web stats

CSBG Archive

A review a day: Strange Suspense: The Steve Ditko Archives volume 1

Smell the history!

Fantagraphics continues to bring out nifty collections of olde-tyme comics, allowing us whippersnappers to check out what the four-color stuff looked like back before the Internet, cell phones, video games, Alan Moore, and the wheel. This time around, we get Strange Suspense by Steve Ditko, whom you may have heard of. It’s $39.99, but man! are these some cool comics.

This book collects short stories written and drawn by Ditko when he first broke into comics, back when he was in his late twenties (Ditko, presumably, turned 82 a few months ago). It was just before the Comics Code Authority drove companies like EC out of business, and Ditko was going a bits nuts with various stuff, mostly horror and mostly for Charlton. These stories are from 1954 with the exceptions of the first one and the last one, which are from ’53 and ’55, respectively. The CCA was adopted on 26 October 1954, so all of the stories but the last one are pre-Code (and the last one is a humor story). Ditko therefore had no restraints, and the stories show it. This is pretty wild stuff.

What’s impressive about this collection is Ditko’s versatility. Yes, the stories are mostly horror, but Ditko also throws in the aforementioned humor story, a romance (a fairly racy one, for the time), some westerns, a crime story, and some space epics. He even retells two fairy tales (“Cinderella” and “Rumpelstiltskin”) with some nasty twists. He goes from the West to Egypt to London to the jungle, and while none of the locations are perfectly sketched out (the panels are mainly packed with characters, so there isn’t room for backgrounds), Ditko gives us enough to show his chops with setting a scene. His best work comes from the character work, as we get strange demons and fantastic space aliens and giant worm monsters and people who look … well, not like real people, because they’re often bizarre-looking, but definitely distinctive. He puts his characters through the wringer, too, as he was allowed to do back then. While the horror stories pretty much fall into a fairly standard trope – we get a character or characters who are really not that nice put into a situation where they think they have the upper hand, but then, of course, they discover they’re really in a pickle and are dispatched horribly – Ditko does such a marvelous job with the design of each panel that even though we know people are going to get their comeuppance, it’s a true pleasure to watch it happen!

We really get a sense of a master at work in this book, even though it was so early in Ditko’s career. As I’ve read more Golden and Silver Age comics, I’ve become more appreciative of Ditko even more than Kirby (sorry, King), and this book is a good primer on why. Ditko’s people are more disturbing than Kirby’s, from his eerie grinning Rumpelstiltskin to his truly creepy giant worm. He gives us almost subhuman bad guys and exotic evil women, all caught in the grip of cruel fate. Kirby’s more lantern-jawed heroes wouldn’t fit in this twisted mileau of Ditko’s, which, despite the weirdness going on, feels more “realistic” than Kirby’s work. If Kirby shows humanity at its pinnacle, Ditko isn’t afraid to show humanity at its nadir. As I’ve read more work from the 1940s and 1950s, I’ve been impressed with the energy of the work even if much of it was fairly crude. There’s nothing crude about Ditko’s work here, and even at this early stage of his career, you can tell why he went on to become a legend. Yes, some of the stories are a bit goofy – in one, a modern character’s great-grandfather was somehow alive in the time of the pharoahs, while in another, Ditko suggests one can get to Jakarta by sailing down the Amazon river – and the coloring is a bit odd occasionally, but this volume is still wildly entertaining.

I’ll just stop writing now and show a few more art samples from the book. I realize this is a bit steep, money-wise, but it shows what a master Ditko was and what he could do when he was allowed to cut loose. It’s totally worth the price!


12-19-2009 08;37;48PM
12-19-2009 08;41;39PM
12-19-2009 08;43;43PM
12-19-2009 08;46;09PM
12-19-2009 08;48;19PM
12-19-2009 08;50;37PM
12-19-2009 08;53;09PM
12-19-2009 08;55;17PM
12-19-2009 08;57;01PM
12-19-2009 09;01;03PM

Tomorrow: Yeah, I’ll be taking a break, even though I have a few more of these to do. I usually give myself a week or so of lag time before I start posting these, building up a backlog so I’m not so pressed for time. Well, I’ve used that all up and this weekend has been really rough, so I’ve started the next review but I’m nowhere near finishing it. Oh well. I’ll get a few under my belt and fire them up again, possibly on Christmas but more likely the day after. I’d like to get them done before the end of the year, just because these are all from 2009. We’ll see!

12 Comments

What leads you to believe Ditko WROTE these stories? Not saying he didn’t, but there isn’t any evidence that he did, and he was never too great of a scripter, even during his most creative period. The book avoids the issue completely in its introdyuction. According to the Ditko bio written by Bell (editor of Strange Suspense), “Stretching Things” at least was written by a guy named Bruce Hamilton. I would guess that he worked off a script for most if not all of these stories.
Still a great book, though. Looking forward to The Art of Steve Ditko as well.

Wow. This does look better than most of the later stuff I’ve seen. I wish you could’ve shown more of these stories.
And you’re right. That romance story does appear pretty racy for the time.

“he was never too great of a scripter, even during his most creative period.”

You’re kidding, right? You’re not being serious?
Or you don’t know that he plotted his entire run on Spider-Man. This is considered one of the all-time classic runs.

You’re kidding, right? You’re not being serious?
Or you don’t know that he plotted his entire run on Spider-Man. This is considered one of the all-time classic runs.

scripter =/= plotter

I personally don’t have a problem with Ditko’s scripting, but if the guy’s position is that he is a poor scripter then saying he is a good plotter isn’t much of a counterpoint.

People interested in perusing more of Ditko’s early stuff may dig this.

I love that Fantagraphics came out with this, but the reproduction really leaves a lot to be desired. If I wanted to read used copies of these stories I’d troll ebay for originals or download scans of the originals. With the technology available today, not that I’m saying they should have gone all Marvel Masterworks on the reproduction (although that would have been nice in its own way. Seeing all the color redone is nice with the uniformity of the Masterworks) but these look like they had very minimal touching up done at all and I think it does a disservice to Ditkos art to reproduce Charlton’s crappy printing press version of his art with all of its color bleeding and not-completely-filled blacks and the like. Still nice to see this stuff in print, hope someday when companies can afford to do higher quality reproductions itll be redone.

Well I’m thankful for it. I can rarely stand when they “fix” printing processes. That’s part of the artifact for me.

You can definitely see the EC influence in this art. Shades of Krigstein, Ingles, and even a bit of Wood and Orlando.

I should have mentioned that no writer is actually credited, and therefore I just assumed Ditko wrote them himself. If he didn’t, that’s a serious oversight by Fantagraphics, as they didn’t even mention the possibility that he didn’t write them.

Bicycle Repair Man.

I personally prefer that most of the comics haven’t been recoloured and touched up. If you look at Marvel and the EC Archives its pretty awful what they do. Photoshop blends, redrawn lines, glossy paper that shines.

If it were possible to compare the Marvel Archive of the Ditko Doctor Strange run and the original printed comic, you would I’m sure see a radical difference.

An Archive should be just that, an archive of the original material.

Though I think if you look closely some amount of reconstruction has gone on.

There may be a question of budget, but I think its an aesthetic decision as much as anything.

I would be perfectly happy if FB had got to do Ditko’s Spiderman, Doctor Strange, EC etc.

The EC Archives are paticularly revolting and hugely expensive as well.

Would you put Arms on the Venus de Milo?, re do the Bayeux tapestry?. I suppose alot of people would vote yes.

Its a question of Aesthetics.

I want to see those dots!

Happy Christmas everyone

I’ve been looking all over for this!

Thanks.

Leave a Comment

 

Categories

Review Copies

Comics Should Be Good accepts review copies. Anything sent to us will (for better or for worse) end up reviewed on the blog. See where to send the review copies.

Browse the Archives