<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Comic Book Legends Revealed #229</title>
	<atom:link href="http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2009/10/15/comic-book-legends-revealed-229/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2009/10/15/comic-book-legends-revealed-229/</link>
	<description>Comic Book Resources Presents... Comics Should Be Good!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:59:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony Durrant</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2009/10/15/comic-book-legends-revealed-229/comment-page-2/#comment-800803</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Durrant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 04:43:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=33161#comment-800803</guid>
		<description>Mike Hammer-Schlammer was a spoof of Mickey Spillane&#039;s Mike Hammer; the name &quot;Stella&quot; and Mike&#039;s last words (&quot;Stella!  Stella!&quot;) were a reference to the Marlon Brando play A STREETCAR NAMED DESIRE.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike Hammer-Schlammer was a spoof of Mickey Spillane&#8217;s Mike Hammer; the name &#8220;Stella&#8221; and Mike&#8217;s last words (&#8220;Stella!  Stella!&#8221;) were a reference to the Marlon Brando play A STREETCAR NAMED DESIRE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Comic Book Legends Revealed 10/16/2009: Mal Duncan &#124; Titanstower.com Monitor Room</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2009/10/15/comic-book-legends-revealed-229/comment-page-2/#comment-768260</link>
		<dc:creator>Comic Book Legends Revealed 10/16/2009: Mal Duncan &#124; Titanstower.com Monitor Room</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 14:56:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=33161#comment-768260</guid>
		<description>[...] week&#8217;s Comic Book Legends Revealed has a discussion on Mal, Teen Titans, &amp; 1970s interracial politics&#8230;. complete with some [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] week&#8217;s Comic Book Legends Revealed has a discussion on Mal, Teen Titans, &amp; 1970s interracial politics&#8230;. complete with some [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Happy Holidays &#124; J David Weter Dot Com</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2009/10/15/comic-book-legends-revealed-229/comment-page-2/#comment-761318</link>
		<dc:creator>Happy Holidays &#124; J David Weter Dot Com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 04:32:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=33161#comment-761318</guid>
		<description>[...] Comic Book Legends Revealed #229 (goodcomics.comicbookresources.com) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Comic Book Legends Revealed #229 (goodcomics.comicbookresources.com) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Comic Book Legends Revealed #229</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2009/10/15/comic-book-legends-revealed-229/comment-page-2/#comment-759746</link>
		<dc:creator>Comic Book Legends Revealed #229</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 12:44:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=33161#comment-759746</guid>
		<description>[...] here to read [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] here to read [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacob T. Levy</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2009/10/15/comic-book-legends-revealed-229/comment-page-2/#comment-747486</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacob T. Levy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 16:15:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=33161#comment-747486</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d almost forgotten about Shadowgames, which for my money was some of the best Marvel superheroics of the 90s.  I wonder if that&#039;s out in trade?  I&#039;m not really going to search through my longboxes for it, but it&#039;d be good to reread!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d almost forgotten about Shadowgames, which for my money was some of the best Marvel superheroics of the 90s.  I wonder if that&#8217;s out in trade?  I&#8217;m not really going to search through my longboxes for it, but it&#8217;d be good to reread!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Random</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2009/10/15/comic-book-legends-revealed-229/comment-page-2/#comment-746639</link>
		<dc:creator>Random</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 08:56:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=33161#comment-746639</guid>
		<description>&quot;for a black person to be elected president he&#039;d need to have a LOT more experience than his white opponent in order to have a shot.&quot;

 Not if his only credible white opponent is a woman... (you&#039;re crazy if you think the republicans had any chance after 8 years of Bush). 
 
 Also, &quot;we elected a (half)-black president, so we&#039;re not racist&quot; sound like those comments about black friends that judge was making there....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;for a black person to be elected president he&#8217;d need to have a LOT more experience than his white opponent in order to have a shot.&#8221;</p>
<p> Not if his only credible white opponent is a woman&#8230; (you&#8217;re crazy if you think the republicans had any chance after 8 years of Bush). </p>
<p> Also, &#8220;we elected a (half)-black president, so we&#8217;re not racist&#8221; sound like those comments about black friends that judge was making there&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zabba</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2009/10/15/comic-book-legends-revealed-229/comment-page-2/#comment-746415</link>
		<dc:creator>Zabba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 08:22:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=33161#comment-746415</guid>
		<description>Kurt Busiek, thanks for info. I love it when a creator comes along and gives his side of the story.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kurt Busiek, thanks for info. I love it when a creator comes along and gives his side of the story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2009/10/15/comic-book-legends-revealed-229/comment-page-2/#comment-746361</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 21:07:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=33161#comment-746361</guid>
		<description>T.: &quot;And no black politician to my knowledge has come close to Barack&#039;s heights in Canada.&quot;

No black Canadian has ever been Prime Minister or led a federal party, but Canada&#039;s current Governor General, the appointed representative of Queen Elizabeth II, is a black woman.

Canada has different demographics than the United States. Blacks are about 2.5% of Canada&#039;s population while they are 13.4% of the US population.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>T.: &#8220;And no black politician to my knowledge has come close to Barack&#8217;s heights in Canada.&#8221;</p>
<p>No black Canadian has ever been Prime Minister or led a federal party, but Canada&#8217;s current Governor General, the appointed representative of Queen Elizabeth II, is a black woman.</p>
<p>Canada has different demographics than the United States. Blacks are about 2.5% of Canada&#8217;s population while they are 13.4% of the US population.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2009/10/15/comic-book-legends-revealed-229/comment-page-2/#comment-746238</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 09:55:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=33161#comment-746238</guid>
		<description>T: I&#039;m not going to try and defend the Hey Hey skit, although I will point out that Australia never had a tradition of minstrel shows, and so a large portion of the Australian population are ignorant of the difference between blackface and black make-up.

What I will say, though, is that many of the people who answered that they didn&#039;t find the skit offensive weren&#039;t actually answering about the skit. What they were concerned with was that an &lt;i&gt;American&lt;/i&gt; called us racist. It&#039;s one thing for someone from a country to call that country racist, for a foreigner to call a country racist is something that many people will not take.

I will point out that, while they Hey Hey skit was performed by &lt;i&gt;private&lt;/i&gt; citizens aired by a private network, which caused huge emotional offence but no direct legal or economic harm, the denial of a marriage licence was performed by a &lt;i&gt;government&lt;/i&gt; official and caused direct legal and economic harm.

Was the skit better or worse than the denial of a marriage licence? It&#039;s a pointless question. Is Australia more racist than America? Maybe. I would say that there is probably more low-level racism, which the poll results show, but less extreme racists. It&#039;s fairly academic question anyway, they both have come a long way and both have a long way to go.

When you mention your favourite target, the liberal media, you seem to be missing that Canadians think that Canada is the least racist and Australians think Australia is the least racist and, yes, Americans think that Americans are the least racist. My question is this, T. Had our positions been reversed, would you be pointing at the denial of a marriage licence as uncontrovertible proof of America&#039;s racism, and be saying that the Hey Hey skit was bad but could have been worse? When discussing how racist America is, are you more concerned with the truth, or protecting your ego?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>T: I&#8217;m not going to try and defend the Hey Hey skit, although I will point out that Australia never had a tradition of minstrel shows, and so a large portion of the Australian population are ignorant of the difference between blackface and black make-up.</p>
<p>What I will say, though, is that many of the people who answered that they didn&#8217;t find the skit offensive weren&#8217;t actually answering about the skit. What they were concerned with was that an <i>American</i> called us racist. It&#8217;s one thing for someone from a country to call that country racist, for a foreigner to call a country racist is something that many people will not take.</p>
<p>I will point out that, while they Hey Hey skit was performed by <i>private</i> citizens aired by a private network, which caused huge emotional offence but no direct legal or economic harm, the denial of a marriage licence was performed by a <i>government</i> official and caused direct legal and economic harm.</p>
<p>Was the skit better or worse than the denial of a marriage licence? It&#8217;s a pointless question. Is Australia more racist than America? Maybe. I would say that there is probably more low-level racism, which the poll results show, but less extreme racists. It&#8217;s fairly academic question anyway, they both have come a long way and both have a long way to go.</p>
<p>When you mention your favourite target, the liberal media, you seem to be missing that Canadians think that Canada is the least racist and Australians think Australia is the least racist and, yes, Americans think that Americans are the least racist. My question is this, T. Had our positions been reversed, would you be pointing at the denial of a marriage licence as uncontrovertible proof of America&#8217;s racism, and be saying that the Hey Hey skit was bad but could have been worse? When discussing how racist America is, are you more concerned with the truth, or protecting your ego?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drew</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2009/10/15/comic-book-legends-revealed-229/comment-page-2/#comment-746232</link>
		<dc:creator>Drew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 08:55:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=33161#comment-746232</guid>
		<description>Hey, just thought I&#039;d draw attention to T.&#039;s 3:24 p.m. post. It&#039;s quite interesting, he makes some good points, and it took a while to actually show up (probably because it has so many links and therefore needed to be approved by someone at CBR). I had actually read the next six posts before it showed up, which is why I&#039;m pointing it out now . . . enjoy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, just thought I&#8217;d draw attention to T.&#8217;s 3:24 p.m. post. It&#8217;s quite interesting, he makes some good points, and it took a while to actually show up (probably because it has so many links and therefore needed to be approved by someone at CBR). I had actually read the next six posts before it showed up, which is why I&#8217;m pointing it out now . . . enjoy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2009/10/15/comic-book-legends-revealed-229/comment-page-2/#comment-746224</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 07:31:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=33161#comment-746224</guid>
		<description>I think the &quot;Panic&quot; story might have been considered objectionable not just because of the transvestism but because the violence could be seen as being of a sexual nature. A woman is shot in the chest and a man dressed as a woman is shot &quot;a little below the belly-button&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the &#8220;Panic&#8221; story might have been considered objectionable not just because of the transvestism but because the violence could be seen as being of a sexual nature. A woman is shot in the chest and a man dressed as a woman is shot &#8220;a little below the belly-button&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2009/10/15/comic-book-legends-revealed-229/comment-page-2/#comment-746222</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 06:54:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=33161#comment-746222</guid>
		<description>Experience didn&#039;t matter much to voters in the 2008 US Presidential campaign. People were so frustrated with the government that having a lengthy record in public office could actually be seen as a liability. Barack Obama&#039;s closest competitors in the Democratic primaries, Hilary Clinton and John Edwards, hadn&#039;t served in the US Senate much longer than he did. Obama actually had more experience than Clinton and Edwards in elected office when you include his time in the Illinois Senate. Joe Biden, Chris Dodd, Bill Richardson, and Dennis Kucinich all had more experience than Obama, Clinton, and Edwards, but it didn&#039;t help their campaigns much. Sarah Palin didn&#039;t have much experience either before being selected as the Republican Vice Presidential candidate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Experience didn&#8217;t matter much to voters in the 2008 US Presidential campaign. People were so frustrated with the government that having a lengthy record in public office could actually be seen as a liability. Barack Obama&#8217;s closest competitors in the Democratic primaries, Hilary Clinton and John Edwards, hadn&#8217;t served in the US Senate much longer than he did. Obama actually had more experience than Clinton and Edwards in elected office when you include his time in the Illinois Senate. Joe Biden, Chris Dodd, Bill Richardson, and Dennis Kucinich all had more experience than Obama, Clinton, and Edwards, but it didn&#8217;t help their campaigns much. Sarah Palin didn&#8217;t have much experience either before being selected as the Republican Vice Presidential candidate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2009/10/15/comic-book-legends-revealed-229/comment-page-2/#comment-746203</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 23:52:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=33161#comment-746203</guid>
		<description>I apologize to all comic fans for adding another political comment but, if you can&#039;t figure out why Obama doesn&#039;t &quot;satisfy&quot; Birthers as one commenter asked, you should ask your mom before writing.

1. The certificate would not satisfy them any more than NASA&#039;s photos of the &quot;face on Mars&quot; satisfied UFOlogists. They&#039;d declare it fake but celebrate that the president bowed to their demands.

2.  There is no reasonable doubt about the issue. Even if you believe every single authority in the U.S. entered into a conspiracty to lie about the certificate, public records show Obama&#039;s birth announcements in Hawaii. Unless his mother could see the future or had access to a time machine, she would have had no reason to submit it.

3.  If Obama bows to the Birthers&#039; demands, he sets himself up for the rest of the loons. One of the claims against him involves a detailed description of his penis. The office of the president should not have to jump to the demands of the Birthers much less the rest of the pack.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I apologize to all comic fans for adding another political comment but, if you can&#8217;t figure out why Obama doesn&#8217;t &#8220;satisfy&#8221; Birthers as one commenter asked, you should ask your mom before writing.</p>
<p>1. The certificate would not satisfy them any more than NASA&#8217;s photos of the &#8220;face on Mars&#8221; satisfied UFOlogists. They&#8217;d declare it fake but celebrate that the president bowed to their demands.</p>
<p>2.  There is no reasonable doubt about the issue. Even if you believe every single authority in the U.S. entered into a conspiracty to lie about the certificate, public records show Obama&#8217;s birth announcements in Hawaii. Unless his mother could see the future or had access to a time machine, she would have had no reason to submit it.</p>
<p>3.  If Obama bows to the Birthers&#8217; demands, he sets himself up for the rest of the loons. One of the claims against him involves a detailed description of his penis. The office of the president should not have to jump to the demands of the Birthers much less the rest of the pack.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Gray</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2009/10/15/comic-book-legends-revealed-229/comment-page-2/#comment-746199</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Gray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 23:23:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=33161#comment-746199</guid>
		<description>No, really, this is one of the most wonderfully trivial columns around and its focus is meant to be comics. Long arguments about US politics, not so much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, really, this is one of the most wonderfully trivial columns around and its focus is meant to be comics. Long arguments about US politics, not so much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: deron</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2009/10/15/comic-book-legends-revealed-229/comment-page-2/#comment-746196</link>
		<dc:creator>deron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 23:01:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=33161#comment-746196</guid>
		<description>@ Martin: OK. What&#039;s up with Green Lantern&#039;s hands?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Martin: OK. What&#8217;s up with Green Lantern&#8217;s hands?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: deron</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2009/10/15/comic-book-legends-revealed-229/comment-page-2/#comment-746195</link>
		<dc:creator>deron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 22:57:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=33161#comment-746195</guid>
		<description>@ T: Your point is understood. My point is that the issue of qualifications is itself suspect. No one questions the qualifications of most white candidates -- the experience, maybe, but not the qualifications. Furthermore, you have gone out of your way to suggest that Obama is at best underqualified. As such, your assertion that his election demonstrates we aren&#039;t consumed by racist amounts to: &quot;hey, we can&#039;t be racist, we just elected an un(der)-qualified black guy!&quot; Had you said, people looked at McCain and Obama and decided between them without going out of your way to argue that Obama was &quot;on paper&quot; less qualified, you&#039;d be on stronger ground.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ T: Your point is understood. My point is that the issue of qualifications is itself suspect. No one questions the qualifications of most white candidates &#8212; the experience, maybe, but not the qualifications. Furthermore, you have gone out of your way to suggest that Obama is at best underqualified. As such, your assertion that his election demonstrates we aren&#8217;t consumed by racist amounts to: &#8220;hey, we can&#8217;t be racist, we just elected an un(der)-qualified black guy!&#8221; Had you said, people looked at McCain and Obama and decided between them without going out of your way to argue that Obama was &#8220;on paper&#8221; less qualified, you&#8217;d be on stronger ground.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: deron</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2009/10/15/comic-book-legends-revealed-229/comment-page-2/#comment-746194</link>
		<dc:creator>deron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 22:55:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=33161#comment-746194</guid>
		<description>@ Mary Warner: I never said he was one of the ten best; I said he is considered one of the best. Several rankings of U.S. presidents over the years have placed him in the top ten; a recent CPAN poll of presidential historians put him at ninth, and many other polls place him in that general range. Wilson was no doubt a racist; many African Americans voted for him to their eventual regret in 1914, and he fairly well flipped them off when they complained about being forced from their jobs after he was elected. And while he did encourage the passing and enforcement of the Espionage Act of 1917 and Sedition Act of 1918, he did work with socialists who supported the war -- unlike McCarthy who considered socialist beliefs to be prima facie treasonous. Wilson did invade the Latin American countries but it is a stretch to say he invaded Russia; rather, American troops (along with troops from fourteen other nations fighting on the same side in World War I) were sent into Russia after the October Revolution and subsequent Treaty of Brest-Litovsk caused the collapse of the Eastern Front in WWI. The goal of the Allied troops was to secure the free passage of Czech troops to the Western front and prevent the usage of materiel sent to Russia to aid its war effort did not fall into the hands of the Bolsheviks. Troops remained in Russia after the end of WWI, but Wilson pulled the Americans out in 1920; it was not the last nation to do so. It is not a good moment in our nation&#039;s history but hardly an act of imperialism.

Wilson also created the Federal Trade Commission, the Clayton Antitrust Act, the Revenue Act of 1913 (the first progressive tax in the country), supported and promoted the passage of the Nineteenth Amendment (women&#039;s suffrage), and tried to create a world body that would prevent future world wars (the League of Nations). His Fourteen Points are about as far from fascism as one could get, and he actively believed in and fought for them; he wasn&#039;t merely paying lip service to peaceful ideas. He also created Mothers Day. In short, he is a very difficult president to fairly gauge; many of his policies were abhorrent but he did do a great deal of good and was successful in achieving most of his goals.

Oh, and acts similar to the anti-free speech laws passed during WWI were also passed by John Adams (at a time when the U.S. was not in a war though it feared one). Lincoln suspended habeus corpus, blockaded the South and imprisoned 18,000 on suspicion of Confederate sympathies without Congressional approval, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Mary Warner: I never said he was one of the ten best; I said he is considered one of the best. Several rankings of U.S. presidents over the years have placed him in the top ten; a recent CPAN poll of presidential historians put him at ninth, and many other polls place him in that general range. Wilson was no doubt a racist; many African Americans voted for him to their eventual regret in 1914, and he fairly well flipped them off when they complained about being forced from their jobs after he was elected. And while he did encourage the passing and enforcement of the Espionage Act of 1917 and Sedition Act of 1918, he did work with socialists who supported the war &#8212; unlike McCarthy who considered socialist beliefs to be prima facie treasonous. Wilson did invade the Latin American countries but it is a stretch to say he invaded Russia; rather, American troops (along with troops from fourteen other nations fighting on the same side in World War I) were sent into Russia after the October Revolution and subsequent Treaty of Brest-Litovsk caused the collapse of the Eastern Front in WWI. The goal of the Allied troops was to secure the free passage of Czech troops to the Western front and prevent the usage of materiel sent to Russia to aid its war effort did not fall into the hands of the Bolsheviks. Troops remained in Russia after the end of WWI, but Wilson pulled the Americans out in 1920; it was not the last nation to do so. It is not a good moment in our nation&#8217;s history but hardly an act of imperialism.</p>
<p>Wilson also created the Federal Trade Commission, the Clayton Antitrust Act, the Revenue Act of 1913 (the first progressive tax in the country), supported and promoted the passage of the Nineteenth Amendment (women&#8217;s suffrage), and tried to create a world body that would prevent future world wars (the League of Nations). His Fourteen Points are about as far from fascism as one could get, and he actively believed in and fought for them; he wasn&#8217;t merely paying lip service to peaceful ideas. He also created Mothers Day. In short, he is a very difficult president to fairly gauge; many of his policies were abhorrent but he did do a great deal of good and was successful in achieving most of his goals.</p>
<p>Oh, and acts similar to the anti-free speech laws passed during WWI were also passed by John Adams (at a time when the U.S. was not in a war though it feared one). Lincoln suspended habeus corpus, blockaded the South and imprisoned 18,000 on suspicion of Confederate sympathies without Congressional approval, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Gray</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2009/10/15/comic-book-legends-revealed-229/comment-page-2/#comment-746192</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Gray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 22:47:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=33161#comment-746192</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t suppose you guys could swap emails and we could talk comics?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t suppose you guys could swap emails and we could talk comics?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T.</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2009/10/15/comic-book-legends-revealed-229/comment-page-1/#comment-746191</link>
		<dc:creator>T.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 22:24:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=33161#comment-746191</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I&#039;m thinking it&#039;s probably easier, or at least there&#039;s less baggage, to be black in Canada. Or Australia&lt;/blockquote&gt;

If you listen to liberal propaganda in this country about how every single other western country is more enlightened than the US, sure.  But if you objectively judge evidence I&#039;ve never seen any evidence that Canada is any better to blacks than the US currently is.  Not any worse either, but nothing to show they treat them any better.  And no black politician to my knowledge has come close to Barack&#039;s heights in Canada.

And as for Australia, have you been following the news lately?

A talent show in Australia recently had Harry Connick Jr on as a guest judge, and one of the performances they had was a bunch of impersonating Michael Jackson in full blackface and afro wig attire and they called themselves &quot;The Jackson Jive.&quot;  And do you know what?  The Australian audience was loving it and saw nothing wrong with it.  When Harry Connick Jr, the only American on panel, found it disgusting and tasteless and &quot;gonged&quot; them, many in the audience even BOOED.

http://www.dlisted.com/node/34259

The best is what Harry said next:

&lt;blockquote&gt;Harry said, &quot;I just wanted to say on behalf of my country, I know it was done humorously, but we’ve spent so much time trying to not make black people look like buffoons, that when we see something like that, we take it really to heart. I know it was in good fun, and the last thing I want to do is take this show to a down level—because you know how much I love this show and this country—but I feel like I’m at home here, and if I knew that was going to be part of the show, I probably—I definitely wouldn’t have done it.”&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Harry Connick threatened to quit the show on the spot backstage and had to be soothed into returning on the condition that he was allowed to openly speak out against it.  Even afterwards, the people partaking in it still didn&#039;t feel it was racist at all.  The host dismissed it as a &quot;storm in a teacup&quot; and defended it later.  And best of all, if you check the link below, a MAJORITY of people polled by Australian media felt the skit was totally fine and not racist or tasteless in the least:

http://www.news.com.au/couriermail/story/0,23739,26182444-952,00.html

&lt;blockquote&gt;An overwhelming 69 per cent of readers who voted in online News Ltd polls across Australia said the skit – which featured four men with blackened faces wearing afro wigs miming to the Jackson Five’s Can You Feel It – was neither racist nor tasteless. The strongest reactions came from readers of PerthNow.com.au, where 81 per cent said the skit was not racist, and adelaidenow.com.au, where 80 per cent supported the skit...

Results from other News Ltd sites were: 

• News.com.au - 72.2 per cent said the skit wasn&#039;t racist/tasteless 
• Dailytelegraph.com.au – 77 per cent said the skit wasn&#039;t racist/tasteless 
• Heraldsun.com.au – 76 per cent said the skit wasn&#039;t racist/tasteless 
• Couriermail.com.au – 53 per cent said the skit wasn&#039;t racist/tasteless.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

So basically, if an American wasn&#039;t there to get offended and turn it into world news, chances are the skit would have just aired in Australia, laughed at and life would have just carried on and it wouldn&#039;t have been made into world news.  And one last thing, one of the participants of the blackface skit, who was avidly defending the skit and saying he didn&#039;t think it was racist?  Check out what he said below:

&lt;blockquote&gt;Asked if he would have done the same skit in America, Dr Deva replied, &quot;Absolutely not&quot;.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Think about it, after all his defending of his own skit, even he admits without hesitation that he&#039;d never have the nerve to even think of trying such a stunt in the USA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I&#8217;m thinking it&#8217;s probably easier, or at least there&#8217;s less baggage, to be black in Canada. Or Australia</p></blockquote>
<p>If you listen to liberal propaganda in this country about how every single other western country is more enlightened than the US, sure.  But if you objectively judge evidence I&#8217;ve never seen any evidence that Canada is any better to blacks than the US currently is.  Not any worse either, but nothing to show they treat them any better.  And no black politician to my knowledge has come close to Barack&#8217;s heights in Canada.</p>
<p>And as for Australia, have you been following the news lately?</p>
<p>A talent show in Australia recently had Harry Connick Jr on as a guest judge, and one of the performances they had was a bunch of impersonating Michael Jackson in full blackface and afro wig attire and they called themselves &#8220;The Jackson Jive.&#8221;  And do you know what?  The Australian audience was loving it and saw nothing wrong with it.  When Harry Connick Jr, the only American on panel, found it disgusting and tasteless and &#8220;gonged&#8221; them, many in the audience even BOOED.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.dlisted.com/node/34259" rel="nofollow">http://www.dlisted.com/node/34259</a></p>
<p>The best is what Harry said next:</p>
<blockquote><p>Harry said, &#8220;I just wanted to say on behalf of my country, I know it was done humorously, but we’ve spent so much time trying to not make black people look like buffoons, that when we see something like that, we take it really to heart. I know it was in good fun, and the last thing I want to do is take this show to a down level—because you know how much I love this show and this country—but I feel like I’m at home here, and if I knew that was going to be part of the show, I probably—I definitely wouldn’t have done it.”</p></blockquote>
<p>Harry Connick threatened to quit the show on the spot backstage and had to be soothed into returning on the condition that he was allowed to openly speak out against it.  Even afterwards, the people partaking in it still didn&#8217;t feel it was racist at all.  The host dismissed it as a &#8220;storm in a teacup&#8221; and defended it later.  And best of all, if you check the link below, a MAJORITY of people polled by Australian media felt the skit was totally fine and not racist or tasteless in the least:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.news.com.au/couriermail/story/0,23739,26182444-952,00.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.news.com.au/couriermail/story/0,23739,26182444-952,00.html</a></p>
<blockquote><p>An overwhelming 69 per cent of readers who voted in online News Ltd polls across Australia said the skit – which featured four men with blackened faces wearing afro wigs miming to the Jackson Five’s Can You Feel It – was neither racist nor tasteless. The strongest reactions came from readers of PerthNow.com.au, where 81 per cent said the skit was not racist, and adelaidenow.com.au, where 80 per cent supported the skit&#8230;</p>
<p>Results from other News Ltd sites were: </p>
<p>• News.com.au &#8211; 72.2 per cent said the skit wasn&#8217;t racist/tasteless<br />
• Dailytelegraph.com.au – 77 per cent said the skit wasn&#8217;t racist/tasteless<br />
• Heraldsun.com.au – 76 per cent said the skit wasn&#8217;t racist/tasteless<br />
• Couriermail.com.au – 53 per cent said the skit wasn&#8217;t racist/tasteless.</p></blockquote>
<p>So basically, if an American wasn&#8217;t there to get offended and turn it into world news, chances are the skit would have just aired in Australia, laughed at and life would have just carried on and it wouldn&#8217;t have been made into world news.  And one last thing, one of the participants of the blackface skit, who was avidly defending the skit and saying he didn&#8217;t think it was racist?  Check out what he said below:</p>
<blockquote><p>Asked if he would have done the same skit in America, Dr Deva replied, &#8220;Absolutely not&#8221;.</p></blockquote>
<p>Think about it, after all his defending of his own skit, even he admits without hesitation that he&#8217;d never have the nerve to even think of trying such a stunt in the USA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary Warner</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2009/10/15/comic-book-legends-revealed-229/comment-page-1/#comment-746189</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary Warner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 22:14:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=33161#comment-746189</guid>
		<description>Woodrow Wilson was one of the ten best presidents????   Are you insane?  He was almost certainly the worst!  Wilson was the closest thing to a Fascist dictator the United States has ever had.  He pretty much tossed out the Bill of Rights.  He had people arrested and sent to prison for criticising the Government, questioning his war policies, even expressing doubt that the war was going well was a Federal offense.  He led a witchhunt against Communists and Socialists far more extreme than anything McCarthy ever did.  Lots of people were imprisoned for their political beliefs and nothing more.  He kicked the last remaining Black civil servants out of the Federal Government.  He invaded several Latin American countries, as well as Russia, without Congressional approval.
And yet, few people these days seem to know about any of this, even though you can find it all in countless popular history books.  He was deified a generation after leaving office by the more extreme social scientists, the ones who worship power, and who also praised Mussolini and Stalin around the same time.
Wilson did nearly everything Bush has done only more successfully.  (Even &#039;freedom fries&#039; dates back to Wilson&#039;s administration-- back then it was &#039;liberty cabbage&#039;-- although I don&#039;t think Wilson himself was responsible.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Woodrow Wilson was one of the ten best presidents????   Are you insane?  He was almost certainly the worst!  Wilson was the closest thing to a Fascist dictator the United States has ever had.  He pretty much tossed out the Bill of Rights.  He had people arrested and sent to prison for criticising the Government, questioning his war policies, even expressing doubt that the war was going well was a Federal offense.  He led a witchhunt against Communists and Socialists far more extreme than anything McCarthy ever did.  Lots of people were imprisoned for their political beliefs and nothing more.  He kicked the last remaining Black civil servants out of the Federal Government.  He invaded several Latin American countries, as well as Russia, without Congressional approval.<br />
And yet, few people these days seem to know about any of this, even though you can find it all in countless popular history books.  He was deified a generation after leaving office by the more extreme social scientists, the ones who worship power, and who also praised Mussolini and Stalin around the same time.<br />
Wilson did nearly everything Bush has done only more successfully.  (Even &#8216;freedom fries&#8217; dates back to Wilson&#8217;s administration&#8211; back then it was &#8216;liberty cabbage&#8217;&#8211; although I don&#8217;t think Wilson himself was responsible.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

