web stats

CSBG Archive

My Year-End Roundup Thing… Built Out Of Other, Vintage Years

It’s that time of year, where all of us that write about comics and pop culture try and make sense of the previous twelve months. The trouble is, I’m really not very good at that sort of thing, and I already kind of shot the works contributing to other people’s best-of-the-year, what-are-you-reading roundups (two here at CBR and a couple of others elsewhere on the net.) So what IS there left to say about 2012?

Like I said, I’m not good at this. I read a lot, I generally liked what I read, I enjoyed most of the comics I got this last year… but was there a trend? Something that kind of summed up what my last twelve months of comics had been about?

I didn’t quite have a handle on it until just a couple of days ago when I went into the comics shop on my weekly visit to pick up the books from my reserve box. There wasn’t a lot of new stuff on the rack what with the holidays, but I did see something that I decided I had to have.

One of my proudest achievements back in 1975 was learning how to draw an Eagle spacecraft accurately. Those are HARD, man.

Space: 1999 – Aftershock and Awe is a really nice hardcover from Archaia Publishing. It came out just a few days ago, and it’ll set you back $24.95 for a hundred and fifty-two pages. Perfectly reasonable for a graphic-novel hardcover, especially if your shop gives you a subscriber discount (and mine does, even on the impulse buys like this one.)

I assumed it was a reprint album– I didn’t really look at the credits, thinking it had to be collecting the old Charlton book with the Joe Staton and John Byrne stuff.

As often happened at Charlton in the late 60s and early 70s, the stories were forgettable but the art was amazing.

Except it’s not.

Oh, there’s a sort of reprint in the front, an adaptation of the show’s pilot episode drawn by Gray Morrow, but “remastered” with new material. This isn’t from Charlton, but rather the Power Records comic, but with new material added by artist Miki, and also a bit of the Charlton adaptation of the pilot folded into it as well.

The sources for the remaster-- Power Records, and then on the right, the first story from Charlton's SPACE: 1999 magazine.

It looks odd to someone who’s seem the original pieces but it works; you’d have to be a Human Geek Index (like, admittedly, myself) to spot the seams.

But what blows me away is that the bulk of this book is new.

It looks great, too. Very nice art job from David Hueso.

I mean, don’t get me wrong. I have a certain fondness for Space: 1999– actually, I’m more forgiving of it now than when it originally aired. We have a few of the paperbacks kicking around here, and most of the show on DVD– I picked it up for us when I found out Julie had never seen it.

Yeah, it's mostly nostalgia. But I do like these.

So I was surprised and pleased to see a new Space: 1999 book, for sure. But here’s the thing. I bought that other stuff on the cheap– the books were fifty cents and the DVDs were, I dunno, three bucks or so for each “set” and we have five sets here. All of the second season and the first set of four from the first season. Call the total investment, books and DVDs, around twenty dollars. That’s about enough to blow on a nostalgic whim.

Except twenty-plus dollars is also what I spent on the Archaia hardcover under discussion. In other words, I paid as much for this graphic novel as I did for all the other Space:1999 stuff here– including the actual show– combined. That’s the world we live in now, where a high-end hardcover of Space: 1999 comics is a good bet for a small-press publisher. They figured my nostalgic whim would strike again and they weren’t wrong.

For me, that kind of sums up my year in comics and pop culture. It’s all been about remixes and revivals.

The Charlton reprint series from Archaia does exist, by the way, digital-only from Comixology-- but with that same 'remaster' thing going on.

And it’s not just me. It seems like everywhere I look in the comics shop, it’s all about reboots and reimaginings of the old stuff. Not the smirky, ironic kind, either; this is all done straight and with love. I have a running joke about how Dynamite Comics bases their entire publishing strategy on stuff I thought was awesome in the mid-70s, but if I am honest, they are far from alone. Nostalgia is the linchpin of most comics publishing strategy these days, it seems. Archaia’s just the latest.


Image, DC, IDW, Marvel, Boom, and of course Dynamite. Some of these are great and some of them maybe not, but the point is that they are ALL going there.

On top of all that, we are having a renaissance in ACTUAL reprints. Never in the history of comic books has a wider variety of adventure and superhero stuff been available in collected editions.


Seriously, if it was ever a comic book between 1962 and 1985 or so, you can probably find it reprinted in a book collection SOMEWHERE. Often even in high-end hardcover. And note, again, that five of these six reprint titles are ALSO now on the comics shelf as rebooted, re-imagined monthlies-- even AVENGERS just got a fresh coat of paint and a new #1. The outlier is EERIE's Hunter strip, but I imagine a new version will be along any day now. Probably right after someone remembers THE ROOK.

For someone in my age bracket, hell, it’s Christmas every week. I’m almost getting to the point where I’m embarrassed about it. You know, like, “Dudes, it’s OKAY with me if you do some books for the younger folks too. Really. I’ve got plenty to read over here.” I remember worrying about this a few years ago, right here in print, that comic books were turning into this tiny self-referential key club for superhero geeks, where companies would just all be publishing fan fiction all the time.

Well, as far as the big publishers are concerned, that’s exactly what happened. That’s why when I walk into my comics shop it’s all about the latest rebooted version of whoever, side-by-side with a fifty-dollar hardcover archival reprint of something that ran for fourteen issues in 1973. There’s no point in crabbing about it. It’s where we are. We have joined the pulp fans in their world of reprints and re-invention, all done for a narrow specialty audience.


There's a fair amount of overlap between the two groups of fans, but not as much as you'd think.

Look, I don’t except myself from this. Hell, a couple of weeks ago I was rhapsodizing right here how awesome it was to have a great new reboot of Tarzan from Dynamite along with an amazing archival Russ Manning Tarzan hardcover from Dark Horse. I’m all over Planet of the Apes and Steed and Mrs. Peel and the latest Conan book. I’m totally that guy. I admit it. And when I visit my comics retailer, I have plenty of company. So the natural conclusion is that comics are losing whatever freshness and originality they once had, doomed by trying to placate an increasingly jaded audience that shrivels ever smaller year after year, until it all disappears in a tail-swallowing spiral.

Except… that’s a skewed view. It’s what you would think if you only got your comics from a specialty shop.

But if you are out in the world, it would dawn on you that comics, the form, are in great shape. There’s webcomics and books and zines and all kinds of incredible work being done out there.

The same year I watched Marvel and DC tiptoe into the world of original hardcover graphic novels by doing origin revamps of their biggest hero franchises, I also saw all kinds of startlingly original and fun work exploding out of the indie small-press scene, the world of webcomics, and self-published Kickstarter projects. Honestly, if I wasn’t too set in my ways to give up visiting the comics shop, I’d have done all my comics consumption online… either by ordering deep-discounted book collections of one sort or another, or just reading the things on the web.


HARK! A VAGRANT by Kate Beaton, LADY SABRE AND THE PIRATES OF THE INEFFABLE AETHER by Greg Rucka and Rick Burchett, and THE CARTER FAMILY by David Lasky and Frank Young. In a comics landscape where all these great things exist side-by-side, I just can't stay worried.

So we’re not actually doomed to drown in a constant cycle of reboots and rehashings of the same old stories. The cool new comics are out there. We just have to go look for them. It’s not that hard, especially since you can do the looking from right where you’re sitting reading this column.

I think, in 2013, I’m going to make it a point to try and change my normal orbit a little and check out more new stuff along with the old. If you’re like me, feeling vaguely annoyed with Marvel and DC most of the time for being on the same old hamster wheel… maybe you could use a change of orbit too. I love the Bronze Age of comics as much as anyone and more than most, and this last year has been a great time for guys like me– I loved getting to revisit beloved comics from my youth in so many different ways– but even I don’t think comics should live there. That embarrassed feeling is getting more pronounced.

After all, it helps to remember– that old stuff we love so much? Once upon a time, it was new stuff.

See you next week.

6 Comments

Excellent post as usual, Greg. Happy New Year to you and Julie.

I’ve got to search out that Space 1999 in the original form, as I loves me some Staton. The remaster-y stuff being digital only is kinda outta my grasp right now.

Ravenwood is the “Stepson of Mystery”? Let’s hope he’s not redheaded, or else he’ll never solve a case.

When I saw the Space 1999 images my first thought was of the recent death of Gerry Anderson.
Being British my second thought was of the old Look-in strips drawn by John Burns and Mike Noble
Then I thought of The Score and all the reboots and revivals (ongoing in the “new 52″, etc)
And then I thought was that I had better look for that Rucka series..

Totally agree with your main point. Basically, the new comics material I buy is pretty much always “indie” stuff and usually not super-hero; meanwhile, pretty much anything I buy from the big two is usually reprints of pre-1990s stuff.
That Aftershock & Awe book looks really cool, but I have to say I’m a bit disappointed that the classic material is only available in digital format – I’d love some kind of omnibus of Charlton’s Space 1999 (by the way, cut poor Nicola Cuti some slack: not all of those stories were forgettable).

Hi there.

Speaking as someone born in the 80s who doesn’t have any nostalgic affection toward this older material, I think it’s great to have it all out there and easy to find. When a book or property gets relaunched (which you’re right to note happens every week now), it’s neat being able to see the old version, or, basically, the reason why people cared about it in the first place. Not to say I check out the reprint material for everything I’m reading, but when I *want* to be able to seek it out, it’s nice the companies are aware that there’s a market for that. Wish they’d make an effort to get that material out digitally for that audience too, but this industry was built on hesitance and babysteps so I’ll take what I can get.

Have a good day.
G Morrow

tdsacomic.com

Nice post Greg seems 2012 became a revival of old nostalgia and classics like that Tarzan stuff coming back into the fold after a long absence even from the big two dc and marvel. like a new age for comic fans old and new readers discovering some of the old stuff like Tarzan. Happy New year Greg.

Nicely put, Greg. I find myself straddling that line of nostalgia and trying-something-new. That’s why my bookcases are becoming filled with things like Doctor Spektor and Tarzan Archives sitting alongside Hark! A Vagrant and Courtney Crumrin.

If there’s anything to complain about amidst this ‘wealth of riches’, it’s when something DOESN’T get collected. That frustration of watching ‘title X’ get a nice hardcover treatment while ‘title Y’ languishes in back issue boxes or marked up eBay listings. (Speaking of which, Hermes Press, I anxiously await you announcing a collection of GET SMART comics from the 60′s.. I mean, if I SPY can get a collection…)

Leave a Comment

 

Categories

Review Copies

Comics Should Be Good accepts review copies. Anything sent to us will (for better or for worse) end up reviewed on the blog. See where to send the review copies.

Browse the Archives