<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nostalgia November Day 07 &#8212; Excalibur #75</title>
	<atom:link href="http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2009/11/07/nostalgia-november-day-07-excalibur-75/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2009/11/07/nostalgia-november-day-07-excalibur-75/</link>
	<description>Comic Book Resources Presents... Comics Should Be Good!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:44:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Excalibur comics &#124; Sickfightgear</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2009/11/07/nostalgia-november-day-07-excalibur-75/comment-page-1/#comment-844535</link>
		<dc:creator>Excalibur comics &#124; Sickfightgear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2011 10:27:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=34549#comment-844535</guid>
		<description>[...] Nostalgia November Day 07 &#8212; Excalibur #75 &#124; Comics Should Be Good! @     Published by admin on Jun 6, 2011 under Uncategorized &#124; Post your comment now       &#171; Avian supplies [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Nostalgia November Day 07 &#8212; Excalibur #75 | Comics Should Be Good! @     Published by admin on Jun 6, 2011 under Uncategorized | Post your comment now       &laquo; Avian supplies [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Snikt Snakt</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2009/11/07/nostalgia-november-day-07-excalibur-75/comment-page-1/#comment-750547</link>
		<dc:creator>Snikt Snakt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 21:14:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=34549#comment-750547</guid>
		<description>I also loved Davis&#039; solo run on Excalibur, and promptly dropped it when I saw EVERYTHING he did was wiped away.

Just a few years ago I unloaded/donated all my Excalibur issues...except for any done by Davis!  :-)

I would love it if one day Alan could come back and do Excalibur again, w/the same team line-up.  Hey, if they can bring back the original Alpha Flight and New Mutants, why not this?!?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also loved Davis&#8217; solo run on Excalibur, and promptly dropped it when I saw EVERYTHING he did was wiped away.</p>
<p>Just a few years ago I unloaded/donated all my Excalibur issues&#8230;except for any done by Davis!  <img src='http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I would love it if one day Alan could come back and do Excalibur again, w/the same team line-up.  Hey, if they can bring back the original Alpha Flight and New Mutants, why not this?!?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: smkedtky</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2009/11/07/nostalgia-november-day-07-excalibur-75/comment-page-1/#comment-750491</link>
		<dc:creator>smkedtky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 15:47:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=34549#comment-750491</guid>
		<description>That Alan Davis run was so well thought out, too.  Alan Davis incorporated every single previous story (fill-ins included) to create the best run of the whole series.  Ellis&#039; run was good too but Alan Davis stayed true to the original concept and tied up every loose end (Widget) while telling an incredible story.  By the time Ellis got to it, EXCALIBUR was a completely different book.

The first issue after Alan Davis left made me cringe and the issue reviewed here provoked the same reaction.  I couldn&#039;t believe that after all Alan Davis had done to make this book readable (and it was at the top of my read pile while he wrote it) that editorial allowed for it to be completely deconstructed (in between issues, no less).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That Alan Davis run was so well thought out, too.  Alan Davis incorporated every single previous story (fill-ins included) to create the best run of the whole series.  Ellis&#8217; run was good too but Alan Davis stayed true to the original concept and tied up every loose end (Widget) while telling an incredible story.  By the time Ellis got to it, EXCALIBUR was a completely different book.</p>
<p>The first issue after Alan Davis left made me cringe and the issue reviewed here provoked the same reaction.  I couldn&#8217;t believe that after all Alan Davis had done to make this book readable (and it was at the top of my read pile while he wrote it) that editorial allowed for it to be completely deconstructed (in between issues, no less).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nostalgia November Archive &#124; Comics Should Be Good! @ Comic Book Resources</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2009/11/07/nostalgia-november-day-07-excalibur-75/comment-page-1/#comment-750418</link>
		<dc:creator>Nostalgia November Archive &#124; Comics Should Be Good! @ Comic Book Resources</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 06:25:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=34549#comment-750418</guid>
		<description>[...] annual #15 Nostalgia November Day 05 -- Transformers #57 Nostalgia November Day 06 -- TaleSpin #7 Nostalgia November Day 07 -- Excalibur #75 Nostalgia November Day 08 -- Marvel Team-Up #148 The Reread Reviews -- The Death of Superman The [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] annual #15 Nostalgia November Day 05 &#8212; Transformers #57 Nostalgia November Day 06 &#8212; TaleSpin #7 Nostalgia November Day 07 &#8212; Excalibur #75 Nostalgia November Day 08 &#8212; Marvel Team-Up #148 The Reread Reviews &#8212; The Death of Superman The [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Herman</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2009/11/07/nostalgia-november-day-07-excalibur-75/comment-page-1/#comment-750332</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Herman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 19:43:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=34549#comment-750332</guid>
		<description>&quot;The most painful thing about this issue is that IIRC it was the first issue following Alan Davis&#039;s fantastic run. Lobdell took less than an issue to obliterate all of Davis&#039;s good work (not literally - I mean Davis&#039;s comics are still there - but for the purposes of serial storytelling, Lobdell&#039;s work was incredibly destructive).&quot;

Um, yeah, I also have to agree with this quote.  Alan Davis did some amazing work on Excalibur, picking up Chris Claremont&#039;s loose ends and crafting some amazing stories.  Then he abruptly left, and it was all downhill from there.  The year between Davis&#039; departure and Warren Ellis coming aboard was pretty dire, aside from a couple of semi-decent stories by Richard Ashford... well, I liked the Annual he wrote.  But, yeah, #75 is smack dab in the middle of one of the lowest periods of quality on Excalibur.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The most painful thing about this issue is that IIRC it was the first issue following Alan Davis&#8217;s fantastic run. Lobdell took less than an issue to obliterate all of Davis&#8217;s good work (not literally &#8211; I mean Davis&#8217;s comics are still there &#8211; but for the purposes of serial storytelling, Lobdell&#8217;s work was incredibly destructive).&#8221;</p>
<p>Um, yeah, I also have to agree with this quote.  Alan Davis did some amazing work on Excalibur, picking up Chris Claremont&#8217;s loose ends and crafting some amazing stories.  Then he abruptly left, and it was all downhill from there.  The year between Davis&#8217; departure and Warren Ellis coming aboard was pretty dire, aside from a couple of semi-decent stories by Richard Ashford&#8230; well, I liked the Annual he wrote.  But, yeah, #75 is smack dab in the middle of one of the lowest periods of quality on Excalibur.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philip Ayres</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2009/11/07/nostalgia-november-day-07-excalibur-75/comment-page-1/#comment-750323</link>
		<dc:creator>Philip Ayres</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 17:45:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=34549#comment-750323</guid>
		<description>I remember reading this and thinking &quot;Don&#039;t be silly, X-Men annual 14 made it obvious Ahab is Cable&quot;.  My word it was a mess....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember reading this and thinking &#8220;Don&#8217;t be silly, X-Men annual 14 made it obvious Ahab is Cable&#8221;.  My word it was a mess&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2009/11/07/nostalgia-november-day-07-excalibur-75/comment-page-1/#comment-750312</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 16:02:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=34549#comment-750312</guid>
		<description>Yeah, the interim books were great too.  I hate when people refer to &quot;the 90s&quot; as awful.  Really, it was the period from late 1990 (I&#039;d say the launch of X-Men #1) to mid 1996 (the end of Onslaught) that was the crapfest.  And that&#039;s just where Marvel is concerned.  For DC, the definitive improvement would be the launch Morrison&#039;s JLA, but there were definite signs of recovery with the Return of Superman and everything post Zero Hour.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, the interim books were great too.  I hate when people refer to &#8220;the 90s&#8221; as awful.  Really, it was the period from late 1990 (I&#8217;d say the launch of X-Men #1) to mid 1996 (the end of Onslaught) that was the crapfest.  And that&#8217;s just where Marvel is concerned.  For DC, the definitive improvement would be the launch Morrison&#8217;s JLA, but there were definite signs of recovery with the Return of Superman and everything post Zero Hour.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Holland</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2009/11/07/nostalgia-november-day-07-excalibur-75/comment-page-1/#comment-750311</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Holland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 15:58:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=34549#comment-750311</guid>
		<description>Adam, let&#039;s not forget Marvel&#039;s interim books, like Ostrander&#039;s Heroes for HIre, Waid/Kubert&#039;s Ka-Zar, and a little book called Thunderbolts. 

AND, so this isn&#039;t a total lobdell/x-bashing thread, I thought the &quot;Operation: Zero Tolerance&quot; story was actually pretty good - though for the life of me I can&#039;t make heads or tails of Bastion&#039;s origin (revealed WELL after the character lost prominence in the stories), or who the hell killed Graydon Creed, or...Huh. Maybe &quot;Operation: Zero Tolerance&quot; wasn&#039;t all that good, either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adam, let&#8217;s not forget Marvel&#8217;s interim books, like Ostrander&#8217;s Heroes for HIre, Waid/Kubert&#8217;s Ka-Zar, and a little book called Thunderbolts. </p>
<p>AND, so this isn&#8217;t a total lobdell/x-bashing thread, I thought the &#8220;Operation: Zero Tolerance&#8221; story was actually pretty good &#8211; though for the life of me I can&#8217;t make heads or tails of Bastion&#8217;s origin (revealed WELL after the character lost prominence in the stories), or who the hell killed Graydon Creed, or&#8230;Huh. Maybe &#8220;Operation: Zero Tolerance&#8221; wasn&#8217;t all that good, either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sijo</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2009/11/07/nostalgia-november-day-07-excalibur-75/comment-page-1/#comment-750300</link>
		<dc:creator>Sijo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 13:56:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=34549#comment-750300</guid>
		<description>-&quot;Sales increased on pretty much every book he was writing.&quot;

It was the 90&#039;s. Comics were selling for all the wrong reasons. And the market almost collapsed as a result.

Man, I&#039;m glad I dropped reading the X-books about this time (I realized that not only had things gotten too messy, but they were NOT going to get any simpler) because Excalibur #75 sounds like crap. Man, what a shame, because this used to be one of the best Marvel books of the time; the Davis run embodied FUN for its own sake, unlike today&#039;s emo writing everywhere. Meh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>-&#8221;Sales increased on pretty much every book he was writing.&#8221;</p>
<p>It was the 90&#8242;s. Comics were selling for all the wrong reasons. And the market almost collapsed as a result.</p>
<p>Man, I&#8217;m glad I dropped reading the X-books about this time (I realized that not only had things gotten too messy, but they were NOT going to get any simpler) because Excalibur #75 sounds like crap. Man, what a shame, because this used to be one of the best Marvel books of the time; the Davis run embodied FUN for its own sake, unlike today&#8217;s emo writing everywhere. Meh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2009/11/07/nostalgia-november-day-07-excalibur-75/comment-page-1/#comment-750272</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 07:12:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=34549#comment-750272</guid>
		<description>Ah, Britannic... 

I don&#039;t know which ignoramus came up with that concept, but it may mark as the lowest attempt to make a character new and hip for the nineties ever. Thank goodness Lobdell would be off this book in a matter of months.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, Britannic&#8230; </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know which ignoramus came up with that concept, but it may mark as the lowest attempt to make a character new and hip for the nineties ever. Thank goodness Lobdell would be off this book in a matter of months.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2009/11/07/nostalgia-november-day-07-excalibur-75/comment-page-1/#comment-750258</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 04:15:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=34549#comment-750258</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;This should be a lesson to all publishers to avoid major re-boots.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Maybe, but as you already said you had dropped most of the books you were buying. The readers that have been lost to major re-boots could only be a fraction to the slow attrition of readers due to apathy. At least major re-boots get new readers in, even if they don&#039;t stay. I&#039;m willing to bet that Marvel would do another Heroes Reborn if they thought they could get 90s sales again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>This should be a lesson to all publishers to avoid major re-boots.</p></blockquote>
<p>Maybe, but as you already said you had dropped most of the books you were buying. The readers that have been lost to major re-boots could only be a fraction to the slow attrition of readers due to apathy. At least major re-boots get new readers in, even if they don&#8217;t stay. I&#8217;m willing to bet that Marvel would do another Heroes Reborn if they thought they could get 90s sales again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2009/11/07/nostalgia-november-day-07-excalibur-75/comment-page-1/#comment-750257</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 04:10:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=34549#comment-750257</guid>
		<description>You dropped comics after Onslaught?  Man, that&#039;s when everything got GOOD again!  A year later, we had Busiek Avengers &amp; Iron Man, Jurgens/Romita Jr Thor, Waid&#039;s Cap, Kelly/McGuinness Deadpool...and I think everything was still under two bucks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You dropped comics after Onslaught?  Man, that&#8217;s when everything got GOOD again!  A year later, we had Busiek Avengers &amp; Iron Man, Jurgens/Romita Jr Thor, Waid&#8217;s Cap, Kelly/McGuinness Deadpool&#8230;and I think everything was still under two bucks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary Warner</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2009/11/07/nostalgia-november-day-07-excalibur-75/comment-page-1/#comment-750254</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary Warner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 03:28:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=34549#comment-750254</guid>
		<description>I guess Onslaught might&#039;ve been partially responsible for me dropping comics for a decade, as well.  
I had largely stopped by 1995 because of money and low quality, but I hadn&#039;t stopped buying them completely.  But then the local store closed down (this was around the time the market collapsed, I guess), but ordinarily that would&#039;ve just stopped me temporarily, and I would&#039;ve continued buying them whenever I had a chance.
But then I read in a newspaper that Marvel was erasing their history and starting over from the beginning, and that just upset me completely.  Of course, they only did that with the Fantastic Four and Avengers, following Onslaught, but as is usually the case, the newspaper writers got some of their details wrong, so I thought all of Marvel&#039;s history was gone.  I had already abandoned DC when they&#039;d done that back in the &#039;80s (Of course, I hardly ever bought any DCs by that time, so it wasn&#039;t as though everything changed for me when that happened.  And I knew they would continue to have good stories at least some of the time, but I never could get into DC again, although I have read some here and there since.  I just didn&#039;t want to go through the hassle of learning all the characters and history all over again, especially since my funds are always limited so I have to be very choosy about what I get anyway.)
It wasn&#039;t until about 2004 or 2005 that I found out that Heroes Reborn-thing had been temporary, and that Marvel history was still (mostly) intact.  And I didn&#039;t actually start buying new books until 2006 (I&#039;d been buying some old stuff, though, ever since the new store had opened a couple of years earlier.)

I wonder how many other readers Marvel or DC have lost because of stuff like this.

(It&#039;s a miracle I continued reading Spider-Man after One More Day.  I guess since it was the only series I was buying regularly at the time, I just didn&#039;t have the heart to abandon it.  And of course, after a few issues it was obvious that it was better than it had been in years, and that they were keeping the history as intact as Quesada would let them, so I wasn&#039;t too upset then.)

This should be a lesson to all publishers to avoid major re-boots.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess Onslaught might&#8217;ve been partially responsible for me dropping comics for a decade, as well.<br />
I had largely stopped by 1995 because of money and low quality, but I hadn&#8217;t stopped buying them completely.  But then the local store closed down (this was around the time the market collapsed, I guess), but ordinarily that would&#8217;ve just stopped me temporarily, and I would&#8217;ve continued buying them whenever I had a chance.<br />
But then I read in a newspaper that Marvel was erasing their history and starting over from the beginning, and that just upset me completely.  Of course, they only did that with the Fantastic Four and Avengers, following Onslaught, but as is usually the case, the newspaper writers got some of their details wrong, so I thought all of Marvel&#8217;s history was gone.  I had already abandoned DC when they&#8217;d done that back in the &#8217;80s (Of course, I hardly ever bought any DCs by that time, so it wasn&#8217;t as though everything changed for me when that happened.  And I knew they would continue to have good stories at least some of the time, but I never could get into DC again, although I have read some here and there since.  I just didn&#8217;t want to go through the hassle of learning all the characters and history all over again, especially since my funds are always limited so I have to be very choosy about what I get anyway.)<br />
It wasn&#8217;t until about 2004 or 2005 that I found out that Heroes Reborn-thing had been temporary, and that Marvel history was still (mostly) intact.  And I didn&#8217;t actually start buying new books until 2006 (I&#8217;d been buying some old stuff, though, ever since the new store had opened a couple of years earlier.)</p>
<p>I wonder how many other readers Marvel or DC have lost because of stuff like this.</p>
<p>(It&#8217;s a miracle I continued reading Spider-Man after One More Day.  I guess since it was the only series I was buying regularly at the time, I just didn&#8217;t have the heart to abandon it.  And of course, after a few issues it was obvious that it was better than it had been in years, and that they were keeping the history as intact as Quesada would let them, so I wasn&#8217;t too upset then.)</p>
<p>This should be a lesson to all publishers to avoid major re-boots.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crusader k</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2009/11/07/nostalgia-november-day-07-excalibur-75/comment-page-1/#comment-750253</link>
		<dc:creator>Crusader k</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 03:27:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=34549#comment-750253</guid>
		<description>&quot;The most painful thing about this issue is that IIRC it was the first issue following Alan Davis&#039;s fantastic run. Lobdell took less than an issue to obliterate all of Davis&#039;s good work (not literally - I mean Davis&#039;s comics are still there - but for the purposes of serial storytelling, Lobdell&#039;s work was incredibly destructive).&quot;

Man - is THAT ever quoted for the truth! I remember picking up Lobdell&#039;s first book after Davis&#039; - with Meggan all emo kinda...merging...with the waterfall and thinking...&#039;the hell?!&#039; We find out PRIOR to the issue being held that some kinda disastrous time thingie happened off camera allowing Lobdell to obliterate EVERYTHING Davis had established and allowing the 90&#039;s X-madness to creep into an otherwise awesome book.

Craptacular.

And the artwork segue wayed into the bad 90&#039;s over crosshatched and weirdly over muscled heroes. Everything that Davis did to make each character unique and distinct had been heaved over for the hot new look. ARGH.

Ok...that felt good. I&#039;ve waiting nearly 20 years to vent that. LOL!

I am SOOO grateful that Marvel is reprinting Davis&#039; stuff in their Visionaries trades.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The most painful thing about this issue is that IIRC it was the first issue following Alan Davis&#8217;s fantastic run. Lobdell took less than an issue to obliterate all of Davis&#8217;s good work (not literally &#8211; I mean Davis&#8217;s comics are still there &#8211; but for the purposes of serial storytelling, Lobdell&#8217;s work was incredibly destructive).&#8221;</p>
<p>Man &#8211; is THAT ever quoted for the truth! I remember picking up Lobdell&#8217;s first book after Davis&#8217; &#8211; with Meggan all emo kinda&#8230;merging&#8230;with the waterfall and thinking&#8230;&#8217;the hell?!&#8217; We find out PRIOR to the issue being held that some kinda disastrous time thingie happened off camera allowing Lobdell to obliterate EVERYTHING Davis had established and allowing the 90&#8242;s X-madness to creep into an otherwise awesome book.</p>
<p>Craptacular.</p>
<p>And the artwork segue wayed into the bad 90&#8242;s over crosshatched and weirdly over muscled heroes. Everything that Davis did to make each character unique and distinct had been heaved over for the hot new look. ARGH.</p>
<p>Ok&#8230;that felt good. I&#8217;ve waiting nearly 20 years to vent that. LOL!</p>
<p>I am SOOO grateful that Marvel is reprinting Davis&#8217; stuff in their Visionaries trades.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jazzbo</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2009/11/07/nostalgia-november-day-07-excalibur-75/comment-page-1/#comment-750247</link>
		<dc:creator>jazzbo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 03:03:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=34549#comment-750247</guid>
		<description>Jeff, yes, Joseph and Onslaught were terrible. Onslaught actually was largely responsible for me dropping comics altogether for 5 or 6 years.

And I have to wonder how much of the rise in sales on the Lobdell books were because of the fact that at that time you couldn&#039;t read just one X book. You had to read all of them to make any sense of the story. What little sense there was, that is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff, yes, Joseph and Onslaught were terrible. Onslaught actually was largely responsible for me dropping comics altogether for 5 or 6 years.</p>
<p>And I have to wonder how much of the rise in sales on the Lobdell books were because of the fact that at that time you couldn&#8217;t read just one X book. You had to read all of them to make any sense of the story. What little sense there was, that is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Mutt</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2009/11/07/nostalgia-november-day-07-excalibur-75/comment-page-1/#comment-750240</link>
		<dc:creator>The Mutt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 02:22:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=34549#comment-750240</guid>
		<description>When I read things like this I am ever and ever more grateful that the comics of my childhood were made by Kanigher and Kubert and Kirby.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I read things like this I am ever and ever more grateful that the comics of my childhood were made by Kanigher and Kubert and Kirby.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2009/11/07/nostalgia-november-day-07-excalibur-75/comment-page-1/#comment-750227</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 00:28:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=34549#comment-750227</guid>
		<description>Ha.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Holland</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2009/11/07/nostalgia-november-day-07-excalibur-75/comment-page-1/#comment-750221</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Holland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 23:39:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=34549#comment-750221</guid>
		<description>1) Was there ever an X-book more superfluous than post-Claremont Excalibur? I don&#039;t think anyone could&#039;ve made this book mean anything - not Lobdell, not even Warren Ellis (who, I believe, referred to his run as &quot;beating the crap writing&quot; out of himself). 

2) The Nicieza-Lobdell run of the X-Men books makes up the bulk of my collection, and while I have the standard Fond Childhood Memories, it&#039;s only thinking about it now - Joseph, Onslaught, pointless Shiar stories - that I realize, &quot;Oh my god - those stories were probably terrible!&quot;

3) As a high school student, I got the opportunity to interview Mark Waid, and I asked him what he would&#039;ve done different about his X-Men run. His response: &quot;First, I would have killed Scott Lobdell and buried him in my back yard. Second...actually...everything would&#039;ve been fine after that.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1) Was there ever an X-book more superfluous than post-Claremont Excalibur? I don&#8217;t think anyone could&#8217;ve made this book mean anything &#8211; not Lobdell, not even Warren Ellis (who, I believe, referred to his run as &#8220;beating the crap writing&#8221; out of himself). </p>
<p>2) The Nicieza-Lobdell run of the X-Men books makes up the bulk of my collection, and while I have the standard Fond Childhood Memories, it&#8217;s only thinking about it now &#8211; Joseph, Onslaught, pointless Shiar stories &#8211; that I realize, &#8220;Oh my god &#8211; those stories were probably terrible!&#8221;</p>
<p>3) As a high school student, I got the opportunity to interview Mark Waid, and I asked him what he would&#8217;ve done different about his X-Men run. His response: &#8220;First, I would have killed Scott Lobdell and buried him in my back yard. Second&#8230;actually&#8230;everything would&#8217;ve been fine after that.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2009/11/07/nostalgia-november-day-07-excalibur-75/comment-page-1/#comment-750220</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 23:39:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=34549#comment-750220</guid>
		<description>Yeah.  That Nightcrawler story was really great.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah.  That Nightcrawler story was really great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Curran</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2009/11/07/nostalgia-november-day-07-excalibur-75/comment-page-1/#comment-750214</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad Curran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 23:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/?p=34549#comment-750214</guid>
		<description>I really liked that Krueger/Sale Nightcrawler story at the time. I was getting religious myself, and am a huge Nightcrawler mark, so that probably helped. Also, Tim Sale makes everything he does a lot better (insert &quot;Jeph Loeb sucks&quot; comment here). Rachel ceasing to exist was a bummer, but hey, she did get better (and didn&#039;t come back with that awful mullet).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really liked that Krueger/Sale Nightcrawler story at the time. I was getting religious myself, and am a huge Nightcrawler mark, so that probably helped. Also, Tim Sale makes everything he does a lot better (insert &#8220;Jeph Loeb sucks&#8221; comment here). Rachel ceasing to exist was a bummer, but hey, she did get better (and didn&#8217;t come back with that awful mullet).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

