CSBG Archive
Comic Critics #100!!
January 3, 2010 @ 02:51 PM
Here is the ONE HUNDREDTH installment of the Comic Critics strip, courtesy of Sean Whitmore (writer) and Brandon Hanvey (artist)! You can check out the first ninety-nine strips at the archive here and you can read more about Sean and Brandon at the Comic Critics blog.
Enjoy!

Congrats, guys!!






28 Comments
Mark Black
January 3, 2010 at 2:56 pm
Pretty great!
Bill Reed
January 3, 2010 at 3:08 pm
Are you relaunching with a new #1 now?
Brandon Hanvey
January 3, 2010 at 3:11 pm
>>>Are you relaunching with a new #1 now?
I thought the new trend was re-numbering to a larger number?
Van GoghX
January 3, 2010 at 3:14 pm
No new comics… no new comics….
I thought it was just a bad nightmare!
Aaron Walther
January 3, 2010 at 3:15 pm
That was really funny, guys.
Van GoghX
January 3, 2010 at 3:16 pm
| I thought the new trend was re-numbering to a larger number?
And working your way backwards.
Matt Ampersand
January 3, 2010 at 3:29 pm
I laughed.
Adam
January 3, 2010 at 3:32 pm
“I was afraid I was going to have to learn a trade.” There but for the grace of God….
Thok
January 3, 2010 at 3:56 pm
So, when is DC/Diamond going to stop shipping comics to that store because they released Blackest Night 6 early? Inquiring fans want to know!
Nitz the Bloody
January 3, 2010 at 4:14 pm
ha ha ha! classic.
Congratulations on 100 strips; here’s to 100+ more.
Crash-Man
January 3, 2010 at 4:23 pm
I enjoyed this one. Speech bubble placement could use a bit of work though…I kept reading the bubbles out of order.
matthew
January 3, 2010 at 6:09 pm
Good job guys. The strip is consistently good. You’re improving with every strip.
Tom Fitzpatrick
January 3, 2010 at 6:47 pm
@Matthew:
“You’re improving with every strip.”
So you mean that this strip was completely “awful” at the first strip?
Chris Nowlin
January 3, 2010 at 8:30 pm
Bill is right, Brandon. You change the numbering to higher numbers when your close to an anniversary- because those sell- then soon after the anniversary you’ll want to reset the series to #1 because those sell. Then renumber it to the old numbering so you can celebrate your 150th issue. Rinse, wash, and repeat.
And while this was a good anniversary issue for you, it would have been better if somebody died. Then you can resurrect them for the next event and kill somebody else.
chad
January 3, 2010 at 10:41 pm
a nice way of reaching one hundred not to mention love the shot at diemond making last week a skip week. not to mention all the characters troubles seemed to be wrapped up fast like an episode of a cartoon hope a hundred more
Chris Tolworthy
January 4, 2010 at 4:05 am
@Chris Nowlin: “while this was a good anniversary issue for you, it would have been better if somebody died. Then you can resurrect them for the next event and kill somebody else.”
You mean like his aunt? I’m seriously looking forward to her coming back, thanks to a deal with Mephisto. let’s see, “comic critics” as a theoretical species have been around for, what, 70 years? I suspect the 70th anniversary won’t be far away.
CriticalFel
January 4, 2010 at 6:31 pm
Hehe. Illusion of change at fast forward. Really, in superhero comics, you know everything is gonna be ok in the end… which is why sometimes you lose interest.
Aaron Poehler
January 6, 2010 at 3:08 pm
Ugh.
Truth
January 6, 2010 at 3:34 pm
I keep reading Comic Critics hoping someday it will be good. Because it’s a good concept — a cartoon strip which critiques the comic book industry. But so far, I have found the execution somewhat lacking.
In the above “100th spectacular” the first panel was the only one to contain any comics critique. What were the rest of the panels supposed to be, humor?
Sean Whitmore
January 6, 2010 at 6:41 pm
You think that’s something, I read a Shortpacked once that didn’t have a short pack anywhere in it.
Mark
January 6, 2010 at 8:42 pm
This comic sucks, Sean sucks.
Gokitalo
January 6, 2010 at 9:58 pm
But he’s oh so gentle…
“In the above “100th spectacular” the first panel was the only one to contain any comics critique.”
Oh, on the contrary. This entire installment of Comic Critics was based off that one panel of comics critique. Look at what Josh said at the beginning:
“Yippee, another anniversary issue full of shocking changes that are reversed before readers can even commit them to memory.”
What happened in Comic Critics #100? See Josh’s quote above. Like Watchmen, Dr. McNinja and of course, Spider-Man: Torment, Comic Critics is a complex, multilayered work, teeming with deeper meaning.
joshschr
January 6, 2010 at 10:25 pm
And I enjoyed it too.
DanCJ
January 7, 2010 at 4:31 am
You can complain that you don’t find the strip funny, but that statement is just wrong. As Gokitalo said, the whole stip is a demonstration of the comment in that first panel.
FunkyGreenJerusalem
January 10, 2010 at 6:00 pm
Here’s to a thousand more!
Now that Marvel have finished raising their quarterly profits enough to be brought out by Disney, do you think they’ll still continue with silly shit like that?
Message boards and comment posts are a good concept, but sometimes, I find the exectuion lacking.
It’s been a hundred strips, if you don’t like it, you probably should have bailed 85 ago.
You can’t tell him he’s right or wrong – their both just a matter of opinion!
DanCJ
January 11, 2010 at 7:23 am
I can tell him he’s wrong when he says “the first panel was the only one to contain any comics critique”, because it blatantly isn’t.
That’s not a matter of opinion.
FunkyGreenJerusalem
January 11, 2010 at 4:13 pm
I know.
I was trying to be funny.
Right and Wrong being a matter of opinion… objectivity being just a matter of opinion…
I failed.
Sorry.
DanCJ
January 12, 2010 at 4:41 am
Ah, sorry. I’m terrible at spotting what’s a joke and what isn’t.