “ass”? Do you say it like that as well? I hope not.

“Ass” was one of my favourite things about you.

I would seriously like to know.

Tim: When I spent five months in Australia lo those many years ago, a lot of the Yanks started affecting Australian slang. I tried not to, but I did occasionally. I think it’s just the “weirdness” of it all – we’ve been saying “ass” all our lives, and then we read a Garth Ennis comic where some character says “arse” and we think it’s nifty. Fret not – I still say and write “ass”!

Easy: writing “ass” is funny. Writing “arse” is funnier.

Easy: writing “ass” is funny. Writing “arse” is funnier.
Oops…forgot to say great post! Looking forward to your next one.

I thought the whole Ms. Marvel pregnancy thing WAS all Jim Shooter, and it was most definitely NOT what Michelinie wanted to do. (But I could be wrong.)

Anyway, I guess that’s about it. It’s just, considering we’re all posting on a blog about comics that’s on a website about comics, designed so people who read comics can talk to each other about comics, I’m just not quite sure how caring about comic characters makes someone a target for hipster schadenfreude.

I’d phrase it as “maintaining an emotional investment in art you think is shitty.” Or “I’m kind of a dick.” Take your pick.

what was the worst mini series in 2007? I was new to comics so i wouldnt know…

I called New Avengers: Illuminati the worst comic of 2007 back when I was doing the best of 2007 (out of the comics that I read, of course).

As a fellow library-reader (everybody give it up for the Chester County Library System!), I will say it’s a LOT easier to read New Avengers if you’re not actually paying for it. You feel a lot less cheated.

But man, a lot of these books are just a slog of undifferentiated stuttery dialogue, credibility-stretching plot-points (including walking plot device Layla Miller, who nearly made me throw “House of M” across the room before I remembered not to damage library property), hurry-up-and-wait pacing, and everyone’s favorite pet peeve, an inability to write a good Dr. Strange (I can’t give Bendis too much crap for this – Strange seems to be a really tough nut to crack, even if you have given more than a moment’s thought to how he might use magic).

That said, I like Bendis’s IDEAS for stories, even if his execution is off. I like the IDEA of a fractured Marvel Universe, of infiltration by aliens causing distrust and paranoia, of the top cop also being a petty psychopath. These are fun premises to play with. And even if Bendis doesn’t make the best use of them, other writers do (like Matt Fraction on “Invincible Iron Man”). And that ain’t so bad, right?

“That said, I like Bendis’s IDEAS for stories, even if his execution is off. I like the IDEA of a fractured Marvel Universe, of infiltration by aliens causing distrust and paranoia, of the top cop also being a petty psychopath. These are fun premises to play with.”

I pretty much agree with you here. This is actually the source of a lot of my frustration with Marvel over the past few years. They’ve had a lot of really good, interesting ideas that really challenge the status quo and shake things up, which is great — except, I’ve disliked or outright hated almost every single story that has resulted from these ideas. For example, Civil War was a great idea, but I thought the execution was terrible, a complaint I’ve had with many of the books I’ve picked up recently. I can’t even really blame the writers entirely, as I think the editors need to step up and tighten things when the writing gets out of hand.

You’re right, though, that even if many of the big events are falling flat, some people are still doing some good work on the periphery, so it’s not all bad anyway.

FunkyGreenJerusalem

August 24, 2009 at 11:02 pm

I just wanted to point out that in reading the Nick Fury and the Secret Warriors review where Chad said ‘Shield being Hydra makes sense if you think about it’ was pretty thoroughly debunked by Steven grant in his Permanent Damage review of the series.
(He said he liked the series, but then pointed out the many flaws in that thinking).
I dare say it makes more sense than marvel message board complaints would say it does, but having read Grant’s comments on the flaws of the Shield/Hydra shell game first, Chad’s seemed a bit lacking – then again, the man just loves his Fury and doing what the king said and just buying it.
(Even if Shield being Hydra front just makes Fury look like a totally useless dupe who has wasted his life, with every small victory being a lie).

I liked the reviews all up… at first it had me thinking about buying me some New Avengers, but then it talked me out of it.
(The ‘Alias chick having crushed on Peter comes out of nowhere’ bit and then the retraction was pretty funny. That said, it didn’t work in the original comic either. Man was Alias the most over praised book ever. It stunk like The Blob’s turds would, and was stretched out for as long as well).

Thanks Greg that was a good answer. Appreciate it.

Leave a Comment

 

Categories

Review Copies

Comics Should Be Good accepts review copies. Anything sent to us will (for better or for worse) end up reviewed on the blog. See where to send the review copies.

Browse the Archives