web stats

CSBG Archive

Greg reviews every manga series he reads, Part 5: Monster

Hey, I finally got around to reading another manga series! And this one is actually complete!

Our latest entry is Naoki Urasawa’s Monster (sorry, but that’s the official title), an 18-volume opus published on these shores by Viz Signature. Perhaps not surprisingly, it’s written and drawn by Naoki Urasawa, with the English adaptation by Agnes Yoshida while there are several English translators (what’s the difference between “adaptation” and “translation,” I wonder?). Steve Dutro letters this sucker. All 18 volumes, I think, are widely available. Or maybe they’re not. I haven’t looked recently because, well, I own them all.

Our own Danielle Leigh (don’t we all miss Danielle?) wrote about Monster a bit last year, and I encourage you all to read her post, ’cause it’s neat (although there are some spoilers). I’m certainly not going to be as in-depth as she is, even though she only covered the first seven volumes. I’m basically going to go over the plot and discuss some of Urasawa’s bigger themes. I’m probably going to SPOIL some stuff, too, so watch out! But I won’t spoil the ending. That would be mean.

The main plot is fairly straightforward, which isn’t always the case with big sprawling manga. In 1986, a brilliant neurosurgeon, Kenzo Tenma, who is working in Germany, is ordered to save the life of an important man rather than a Turkish laborer who came into the hospital first. The next time this happens, he saves the life of a young boy with a gunshot wound in the head rather than the mayor, and when the mayor dies, Tenma’s life is ruined. His engagement to the daughter of the hospital administrator ends, and his now ex-future father-in-law tells him he’ll never advance in the political structure of the hospital. Soon afterward the administrator and two high-placed doctors are murdered, the young boy and his twin sister disappears, and life goes on. Ten years later, Tenma begins to realize that the young boy might not be all that innocent, and he spends the rest of the book searching for him and trying to clear his name, as suspicion for the original murders has begun to fall on him. In order to prove his innocence, he needs to find the boy, Johan, but as he learns more about Johan, he discovers that he may have saved a vicious serial killer the night he operated on the boy. So that’s the basic plot – Tenma searching for Johan, who is now in his early 20s and apparently insinuating himself into many positions of power in the new, post-Cold War Germany. What’s his plan? Well, Tenma has to discover that, too.

Quite a lot of Monster is window-dressing, to be frank. Urasawa brings up German re-unification and the horrors of East Germany, especially as we learn more about the genesis of Johan, but he never delves too far into it. The main impetus of turning Johan eeeevillllll is Kinderheim 511, an East German orphanage where the children of criminals were housed (“criminals,” or course, encompassing political dissidents in East Germany) and where the state officials performed experiments on them. The nature of these experiments remain vague, but it’s clear that Johan, either because of the experiments or because of something innate, was the orphanage’s big “success” – it’s implied he organized a massacre at the orphanage in which almost everyone was killed. Johan does this a lot – manipulates people behind the scenes, rarely getting his hands dirty. It’s what makes him so elusive. Other political aspects of the book feel a bit tacked-on and skimmed-over, as Urasawa needs to set his book in Germany and the Czech Republic in the mid-1990s, so of course he’s going to mention current events, but even though he seems to place Johan at the center of some of these events, the political aspects of the story remain only to provide a veneer of “relevance.” Ultimately, it’s unimportant that Johan grew up in an East German orphanage. It could have been anywhere.

That doesn’t mean the plot doesn’t zip along, because it does, and a lot of that is because Urasawa tries to turn this into a political thriller. On a surface level, he succeeds, as Johan insinuates himself into the inner circle of a major financial figure and inspires all sorts of political extremists to action. So we have right-wing Germans, doing what they think is Johan’s will, trying to burn down the Turkish section of town, for instance. But that’s not really the point of the series. Obviously, in the beginning we’re meant to believe Johan is the monster of the title, but Urasawa, rather skillfully, gradually shows that Johan, for all his talents, might not be unique. Urasawa’s contention that a monster lives in all of us is obvious but unobtrusive, so it never feels like he’s pushing that thought on the reader. He wants us to see a vast cast of people, all with different backgrounds and personalities and agendas, and realize that there is something that pushes each and every one of them into the dark aspects of their minds. In this way, he can wonder if Johan was simply pushed too far, and if someone else would have turned out the same way as he did. Again, this is nothing terribly unique in literature, but it’s often either far more heavy-handed than this or, conversely, brought up briefly and then ignored (this is often the case in action movies). As Urasawa has the space, he can make this a thrilling action comic and still manage to delve into the philosophical problems with Johan and the people around him.

Part of the reason he does this is because Johan and Dr. Tenma, the two “main” characters, form somewhat of an emotional vacuum at the center of this series. Johan is a bit of a mystery, because Urasawa never spends too much time with him. We see the effects of his passing, but not necessarily a great deal of his involvement with events. His involvement with Schunwald, the financial giant, is perhaps the most we see him directly, and even then, he’s something of a cipher. We see him a bit in flashbacks, but Urasawa often toys with the memories that the characters have of their pasts, so even in the past we’re unsure how important Johan really is. Johan stubbornly refuses to be categorized, and a good deal of the series is about others’ attempts to define him. Yes, he’s a monstrous presence in the book, but nobody really knows who he is or even what he wants. In the end, Urasawa implies that it doesn’t really matter. Similarly, while we know a lot more about Tenma, even he remains something of an enigma. He’s on a mission, but like Johan, a lot of the book deals with people he’s left behind as he travels across Germany and the Czech Republic. Tenma is obviously in the book far more than Johan is, but even he disappears for long stretches of time, as other characters come to grips with what he’s doing. Tenma remains, like Johan, weirdly aloof from life – after his fiancée dumps him, he retreats from emotional attachments because either they’re too painful for him or because his life has become one of pursuit and revenge. He becomes protective of several people – Johan’s sister, Anna/Nina, who has secrets of her own; Dieter, a boy who was abused in much the same way Johan was but who does not turn into a “monster”; even the young girl trying to provide health care for the poor who needs Tenma’s help (and whose name escapes me – sorry!). Tenma also provides inspiration for many characters – he’s almost too perfect, as he puts himself in danger plenty of times because he’s helping someone out. Because of Tenma’s weird separation from society (Urasawa awkwardly inserts a brief scene where we learned he cheated at university, but it almost heightens his “goodness” because of the circumstances under which he admits it), it’s difficult to care about the two characters ostensibly at the manga’s core. Urasawa is hinting that in order to stop Johan, Tenma must become as monstrous as his target, but we never actually believe that Tenma will be able to kill Johan. This robs the narrative of a lot of tension.

Urasawa’s implication that everyone has a monster inside them, however, drives the book and keeps it interesting when the two main characters cannot. Anna Lieber, Johan’s sister (she is later known as Nina Fortner because she doesn’t remember her old name, which wasn’t her real name anyway), is a prime example of this, as she is struggling to live a normal life even though she has these horrors in the past coming at her. As she begins to regain the memories of what was done to her and Johan, the story becomes a bit more convoluted but also more gripping, as Urasawa blends her memories with Johan’s and makes us wonder exactly to whom these things happened. Why did Anna grow into a strong and stable young lady while her brother became a sociopath? Another survivor of the orphanage, Wolfgang Grimmer, takes Urasawa’s theme to further extremes – he is a mild-mannered freelance journalist who, it seems, becomes a fearsome fighter when his life is threatened … but he doesn’t know what he does, as he blacks out when it happens. Urasawa never shows us this “character” – the Magnificent Steiner – just the aftermath, and he leaves it open to speculation what exactly happens to Grimmer when these transformations occur. Grimmer also has to train himself to smile and react emotionally to external stimuli, because the orphanage destroyed his capacity for that sort of thing. Grimmer is the tragic hero that Tenma can’t be – he has done terrible things but is working to overcome them, because he doesn’t want to be a monster.

In a less obvious way, the other characters embody this struggle as well. Eva, Tenma’s fiancée, realizes that dumping Tenma was perhaps a foolish move, especially because every other man in her life treats her poorly. She decides to kill Tenma, but as she tracks him, she starts her own journey to maturity and the conquering of her own “monster.” Inspector Lunge of the BKA is convinced that Tenma is the murderer, and once he hears of Johan, he’s convinced that “Johan” is an alternate personality of Tenma (an intriguing possiblity that is never explored by Urasawa). Lunge is so obsessed with his job that his wife and pregnant daughter leave him, and while he never struggles, per se, with this “monster” that drives him, it’s clear that Urasawa is showing another facet of this war within. Urasawa even tantalizingly hints that Lunge might be experiencing a personality fracture himself when he starts to pretend to be Tenma in order to get inside his target’s mindset. Even the far more minor characters are shown to be struggling with their own monsters, and Urasawa does a very good job showing different characters with different problems with which they all need to deal. He’s able to create very real characters in many different professions, so the fact that almost all of them are struggling with similar issues doesn’t become annoying. Each character helps build this grand theme that reaches its apotheosis in Johan and Tenma. While they aren’t the most compelling characters, their internal battles are the grandest, so in the end, they need to take center stage.

I’ve reached a point in my writing where I don’t often neglect art anymore, but I’m going to here. Just look at the examples of what Urasawa’s art looks like and you’ll get a good idea. He doesn’t do too much that’s fascinating in the artwork, but one thing he does well is keep the large cast of characters nicely delineated, so that it’s very rare that the reader wonders who the character is, even if it’s been a while since we’ve seen them. The only time it happened for me, if I recall, was when Urasawa shifted to the south of France for the story of a retired policeman, and as we only saw him briefly prior to this story, it took another character commenting on who he is for me to remember him. But that’s the only time I can think of. Mostly, Urasawa does a nice job showing the wide variety of faces and body shapes, and he does a nice job with, say, Tenma’s physical breakdown or the fact that the sociopath Grimmer seems to resemble the “respectable” Lunge in facial expressions and body language. It’s part of the way he makes his theme more subtle than it might have been otherwise. It’s not mind-blowing art, but it does work well in the service of the story.

Monster is an ambitious manga that doesn’t quite achieve what it seems like Urasawa wants to achieve, especially with regard to the main plot. Johan is an enigma, Tenma is a saint, and neither holds our attention like they should. However, because Urasawa allows these two men to engage in their game a bit obsessively, he can show us all the characters they touch, and those are the people who make this a fascinating read. It’s a gripping thriller, if a bit hollow – the final few volumes, however, when Johan orchestrates something horrible, are tense and well done. While we can’t quite commit to the great war between Tenma and Johan, overall, Monster is a good look into human personality and what drives people to great heights and depraved lows. Plus, there are creepy children’s books! Everyone loves those!

17 Comments

Regarding Johan and Tenma, your mileage may vary. While I found Tenma somewhat uninteresting, several of my friends found him fascinating. On the other hand, I think Johan is fascinating and I really appreciate the fact that Urasawa characterizes him so indirectly. Few people seem to remember or reference the flashback involving Johan and Anna playing with acorns, perhaps because it seems like a perfectly innocuous way of simply showing that kid Johan loved his sister a lot. But if you keep in mind the game Johan plays with the acorns when reading a highly significant flashback near the end of the series, it takes on a whole new meaning. I want to be more explicit but don’t want to spoil anyone. Obviously the storybooks give us a big insight into Johan’s character as well.

I’d like to note that the manga pretty clearly states that Johan was already monstrous and evil before ever arriving at Kinderheim 511, contrary to what you claim in this review. Not only does it state it straight-out at the end of the arc that introduces Kinderheim 511 there are several flashbacks involving Johan behaving in a monstrous manner prior to the twins’ being picked up by Wolfe at the Czech border.

I’m not savvy enough on the politics of the time to comment on whether they’re really window-dressing. I never got the impression that Urasawa was trying to make a particularly substantive political statement about the era, so I never really felt I was missing anything. I don’t think where Johan grew up is irrelevant at all, though. Eugenics plays a highly important role in the story and are required to manifest in the forms of institutions and programs. That narrows down the options quite a bit, and makes 20th century Germany a pretty good fit.

I haven’t read this yet, but I love Urasawa’s art.

I’ve been wanting to read something by Urasawa. I was trying to decide between this, Pluto, and 20th Century Boys. I picked up the first volume of 20CB simply because I’m rather lukewarm toward most everything I’ve read by Tezuka and the Monster just seemed dauntingly long (budgetwise). It sounds like I may have made the right decision (depending of course on how 20CB turns out, but so far the characters seem pretty fairly developed).

Tom Fitzpatrick

April 26, 2011 at 8:13 pm

Whatever happened to Danielle? Haven’t seen a post by her for awhile.

Read the first volume of Pluto, may read the rest someday.

Maybe 20CB one day.

Finished reading Monster awhile ago, a terrific read.

Ah! I need to read this! I will read this and then comment.

I really enjoy these manga reviews, please keep doing them!

If you are looking for recommendations:

Fullmetal Alchemist – the best cast of characters I have ever seen in a comic. Every character is awesome.

Gunsmith Cats – jawdropping art. Sonoda’s art skills are just insane — better than most action films!

Danielle Leigh

April 27, 2011 at 5:32 am

Thanks for the kind shout-out and I’m pleased as punch, Greg, that you have read and now written about Monster (I still need to finish the series, arrrgh!!!).

For those who are wondering where I went, I’m about to defend my dissertation (mid-June), so that’s basically where I’ve been. Trying to wrap this thing up!

re: Tenma. Sometimes I think I just like him because he’s kind of attractive (at least for a Urasawa character). You are probably right, though, about the emotional vacuum thing. His construction is flawed, like the series, but I still have great affection for both.

The Alliterator

April 27, 2011 at 11:27 am

A surprisingly lukewarm review, considering how excellent Monster really is. I’m particularly nonplussed by the description of Urasawa’s art as merely serviceable.

Frankly, I consider it his best work and a classic in the genre, for reasons better articulated by others elsewhere. Monster’s not perfect, but it’s much, much better than this piece gives it credit for. To each his own, but I found a lot of the criticisms here were a little off the mark – the enigmatic, dichotomous characterization of Tenma and Johan is actually crucial to understanding the plot and the rest of the characters, since Urasawa uses them as idealized first-movers to underscore the development of all the personalities in between.

Anon: Sorry, I got the chronology a bit mixed up, but I still think that when Johan is in the room above the inn, it’s not clear whether he’s evil or not. Maybe I missed something. As for Germany being a good setting for the book, I agree, but I don’t think Urasawa did enough with it. A lot of countries have a history of dabbling in eugenics, including the United States, so while as a reader, we’re aware of the deep connections to the horrors of 20th-century Germany, it feels like Urasawa could have done more with it. But that’s just me.

Alliterator: I like Monster a lot, but I don’t think it works as well as a political thriller as Urasawa seems to want it to work. That may be why you think the review is lukewarm; I didn’t feel like I wasted my money in any way, and I enjoyed the action part of it, but I also thought it got a bit repetitive. As for the art, perhaps I’m just not good with manga art because I haven’t read enough of it. However, I think both Pluto and 20th Century Boys (probably the next two series I’m going to review) both have better art. I also think they’re both better than Monster, so there’s that. Pluto is more ambitious, it feels, and 20th Century Boys does a better job with the notion of memory and how the past influences the future. Again, that’s just my opinion. But still, I like Monster a lot, and recommend it to anyone.

When he’s in the room above the inn, I think it’s unclear because the formative events that lead him to be monstrous (as implied by the series) occurred there. I don’t think it’s definitively answered, he could have just been born that way, but I think that there’s too much linking those events to the nihilism that fuels Johan’s sociopathy as well as his deep identification with his sister. Also considering the final and most significant flashback we see regarding Johan’s life takes place in that time period.

I agree Urasawa certainly could have done more with the setting, even based on what little I know of it, and it’s certainly fair to say that the series would have been better if he had (presuming it didn’t sidelines some other important elements in a way that malfunctioned, but this is a hypothetical so there’s no reason to assume it would). Any additional depth is better. Perhaps if I were more of a history buff I would have received the impression that Urasawa was trying to do more with it than he did. Perhaps he was, I have seen an interview in which he effectively states that 20th Century Boys was written with a political/social message in mind.

I would be very interested to see your thoughts on some of Master Keaton which has a very similar feel to Monster at times, and draws on a lot of the same history.

I look forward to your reviews of Pluto and/or 20th Century Boys.

The Alliterator

April 28, 2011 at 7:41 am

I wholeheartedly agree that the art is better in Pluto and 20th Century Boys, which reflects the progression of Urasawa’s technique. I prefer Monster to 20th Century because I always felt the latter required too much suspension of disbelief to take its plot seriously – notably the true identities of the main villains – even though it’s an engaging read by all accounts. While Monster has many stretches, like Tenma’s godlike ability to conjure medical miracles, I think it has more internal consistency. Pluto is superb, but I’m biased against it because I’ve never been very sympathetic to the whole “robots are humans too” sub-genre of science fiction.

I think I was mostly surprised that aspects of Monster that I saw as strengths (Tenma and Johan’s idiosyncratic characterization, the incidence of the setting to the timelessness of the struggle) were pointed out as weaknesses. Disagreements aside, it was a well-written and thoughtful review.

Anon: Seconded on Master Keaton. Urasawa’s move from Yawara to Keaton to Monster is fascinating in the stark contrasts and weird similarities between all three.

The jobs aren’t always separated, but the translator does a literal translation and emphasises comprehension of the original over the literary quality of the text they produce, the adaptor produces a polished final text.

[...] Greg reviews every manga series he reads, Part 5: Monster (goodcomics.comicbookresources.com) Tweet [...]

I want to second Dan’s recommendation of Full Metal Alchemist.

I’d also like to recommend:

Bakuman: it’s a new manga by the creators of Death Note, and it’s really meta. It’s a shonen manga about two people aspiring to be superstar manga creators, and it gives a lot of behind the scenes info about the manga world, using real life examples too.

Also, Naruto and One Piece.

It’s a pain in the neck to find certain volumes. Anyone know why? Any chance that a reprinting will happen?

[...] Greg reviews every manga series he reads, Part 5: Monster (goodcomics.comicbookresources.com) [...]

Leave a Comment

 

Categories

Review Copies

Comics Should Be Good accepts review copies. Anything sent to us will (for better or for worse) end up reviewed on the blog. See where to send the review copies.

Browse the Archives